NVHL RESEARCH LIBRARIES ^^^^^^H
^^H
H
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Bk!!m7^!u?!!d^^^^^^
^^^^^^I^^B
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^K^^ '' '''
9^1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^K;
'
^H^^^^^B'
1
'H
--*f5W?
ROBERT OWEN
VOL. I
ROBERT
^ BIOGRAPHY
By FRANK POD^
I
Author of "Modern Spiritualis
in Psychical ResearcJi
WITH
TWO
ROBERT OWEN
A BIOGRAPHY ^ ^
By FRANK PODMORE
Author of "Modern Spiritualism, "Studies
in Psychical Research," etc.
WITH FORTY'FOUR ILLUSTRATIONS,
TWO PHOTOGRAVURE PLATES, AND FACSIMILES
Vol. 1
New York
D. APPLETON AND COMPANY
1907
L
THE "EW YORK
PUBLIC LIBRARY
aONS
L
PRiyTED /.V GREAT BRITAIN
PREFACE
ROBERT OWEN died in 1858. Up to January,
1905, four biographies of him, and four only,
had appeared, all in English — the last having been
written more than twenty years ago/ When, in 1901,
I formed the intention of adding another to the list,
I was moved less by a sense of the inadequacy of the
work of my predecessors, than by my own desire to
treat of so congenial a theme. In a word, I made up
my mind, as I supposed, to write because I wanted to
write. But a subsequent series of coincidences has led
me to question whether in following my own pleasure
I was not the unconscious instrument of larger forces,
and the impulse which I held at the time to be the
t spontaneous outcome of my own volition part of a wider
•^ movement in the world of thought, the existence of
^^- which I had scarcely suspected.
' Robert Owen and his Social Philosophy, by W. L. Sargant, i860.
Robert Owen . . . the Founder of Socialis77i in England, by A. J,
Booth, M.A., 1869.
^ Life of Robert Owen, Philadelphia, 1866 (published anonymously,
5 but since acknowledged to be by F. A. Packard).
3 The Life, Times and Labours of Robert Owe?i, by Lloyd Jones, first
^ edition (posthumous), 1889. Lloyd Jones died in 1886.
There is also a small pamphlet, Life and Last Days of Robert Owen^
by G. J. Holyoake, 1859.
vi PREFACE
For, a few months after I had definitely formulated
my own project, I learnt that another Englishman, who
subsequently withdrew in my fivour, was entertaining
the same idea. Again, in the course of 1903, whilst
my own work was scarcely begun, I made the acquaint-
ance successively of a (ierman lady, Fraulein Simon,
and a Frenchman, iM. Kdouard Doll^ans, who had
conceived, about the same time as myself, the idea of
writing a biography of the great Socialist.^ In the
previous year, 1902, appeared the first adequate account
— for which the world had been content to wait for
three-quarters of a century — of Owen's great Communal
Experiment at New Harmony. "' And finally, when the
present book was already far advanced, a collection of
letters written to or by Owen, which had been lost sight
of for more than a generation, was found in a lumber-
room and forwarded to the late G. J. Holyoake, by
whom it was handed on for safe keeping to the Co-
operative Union at Manchester. The timely discovery
of this correspondence, of which 1 have made such use
as my opportunities permitted, furnishes a retrospective
justification — if further justification is needed — for the
project formed five years ago.^
' Both these lives have already appeared. Robert Owen : sein Leben
und seine BcdeutuHg fiir die Gegemvart, by Helene Simon. Jena, 1905.
Robert Owen, by Kdouard DollC-ans. Paris, 1905.
' The AeTv Harfnony Communities, by C'leorge HrouningiLockvvood.
' All the letters quoted in the following pages, when no other source
is indicated, are in this Collection, which is not yet catalogued. The
letters date from the year 1823, and include a few written to or by
Owen on his tour in Ireland in that year. From the fact that the letters
begin just where the Autobiography leaves off, it seems probable that
PREFACE
Vll
Amongst those who have assisted me to obtain In-
formation, and have lent or given valuable books and
documents, I have to render special thanks to Mr. T.
Parry Jones, of Newtown — the place of Owen's birth
and of his death — to Mr. William George Black,
Professor Earl Barnes, Mr. J. C. Gray, Secretary of the
Co-operative Union, Mr. A. Dransfield, of the Working-
Men's Institute and Public Library, New Harmony,
Indiana, Mrs. Templeton, Mr. William Tebb, Mr. C.
Godfrey Gumpel, Mr. C. S. Loch and the Council of
the Charity Organisation Society. To other friends I
render cordial acknowledgment for help given.
the letters form part of the material collected by Owen in his life-time
for the purpose of his Autobiography. I have found only two letters
dated before 1823 (both of which are referred to in the following pages),
and these evidently owe their preservation to the date, which is very
indistinct in each case, having been misread. The Collection includes
a bundle containing several hundred letters written by Owen during the
last seven or eight years of his life to his personal friend, attendant and
factotum, James Rigby. Most of the letters, some 3,000 in all, are docketed
by Rigby, but in a few cases the docket is in the handwriting of William
Pare.
P.P.
March^ 1906.
CONTENTS
VOL. I
CHAPTER I
BOYHOOD
Parentage — Description of Newtown — Cliildish Adventures —
His Schooling — Becomes Usher at Seven — His Reading
— Acquaintance with James Donne — Helps in a Shop —
Journeys to London — Takes Situation at Stamford with
Mr. McGuffog — Early Religious Experiences — Takes
Situation in London i
CHAPTER II
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
General Survey — Gradual Rise of Capitalist Industries —
Invention of the Spinning-jenny, the Water-frame, the
Mule — The Power Loom— Rapid Growth of the Cotton
Trade — And of Manchester 24
CHAPTER III
LIFE IN MANCHESTER
Owen takes Situation with Mr. Satterfield — Undertakes the
Manufacture of " Mules " — Starts as Employer of Labour
on his own account — Is appointed Manager of Mr.
Drinkwater's Mills— Leaves Drinkwater and enters New
Partnership — Visits Glasgow on Business and Meets
Miss Dale — Buys New Lanark Mills — Marriage — Social
Life in Manchester — Dr. Percival and the Manchester
Literary and Philosophical Society — Owen's Contributions
to the Society — Partnership with Robert Fulton . . 42
X CONTENTS
CHAPTER IV
THE FACTORY SYSTEM
PAGE
Evils of Factory Employment — Description by Dr. Aikin —
The Manchester Board of Health— The Apprentice
System and Child Labour — New Lanark under Dale —
The Act of 1802 — The Committee of 1816 ... 62
CHAPTER V
NEW LANARK
Description of New Lanark — Of the Inhabitants — Reforms In-
troduced by Owen — The Silent Monitor — Forms New
Partnership in 1809 — Again Seeks for New Partners in
1813 — Letter to Mrs. Owen — The New Partners — William
Allen and Jeremy Bentham — The Sale of the Business —
Triumphant Return to New Lanark .... 80
CHAPTER VI
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY
State of Education in England in 1S16 — Bell and Lancaster —
Owen's Speech in 1812 on the Importance of Education —
Genesis of his Ideas — The Argument of the Essays on
t/if Formation of Character 'Suvcixnansi:^^ — Debt to (Godwin
— Francis Place — Effect Produced by the Essays . .102
CHAPTER VII
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS
Visits Oberlin, l-'ellenberg and Pestalozzi — 'I'he Institution for
the Formation of Character— The Infant School — The
Subjects Taught — Moral Geography Lessons — Dancing,
Drilling, Music — Accounts from Visitors — The Leeds
Deputation— Dr. Macnab — Disputes with the Other
l^artners — Compromise Effected — Infant Schools in
London 126
CONTENTS xi
CHAPTER VIII
NEW LANARK {continued)
PAGE
General Description of Mills — Reduction in Hours of Labour
and its Effect on Production — Child Labour — Wages —
The Village Store — Character of the Population — Visitors
— The Grand Duke Nicholas — Braxfield House — Owen's
Family — No Praise or Blame — Rehgious Views — His Son
Essays to Convert Him i6i
CHAPTER IX
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT
Owen's Position in the Cotton Trade — Agitation against
Taxation — Owen's Proposals — Observations oji the Effect
of the Manufacturing System — The Draft Bill of 1816 and
Sir R. Peel — Owen Travels through Great Britain on a
Tour of Inspection — The Committee of t8i6 on Children
in Factories — Owen's Evidence — Attack on his Religious
Views — Postponement of Legislation — The Arguments
Against the Bill — The Lords' Committee of 1818 and
18 1 9 — The Bill is passed — Owen's Share in it . . .184
CHAPTER X
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED
Peace and the Fall of Wages — National Distress and Popular
Disturbances — Meeting for the Relief of Distress — Owen's
Report — Argument of the Report — The Plan — The Quad-
rangle— Reception by the Press — Owen's Visit to Newgate
— Further Development of the Plan — Genesis of Owen's
Ideas — Parochial Farms— Thomas Spence — The Rappites
— John Bellers' Colledge of Industry — Criticism by the
Black Dwarf Hone and Cobbett . . . . .212
xii CONTENTS
CHAPTER XI
1817 — 1 819
PAGE
Owen Denounces the Religions of the World— Further Deve-
lopments of his Plan — Newspaper Criticism — Tour on
the Continent in 181 8 — Memorials to the Governments
of Europe and America, and to the Allied I'owers in
Congress— Address to the Working Classes— Corre-
spondence and Friendship with the F)uke of Kent — Dr.
Macnab Visits New Lanark — Committee to Promote
Owen's Plan — Debate in the House of Commons (18 19)
— Owen Stands for Parliament ..... 242
CHAPTER XII
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF L.VNARK
Owen Defines his Economic Position — Spade Cultivation —
Falla's Flxperiment — The Currency — Proposed Labour
Standard — Further Debate in the House of Commons
(182 1) — The British and Foreign Philanthropic Society —
Visits Ireland — Expounds his Plan in a Series of Lectures
— His Reception — The Hibernian Philanthropic Society
— Committee of House of Commons on Poor in Ireland
— Owen's Evidence 265
CHAPTER XIII
NEW n.ARMONV
George Rapp and His I-ollowers— Owen i'urchases the \illage
of Harmony — Visits America and Lectures at Washington
— The Colonists at New Harmony — The Preliminary
Society— Letter from \Villiam Owen— The Boatload of
Knowledge — The New Harmony Community of Equality —
Foundation of Macluria and Feiba Peveli— Era of Mental
CONTENTS xiii
PAGE
Independence — The Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-
Eisenach Visits New Harmony — Dancing and Concerts —
The Schools — Criticism of Paul Brown — Dissolution
of Community — Formation of Daughter Communities
— Owen's Farewell Address 285
CHAPTER XIV
THE END OF NEW HARMONY
The Affairs of the Community Wound Up — Owen's Sons — •
Other Communities — Causes of the Failure — Owen Visits
Jamaica — His Account of the Slaves There — Journey to
Mexico — Calls on the President and Asks for Grant of
Territory — Discusses the New System with Santa Anna —
Debate at Cincinnati with Rev. A . Campbell — Interview
with Lord Aberdeen 325
ILLUSTRATIONS VOL. I
ROBERT OWEN, FROM AN EARLY MEZZOTINT PORTRAIT BY AN
UNKNOWN ARTIST (^Photogravure) . . ^ . . Frontispiece
FACING PAGE
NEWTOWN, MONTGOMERYSHIRE 4
THE OLD HALL, NEWTOWN, WHERE ROBERT OWEN WENT TO SCHOOL . 8
ROBERT Owen's birth- and DEATH-PLACE, NEWTOWN, north WALES 22
A VIEW OF NEW LANARK 48
ROBERT OWEN, FROM A DRAWING BY MATILDA HEMING ... 58
THE MILLS AT NEW LANARK 80
ROBERT OWEN, FROM A DRAWING BY SMART 94
THE EFFECT OF BAD AND GOOD CIRCUMSTANCES RESPECTIVELY . .112
M. FELLENBERG's CHIEF SCHOOL AT HOFWYL ...... I26
INSTITUTION FOR THE FORMATION OF CHARACTER, NEW LANARK . I32
MR. Owen's institution, new lanark 144
BRAXFIELD HOUSE, NEW LANARK 1 76
ROBERT OWEN, FROM A SKETCH BY J. COMERFORD .... I98
A VIEW OF ONE OF MR. OWEN'S VILLAGES OF UNION .... 2l8
ROBERT OWEN, FROM THE PORTRAIT BY PICKERSGILL .... 244
ROBERT OWEN, FROM A PICTURE BY W. T. FRY 270
HARMONY 286
MODEL OF ROBERT OWEN's PROPOSED COMMUNITY 290
THE TOWN HALL, HARMONY, INDIANA 3 ID
THE GRANARY FORT AND GEORGE RAPP's RESIDENCE, HARMONY . . 326
THE DEBATE BETWEEN OWEN AND CAMPBELL 344
XV
ROBERT OWEN
CHAPTER I
BOYHOOD
OF Robert Owen's early life our only, but sufficient,
record is the autobiography which he published
in 1857. Apart from the descriptions of what he felt
and thought as a child — his speculations on the forma-
tion of character, his weighing in the balance the several
religions of the world, in all which we cannot but
suppose that the old man of eighty-seven read back into
the primitive, fluent consciousness of infancy the re-
flections and judgments of maturer years — there is no
reason to doubt the substantial accuracy of the narrative,
and, in any case, we have no other or better authority.
I propose, therefore, as it would be useless to refer
the reader to a book which has long been out of print
and is now difficult to obtain, to quote from the auto-
biography, making only a few transpositions for the
sake of clearness, and such omissions as are rendered
necessary by the limitations of space. In the chapter
which follows, therefore, Robert Owen speaks for himself.
For the sake of convenience I will omit the usual signs
VOL. I. I
2 ROBERT OWEN
of quotation and omission, and when I find it necessary
to summarise or interpolate an editorial comment, square
brackets [ ] will indicate the change of person.
As it appears in the family great Bible, I was born
in Newtown, Montgomeryshire, North Wales, on the
14th of May, 1 77 1, and was baptized on the 12th of
June following.
My father was Robert Owen. He was born in
Welshpool, and was brought up to be a saddler, and
probably an ironmonger also, as these two trades were
at that period often united in the small towns on the
borders of Wales. He married into the family ot
Williams, a numerous family, who were in my childhood
among the most respectable farmers around Newtown.
I think my mother (who was deemed beautiful, as
I was informed, when she was married) was the eldest
sister of the flmiily, and, for her class, superior in mind
and manner.
I suppose that on their marriage they settled in
Newtown — my father taking up his own calling as a
saddler and ironmonger. He was also postmaster as
long as he lived.^ He had the general management of
the parish affairs, being better acquainted, as it appears,
with its finances and business than any other party in
the township. I never thought of enquiring of him
for any particulars respecting his father or mother,
* Prior to 1 791, the postmaster of Newtown was a sub-deputy to tlie
postmaster of Bristol. When, in the latter year, the office at Newtown
was made a head p(jst office, the salary of the postmaster was fixed at
£\o a year. It may perhaps be inferred that the appointment of sub-
deputy-postmaster conferred more prestige than profit on the liolder.
BOYHOOD 3
both being dead before I was born ; and owing to
the then very bad state of the roads there was com-
paratively little communication for young persons between
Newtown and Welshpool. Newtown was at this period
a very small market town, not containing more than
one thousand inhabitants — a neat, clean, beautifully
situated country village, rather than a town, with the
ordinary trades, but no manufactures except a very few
flannel-looms.
[Newtown is still a very small market town, having
now about six thousand inhabitants, and its staple industry
is still the manufacture of woollen stufFs. But whereas
in Owen's boyhood spinning and weaving were ahke
done by hand, there are now four or five mills with
machinery driven by steam, the two largest having about
a hundred looms each. The town is beautifully situated
in the upper valley of the Severn, surrounded on all
sides by finely wooded hills.
The house in which the elder Owen carried on his
trade as a saddler and in which Robert Owen was born
stands in the main street of the town — a fairly broad
street which goes in a straight line over a stone bridge
(built since Owen's time) across the Severn, and then
for some distance still in a straight line up the steep
side of the opposite hill. The Owens' house has now
been thrown into the adjoining house, and a passage-
way has been cut through the ground-floor rooms, but
the old divisions of the walls are still to be seen. The
house is almost incredibly small, the rooms low and
dark. All the timber — the staircase, the balustrade, the
beams and floors — is of solid oak ; the flooring is
made up of pieces of oak — not planks, but odd pieces
4 ROBERT OWEN
fitted together in a clumsy mosaic ; the doors are of
oak with deep-cut panels, and still bear the marks of
the broad chisel which was used, instead of a plane, to
smooth the surface.
Just to the north of the Owens' house there stood
in the middle of the street the old Town Hall, a narrow
two-storied building with a high-pitched roof, the ground-
floor having a kind of tunnel driven through it length-
ways, for the convenience of traffic. The building seems
to have occupied nearly half the width of the street.
It was pulled down in 1852 ; but Newtown still possesses
several old black-timbered houses, and the general aspect
of the town has probably altered less than most English
towns in the last hundred and thirty years.]
I was the youngest but one of a family of seven,
two of whom died young. The survivors, William,
Anne, and John,^ were older, and Richard was younger
than myself The principal adjacent estate was Newtown
Hall, at the period of my birth and for a few years
afterwards the property and residence of Sir John Powell
Price,' Bart. ; and my first recollection is of Sir John
opening a glass door which divided my father's shop
from the dwelling part of the house, and setting a bird
flying towards us, saying there was something for the
children's amusement, and they must take care of it.
This must have been shortly before he left his estate,
I suppose from being in debt, for it soon passed into
other hands. My next recollection is being in school
' Tliis brother John, as I am informed by Mr. Harold Owen, a great-
great-grandson, emigrated as a young man to Canada, and appears to
have remained tliere throughout his life. His grandson returned to this
coimtry.
* The name is more correctly spelt Pryce.
BOYHOOD 5
in apartments in the mansion of his estate/ and a Mr.
Thickness, or some such name, was the schoolmaster.
I must have been sent young to school — probably at
between four and five years of age — for I cannot
remember first going there. But I recollect being very
anxious to be first in school and first home, and the
boys had always a race from the school to the town,
and, being a fast runner, I was usually at home the first,
and almost always the first at school in the morning.
On one occasion my haste nearly cost me my life. I
used to have for my breakfast a basin of flummery,
a food prepared in Wales from flour, and eaten with
milk, and which is usually given to children as the
Scotch use oatmeal porridge.^ [Hastily swallowing his
flummery one morning, he found it scalding hot, and
the result was a severe and prolonged fainting fit.] In
that state I remained so long, that my parents thought
life was extinct. However, after a considerable period
I revived ; but from that day my stomach became in-
capable of digesting food, except the most simple and
in small quantity at a time. This made me attend to
the eff^ects of diff'erent qualities of food on my changed
constitution, and gave me the habit of close observation
^ This house, a low, rambhng, unpretentious building, is still standing.
It is just on the outskirts of the small town, barely three hundred yards
from the Owens' house. After serving as a school, it was for some
time used as a woollen factory. It is now again used as a private
residence.
2 "Welsh flummery — Llumruwd (sour sediment), whence our Enghsh
word ' flummery.' It is formed of the husks of the oatmeal roughly
sifted out, soaked in water until it becomes sour, then strained and
boiled, when it forms a pale brown subgelatinous mass, usually eaten
with abundance of new milk." (^My Life, etc., by A. R. Wallace, Vol. I.,
p. 179.)
6 ROBERT OWEN
and of continual reflection ; and I have always thought
that this accident had a great influence in forming my
character.
Shortly before this event I was doing something
with the keyhole of a large door in a passage between
my father's house and that of our next neighbour, and
by some means I got one of my fingers fast in the
keyhole, and in my attempt to get it out it was twisted
so painfully that I fainted, and I know not how it came
loose, for I was found in a swoon lying on the ground.
On another occasion my life was perilled, and I again
escaped without knowing how. Newtown is situated on
the banks of the river Severn, over which at that time
there was a bridge that had been erected many years-
before, of wood.^ It admitted of a wagon-way with a
narrow footpath on each side. My father had a favourite
cream-coloured mare, and her pasture-fields were on the
side of this bridge opposite to where we lived. When
my father required this mare, as it was a favourite of
mine also, I frequently went lor it to the field, and
rode it home, although a young horseman, for at this
period I was only six or seven years old. One day
when returning from the field mounted on this mare,
I was passing homeward over the bridge, but before I
was half over, a wagon had made some progress from
the opposite side. There was not room for me to pass
without my legs coming in contact with the wheels of
this wagon or with the rails of the bridge. 1 had not
sense enough to turn back, and endeavoured to pass
the wagon. I soon found that my leg was in danger
' This wooden bridge was replaced in 1827 by the stone structure
already mentioned.
BOYHOOD 7
of being grazed by the wheels and I threw it over the
saddle, and in consequence I fell on the opposite side,
but in falling I was so alarmed lest I should drop into
the river or should strike against the bridge, that I
lost all recollection. How I escaped I know not, but
on recovering I found myself on the footpath of the
bridge, the mare standing quietly near me, and the wagon
had fairly passed and I was unhurt. Since that occurrence
I have always felt a more especial liking for cream-coloured
horses than for any others.
In schools in these small towns it was considered a
good education if one could read fluently, write a legible
hand and understand the first four rules of arithmetic.
And this I have reason to believe was the extent of
Mr. Thickness's qualification for a schoolmaster, because
when I had acquired these small rudiments of learning
at the age of seven, he applied to my father for
permission that I should become his assistant and
" usher," as from that time I was called while I remained
in school. And thenceforward my schooling was to be
repaid by my ushership. As I remained at school about
two years longer, those two years were lost to me,
except that I thus early acquired the habit of teaching
others what I knew.
But at this period I was fond of and had a strong
passion for reading everything which fell in my way.
As I was known to and knew every family in the town,
I had the libraries of the clergyman, physician, and
lawyer — the learned men of the town — thrown open to
me, with permission to take home any volume which I
liked, and I made full use of the liberty given to me.
Among the books which I selected at this period
8 ROBERT OWEN
were Robinson Cmsoe, Philip Cltiarle, Pilgrim's Progress^
Paradise Lost, Harvey's Meditations Among the Tombsy
Young's Night Thoughts, Richardson's and all other
standard novels. I believed every word of them to be
true and was therefore deeply interested, and I generally
finished a volume daily. Then I read Cook's and all
the circumnavigators' voyages, the history of the world,
— Rollin's Ancient History — and all the lives I could
meet with of the philosophers and great men.
At this period, probably when I was between eight
and nine years of age, three maiden ladies became
intimate in our family, and they were Methodists. They
took a great fancy to me, and gave me many of their
books to read. As I was religiously inclined,^ they
were very desirous to convert me to their peculiar faith.
I read and studied the books they gave me with great
attention ; but as 1 read religious works of all parties,
I became surprised, first at the opposition between the
difl^erent sects of Christians ; afterwards at the deadly
hatred between the Jews, Christians, Mahomedans,
Hindoos, Chinese, etc., etc., and between these and what
they called Pagans and Infidels. The study of these
contending faiths, and their deadly hatred to each other,
began to create doubts in my mind respecting the
truth of any one of these divisions. While studying
' We have some independent testimony to Robert Owen's religious
character in childhood. A nephew — Robert Owen Uavies— wrote to the
Sf. James s Chronicle, December, 1826, to vindicate his uncle from the
charge of Atheism. " As a boy," he writes, " Robert Owen slept
alone, because his elder brother was always beating him for saying
his prayers upon his knees at the bedside: and afterwards when a
youth he was ever remarked for his strict attention to his religious
duties." (Quoted in letter to Mrs. Stewart, May 6, 1S30, Manchester
Collection.)
.\
. >4^
V « .. — — "■
BOYHOOD 9
and thinking with great earnestness upon these subjects,
I wrote three sermons, and I was called the little parson.
These sermons I kept until I met with Sterne's works,
in which I found among his sermons three so much
like them in idea and turn of mind, that it occurred to
me as I read them that I should be considered a plagiarist,
and without thought, as I could not bear any such
suspicion, I hastily threw them into the fire ; which I
often after regretted, as I should like to know now how
I then thought and expressed myself on such subjects.
But certain it is that my reading religious works
combined with my other readings, compelled me to
feel strongly at ten years of age that there must be
something fundamentally wrong in all religions, as
they had been taught up to that period.
[As already said] 1 could not eat and drink as others
of my age, and I was thus compelled to live in some
respects the life of a hermit as regards temperance. I
entered, however, into the amusements of those of my
own standing, and followed the games played by boys
at that period in that part of the country — such as
marbles, hand and foot ball, etc. I also attended the
dancing-school for some time, and in all these games
and exercises I excelled, not only those of my own age,
but those two or three years older, and I was so active
that I was the best runner and leaper, both as to height
and distance, in the school. I attempted also to learn
music, and to play upon the clarionet, and during my
noviciate, as my father's house was in the middle of the
principal street, I fear I must have annoyed all the
neighbourhood, for my "God save the King" and
similar tunes were heard almost all over the town. But
lo ROBERT OWEN
I do not recollect that any formal complaint was ever
made. I was too much of a favourite with the whole
town for my benefit.
About this period, a young gentleman, a Mr. James
Donne, who was studying for the Church, either at
Oxford or at Cambridge, came upon a visit to Newtown
during a vacation, and I became his every-day com-
panion. He was then about nineteen, and I was between
eight and nine. The country around Newtown is, I
beHeve, generally considered to be interesting and beau-
tiful, and Mr. Donne and myself, while he remained
upon his visit, rambled about the woods and lanes and
higher grounds to examine the scenery in all directions.
These excursions with a man of his cultivated taste and
superior conversation awakened in me a sense of pleasure
which I ever afterwards experienced, in observing nature
in its every variety — a pleasure which, as I advanced in
years, continued and increased. The friendship thus
commenced strengthened with our years and continued
to the death of Mr. Donne, who became well known and
highly respected as Mr. Donne of Oswestry. We had
much correspondence, and when I had aroused the think-
ing faculties of the civilised world by the great public
meetino-s which I held in the Citv of London Tavern
in I 817, I was surprised by receiving a letter from my
much valued frienJ, Dr. Donne, to inform me that he
had taken a pleasant task upon himself, which was to
trace my pedigree, and had discovered that I was a
regular descendant from the Princes of North Wales.^
' Tlif-re ar(^ several letters from Dr. Donne in the Manchester
Collection, He acted as Owen's agent in forwarding remittances to Owen's
aister, Mrs. Weaver.
BOYHOOD II
[During the school holidays Robert Owen used to
visit his relations, farmers living in the neighbourhood
of Newtown. His most intimate friend appears to have
been a cousin, Richard Williams, a boy just a year
younger than himself.] One very hot day in hay-
harvest time we felt ourselves, being over-clothed, quite
overcome with heat while we sauntered from the house
towards a large field where numerous haymakers were
actively at work. They appeared to us, who had been
doing nothing and yet were overcome with heat, to be
cool and comfortable. 1 said, " Richard, how is this ^
These active workpeople are not heated, but are pleasantly
cool, and do not suffer as we do from the heat. There
must be some secret in this. Let us try to find it out.
Let us do exactly as they do, and work with them."
He willingly agreed. I was, I suppose, between nine
and ten years of age, and he was between eight and
nine. We observed that all the men were without their
coats and waistcoats, and had their shirts open. We
adopted the same practice, procured the lightest rakes
and forks, for both were used occasionally, and Richard
and I, unburthened of our heavy clothing, led the field
for several hours, and were cooler and less fatigued than
when we were idle and wasting our time. This became
ever afterwards a good experience and lesson to both ;
for we found ourselves much more comfortable with
active employment than when we were idle.
Our next neighbours were two maiden ladies of the
name of Tilsley, and they kept a superior country shop
for the sale of drapery and haberdashery on one side,
and groceries on the other. One of these ladies changed
her situation by marrying a Mr. Moore, and as he
12 ROBERT OWEN
enlarged the business so as to add a wholesale branch to
their former retail trade, they required more assistance,
and as 1 was active, it was supposed I could be useful to
them, and my services were borrowed, at first on market
and fair days ; and as I had been then two years in the
capacity of usher, learning nothing but how to teach,
Mr. Moore requested my father to permit me to be
with them every day in the week, instead of, as hitherto,
on their more busy days only ; and thus I was occupied
for one year, but living in my own family.
Having by this period read much of other countries
and other proceedings, and, with my habits of reflection
and extreme temperance, not liking the habits and man-
ners of a small country town, I began to desire a different
field of action, and wished my parents to permit me to
go to London. I was at this time about nine years and
a half old ; and at length, although I was a great
favourite at home, it was promised that when I should
attain my tenth year I should be allowed to go. This
promise satisfied me in the meantime, and I continued
to gain knowledge of the business in which I was
occupied, continuing also to read and to take lessons
in dancing.
It was at those lessons that I first became conscious of
the natural sympathies and dislikes or jealousies of
children. I was esteemed the best dancer of my class,
and at that period I was in the first class. The contest
for partners among the girls was often amusing, but
sometimes really distressing. The feelings of some of
them, if they could not obtain the partners they liked,
were so overpowering that it was afflicting to see how
much they suffered. I have long thought that the minds
BOYHOOD
13
and feelings of young children are seldom duly considered
or attended to, and that if adults would patiently encour-
age them to express candidly what they thought and felt,
much suffering would be saved to the children, and much
useful knowledge in human nature would be gained by
the adults. I am now conscious there was much real
suffering in that dancing-room, which, had there been
more knowledge of human nature in the dancing-master
and in the parents of the children, might have been
avoided.
The time had now drawn near for my departure from
my parental roof, and for me to undertake a journey
which in the then state of the roads was thought formid-
able for grown persons. From Shrewsbury I was to
travel alone to London, inexperienced as I then was. At
that time I knew and was known to every man, woman,
and child in the town, and 1 called upon and took my
leave of every one ; and I received many a keepsake, and,
from the more wealthy, presents of money. I deemed
myself, at ten years of age, amply provided to seek my
fortune with forty shillings — the expenses of my coach
hire being paid for me.
Before proceeding to narrate my journey I may state
that I was never but once corrected by my parents. This
correction took place under the following circumstances,
and when I was, I think, scarcely seven years old. I
was always desirous to meet the wishes of both my
parents, and never refused to do whatever they asked
me to do. One day my mother indistinctly said some-
thing to me to which I supposed the proper answer was
*' no," and in my usual way I said " no " — supposing
I was meeting her wishes. Not understanding me, and
14 ROBERT OWEN
supposing that I refused her request, she immediately,
and to me rather sharply — for her custom was to speak
kindly to me — said '* What ! Won't you ? " Having
said "no," I thought if 1 said "yes, I will" I should
be contradicting myself, and should be expressing a
falsehood, and I said again " no," but without any
idea of disobeying her. If she had then patiently and
cahnly enquired what my thoughts and feelings were,
a proper understanding would have arisen, and everything
would have proceeded as usual. But my mother, not
comprehending my thoughts and feelings, spoke still
more sharply and angrily — for I had never previously
disobeyed her, and she was no doubt greatly surprised
and annoyed when I repeated that I would not. My
mother never chastised any of us — this was left for my
father to do, and my brothers and sisters occasionally
felt a whip which was kept to maintain order among
the children ; but I had never previously been touched
with it. My father was called in and my refusal stated.
I was again asked if I would do what my mother re-
quired, and I said firmly ^^ no," and I then felt the whip
every time after I refused w^hen asked if I would yield
and do what was required. I said " no " every time I
was so asked, and at length said quietly but firmly —
" You may kill mc, but I will not do it " ; and this
decided the contest. There was no attempt ever after-
wards to correct me. From my own feelings, which
I well remember when a child, 1 am convinced that very
often punishment is not only useless, but very pernicious,
and injurious to the punisher and the punished.
Though alone in going to London, I was not to
be alone when I arrived there. My eldest brother,
BOYHOOD 15
William, had been brought up by my father to his own
business, and when out of his apprenticeship, and after
he had subsequently worked some years with my father,
he decided to go to London, when he was between
twenty and thirty, and he there obtained a situation with
a Mr. Reynolds, a saddler, who then lived at No. 84,
High Holborn. To him I was consigned, for by this
time Mr. Reynolds had died, and my brother had
taken the business and had married the widow.
My father took me to Welshpool, and thence I went
to take coach for London at Shrewsbury, which was
then the nearest place to Newtown to which there was
any public conveyance to go to London. The coach left
Shrewsbury at night, and an outside place had been
taken for me, with the expectation that I might travel
inside during the night. The proprietor, who knew my
family, was going to put me inside, when some ill-
tempered man, who had discovered that I had paid only
for an outside place, refused to allow me to enter. It
was dark and I could not see the objector, nor discover
how crowded the coach might be ; — for coaches then
carried six inside. I was glad afterwards that I did not
know who this man was.
My father had written respecting me to his friend,
a Mr. Heptinstall, of No. 6, Ludgate Hill, who was
a large dealer in lace, foreign and British ; and Mr.
Moore had written in my favour to Mr. Tilsley, of
No. 100, Newgate Street, who then kept what was deemed
a large draper's shop. This was in 178 1. I think I
had been on this visit to my brother nearly six weeks,
when Mr. Heptinstall procured me a situation with a
Mr. James McGuffog, of whom he spoke highly as
1 6 ROBERT OWEN
carrying on a large business, for a provincial town, in
Stamford, Lincolnshire. The terms offered to me were
for three years — the first without pay, the second with
a salary of eight pounds, and the third with ten pounds,
and with board, lodging and washing in the house.
These terms I accepted, and being well found with clothes
to serve me more than a year, I from that period, ten
years of age, maintained myself without ever applying
to my parents for any additional aid.
I left my brother's house in Eondon, and arrived at
Stamford, where I found Mr. McGufFog's establishment
all that was stated, and his house respectable and comfort-
able. This was a most fortunate introduction for me
into active life. Mr. James McGufFog was a Scotchman,
thoroughly honest, and a good man of business — very
methodical, kind, and liberal, and much respected by
his neighbours and customers, and also, for his punctu-
ality and good sense, by those from whom he purchased
his goods for sale ; and I was fortunate in obtaining
such a man for my first master. He told me that he
had commenced life in Scotland with half a crown, laid
it out in the purchase of some things for sale, and
hawked them in a basket. That by degrees he changed
his basket for a pack, with which he travelled the
country, acquiring knowledge through experience, and
increasing his stock until he got, first a horse, and
then a horse and covered van. He made his regular
rounds among customers of the first respectability in
Lincolnshire and the adjoining counties, until he was
requested by the nobility and principal families and
farmers around Stamford to open an establishment there
for the sale of the best and finest articles of female
BOYHOOD 17
wear, for which, for some time in his travelling capacity,
he had become celebrated. When I came to his house
he had been some years established in it, and was beo-in-
ning to be so independent that he made all his purchases
with ready money and was becoming wealthy. He had
married a daughter of a well-doing middle-class person,
and they appeared to live on very good terms with
each other, and both were industrious, always attending
to their business, yet respectable at all times in their
persons, and altogether superior as retail tradespeople,
being quite the aristocracy of that class, without its
usual weak vanities. They had at this time an assistant
of the name of Sloan, about thirty-five years of age, a
bachelor ; and also a youth about my own age, nephew
to McGuffog.
Here I was at once installed as a member of the
family, and during my stay with them I was treated
more like their own child than as a stranger come from
afar. I was by Mr. McGuffog carefully initiated into
the routine of the business, and instructed in its detail,
so as to accustom me to great order and accuracy.
The business was carried on under a well-considered
system, which in its results was very successful. I sup-
pose I was considered industrious and attentive to my
instructions, for 1 was seldom found fault with or un-
pleasantly spoken to by either Mr. or Mrs. McGuffog
— the latter often attending to the business.
The articles dealt in were of the best, finest, and
most choice qualities that could be procured from all
the markets of the world ; for many of the customers
of the establishment were amongst the highest nobility
in the kingdom, and often six or seven carriages be-
VOL. I, 2
1 8 ROBERT OWEN
longing to them were iit the same time in attendance
at the premises. Mr. McGuffog's shop had become a
kind of general rendezvous of the higher-class nobiHty.
I had thus an opportunity of noticing the manners of
these parties, and of studying their characters, when
they were under the least restraint. I thus also became
familiar with the finest fabrics of a great variety of
manufactures, many of which required great dehcacy
in handling and care in keeping from being injured.
These circumstances, trivial as they may appear, were
of essential service to me in after life, when I became
a manufacturer and commercial man upon a large
scale ; for they prepared me in some measure for the
future intercourse 1 had with what is called the great
world.
Mr. McGuffog had a well-selected library, which
I freely used ; for our chief business was from ten in
the morning to four in the afternoon, and while I
remained in Stamford 1 read upon the average about
five hours a day.
One of the entrances to Burleigh Park was near
the town ; and in summer, and as long as the weather
permitted, my chief pleasure was to go early into the
park to walk, read, think, and study in those noble
avenues which were then numerous in it. Very often
in the midst of summer 1 was thus in the park from
between three and four in the morning until eight, and
again in the evening from six or seven until nearly
dark. I had transcribed many of Seneca's moral precepts
into a book which I kept in my pocket. To ponder
over them in the park was one of my pleasurable
occupations ; and in this park, which I made my study,
BOYHOOD
19
I read many volumes of the most useful works I could
obtain.
Mr. McGuffog was of the Church of Scotland, Mrs.
McGuffog of the Church of England, and they agreed
to go in the morning to the service of the one, and
in the afternoon to that of the other, and they always
took me with them. I listened to the contending
sermons, for they were often, and indeed most generally,
either in reference to their own sectarian notions, or
in opposition to some of the opposing sects. But
during the four years I remained with Mr. and
Mrs. McGuffog, I never knew a religious difference
between them.
I was all this time endeavouring to find out the
true religion^ and was greatly puzzled for some time
by finding all of every sect over the world, of which
I read, or of which I heard from the pulpits, claim each
for themselves to be in possession of the true religion.
1 studied and studied, and carefully compared one with
another, for I was very religiously inclined, and desired
most anxiously to be in the right way. But the more
I heard, read, and reflected, the more I became dis-
satisfied with Christian, Jew, Mahomedan, Hindoo,
Chinese, and Pagan. I began seriously to study the
foundation of all of them, and to ascertain on what
principle they were based. Before my investigations
were concluded, I was satisfied that one and all had
emanated from the same source, and their varieties from
the same false imaginations of our early ancestors —
imaginations formed when men were ignorant of their
own nature, were devoid of experience, and were governed
by their random conjectures, which were almost always,
20 ROBERT OWEN
at first, like their notions of the fixedness of the earth,
far from the truth.
It was with the greatest reluctance, and after long
contests in my mind, that I was compelled to abandon
my first and deep-rooted impressions in favour of
Christianity. But being obliged to give up my taith in
this sect, I was at the same time compelled to reject all
others, for I had discovered that all had been based on
the same absurd imagination, *' that each one formed his
own qualities — determined his own thoughts, will, and
action, — and was responsible for them to God and to his
fellow-men." My own reflections compelled mc to come
to very different conclusions. My reason taught me
that I could not have made one of my own qualities —
that they were forced upon me by Nature ; that my
language, religion, and habits were forced upon me by
Society ; and that I was entirely the child of Nature and
Society ; that Nature gave the qualities, and Society
directed them. Thus was I forced, through seeing the
error of their foundation, to abandon all belief in every
religion which had been taught to man. But my
religious feelings were immediately replaced by the spirit
of universal charity — not for a sect or a party, or tor a
country or a colour, but for the human race, and with
a real and ardent desire to do them good.
Before, however, I had advanced so far in know-
ledge, while I was yet a Christian, and was impressed
with the sacredness of the Christian Sabbath, it seemed
to me that in Stamford it was much disregarded, and it
came into my head, at the age of twelve or thirteen, to
write upon the subject to Mr. Pitt, who was then Prime
Minister. In mv letter to him, I stated the desecration
BOYHOOD 21
which was going forward in Stamford, and expressed a
hope that Government would adopt some measures to
enforce a better observance of the Sabbath.
[To the delight of the youthful Puritan and the
amazement of Mr. and Mrs. McGuffog, a Government
proclamation, enjoining a stricter observance of the
Sabbath, was published a few days later. At the age of
fourteen or fifteen the boy returned to London, and
then paid a brief visit to his parents at Newtown.]
After some time of this relaxation from business it
was necessary for me to seek for a new situation, and
through Mr. McGufFog's recommendation I procured
one with Messrs. Flint and Palmer, an old-established
house on old London Bridge, Borough side, overlooking
the Thames. My previous habits prepared me to take
an efficient part in the retail division of the business of
serving. I was lodged and boarded in the house and
had a salary of twenty-five pounds a year, and I thought
myself rich and independent. To the assistants in this
• busy establishment the duties were very onerous. They
were up and had breakfasted and were dressed to receive
customers in the shop at eight o'clock — and dressing
then was no slight affair. Boy as I was then, I had to
wait my turn for the hairdresser to powder and pomatum
and curl my hair, for I had two large curls on each side,
and a stiff pigtail, and until all this was very nicely and
systematically done, no one could think of appearing
before a customer. Between eight and nine the shop
began to fill with purchasers, and their number increased
until it was crowded to excess, although a large apart-
ment, and this continued until late in the evening ;
usually until ten, or half-past ten, during all the spring
22 ROBERT OWEN
months. Dinner and tea were hastily taken — two or
three, sometimes only one, escaping at a time to take
what he or she could the most easily swallow, and
returning to take the places of others who were serving.
The only regular meals at this season were our break-
fast, except on Sundays, on which days a good dinner
was always provided, and was much enjoyed. But
when the purchasers left at ten or half-past ten, before
the shop could be quite clear a new part of the business
was to be commenced. The articles dealt in as haber-
dashery were innumerable, and these when exposed to
the customers were tossed and tumbled and unfolded in
the utmost contusion and disorder, and there was no
time or space to put anything right and in order during
the day. This was a work to be performed with closed
doors after the customers had been shut out at eleven
o'clock ; and it was often two o'clock in the morning
before the goods in the shop had been put in order and
replaced to be ready for the next day's similar pro-
ceedings. Frequently at two o'clock in the morning,
after being actively engaged on foot all day from eight
o'clock in the [previous] morning, J have scarcely been
able with the aid of the banisters to go upstairs to bed.
And then I had but about five hours for sleep.
This hurried work and slavery of every day in the
week appeared to me more than my constitution could
support for a continuance, and before the spring trade
had terminated I had applied to my friend to look
out for another situation for me. 'Ihe spring trade
ceased, and the business gradually became less onerous.
We could take our meals with some comfort, and retire
to rest between eleven and twelve, and by comparison
22
o o
I I
c o
3 S^
2 3
o -
BOYHOOD 23
this became an easy life. 1 was kindly treated. The
youngest Palmer, a good and fine youth, took a great
liking to me, and we became great friends, and spent
our Sundays in some excursion always together, and as
the less busy season advanced we began to enjoy our
leisure hours in out-of-door exercise or in readinor. His
habits were good and his manners very pleasing. With
this change I was becoming every day more and more
reconciled to this new mode of life. I was beginning
to enjoy it, having forgotten that I had requested my
friend to look out for another situation, when, really
to my regret, I learned from my brother that my former
friend Mr. Heptinstall, of No. 6, Ludgate Hill, had
obtained the offer of a very good situation for me,
from a Mr. Satterfield, who carried on a wholesale and
retail establishment in Manchester, that it was a first-
rate house, and that he offered me, besides board, lodging
and washing, in his house, forty pounds a year.
[With his removal to Manchester, apparently in his
seventeenth year, the chapter of Owen's boyhood may
be said to have closed. He now began to take up a
man's work, and his later life belongs to history.]
CHAPTER II
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
BEFORE proceeding to trace Owen's life and work
in Manchester, it will be well to take a wider
survey and consider the conditions of the time into
which he had been born and the manner of world he
was now about to enter.
The closing decades of the eighteenth century
witnessed the final stages in the supersession of the
mediaeval system of industry, and the establishment of
the present era. The essential differences between the
two eras from the economic standpoint can be summarised
in a few sentences. In mediaeval England the prices
of commodities, the wages of labour, and the rent, where
rent existed, of land were fixed by custom, and the
changes enforced from century to century by changing
economic conditions were regulated and as far as possible
retarded by legal enactments, and by the restrictions
imposed by guilds and immemorial usage. Profit was
not recognised as an element in production, and the
minds of devout Christians were still exercised as to
the lawfulness of exacting interest. Agriculture for the
most part was carried on under the communal system
which prevailed at an early stage in the history of all
Aryan peoples, and the several functions of landlord,
capitalist, and labourer were still in the main un-
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 25
differentiated. The yeoman freeholder tilled his own
land : in the handicrafts the apprentice and the journey-
man rose in the natural course of events to the position
of a master.
But the revolution, though in its last stages it pro-
gressed with startling rapidity, had been for centuries
in preparation. Gradually Parliament had learnt the
futility of regulating wages and prices by statute : the
communal system of land tenure had been disappearing
step by step ; one industry after another had developed
to a point at which it became possible for a single
employer to organise and profit by the labours of many
workmen. At the beginning of the eighteenth century
the revolution began to quicken its pace. The fifty
years from 17 10 to 1760 were years of good harvests, a
slowly increasing population, and unexampled prosperity.
The rapid growth of our Colonies created a demand
for our manufactures — a demand which our steadily
growing mastery of the sea, hampered though internal
communication still remained through bad roads, enabled
us in a large measure to supply. England exported
during this period not only manufactured goods, but
a considerable quantity of corn ; and the agricultural
labourer was better off than he had been for nearly two
hundred years. But his status was already changing
for the worse. At the close of the preceding century
there had been in England some 180,000 yeomen —
small freeholders tilling their own land — a large pro-
portion of the land of England was still cultivated by
villages on the communal system ; there were millions
of acres of waste land, on which the poor could graze
their beasts and even build their cottages. But through-
26 ROBERT OWEN
out the eighteenth century the nobility and the country
squires betook themselves to enlarging and improving
their estates, partly to have and to hold the political
power which went with the land, partly to maintain
their position in face of the growing wealth of the
merchant princes of London and the west of England.
As a means to this end the small freeholders were
gradually expropriated, until towards the close of the
century the class had become almost extinct. Commons
and waste lands were enclosed under successive Acts
of Parliament, and the old three-field system of the
village commune — wasteful and antiquated as it was —
yielded to improved methods of agriculture, which per-
mitted of a better rotation of crops, scientific manuring
of the ground, and improved breeds of sheep and
cattle. These various measures, whilst largely increasing
the productiveness of the soil and the general wealth
of the country, had the effect of driving out the small
freeholder, and ultimately of making the labourer poorer
and much more dependent than before.
But it was in the handicrafts, and especially in the
textile industries, that the progress of the century wrought
most change. At the beginning of the eighteenth century
the staple industry of the country, as it had been for
some hundreds of years, was the manufacture of woollen
goods. The raw material was for the most part supplied
from native sources. The instruments of the manufacture
were the spinning-wheel and the handloom ; and even
if this primitive machinery had admitted of consolidation
in large factories, the only available motive power was
to be found in the watcrwheel and the horse-mill. More-
over, in the early years of the century, " commercial
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 27
enterprise was exceedingly limited. Owing to the bad
state of the roads, and the entire absence of inland
navigation, goods could only be conveyed on pack-horses,
with a gang of which the Manchester chapmen used oc-
casionally to make circuits to the principal towns, and sell
their goods to the shopkeeper — bringing back with them
sheep's wool, which was disposed of to the makers of
worsted yarn at Manchester, or to the clothiers of Roch-
dale, Saddleworth and the West Riding of Yorkshire." ^
Baines's description applies chiefly to the north of
England, in which the means of internal communication
remained in a very backward state until, in the latter
part of the eighteenth century, Brindley constructed his
famous canals and Metcalf showed how roads could
be made. In the south and west no doubt foreign trade
and internal communications were much more advanced ;
and here we find the beginnings of a capitalist industry.
But for the most part the functions of capitalist, employer,
and workmen were still undifferentiated.
Spinning and weaving were very largely carried on
by the poor in their own homes, and often v/ere an
adjunct to a small farm or croft. There is a well-known
passage in Defoe's Tour which describes this cottage
or yeoman industry, as he witnessed it in the neighbour-
hood of Halifax about 1725.
Not only, he writes, were the houses thick at the
bottoms of the valleys, " but the sides of the hills were
spread with Houses, and that very thick : for the Land
being divided into small Enclosures, that is to say, from
two Acres to six or seven Acres each, seldom more ;
every three or four Pieces of Land had a House
* Baines's History of the Cotton Manufacture, p. 105.
2 8 ROBERT OWEN
belonging to it. . . . Hardly a House standing out
of a Speaking distance from another. We could see
that almost at every house there was a Tenter, and almost
on every Tenter a piece of cloth or Kersie or Shalloon,
for they are the three Articles of that country's Labour.
At every considerable House was a Manufactury. As
every clothier must keep a horse, perhaps two, to fetch
home his Wool and his Provisions from the Market,
to carry his Yarn to the Spinners, his manufacture to a
fulling Mill, and when finished, to the Market to be
sold, and the like ; so every Manufacturer generally,
keeps a cow or two or more for his Family, and this
employs the two, or three or four pieces of enclosed
Land about his House, for they scarce sow Corn enough
for their Cocks and Hens. Amonor the Manufacturers'
o
Houses are likewise scattered an infinite number of Cottages
or small Dwellings, in which dwell the W^orkmen which
are employed, the Women and Children of whom are
always busy carding, Spinning &c., so that no Hands being
unemployed, all can gain their Bread, even from the
youngest to the ancient : hardly anything above four
years old, but its Hands are sufficient to its self." ^
• Defoe's Zi^wr (edition of 1727), Vol. iii., pp. 97-101. These remote
moorland districts round Halifax were behind many parts of England
in their industrial development even in the third decade of the eighteenth
century, and they have remained behind the world until quite recent
times. Mr, F. H. Williamson, writing to me in January, 1903. gives the
following description of this part of Yorkshire, from his personal
knowledge : —
" It is only quite recently that tiie handloom has disappeared from parts
of the West Riding. I can cjuite well remember about 1880-85 seeing
a few old men who still carried on their weaving business in their own
homes ; and the click of the loom was not infrequently heard from the
roadside cottages out on tlie moors.
" I can remember (juite a number of old men who had been handloom
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 29
William Radcliffe, the joint inventor of a machine for
dressing the warp, gives a minute and highly inter-
resting description of rural life in the more populous
parish of Mellor, about 14 miles from Manchester, in
the period just before the introduction of the new
machinery: "In the year 1770, the land in our town-
ship was occupied by between fifty to sixty farmers ;
rents, to the best of my recollection, did not exceed
los. per statute acre ; and out of these fifty or sixty
farmers, there were only six or seven who raised their
rents directly from the produce of their farms ; all the
rest got their rent partly in some branch of trade, such
as spinning and weaving woollen, linen or cotton. The
cottagers were employed entirely in this manner, except
for a few weeks in the harvest. Being one of those
cottagers and intimately acquainted with all the rest,
as well as every farmer, I am better able to relate
particularly how the change from the old system of
hand labour to the new one of machinery operated in
weavers when they were younger, but had been compelled to give it
up in later life. These old men were frequently both farmers and
weavers; they had a little plot of freehold land where they would keep
a cow or two and perhaps a donkey which they used to carry their cloth
or materials — when they did not carry them on their backs, as they often
did — to market. The warp and weft were, I believe, bought in the
neighbouring towns, Huddersfield or Halifax, but all the operations were
conducted at home ; the warp was put on tiie loom, the weft was wound
on bobbins for the shuttles by tlie women (I think a treadle winding-
machine, somewhat similar to the spinning-wheel, was used) and woven
by the men. The piece was "tented" on tenting-frames in the fields, and
then taken off to the towns to be disposed of.
" I never saw a young man at the handloom. The older men who had
used it were a much finer race than the present generation who work
in large factories— tall, hardy, of great physical strength and endurance,
and very long-lived. Eighty was not at all an uncommon age ; and
whole families could be found of which all the members attained that
age."
30 ROBERT OWEN
raising the price of land in the subdivision I am speaking
of. Cottage rents at that time, with convenient loom-
shop, and a small garden attached, were from one and
a half to two guineas per annum. The father of a family
would earn from eight shillings to half-a-guinea at his
loom ; and his sons, if he had one, two or three along-
side of him, six or eight shillings each per week ; but
the great sheet-anchor of all cottages and small farms,
was the labour attached to the hand-wheel ; and when
it is considered that it required six to eight hands to
prepare and spin yarn, of any of the three materials I
have mentioned, sufficient for the consumption of one
weaver, — this shows clearly the inexhaustible source
there was for labour for every person from the age
of seven to eighty years (who retained their sight
and could move their hands) to earn their bread, say
one to three shillings per week, without going to the
parish." ^
The Yorkshire weavers no doubt used wool grown
in the neighbourhood, and the farmers of Mellor were
largely dependent upon similar supplies. But where
the raw material was imported from afar, or where
the proximity of a seaport or other circumstances offered
greater facilities for trade, we find that the industry
tended to concentrate itself in a particular locality,
and that frequently the raw material would be supplied
and the whole operation directed by capitalist employers.
There were tailors in London at the end of the
seventeenth century who employed scores of workmen,
engaging and dismissing them as the work required,
• Origin of Power Loom Weaving, by William Radcliffc (1828), pp.
59-60.
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 31
much as in recent times ; ^ the capitalist clothiers of
Wiltshire, Somerset, Gloucester and Devon, who
employed mostly Spanish wool and exported largely
to foreign markets, supplied the raw material to the
spinners and weavers, and disposed of the manufactured
product, earning large fortunes for themselves in the
process. Hollinworth mentions three famous clothiers,
at Kendal, Halifax, and Manchester respectively, so
early as 1520, each of whom had in his employment
a large number of carders, spinners, weavers, and so
on.^ In Arthur Young's time there was a large silk-
mill, worked by water power, on the banks of the
Derwent.^ The same writer found in 1776 a linen
factory at Ballymote, co. Sligo, employing ninety looms,
which had been established by Lord Shelburne some
twenty years previously. ^
Again, the manufacture of cotton from the very
beginning was concentrated chiefly in Manchester and
its neighbourhood. Both the fibres of which cotton
cloth was at this time composed — for until about 1770
linen thread was always used for the warp — were imported,
the linen chiefly from Ireland, the cotton from the West
Indies, and it is probable that the geographical situation
of Manchester was mainly responsible for the concentra-
tion of the industry in this spot. Further, it seems
certain that, as in the west of England, the industry
was at least partly organised on a capitalist basis. Thus
Dr. Aikin, in his Description of Manchester ^^ writes :
^ Webb's History of Trade Unionism, p. 26.
' Quoted by Baines, History of Cotton Manufacture, p. 91.
^ See The Moderfi Factory System, by W. Cooke Taylor, p. 71.
* Tour i7i h'cland, Reprint of 1892, Vol. I., p. 223.
'" Description of the Country Roiind Manchester ^ 1795) P- 15S.
3^
ROBERT OWEN
'* Fustians were manufactured about Bolton, Leigh, and
the places adjacent : but Bolton was the principal market
for them, where they were bought in the grey by the
Manchester chapman, who finished and sold them in
the country.
*' The Manchester traders went regularly on market-
days to buy pieces of fustian of the weaver ; each
weaver then procuring yarn or cotton as he could, which
subjected the trade to great inconvenience. To remedy
this, some of the chapmen furnished warps and wool
to the weavers, and employed persons on commission
to put out warps to the weavers. They also encouraged
weavers to fetch them from Manchester, and, by
prompt payment and good usage, endeavoured to secure
good workmanship."
But the factory system, as we understand it, had
not yet begun. Even when the employer supplied the
raw material and sold the finished cloth, the workers
for the most part provided their own spinning-wheels
and looms and worked in their own homes. In the
earlier decades of the eighteenth century it was only in
the manufacture of silk that the nature of the machinery
used was such as to admit of the economical employment
of any power except that of human limbs. For indeed,
up to the middle of the century, the machinery employed
throughout Europe in spinning and weaving had scarcely
advanced since the time of the Pharoahs. The distaff
had yielded to the spinning-wheel ; but the spinster
still laboriously wrought a single thread, with such
slowness that one loom, even a handloom, required,
as we have seen, the services of six or eight spinning-
wheels to keep it constantly supplied, llie handloom
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 33
itself, an improvement, no doubt, on the rude frame
stretched by the Hindoo betv/een two palm-trees, was
still worked by the weaver's feet ; and, until the
invention, in 1738, of the fly-shuttle, the thread was
still passed through the warp by the weaver's hand.
Again, the manufacturers of Manchester could not
compete in fineness with the fabrics of India, wrought
by still ruder machinery, nor make a thread of cotton
strong enough to be used for the warp in the process of
weaving.
But from 1738 onwards there came, in rapid succes-
sion, a number of inventions, each aiming at substituting
mechanical devices for the slow and uncertain operations
of human fingers in spinning. John Wyatt, Thomas
Highs, James Hargreaves, Richard Arkwright, and
Samuel Crompton are the chief names on this roll of
honour. Hargreaves invented the spinning-jenny (the
name was given out of compliment to his wife), Arkwright
the water-frame, as it was called, from the motive power
originally employed to work it. Both inventions were
actually brought into use for commercial purposes between
1760 and 1770 ; and a few years later Crompton combined
the characteristic merits of the inventions of his two
predecessors in a new machine, hence called the " mule."
The work done by the fingers in spinning con-
sisted in at once stretching and twisting the fine fibres
of the cotton. The problem which the great inven-
tors set before them was how to enable machinery to
do the work hitherto done by human fingers ; to do it
faster ; to stretch the fibres to a much higher degree of
fineness ; and to twist the thread to a much greater hard-
ness. Robert Dale Owen gives an admirable description
VOL. I. 3
34 ROBERT OWEN
of the working of Arkwright's machine. " In the earliest
days the Hindoo, holding in his left hand a staff around
one end of which was wrapped a portion of the vegetable
fleece, drew out with forefinger and thumb, moist and
delicate, and then deftly twisted, the thread. After
tens of centuries Arkwright substituted for human fore-
finger and thunib two sets of rollers revolving with
unequal velocity, the lower roller of each pair fluted
longitudinally, the upper covered with leather. This
gave them a suflicient hold of the cotton as it passed
between them. The space between the two pairs of
rollers was made somewhat greater than the length of
the cotton fibre. The back pair which received the
cotton in the form of a band or ribbon, revolved much
more slowly than the front pair, which delivered it.
The effect was that, at the moment when the cotton
ribbon was released from the grasp of the back pair
of rollers, the front pair, because of their greater velocity,
exerted upon it a slight steady pull.
" The result of this was twofold, first, to straighten
out the fibres left crooked or doubled in the carding ;
secondly to elongate the Ime of cotton presented to the
action of these rollers, and thus diminish its calibre. In
other words, the front pair of rollers drew the cotton out,
as the finger and thumb pulling on the contents of the
distaff had done, but with far more rapidity and regularity
than human fingers ever attained. This process was
repeated through three machines, and the cotton band
was thus reduced in thickness by successive attenuations.
. . . By the front rollers of the last of these machines,
usually called a throstle frame ^ the cotton cord was drawn
out to the calibre or fineness of the thread to be pro-
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
35
duced ; and underneath these rollers were stationary
spindles (revolving with much greater velocity than the
spindle of the cottager's wheel had done) on which the
hard-twisted thread was finally wound." ^
In Crompton's mule moving, instead of stationary,
spindles were employed, and the final process of
stretching and twisting the fibres was effected by the
spindles as they receded from the rollers. Yarn of
much finer quality was produced by the mule than it
had been found possible to produce with Arkwright's
machine.
It was obvious that the relations between spinning
and weaving were now in danger of being reversed.
The mule and the water-frame could produce far more
cotton twist than the slow handloom could hope to
overtake. A Kentish clergyman named Cartwright,
realising this danger, set himself to work in 1785 to
invent a loom which could be worked by mechanical
power. He took out a patent in the following year ;
and between that date and the end of the century suc-
cessive improvements were made by various inventors.
It was not, however, until early in the nineteenth century
that the power-loom came into general use.
Hitherto, as already said, the only motive-powers
available for working machinery, whether for spinning
or for weaving, were the labour of men or animals and
the waterwheel. But for the last thirty years of the
eighteenth century James Watt, protected by a special
statutory monopoly, laboured incessantly to perfect his
discovery of the steam-engine ; and in the early years
^ Threading my Way (An Autobiography), by Robert Dale Owen,
pp. 10-12. London, 1874.
36 ROBERT OWEN
of the nineteenth century steam began to displace water
as the motive-power in mills and factories.
At the time when Robert Owen came to Manchester,
howevxT, the power-loom and the steam-engine were
still in their infancy. The spinning machinery em-
ployed in the great mills which were springing up on
every side in Manchester was worked by water-power.
Manufacturers on a smaller scale drove the spinning
jennies and mules by hand or foot. Its nearness to a
great port had originally made Lancashire the chief seat
of the cotton industry : the abundance of water-power
enabled the county still to retain its pre-eminence in this
manufacture, to which the mechanical inventions described
now gave an enormous impetus. The following figures
will show that Owen came upon the scene just at the
time of the most rapid increase, due mainly to the
annulling of Arkwright's patent in 1785.
Cotton Importkd into Great Brtiain from 170 1-1800.
LBS.
In 1701 the amount of cotton imported was ... 1,985,868
„ 1764 ,. M M ... 3.870.392
„ 1776-80 (yearly average) ,, ... 6,766,613
U 1790 M „ „ ... 31,447,605
n 1800 „ „ „ ... 56,010,732
British Cottons Exported from i 701-1800.
O^iia/ Ja/uf.
In 1 70 1 the cottons exported were valued at ... 23,253
.. 1764 „ „ „ ... 200,354
.. 1780 ,. „ „ ... 355,060
,. 1790 .. .. M ... 1,662.369
.. 1800 ,, ,, ,, ... 5,406,501 •
In the space of ten years, from 1780 to 1790, the
' These figures are quoted from Raines's llisUny of the Cotton
yfanufacturc, p. 215, where they are stated to have been supplied by
the Custom House.
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 37
amount of raw cotton imported, and the value of the
manufactured cottons exported from this country had
increased in about the same proportion, viz. nearly-
fivefold. At the end of the next decade the imports
had again nearly doubled, whilst the exports had
increased more than threefold in value. This enormous
increase in the volume of the work done was necessarily
accompanied by a large, though not of course a pro-
portionate, increase in the number of the workers.
There were no census returns in the eighteenth century,
and it is difficult to find trustworthy figures showing
the growth of population. But Dr. Aikin in the
work already quoted gives, presumably from official
sources, tables of the number of births and deaths in
Manchester at successive periods, which affiord some
measure of the enormous growth of the population at
this time : —
Bills of Mortality for Manchester.
YEAR. BIRTHS. DEATHS.
1700
231
229
1760
793
818
1770
1,050
988
1780
1,566
993
1790
2,756
1,940
These figures, it will be seen, tell the same tale
as the statistics of imports and exports already quoted.
Between 1780 and 1790 the population had probably
doubled itself. ^ The rush to the great cotton centres
* Sir S. Walpole in his History of England from 1815 (Vol. I., p. 89)
gives the following figures of the population of Manchester at different
periods : —
1724 2,400 families ... = 12,000 persons
1757 Manchester and Salford 20,000 „
1774 Manchester alone 41.032 ,,
1801 „ „ 84,020 „
38 ROBERT OWEN
must have been like the rush to a goldfield in more
recent times, hut on a much more extended scale, for
all alike, the old, men and women in their prime, and
young children, could take part in this race for wealth.
And, as will presently be shown, the young children bore
a disproportionate part of the burden. Again, the influx
comprised all classes. Those who had money and
organising capacity to invest, and those whose only
capital was the ability of their hands, alike flocked into
Manchester and the surrounding districts. The numbers
were recruited no doubt largely from the labourers, the
yeomen and small farmers who had been thrust off^
the land as a consequence of wholesale enclosures and
other changes described in the earlier part of this
chapter.
William Radclifl^e, from whom I have already quoted,
gives a vivid description of the nature of the revolution
in the textile industry, in so far as it afl^ected the domestic
manufacturers in the closing decades of the eighteenth
century: '* From the year 1770 to 1788, a complete
change had gradually been efi^ected in the spinning of
yarns ; that of wool had disappeared altogether, and
that ot linen w^as also nearly gone ; cotton, cotton,
cotton was become the almost universal material for
employment ; the hand-wheels were all thrown into
lumber-rooms ; the yarn was all spun on common
jennies. ... In weaving, no great alteration had taken
place during these eighteen years, save the introduction
of the fly-shuttle, a change in the woollen looms to
fustians and calico, and the linen nearly gone, except
the few fabrics in which there was a mixture of
cotton. To the best of my recollection, there was
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 39
no increase of looms during this period, but rather a
decrease. . . .
"The next fifteen years, viz. from 1788 to 1803,
I will call the golden age of this great trade. . . .
Water twist and common jenny yarns had been freely
used in Bolton, etc., for some years prior to 1788 ;
but it was the introduction of mule yarns about this time,
along with the other yarns, all assimilating together
and producing every description of clothing, from the
finest book-muslin, lace, stocking, etc., to the heaviest
fustian, that gave such a preponderating wealth through
the loom. . . .
'' The families in my own neighbourhood, whether
as cottagers or small farmers, had supported themselves
by the different occupations I have mentioned in spinning
and manufacturing, as their progenitors from the earliest
institutions of society had done before them. But the
mule twist now coming into vogue, for the warp, as
well as weft, added to the water twist and common jenny
yarns, with an increasing demand for every fabric the
loom could produce, put all hands in request, of every
age and description. The fabrics made from wool and
linen vanished, while the old loom-shops being insuffi-
cient, every lumber-room, even old barns, cart-houses,
and outbuildings of any description were repaired,
windows broke through the old blank walls, and all
fitted up for loom-shops. This source of making room
being at length exhausted, new weavers' cottages, with
loom-shops, rose up in every direction ; all immediately
filled, and when in full work, the weekly circulation of
money, as the price of labour only, rose to five times
the amount ever before experienced in this sub-division.
40 ROBERT OWEN
every family bringing home weekly forty, sixty, eighty,
one hundred, or even one hundred and twenty shillings
per week." ^
But the spinning-jenny, the water-frame and the
mule cost far more to purchase than the old cottage
wheel which they had displaced, and under the new
conditions the cotton industry depended wholly on
foreign countries for the supply of its raw material, and
largely on foreign markets for the sale of its finished
products. Both the cost of the new machinery and the
conditions attending production for external markets
favoured the capitalist at the expense of the individual
worker. We find Robert Owen starting in 1790 as
the owner of three of the new machines (Crompton's
mules), and the master to that extent of three pairs of
hands besides his own. And in all directions it is clear
that the new industry was being organised on a large
scale. Already in 1787, according to the reckoning of a
contemporary pamphlet,^ there were 143 cotton mills
in Great Britain, of which 41 were in Lancashire and
22 in Derbyshire ; and we see from Owen's account of
his life in Manchester that more mills were springing
up yearly in the town and its environs. Half a century
later, at the time of the publication of Baines's book, the
number of cotton mills in Lancashire alone was 657, and
the number of operatives employed in them was estimated
at more than 137,000. By that date the industrial revo-
lution may be supposed to have been complete, and the
cottage industry had practically ceased to exist except
in a few moorland parishes and other remote corners of
' Radcliffe, op. cit. pp. 63-6.
' Quoted by Baines, p. 219.
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 41
England. But during Owen's sojourn in Manchester from
1788 to 1800, the two forms of production existed side by
side. These twelve years represent the most interesting
part of the transition period. It was not until the steam-
engine and the power-loom had been perfected that
the superior advantages conferred by capital and
organising ability became sufficiently marked to drive
the cottage manufacturer from the field.
CHAPTER III
LIFE IN MAXCHESTER
IT was in 1787, apparently, that Robert Owen entered
the shop of Mr. Satterfield, in St. Ann's Square,
Manchester. The living, he tells us, was good, the
company congenial, and the work not too hard ; he was
well treated, and found his income much more than
sufficient for his moderate wants. In this situation he
remained for two uneventful years, leaving it when
eighteen years of age to take a share for himself in the
great industrial hurly-burly.
At this time, 1789, Crompton's mule, the invention
of which had been made public a few years previously,
was rapidly displacing the spinning-jenny and the water-
frame. As Crompton had neither the means nor
apparently the desire to patent his great invention, it was
open to all the world to make and use the new machine.
A man named Jones, who sold wire bonnet-frames to
Mr. Satterfield's establishment, told Owen of the new
invention, and suggested that it Owen could find the
small capital required, they might enter into partnership
and make mules for sale. Owen obtained the loan of
a hundred pounds from his brother William in London,
left Mr. Satterfield's service, and set up business with
Jones. They rented a large machine-shop, obtained the
42
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 4j
necessary wood, Iron, and brass on credit, and soon had
forty men at work making spinning-mules. But whilst
Jones supplied the knowledge requisite for working
the machinery, the whole direction of the business de-
volved upon young Owen. " I had not the slightest
knowledge of this new machinery — had never seen it at
work. I was totally ignorant of what was required ; but
as there were so many men engaged to work for us,
I knew that their wages must be paid, and that if they
were not well looked after, our business must soon cease
and end in our ruin. Jones knew little about book-
keeping, finance matters, or the superintendence of men.
I therefore undertook to keep the accounts — pay and
receive all ; and 1 was the first and last in the manu-
factory. I looked very wisely at the men in their
different departments, although I really knew nothing.
But by intensely observing everything, I maintained order
and regularity throughout the establishment, which pro-
ceeded under such circumstances, far better than I
anticipated." {^Autobiography^ p. 23.)
In a few months' time, however, Jones found another
partner, a man who had a larger capital to dispose of, and
Owen was bought out, accepting for his share of the
business the promise of six mules, a reel, and a making-
up machine. Thus in 1790, at the age of nineteen, Owen
was left to his own resources.
It is worthy of note that whilst still in partnership
with Jones, Owen had received an offer from his first
master, McGuffog, that he should join him in his
Stamford shop, receiving half profits in the first
instance, and ultimately succeeding to the whole
business. This offer, Owen writes, " I was of course
44 ROBERT OWEN
obliged to decline " — conceiving apparently that his
undertaking with Jones precluded him from dissolving
the partnership.
Owen now immediately hired a large building " or
factory^ as such places were beginning to be called,"
and engaged three men to work his three mules — all that
he ever received out of the promised six — and thus
started life on his own account as an employer of labour
on a small scale. The mules could only undertake the
final process in the manufacture of cotton thread : the
preliminary stages of carding, drawing, and making-up
the cotton into " rovings " were performed on Arkwright's
machines. Owen purchased his " rovings," — loose skeins
of half-spun cotton fibre — from two young Scotchmen,
McConnell and Kennedy, afterwards well known as
cotton lords, at twelve shillings a pound, and sold the
finished cotton yarn at twenty-two shillings a pound.
His profits in the first year were no less than ^^300.
At this time, as already said, many wealthy capitalists
were embarking on the business of cotton-spinning, and
large factories were springing up on every hand. One
Drinkwater, a rich fustian manufacturer, was amongst
those who had recently built and equipped with machinery
a large cotton mill, when his superintendent, tempted
by a richer offer from the outside, suddenly left his
service, and Mr. Drinkwater, himself almost wholly
ignorant of the processes of cotton manufacture, was
forced to advertise for a new manager : " On the
Monday morning following," Owen writes, '* when I
entered the rooni where my spinning-machines were,
one of the spinners said — * Mr. Lee has left Mr. Drink-
water, and he has advertised for a manager.' I merely
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 45
said, ' What will he do ? ' and passed on to my own
occupation. But (and how such an idea could enter
my head, I know not), without saying a word, I put
on my hat and proceeded straight to Mr. Drinkwater's
counting-house, and boy and inexperienced as I was,
I asked him for the situation which he had advertised.
The circumstances which now occurred made a lasting
impression upon me, because they led to important future
consequences. He said immediately — ' You are too
young ' — and at that time being fresh coloured I looked
younger than I was. I said ' That was an objection made
to me four or five years ago, but I did not expect it
would be made to me now.' — * How old are you ? '
' Twenty in May this year ' — was my reply. * How
often do you get drunk in the week ? ' (This was a
common habit with almost all persons in Manchester
and Lancashire at that period). ' I was never,' I said,
' drunk in my life ' — blushing scarlet at this unexpected
question. My answer and the manner of it made, I
suppose, a favourable impression ; for the next question
was — * What salary do you ask ? ' ' Three hundred
a year ' — was my reply. ' What ^ ' Mr. Drinkwater said,
with some surprise, repeating the words — ' Three hundred
a year ! I have had this morning I know not how many
seeking the situation, and I do not think that all their
askings together would amount to what you require.'
* I cannot be governed by what others ask,' said I, * and
I cannot take less. I am now making that sum by my
own business.' ' Can you prove that to me ? ' ' Yes,
I will show you the business and my books.' ' Then I
will go with you, and let me see them,' said Mr.
Drinkwater. We went to my factory. I explained the
46 ROBERT OWEN
nature of my business, opened the book, and proved
my statement to his satisfaction" (p. 27).
In the sequel Owen got the appointment on his own
terms, and was set straightway to superintend an establish-
ment employing five hundred workpeople, and fitted with
machinery much of which was quite unfamiliar to him.
For a time, he tells us, his heart failed him at the thought
of the task which lay before him, and he was stupefied
at his own presumption. But '' there I w^as, to under-
take this task, and no one to give me any assistance.
I at once determined to do the best I could, and began
to examine the outline and detail of what was in progress.
I looked grave, — inspected everything very minutely, —
examined the drawings and calculations of the machinery,
as left by Mr. Lee, and these were of great use to me.
I was with the first in the morning, and I locked up
the premises at night, taking the keys with me. I
continued this silent inspection and superintendence day
by day for six weeks, saying merely yes or no to the
questions of what was to be done or otherwise, and
during that period I did not give one direct order about
anything. But at the end of that time I felt myself so
much master of my position, as to be ready to give
directions in every department" (p. 29).
Owen's experience during the past year, and the
training and knowledge of fine fabrics acquired under
Mr. McGuffog, now stood him in good stead. He
soon learnt to correct defects in the machinery and to
improve the quality of the yarn. He learnt also to
maintain order and discipline amongst the workpeople,
and succeeded, as he tells us, in winning their goodwill
and in establishing a salutary influence over them.
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 47
Owen's management of the factory soon proved
remarkably successful. Under the management of his
predecessor, Lee, the finest yarn produced averaged only
one hundred and twenty hanks to the pound. Within
twelve months Owen so improved the process of manu-
facture that his yarns ran from two hundred and fifty
to three hundred hanks to the pound — a noteworthy
feat in those early days — and were eagerly sought after
by the best houses for weaving of mushn and other fine
fabrics. His name was printed on the outside of every
bundle, so that he soon became favourably known in
manufacturing circles. Mr. Drinkwater seems to have
been fully alive to his merits, and within a short time
offered him a partnership in the business — an offer which
Owen gladly accepted. Within a year or two, however,
Mr. Drinkwater was led to repent his precipitancy.
Mr. Oldknow, the leading manufacturer at that time of
British muslins — for the finest muslins still came from
the East — proposed for the hand of Mr. Drinkwater's
eldest daughter, and seems at the same time to have
suggested a partnership, or at least a joint interest
between them in business. The deed of partnership
with young Owen stood in the way of this scheme,
and, at Oldknow's suggestion, Drinkwater approached
Owen to ascertain on what terms he would consent to
cancel the agreement, offering him any salary he might
choose to name as the price of his consent. The boy's
pride took fire — he destroyed the deed on the spot, and
resigned at the same time his position as manager, con-
senting, however, to remain until Mr. Drinkwater should
find some one to replace him. Owen at once received
more than one offer of partnership from capitalists who
48 ROBERT OWEN
were no doubt already acquainted with the excellence of
the yarn produced under his superintendence, and finally
entered into an agreement with two well-known firms,
Messrs. Borrodale and Atkinson of London, and Messrs.
Barton of Manchester. He joined himself with them
to form a new firm under the style of the Chorlton
Twist Company, and left Drinkwater's service in 1794
or 1795 ^^ ^-^^^ "P ^^^ ^"'^^^ duties.
As one of the manaG:in2r directors of the Chorlton
Twist Company he had first to superintend the building
of the new factory, and to install the machinery, and,
when this work was completed, to purchase the raw
cotton, to supervise its manufacture, and to dispose of
the manufactured product. In the course of his duties
he visited not only other manufacturing towns in
Lancashire, but proceeded as far north as Glasgow, where
his firm had many customers. His journeys to Glasgow
had important consequences. It so happened that on
his first visit he met in the street a Miss Spear, sister
of a business acquaintance in Manchester. Miss Spear
introduced him to the friend with whom she was staying
in Glasgow, a young lady of nineteen, Caroline, daughter
of the well-known merchant and philanthropist, David
Dale. Miss Dale gave Owen an introduction to see
her father's cotton mills at New Lanark ; and on Owen's
return from their inspection he saw Miss Dale again,
and even accompanied her and her younger sisters in
their morning walk on Glasgow Green. The acquaintance
thus happily begun was improved on Owen's subsequent
visits to Glasgow, which his partners decided should in
future be made twice a year. In those days of dear
postage it was the custom for every traveller to defy
■*-3
FU
LIFE IN MANCHESTER
49
the Postmaster-Generars monopoly, and become an un-
licensed postman for the benefit of his friends. Owen
in this fashion, on his next journey to the north, conveyed
a letter from Miss Spear to her friend Miss Dale. He
was no doubt a purely innocent go-between ; but it may
be doubted whether Miss Spear was not actuated by
other motives than the desire of defraudinor the revenue.
o
She had, it seems, already spoken to Owen much, and
with intention, of the excellent qualities of her friend,
and of the still unfettered state of her affections. This
second visit, thanks to the timely introduction afforded
by Miss Spear's letter, led to more walks on the banks
of the Clyde, and to a further progress in intimacy.
On his return from this second visit, Miss Spear again
spoke much of her friend's personal excellence ; and,
finally — for the young Owen, bold and self-reliant in
business, was sufficiently diffident in social matters to
need something stronger than a hint — ventured to tell
him plainly that Miss Dale desired no other than himself
for her future husband. Owen for his part was more
than willing, though without this open encouragement
he would scarcely, he tells us, have ventured to aspire
so high. For David Dale stood well in the eyes of the
world. He was a man of great wealth, the leading
merchant, probably, at that time in Glasgow. He
owned several factories and other business concerns
in various parts of Scotland ; his cotton mills at New
Lanark, founded in conjunction with Arkwright in 1783,
were the first mills of any importance in Scotland ; he
had opened a branch of the Royal Bank in Glasgow ;
had helped to found the Chamber of Commerce in that
town ; was a member of the Town Council and had
VOL. I. 4
50 ROBERT OWEN
twice served as magistrate. As material evidence of his
wealth and position he had built for himself, some fifteen
years previously, a magnificent house — still standing —
in Charlotte Street, of which the brothers Adam are
the reputed architects. Moreover his religious views
presented, even more than his social importance, a serious
obstacle to a prospective son-in-law who already suspected,
if he had not at this time openly proclaimed, that he had
discovered the fallacies of all revelation.
For David Dale was religious with all the fervour
and narrowness of his country and his generation. He
had in early manhood seceded from the mother Church
of Scotland and founded the sect of the '' Old Scotch
Independents." He travelled round the country visiting
and encouraging the various churches belonging to the
communion, and himself acted for nearly forty years
as pastor to his own special congregation in Greyfriars
Wynd. To help him in his Sunday sermons he had
taught him.self to read the Scriptures in Hebrew and
Greek. Such was the man whose daughter Owen, the
freethinker, aspired to marry. ^
Upon his next visit to Scotland, nevertheless, Owen
discovered his hopes to Miss Dale, who for her part
explained that she could never marry without her father's
consent, but added, *' If you can find the means to
overcome my father's objections it would go tar to
remove any I may now have to the request you have
made."
Owen had already learnt from Miss Dale that her
> I owe mirh of tlic iiilormation about David Dale given in the text
to an essay l.y Mr. W. G. i31ack on David Dales House in CharlotU
Street, printed in the papers of the Regality Club, Vol. IV'., part ii.
(Glasgow, 1902).
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 51
father, finding the management of so many concerns too
heavy a burden, was anxious to dispose of the New
Lanark Mills. This gave him the pretext he required.
He called on Mr. Dale and proposed himself as a
purchaser, explaining in reply to Mr. Dale's expression
of astonishment at such an offer from one so young —
Owen was then twenty-eight, but looked much younger
than his years — that he represented men older and
wealthier than himself. With Mr. Dale's permission
Owen proceeded to make a detailed survey of the mills,
and duly reported the matter to his partners on his
return to Manchester. Two of them at once accompanied
him back to Glasgow, and visited Mr. Dale. After
making the necessary enquiries as to their financial
position, Mr. Dale expressed himself ready to treat with
them. When asked his terms, Mr. Dale professed
himself at a loss to put a fair price upon the concern,
as he was seldom there, and left its management entirely to
his half-brother, James Dale, and a Mr. Kelley. " * But,
said he, ' Mr. Owen knows better than I do the value
of such property at this period, and I wish that he
would name what he would consider a fair price between
honest buyers and sellers.* I was somewhat surprised
and nonplussed at this reference to me, with all its
responsible consequences, taking into consideration the
position of all parties. My estimate of the establishment,
from having taken only the very general inspection of
it which I had had an opportunity of doing, was such,
that I said, ' It appears to me, that sixty thousand pounds,
payable at the rate of three thousand a year for twenty
years, would be an equitable price between both parties.'
Mr. Dale had been long known for the honest simplicity
52 ROBERT OWEN
of his character, and as such was universally trusted and
respected, and as a further proof of it, to the surprise
of my London and Manchester commercial partners, he
replied — ' If you think so, I will accept the proposal as
you have stated it, if your friends also approve of it.'
And equally to my surprise they said they were willing
to accept the terms ; and thus, in a few words, passed
the cstabHshment of New Lanark from Mr. Dale into
the hands of the ' New Lanark Twist Company '" (p. 53).
This transaction took place apparently in the early
summer of 1799. ^
Owen proceeded at once to assume the management
of the mills on behalf of his partners, and took up his
quarters in the Clydesdale Hotel, Old Lanark, about
a mile distant from the mills. Miss Dale and her sisters
were at this time, according to their usual custom,
spending the summer months in a cottage on the New
Lanark estate, and they remained there for some six
weeks after Owen took over the management. In the
intervals of business there were, we learn, more walks
and talks on the banks of the Clyde, until Mr. Dale
cut short his daughters' holiday and summoned them
to return to Glasgow. Mr. Dale had previously to the
purchase of the mills been informed by his daughter
of Owen's aspirations, and had given her to understand
that he was not prepared to welcome as a son-in-law a
*' land louper," — a stranger of whom he knew nothing.
No doubt Owen's views on religious matters had a
share in influencinor his decision.
o
' "Apparently," for the dates given in the early part of Owen's
Autobiography arc confused and to some extent contradictory. I infer,
however, that the purchase of New Lanark took place in the same year
as Ijj-j marriage, and the date of that is fixed as September, 1799.
LIFE IN MANCHESTER s:^
Gradually, however, his opposition weakened, a result
due, it may be surmised, not more to the representations
of his friends and the knowledge of his daughter's own
inclinations in the* matter, than to his increasing recogni-
tion of the sterling worth of Owen himself. In effect,
the marriage was ultimately fixed for September 30
of this year, 1799. The marriage took place, Scotch
fashion, in Mr. Dale's house in Charlotte Street.
" When we were all met on the morning of our
marriage, waiting for the ceremony to commence, Mr.
Dale was there to give his daughter to me, and the
youngest sisters of Miss Dale for her bridesmaids. Mr.
Balfour [the officiating clergyman] requested Miss Dale
and me to stand up, and asked each of us if we were
willing to take the other for husband or wife, and each
simply nodding assent, he said without one word more —
' Then you are married, and you may sit down ' — and
the ceremony was all over.
" I observed to Mr. Balfour, that it was indeed
a short ceremony. He said, ' It is usually longer. I
generally explain to the young persons their duties in the
marriage state, and often give them a long exhortation.
But I could not presume to do this with Mr. Dale's
children whilst he lived and was present'" (p. ^^).
The brief ceremony over, the young couple straightway
posted " over very bad roads " to Manchester. Owen had
for some two years before his marriage been living in a
house called "Greenheys." The house had been built
and sumptuously fitted up — the doors of Honduras
mahogany imported for the purpose, and the windows
of plate glass — for a wealthy merchant who died before
he could occupy it. Owen and a friend took the house,
54 ROBERT OWEN
which had large gardens and pleasure-grounds attached,
and divided it into two separate dwellings. Owen's
bachelor establishment consisted of an elderly couple, w^ho
took care of the house, the garden, and the stable. " One
of my habits," he writes, " at that period was peculiar.
The old housekeeper came always after breakfist to know
what I would have for dinner. My reply was ' an apple
dumpling ' — which she made in great perfection — ' and
anything else vou like ' ; and this practice was uniform
as long as 1 remained unmarried. My attention was
devoted to business and study, and I could not be
troubled to think about the details of eating and
drinking."
To this house Owen brought his bride. But on
the way he essayed a small mystification. " We had
to pass in sight of a small low building erected by
the well-known Mr. Henry for the manufacture of
his concentrated essence of vinegar, and I pointed it
out as soon as in sight, there being no other building
near, as our future residence — and wished to know
from my new wife what she thought of it. She evidently
did not expect to find that I lived in a house with
that common appearance, and she said she thought
the house I had described to her was different. The
old servant was, I perceived, disappointed that her
young mistress was to be no better accommodated.
After we had passed it they perceived I had not been
serious in describing my residence, and we soon drove
into the grounds ot Grcenheys, and entering into the
house through a part well contrived and neatly arranged
as a greenhouse, and the interior being well constructed,
furnished, and nicely arranged, both my wife and her
LJFE IN MANCHESTER S5
servant were uncommonly well pleased. And here
we passed our honeymoon " (p. 56).
But their sojourn at Greenheys was of the briefest.
It was found that the two managers, originally appointed
by Mr. Dale, who had been left in charge of the New
Lanark Mills, were incapable of conducting the business
to the satisfaction of the new proprietors, and at
the request of his partners Owen went with his young
wife back to Scotland, and entered upon the govern-
ment of New Lanark, in January, 1 800. With this
change of scene a new period of Owen's life opens,
which will form the subject of a later chapter.
Before closing the account of Owen's life in
Manchester, it will be profitable to glance briefly at the
social side of his activities. Of society in the ordinary
sense, indeed, he saw but little — much less, probably, than
most of his contemporaries in age and equals in wealth
and standing. He was, as he tells us, much absorbed
at this period in his business, and in study. In later life
he claimed to have read in his youth and early manhood
at least four hours a day on an average for twenty
years. -^ Moreover he was shy, ignorant of the manners
and requirements of society, and painfully conscious
of his own deficiencies in these respects. But of society
of another kind he had no lack. There was at this
time in Manchester a Unitarian College,^ under the
presidency of Dr. Baines.
" At this period John Dalton, the Quaker, afterwards
the celebrated Dr. Dalton, the philosopher, and a Mr.
^ First Discourse delivered at Washington in 1825 (AVw Harmony
Gazette, Vol. II., p. 225).
^ The original of Manchester College, Oxford.
56 ROBERT OWEN
Winstanlcy, both intimate friends of mine, were assist-
ants in this college under Dr. Baines ; and in their
room we often met in the evenings, and had much
and frequent interesting discussion upon religion, morals,
and other similar subjects, as well as upon the late
discoveries in chemistry and other sciences — and here
Dalton first broached his then undefined atomic theory.
We began to think ourselves philosophers. Occasionally
we admitted a friend or two to join our circle, but
this was considered a favour. At this period Coleridge
was studying at one of the universities, and was then
considered a genius and eloquent. He solicited per-
mission to join our party, that he might meet me
in discussion, as I was the one who opposed the re-
ligious prejudices of all sects, though always in a
friendly and kind manner, having now imbibed the
spirit of charity and kindness for my opponents, which
was forced upon me by my knowledge of the true
formation of character by nature and society. . . . These
friendly meetings and discussions with my friends
Dalton and Winstanley were continued until they
attracted the attention of the principal, Dr. Baines, who
became afraid that I should convert his assistants from his
orthodoxy, and our meetings were required to be
less frequent in the college. They were, however,
continued elsewhere, and I acquired the name, from
some of the parties who attended these meetings, of
' the reasoning-machine ' — because they said I made man
a mere reasoning-machine, made to be so by nature
and society" (pp. 35, 36).
One of the leading men in Manchester at the end
of the eighteenth century was Dr. Thomas Percival,
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 57
a Fellow of the Royal Society, a physician in active
practice, and a man of keen intelligence and wide
sympathies, profoundly interested in the various social
and economic problems which were at that time forcing
themselves upon the attention of thoughtful men.
Amongst his published works are essays on the principles
and limits of taxation ; on the growth of the population
of Manchester ; on improved methods for recording bills
of mortality, etc. As will be seen in the next chapter,
Percival's sympathies had been specially directed to the
monstrous evils attending the aggregation of large
numbers of workers, especially of children, for long
hours in close, ill-ventilated factories; and from 1795
onwards he took a prominent part in calling public
attention to the matter, and in insisting upon the need
for interference by the State to secure the regulation
of the hours of factory labour and the enforcement of
proper sanitary conditions. In 1781 Percival, with one
or two others, had founded the Manchester Literary
and Philosophical Society. The aim of the Society,
which had grown out of a series of informal meetings
of a few friends, was the reading and discussion of
papers on various subjects. The range of its discussions
was extremely wide, and embraced practically the whole
field of knowledge. But at this period its interest lay
mainly in the direction of physics, chemistry, geology,
and the natural sciences generally. Percival was its
president. Amongst its honorary members were numbered
Sir Joseph Banks, Alexander Volta, Erasmus Darwin,
Joseph Priestley, Arthur Young, and several bishops.
The most prominent contributors, judging from the five
volumes of selected papers published between 1785 and
58 ROBERT OWEN
1802, were Perclval himself, Dr. Ferriar, author of An
Essay towards a Theory of Apparitions^ John Dalton/
Beddoes, Priestley, and one or two others.
Into this Societv, which included, it will be seen,
many men of the highest distinction in science and
philosophy, young Owen was elected on November i,
1793, when he was only in his twenty-third year ; his
last recorded attendance was on December 21, 1798.
During the period of his membership he read four papers
at the Society's meetings, viz. on November 29, 1793,
Remarks on the Improvement of the Cotton Trade ; on
December 27, 1793, An Essay on the Utility of Learning ;
on March 13, 1795, 'thoughts on the Connection between
Universal Happiness and Practical Mechanics : and on
January 13, 1797, 0// the Origin of Opinions with a Piew
to the Improvement of the Social Virtues?
None of Owen's papers were included amongst the
essays selected for publication in the volumes already
referred to ; nor indeed is it at all probable that they
possessed anything of permanent value either in form or
matter. He thus describes the origin of the first paper :
" Upon one occasion, at the sitting of the Society, the
subject of cotton was introduced, on one of the nights
when the President was in the chair.'' I had never
* Owen's name appears as one of the proposers of Dalton in April, 1 794.
' I owe these details to the courtesy of Mr. Charles Leigh, sometime
Secretary of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, which
is still in existence.
' The date was apparently the 4th October, 1793. when a paper is
recorded to have been read by Dr. Matthew Guthrie. On the .\aturc
and Culti7<ation of Persian Cotton. The minutes show tl^at Owen was
present as a visitor on this occasion, and was proposed for membership by
Dr. Percival, Dr. Bardslcy, Mr. Henry, and Mr. Harvey. Owen's own
paper on cotton followed not, as stated by him, at the next meeting, but
some seven weeks later.
From an eiigrtun'iii; after a drawing by Matilda HcMiing, published Dec i, 1823.
ROBERT OWEN.
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 59
spoken in the Society, nor ever heard my own voice
in public, nor had I the slightest desire ever to hear it.
I was too diffident and sensitive to feel any such inclina-
tion ; but upon this occasion, to my surprise and great
confusion, Dr. Percival said, ' I see a young friend present
who I am sure can, if he will, give us some valuable
information upon the subject. I mean Mr. Owen, so
well known for his knowledge in fine-cotton spinning.'
I blushed, and stammered out some few incoherent
sentences, and felt quite annoyed at my ignorance and
awkwardness being thus exposed. Had it not been for
this incident, it is probable I should never have attempted
to speak in public. I was conscious I knew more of
the kinds, qualities, and history of this material than
any of those who spoke this evening on the subject.
This impression induced me to attempt to write a
paper for the Society upon this subject, and it was
read and discussed at the following meeting of the
Society."
The second paper, if we may judge from its title, was
a mere schoolboy's essay. In the titles of the two later
papers, however, we see indications that Owen's thoughts
were already beginning to work on the lines which in
his maturer life developed into his characteristic system
of philosophy. But however crude his own performances
may have been, there can be little doubt that the ex-
perience gained in the Literary and Philosophical Society
was of much value to Owen in later life. It was his
first introduction to educated society ; and apart from
the general intellectual stimulus supplied by familiar
intercourse with men of learning and distinction, his
association with Dr. Percival, who was occupied at this
6o ROBERT OWEN
very time with his investigations into the condition of the
factories and the wrongs of those who worked in them,
can hardly have failed to influence the young Owen, and
may even have determined the bent of his whole future
life and work.^
One other episode of Owen's life in Manchester must
be chronicled. For some months in 1794 he was a
lodger at 8, Brazen Nose Street, in the same house with
Robert Fulton, the celebrated engineer. Fulton had been
for some years studying painting under West in London,
but at this time had forsaken pictorial art for engineering,
and had just patented a device, a double inclined plane,
which was intended to supersede the use of locks on
canals. He was also engaged in perfecting the invention
of a dredging-machine, or mechanical " navvy," for
which also he intended to take out Letters Patent. But
the perfecting and patenting of his inventions required
more money than he possessed, and Owen some time
in 1794 found it necessary to assist him with a loan.
Later in the same year more money, it would seem, was
required, and in December, 1794, a formal deed of agree-
ment was drawn up, under which, in consideration of an
immediate advance of ^65, and further loans amounting
ultimately to a maximum of ;^400, Owen was to be ad-
mitted into partnership with Fulton, and to share in the
profits from his inventions. In the following March,
however, the partnership was dissolved by mutual consent ;
* In 1796 tliere was founded in Manchester, mainly through the efforts
of Dr. Percival, the Manchester Board of Health, the main object of which
was to devise remedies for the evils incident to factory employment. On
the Committee, besides jjhysicians and magistrates, appeared the names of
several well-known cotton-spinners, including Robert Owen himself and
two of his first partners, John Atkinson and John Barton.
LIFE IN MANCHESTER 6i
but Owen advanced some more money, making the actual
loan about £i^o.
The next two or three years Fulton seems to have
spent chiefly in London or Paris, writing at intervals to
Owen. Some time in 1797 he repaid a first instalment —
^60 — of the loan ; but Owen never heard from him
again. The relations between them seem to have been
marked throughout by the greatest cordiality, and Owen
in his old age refers to the episode with pleasure and
with some pride in having been able to help one who
had done so much for the advancement of the world.
CHAPTER IV
THE FACTORY SYSTEM
THE industrial revolution described in a preceding
chapter brought an enormous increase of wealth
and prosperity to the country. And though its benefits
tended at first to accumulate in the hands of a few,
yet in the process of two or three generations they have
become diffused through the whole nation, and have
helped materially to raise the standard of living even
for the poorest. In no point is this higher standard
of life more conspicuous than in the matter of clothing.
For centuries the poorer classes in these islands were
clothed mainly in woollen, linen and silk being luxuries
reserved for the well-to-do, and cotton, at any rate in large
quantities, being of comparatively recent introduction.
Now woollen fabrics are costly, and, as every housewife
knows, they tend rapidly to deteriorate with washing.
One practical result must have been that the poorer
classes in this country could rarely afford the luxury
of clean clothes. With the rapid multiplication of cheap
cotton fabrics towards the close of the eighteenth century,
all this was chan^red. The new stuffs were within the
reach of the poorest ; the wives and children of the
labourer and the factory operative could have two or
three dresses where they had but one before, and could
afford to wash them again and again without detriment
6a
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 63
to their usefulness. Few inventions, it is probable, have
done more to increase the comfort and the health of
the poor.
But in the earlier years of the change these benefits
were purchased at a heavy price. As already shown,
between 1780 and 1790 the population of Manchester,
swollen by recruits drawn in from the surrounding
country to work in the new cotton-mills, had almost
doubled itself Year after year new mills sprang up,
to be filled, as soon as they were built, by ever new
recruits. The results of this process are well described
by Dr. Aikin.
'' The invention and improvement of machines to
shorten labour has had a surprising influence to extend
our trade, and also to call in hands from all parts,
especially children for the Cotton Mills. It is the wise
plan of Providence that in this life there shall be no
good without its attendant inconvenience. There are
many which are too obvious in these Cotton Mills, and
similar factories, which counteract that increase of popula-
tion usually consequent on the improved facihties of
labour. In these children of very tender age are employed,
many collected from the Workhouses of London and
Westminster, and transported in crowds, as apprentices
to masters resident many hundred miles distant, where
they serve unknown, unprotected and forgotten by those
to whose care nature or the laws had consigned them.
These children are usually too long confined to work
in close rooms, often during the whole night : the air
they breathe from the oil, &c., employed in the machinery
and other circumstances is injurious : little regard is
paid to their cleanliness, and frequent changes from
64 ROBERT OWEN
a warm and dense to a cold and thin atmosphere arc pre-
disposing causes to sickness and disabiHty, and particularly
to the epidemic fever which so generally is to be met
with in these factories. It is also much to be questioned
if Society docs not receive detriment from the manner
in which children are thus employed during their early
years. They are not generally strong to labour, or
capable of pursuing any other branch of business, when
the term of their apprenticeship expires. The females
are wholly uninstructcd in sew^ing, knitting, and other
domestic affairs requisite to make them notable and frugal
wives and mothers. This is a very great misfortune to
them and the public, as is sadly proved by a comparison
of the families of labourers in husbandry, and of manu-
facturers^ in general. In the former we meet with
neatness, cleanliness and comfort : in the latter with filth,
rags and poverty, although their wages may be nearly
double those of the husbandman. It must be added,
that the want of early religious instruction and example,
and the numerous and indiscriminate associations in these
buildings, are very unfavourable to their future conduct
in life. To mention these grievances is to point out
their remedies : and in many factories they have been
adopted with true benevolence and much success. But
in all cases the Public have a right to see that its
members are not wantonly injured, or carelessly lost." '
The above passage contains an admirable summary of
the chief evils wrought upon the poor, and upon the
community at large, by the early cotton lords in their
race for wealth. It was the malignant fever which was
" i.e. factory operatives, ns \vp should say lunv.
' Description of tlu Country Round Manchester (pp. 219, 220).
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 6s
very prevalent in the mills during the closing decades
of the eighteenth century which first drew attention to
the subject. The early factories were badly constructed ;
often they were mere make-shift buildings — two or three
cottages knocked together, or something of the kind.
Little attention was paid to ventilation or sanitary require-
ments ; moreover the machinery often ran night and day,
and the importance of cleanliness, for the sake of the
machinery and the fabric, if not for that of the workers,
was at the outset very imperfectly realised. It is little
wonder that in these close, hot rooms, crowded throughout
the twenty-four hours with human beings, infectious dis-
eases found occasion to spread. So early as 1784, on the
occasion of an outburst of fever in the Radcliife cotton
factories, the Manchester magistrates had requested a
committee of medical men to investigate the matter.
Amongst these medical men were Drs. Percival and
Ferriar, of whose doings we have learnt something in the
preceding chapter. Later, in 1796, a permanent com-
mittee, of which these gentlemen were members, was
formed in Manchester under the style of the Board of
Health, and a series of resolutions was drawn up by
Dr. Percival, which were quoted at length by Sir R.
Peel in his evidence before the Select Committee of 1816.
Premising that the object of the Board was to prevent
the generation and spread of infectious diseases, the
resolutions proceeded to draw attention to the unhealthy
conditions in which the operatives, and especially children,
were forced to labour in cotton-factories — the con-
finement ; the hot and impure air ; the long hours of
labour both by night and day ; and the want of proper
education and religious instruction. In conclusion the
VOL. I. s
ee ROBERT OWEN
resolutions invoked the aid of Parliament to establish
laws *' for the wise, humane, and equal government of
all such works." ^
These resolutions, though their immediate effect was
not conspicuous, appear to have first drawn public
attention to the evils prevalent in cotton factories, and
to have given the first impulse to legislation on the
subject. Peel owned his indebtedness to Percival and
his associates in the preparation of the Act of 1802.^
Percival, it will be seen, like Aikin, was not content
with drawing public attention to the physical evils
attendant on the overcrowding of factories, and the
resultant danger to the community, but proceeded to
point out the effect upon the health and the morals
of the persons, especially the young, employed under
such inhuman conditions. For the great majority of
the early workers in the cotton-mills were children ;
and the children began their work as early in many
cases as five or six years of age, and worked the same
hours as the men and women employed with them.
As we have already seen, in the passages quoted in a
previous chapter from Defoe and Radcliffe,' long before
the introduction of the factory system the children ot
the yeoman and the cottager had been employed from
a very early age at the spinning-wheel ; children in
the workhouses were set to labour from the age of
six ; and the children of the handloom weavers, at any
rate until the end of the second decade of the nineteenth
century, worked side by side with their parents in the
* Report of the Minutes of Evidence on the State of Children employed
in Manufactories, 1816, pp. 139-40; J'roceedini^s of the Board of Health
in Manchester, 1796-1805. Manclicstcr, 1805.
' Report, p. 133. ' Above, pp. 28, 29.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 67
cellars of Manchester and neighbouring towns, often for
as long as fifteen hours a day. There was little sentiment,
then, in the eighteenth century, on the part of the parents
to prevent the exploitation of child labour ; and the
manufacturer naturally looked to this source to reduce
the expenses of working his mills. But child labour
was not only cheap and tractable, it was also peculiarly
suited for the manufacturer's requirements. Much of
the labour incident to the working of cotton-spinning
machinery was of the lightest kind. The machines ran
of themselves. The attendants had merely to piece
together the broken threads, remove accidental obstruc-
tions, and clean the machines ; and for work of this
kind a child's slender fingers and small lithe body were
admirably fitted. Thus William Lockhart, writing of the
New Lanark Mills under David Dale, says, " The greater
number of children a widow has, she lives so much
the more comfortably : and upon such account alone
she is often a tempting object to a second husband.
Indeed at cotton-mills it often happens that young
children support their aged parents by their industry." ^
Child labour, then, was regarded as essential to
the profitable working of the cotton-mills. But it is
probable that in a town like Manchester the evils
attendant on the employment of children, to which
Percival and Aikin drew attention, were mitigated by
various circumstances. Many of the children employed,
it is likely, lived in the town with their parents ; and
in any case the conditions of life in a large city, and
the force of public opinion, would do something to
keep cruelty and oppression within bounds. But cotton-
^ Sinclair's Statistical Account of Scotland, Vol, XV.
68 ROBERT OWEN
mills at this time were worked by water-power, and
many were necessarily built in remote districts, far
removed from supervision by public opinion or the
possibility of legal interference. In such circumstances,
there being no resident population in the neighbourhood
of the mills, the master manufacturer was forced to
look elsewhere for his supply of child labour. In any
case he would have found it difficult to obtain as many
volunteers as he required, for parents very generally
at this time regarded it as discreditable to send their
children to work in the factories. The father who
allowed his child to enter a mill " made himself the
town's talk, and the unfortunate girl so given up by
her parents in after life found the door of household
employment closed against her, because she had been
a factory girl." ^ In these circumstances the manu-
facturer drew upon the only available source of supply —
the parish apprentices. In those days it was the practice
for pauper children, from the age of six and upwards,
to be employed on useful work, either in the workhouse
itself, or as apprentices to outside employers. In the
Bloomsbury Workhouse, for instance, there were some
two hundred children, from the age of six to twelve or
fourteen, employed for ten hours a day in summer and
nine in winter, their chief occupations being to wind silk
or to pick oakum." But the children were as a rule
apprenticed, as opportunity served, to outside employers
— farmers, manufacturers, etc. ; and, in the early years
of the great industry, very large numbers of them were
thus sent to the spinning-mills. So great was the
' "Alfred," History of the Factory Movement, 1857, Vol, I., p. 16.
' Evidence of Dr. Ogle before the Committee of 1816.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 69
demand for child labour that the apprentices went in
many cases when only six years old — some even younger
— to serve their time in the factories. Many of the
first mills, as already shown, were of necessity built in
remote districts, far from any possibility of effective
supervision. Many of the early masters were men of
little education, sprung from the ranks of the yeomen
or even labourers : men of coarse fibre, and drunk with
the prospects of unlimited wealth.^
It is not necessary here to fill in the details of the
picture : they may be found in the ghastly story told
by Robert Blincoe,^ and the evidence given before the
Committee of 1832. Even where the mill-owners were
themselves liberal and humane, the vicious system still
permitted all manner of iniquity and oppression. Here
is a description given by Sir R. Peel of the state of
affairs, towards the close of the eighteenth century, in his
own mill at RadclifFe : ^ '' The house in which I have
a concern gave employment at one time to near a
thousand children of this description (i.e. parish ap-
prentices). Having other pursuits, it was not often
in my power to visit the factories, but whenever such
visits were made, I was struck with the uniform appear-
ance of bad health, and in many cases stunted growth of
* See Hutchins and Harrison, A History of Facto7y Legislation (1903),
p. 19; Gaskell, O71 the Manufacturing Population, 1833, pp. 52, 53.
^ Memoir of Robert Bli7icoe, an Orphan Boy. Manchester, 1832.
Robert Blincoe was a pauper child, who in 1799, ^^ the age of seven,
was sent, with a number of other workhouse apprentices, to a cotton-mill,
where he was forced to work fourteen hours a day, " half-starved and
cruelly treated by his taskmaster." In manhood he wrote an account
of his experiences, which was edited and published by John Brown,
who appears to have been at some pains to verify the painful facts
given in the narrative.
' Report of 1816, p. 133.
70 ROBERT OWEN
the children : the hours of hibour were regulated by the
interest of the Overseer, whose remuneration depending
on the quantity of work done, he was often induced to
make the poor children work excessive hours, and to stop
their complaints by trifling bribes. Finding our own
factories under such management, and learning that
like practices prevailed in other parts of the Kingdom
where similar machinery was in use, the children being
much overworked, and often little or no regard paid
to cleanliness and ventilation in the building," Peel
proceeded, as he told the Committee of 1816, to intro-
duce the Act of 1802 in order to remedy the evils thus
brought to light.
Peel in short invoked the law to do what he was
unable to do for himself. For, in a case such as this,
good intentions on the part of an employer, however
well disposed, were of little avail. Nothing less than
personal and incessant supervision would suffice to
prevent oppression and abuse. A further illustration is
affiDrded by the history of the works at New Lanark,
the management of which devolved upon Robert Owen
at the begiiuiing of 1800. David Dale, their sole owner
for some years, was, as " Alfred " says, " known as one of
the most spirited, enterprising and benevolent men of
his age," and New Lanark was *' one of the miost
humanely conducted factories in the Empire." ^ It had
been made the subject of a laudatory notice in the Annual
Register for 1782,^ the writer dwelling specially on
the provision made by Dale for the health and comfort
of the children employed: '* The boys enjoy hours of
' History of the Factory Movement, Vol. I., px 20.
' Part II., p. 33*
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 71
relaxation in succession. Their apartment was likewise
clean and well aired, and ten schoolmasters are daily
employed in their tuition."
Again, the reports of the " Society for Bettering the
Condition and Increasing the Comforts of the Poor "
contain an account by Sir Thomas Bernard, given on the
authority of Professor Garnett of the Royal Institution,
on the state of New Lanark under David Dale. The
report mentions that five hundred children are employed,
who are entirely fed, clothed, and educated by Dale : and
that " the healthy and pleasurable appearance of these
children has frequently attracted the attention of the
traveller." The Reporter goes on to note that cleanliness
and fresh air are insisted on ; the children wash them-
selves before work and after it ; boys and girls lodge
apart, in airy rooms ; their clothes are regularly washed ;
they receive good food and plenty of it. Their supper
is fixed at 7.0 p.m. ; and, supper over, they attend
classes until 9.0 p.m. Three regular masters, it is
added, instruct the lesser children during the day. Seven
others assist in the evening.^
There is no mention in this last account of any
provision for holidays — unless attendance at Church on
Sundays may be reckoned as coming under that head, and
as the church held only one hundred and fifty, and from
five hundred to eight hundred children were employed,
even this form of recreation could only be enjoyed at long
^ Reports, Vol. II, (1800), pp. 2fi^ seqq. The date of the Reporter's
visit is not given by Bernard. But see Dr. Garnett's own Report, Tour
through the Highlands of Scotland, first published in 1800. Dr. Garnett's
visit was apparently made in 1799, ^^^ he mentions in a footnote that an
English company, of whom his friend Owen was one, have just purchased
the mills.
72 ROBERT OWEN
intervals.^ Their hours of work were eleven and a half a
day, i.e. thirteen hours, with intervals of one and a half hours
for meals. For the rest, the report is chiefly noteworthy
for the fact that the Reporter thinks it necessary to mention
that the elementary rules of health and decency were
not violated in the model factory of the Empire. In
*' Alfred's " History we find a more critical account of the
conditions under which New Lanark Mills were worked.
Mr. Dale, like most of the employers of his time, found
some difliculty in procuring a sufficient supply of free
labour, a difficulty which was no doubt increased by
the remote situation of his mills. The surrounding
peasantry, accustomed to their own standard of comfort
and personal freedom, refused to enter his employment.
Mr. Dale built cottages near the mills, but so great was
the aversion to work in a factory that " very few, not
being homeless and friendless, would accept of house-
accommodation from Mr. Dale on the lowest possible
terms." As a matter of fact, his mills were largely
recruited in 1791, as we read in Garnett's report, from
the passengers on a vessel, with two hundred emigrants
from Skye, which was wrecked in the neighbourhood of
the Clyde.
In this difficulty Dale, like others, '' applied to the
managers of charities, and the parish authorities of
Edinburgh, for a supply of children. The application
was successful, and the children under Mr. Dale's
control ultimately numbered five hundred.^ Mr. Dale, in
exchange for the services of these children, undertook
' David Dale's letter to Manchester Board of Health.
' In November, 1793, according to Lockhart (Sinclair's Statistical
Account of Scotland, Vol. XV.) there were 795 persons under 18 employed
at the New Lanark Mills, of whom 2c 4 were less than ten years old.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM
73
to feed, lodge and clothe them. It has been our lot,"
*' Alfred " continues, " to know two women, who, in early
life, had been Mr. Dale's apprentices. On the authority
of these witnesses, Mr. Dale was a man of benevolent
disposition, but seldom visited his factories ; when he
did visit them, it was remarked that ' things were put
in better order,' and he sometimes brought the children
little presents, and was at heart the friend of his work-
people. . . . The ages of the children when apprenticed
to Mr. Dale were from five to eight, the period of
apprenticeship from seven to nine years, the hours of
labour in the factory from six in the morning to seven
in the evening."^
Owen, in his evidence before the Committee of 1816,
explained that from these thirteen hours were to be
deducted one and a half hours allowed for meals, so that
the children actually worked eleven and a half hours a
day.^ In describing the state of the children on his
taking over the management, Owen explained to the
Committee that the children under Mr. Dale's regime
were " extremely well fed, well clothed, well lodged, and
very great care taken of them out of the mills." Never-
theless, in consequence of the long hours of work and
their tender years, their growth was stunted, their limbs
occasionally deformed, and through sheer exhaustion
they made very slow progress in the night-school,
even in learning the alphabet. Dale himself, writing
in 1796 to the Manchester Board of Health, can only
claim that out of 507 scholars, 80 could read well,
^ History of the Factory Movement, Vol. I., pp. 19, 20.
' The hours were from 6.0 a.m. to 7.0 p.m., with intervals from
9 to 9.30 a.m. and from 2.0 to 3.0 p.m. (David Dale's letter to Manchester
Board of Health).
74 ROBERT OWEN
and 24 of these So stood in no need of further
instruction in reading.
And in many mills at this time the children were
not well fed, well clothed or well lodged, little or no
care was taken for their physical and moral welfare :
the hours of work were even longer, and the conditions
far more oppressive.
So matters stood when Owen entered in January,
I 800, on his duties at New Lanark. To place his future
work there in its true proportions, it is desirable at this
point to anticipate a little, and to refer briefly to the
course taken by the Factory Movement up to 18 16.
Moved by the considerations already set forth, and
with the assistance, as he has told us, of Percival
and other Manchester doctors, Sir. R. Peel prepared and
passed through Parliament in 1802 a measure known
as the " Health and Morals of Apprentices Act." The
Act prescribed the periodical whitewashing of all factories
and the introduction of proper ventilation. For the rest,
its provisions related solely to the employment of parish
apprentices, who formed at the time the vast majority
of the children and young persons employed in factories.
The maximum working hours for apprentices were fixed
at twelve a day ; night work was to be discontinued ; the
apprentices were to be instructed in reading, writing, and
arithmetic ; to go to church once a month ; and separate
sleeping-apartments were to be provided for the two
sexes. The Act, less no doubt by the force of its legal
sanctions than by the attention which it called to the
subject, and by the standard of humanity set up, appears
to have helped, with other social forces, in bringing about
some improvement of the conditions of child labour.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 75
The newer factories were built with more regard to
sanitary requirements ; the rooms were loftier ; they
were better ventilated ; more attention was paid to
cleanliness — the last reform being made in the interests
of the masters quite as much as in those of the workmen.
Working throughout the night was gradually discon-
tinued. A more important and not wholly beneficial
change was the substitution of " free " labour for the
system of apprenticeship. Many causes working con-
currently appear to have contributed to this change.
By some employers, no doubt, the provisions of the
Act of 1 802 were felt to impose irksome restrictions,
whereas there was no power but that of the parents
to impose limits on the labour of " free " children. And
of the parents, it seems clear, some had too little humanity,
and many were too poor to dare enter a protest. Again,
apprentices were now more difficult to procure. The
magistrates in many towns refused any longer to allow
the pauper children to be apprenticed to the cotton
manufacturers, or qualified their permission with con-
ditions which the employers were reluctant to accept. ^
Again, the reluctance of the parents to allow their
children to enter the factories appears to have gradually
broken down, partly, no doubt, by greater familiarity
with the conditions, largely under the pressure of in-
creasing poverty as the burden of taxation imposed by
* See Report of 1816. Evidence of Theodore Price, pp. 122, 124,
on his own refusal, and the refusal of the Birmingham Magistrates,
to sign indentures to cotton-mills. At p. 182 it is given in evidence that
the Preston Workhouse authorities refuse any longer to apprentice their
children to cotton-mills. The Manchester Magistrates, so early as 1784,
had passed a resolution binding themselves not to apprentice to mills
where the children worked more than ten hours a day (Hutchins and
Harrison, op. cit.^ p. 9).
76 ROBERT OWEN
the long wars grew heavier and heavier. But the main
cause of the rapid transformation, in the earlier years
of the last century, in the character of the labour
employed, is no doubt to be found in the altered
conditions of the industry. With the introduction of
steam as a motive-power, employers were no longer
forced to place their factories by the banks of streams
in out-of-the-way country districts. They came now
by preference to the large centres of population, where
the markets were ready to hand, and where labour was
abundant.
From this time onwards some of the worst evils
of the factory system gradually disappeared. The
children now lived at home, in the charge of their
parents. They had, at any rate, the daily change of
scene, and such opportunities of home life as could be
enjoyed on a Sunday. The work was done in larger
and cleaner buildings, and generally under healthier
conditions. The master was for the most part of higher
social type, and if not always more humane, at least
more amenable to public opinion. And, not least, the
eves of the public had to some extent been opened.
But notwithstanding all these ameliorating influences, it is
abundantly clear from the evidence given before the Select
Committee of 1816 how much still remained to be done,
and how inhuman were the conditions at the best. The
children began work far too young. The manufacturers
took such labour as they required when it was offered
by the parents : and the parents sent their children to
the mill as soon as they were able to work, sometimes
that they themselves might live in idleness on the money
so earned ; more often, perhaps, because they could not
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 77
afford to keep them at home. Thus Mr. John S. Ward
and Mr. Peter Noaille gave evidence before the Committee
of 1 816 that in their silk-mills the children commonly
began work at six or seven years of age. Thomas
Whitelegg had known children employed in cotton-mills
at Manchester as early as five. Richard Arkwright gave
evidence that children used to enter the Cromford mills
at seven or eisfht.
Again, the hours of work were far too long. In the
Bloomsbury Workhouse the children had worked ten
hours a day in summer and nine in winter. Dale had
allowed his apprentices to work eleven and a half hours a
day in all. But the bulk of the manufacturers, even the
best and most enlightened of their number, who gave
evidence in 18 16 had fixed the minimum hours of work
at twelve a day or seventy-two a week. Generally this
meant a stretch of thirteen hours, with one interval of an
hour for dinner ; breakfast and tea being brought to the
child in the mill, and snatched at intervals during the
work, the machinery going at full speed all the while.
Sometimes the interval for dinner was omitted, and the
children were forced day after day to work twelve hours
without a break. ^ Some manufacturers worked regularly
from 5 a.m. to 7 p.m., with but one hour's interval — or
thirteen hours' solid work in the day. In many cases
even this limit was exceeded. In the Backbarrow Mills
the regular hours, all the year round, were from 5 a.m.
to 8 p.m., with but one hour's interval for meals. And
many of these hapless children were in addition called
upon to attend several hours on Sunday for the purpose
of cleaning the machinery. Peel himself expressed the
* Report, pp. 212, 213.
78 ROBERT OWEN
opinion that fourteen or fifteen hours work a day had
become too general.^
It was contended by the manufacturers that these long
hours were not really hours of work ; that the children
had to be in attendance, but that no physical exertion
was involved, since they had merely to watch the
machines, and piece the broken threads. But they had
to stand practically for the whole time. In most mills no
provision was made for their sitting down at all ; and one
manufacturer, Mr. William Sidgwick, more outspoken
than the rest, put the facts very clearly :
*' Q. — When a child is found sitting in the mill, is
not that contrary to the rules ?
** y^. — Certainly, I expect them to be at work.
*' Q.— The whole day?
*' J. — Yes : the master will not notice it, if the work
is in a proper state.
" a. — If the threads were not breaking, and the work
was going on properly, you would have no objection to
their sitting down ?
" yl. — No : I should not, occasionally ; but it might
become a habit.
" U. — Could they sit down, and yet be able to super-
intend the threads ?
" yi. — Not correctly : I think they would see those in
the immediate neighbourhood of their seats, but not
those at the other end, perhaps." -
The evil effects of the long hours of confinement and
the fiitigue of standing were much enhanced by the heated
atmosphere. After 1802 the ventilation of the mills,
as already said, was much better than it had been. But
' Rfport, p. 137. Ibid., p. 118.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM 79
it appears that the finer qualities of yarn, at any rate,
required a warm atmosphere ; and in many factories the
air was accordingly, summer and winter, maintained at a
temperature of about 80 degrees.
Under such conditions it was inevitable that the health
of the children should deteriorate. The medical wit-
nesses testified to a general impairment of the physique ;
the digestion suffered, the whole organism was enfeebled ;
the children became pale, slight, and weedy-looking.
Specific ailments of various kinds were induced. More-
over, accidents, owing to the fingers and other parts
of the body being caught in the moving machinery, were
by no means infrequent, especially towards the close of
the long day's work.
It need hardly be said that the children had little
energy left to take advantage of the educational oppor-
tunities which, as the masters one after another explained
to the Committee, were freely offered to them. Some of
the employers provided an hour's schooling in the
evening, for such as chose to attend after thirteen hours'
work in the day. Others placed their reliance upon the
religious and moral instruction which could be afforded
in the Sunday Schools. But attendance at the schools
was, as a rule, voluntary, and but a small proportion of
the children cared to come.
Such, then, were the general conditions of child labour
in the cotton-factories up to the passing of the Factory
Act of 1 8 19. To what extent Owen succeeded in
ameliorating the lot of the children employed at New
Lanark we shall see in the next chapter.
CHAPTER V
iVEJF LANARK
THUS in January, 1800, Robert Owen entered upon
his kingdom. The road from the old grey town
of Lanark to the mills runs for about a mile between
stone walls across a treeless and somewhat bleak plateau,
which forms a stern setting for the beauty of New
Lanark itself. For some miles above the town of Lanark
the Clyde flows through a deep ravine between banks
which form precipitous cliffs of no great height at the
water's edge, and then shelve backwards at a slope which
permits of their being covered with a luxuriant growth
of woodland. For some distance the river falls in a
series of cascades — the Falls of the Clyde : but by the
time it reaches New Lanark the descent has become
less rapid, the channel has broadened out, and the
river retreats so as to leave on one shore, between
the wooded banks and the stream, a broad, gently
sloping shelf of rock. The stream itself widens to
a crescent shape at this point, and half its channel
is occupied by a small, richly green island. Just
opposite this island, on the broad, almost flat shelf
which forms the floor of a natural amphitheatre,
whose steep sides, clothed with trees, rise abruptly
to the plateau above, lie the village and the Mills —
FU
ELIC
J
H L
NEW LANARK 8i
three or four rows of grey stone houses, and four
gaunt cotton-mills, seven storeys high, not indeed
smoke-begrimed, but planned with as rigid an economy
of the beautiful as cotton-mills in any other part of
the world. The cold grey colouring and the unlovely
squareness of the buildings make up a picture which
seems altogether unworthy of the exquisite beauty of
its frame.
Such was New Lanark as it was built by Richard
Arkwright and David Dale in 1784 ; such it was when
Robert Owen made his home there in 1800 ; twenty-
five years later, when he left it for ever, the chief
outward memorial of his labours and his dreams were
two large buildings hardly less ungainly than the mills
themselves. And to this day the external aspect of
the place is scarcely changed ; to this day the mills
depend for their motive-power upon the water brought
from an upper reach of the river through the long
tunnel which David Dale caused to be dug out of
the solid rock.
In January, i 800, the establishment, the sole manage-
ment and direction of which were vested in Robert
Owen, consisted of some 1,800 or 2,000 persons, of
whom about 500 were children from the parish
workhouses who had been apprenticed to the mills
for a term of years. For the rest, the original popula-
tion, as Owen described it twelve years later, was '* a
collection of the most ignorant and destitute from all
parts of Scotland, possessing the usual characteristics of
poverty and ignorance. They were generally indolent
and much addicted to theft, drunkenness and falsehood,
with all their concomitant evils, and strongly experiencing
VOL. I. 6
82 ROBERT OWEN
the misery which these ever produce." ^ Nevertheless
he was able in 1812 to write that these same persons
*' had now become conspicuously honest, industrious,
sober and orderly, and that an idle individual, one in
liquor, or a thief, is scarcely to be seen from the beginning
to the end of the year." "
But this result had been brought about gradually
and in the face of manv difficulties and discourac^cments.
To begin with, Owen's " government," as he himself
calls it, was a strictly limited monarchy. He seems
indeed to have had from his partners the full trust and
confidence to which his past career as a successful manu-
facturer entitled him. But he was a junior partner, a
man himself with little capital, acting as the representative
of men older and wealthier than himself. They were
simply manufacturers, probably neither better nor worse
' No man is an impartial witness in his own cause, and there can, I
think, be little doubt that to make the contrast more effective, Owen un-
consciously darkened the shadows in the picture which he drew of the
state of New Lanark in 1800. Dale, as has been said, was a just and
benevolent man, and he had certainly done much to improve the lot of
his workpeople. He had set his face against drunkenness and immorality ;
he had provided good food, clothing, and housing for the children, and had
given them, in addition, the means of proper schooling ; he had set up a
store at which articles of good quality could be purchased at a cheap rate.
That these measures had failed of their full effect for want of the continuous
supervision which only the master's eye could have exercised, must be
admitted. But there is sufficient testimony to assure us that the state of
New Lanark under Dale was not quite so desperate as it was represented
by Owen. [See in particular Lorkhart's report in the Statistical Account
quoted, and a A Refutation 0/ Mr. Owen's System, by the Rev. John
Aiton, Edinburgh, 1824. Aiton, though strongly biassed by his theological
views, is on the whole a fair-minded witness.] But Owen did without
doubt effect a marvellous improvement, partly by working on the lines laid
down by D.ile, partly by innovations of his own.
' Statement regarding the New Lanark Establishment. Edinburgh,
1812.
NEW LANARK 83
than their contemporaries, looking in the first instance
for a large return on their capital, and little likely to
share their junior partner's enthusiasm for reforming the
world. The junior partner^s first concern, then, was to
secure an ample dividend : whatever measures he under-
took which had not this result for their immediate aim,
must, in so far as they involved expenditure, be justified
on the score of their ultimate commercial advantage.
But the opposition to Owen's schemes which proceeded
from the workpeople themselves was more serious, be-
cause more difiicult to combat, and to one of less
sanguine temperament must have proved almost hope-
lessly discouraging. The late proprietor, David Dale,
had given a hundred proofs of his goodwill to the
people who worked in his factories. He had failed, no
doubt, to devote the incessant personal attention to the
business which was necessary for the complete realisa-
tion of his benevolent intentions : but he had done what
he could ; the people knew him as a just man, and one
who cared for something beyond the profit which he
derived from their labour. But Owen and his associates
had come from England — in itself matter for hostility —
with novel ideas and speaking an unfamiliar tongue.
The old managers had been dismissed, the old machinery
displaced : and now the new manager wished to impose
new customs and regulations, and to teach new ways of
doing the work. To what could all these things tend
but the piling up of bigger dividends, and heavier
burdens on the workers. The cotton lords of England
had certainly given the poor little cause to credit them
with any disinterested desire for the well-being of their
operatives : if the people of New Lanark viewed Owen's
84 ROBERT OWEN
innovations with suspicion and even overt hostility,
they had at any rate some reason for their conduct.
Step by step, however, and month by month, the
fine simplicity of the man, his pure unalloyed good-
will, his high character, made themselves felt ; and
all opposition was finally conquered, when, in iSo6,
the American embargo on cotton exportation had nearly
brought the trade to a standstill. It was impossible
to continue working the mills ; but Owen persuaded
his partners to allow the workpeople their full wages
for the tour months during which the embargo lasted ;
and by this act of w^ise generosity he finally won the
full confidence and affection of all those employed in
the factories.^
After the discharge of the former managers and
the instalment in their place of a man called Humphreys,
who on Owen's recommendation had succeeded him in
Mr. Drinkwater's factory, Owen's next step was to
replace the obsolete types of machinery, a!id to intro-
duce improved methods of working. He then set
himself to fight the dishonesty and drunkenness which
prevailed to a ruinous extent. Writing twelve years
later, he says, " He soon discovered that theft was ex-
tended through almost all the ramifications of the
community, and the receipt of stolen goods through all
the country around. To remedy this evil, not one legal
punishment was inflicted, not one individual imprisoned,
even for an hour ; but checks and other regulations
' In this Owen f(jllowed a precedent set by bis predecessor. One
of the mills first built was burnt to the ground in 1788; and two hundred
and fifty people were thrown out of employment. David Dale is said
to have paid them their full wages luitil the mill could be started again
[Threading tny Way, by Robert Dale Owen, p. 15).
NEW LANARK 85
were introduced. They were at the same time instructed
how to direct their industry in legal and useful occupa-
tions. Thus the difficulty of committing the crime
was increased, the detection afterwards rendered more
easy, the habit of honest industry formed, and the
pleasure of good conduct increased." ^
To combat the second evil, he appointed caretakers,
who patrolled the streets of the village each night, and
reported all who were found intoxicated. On the
following morning the offenders were duly fined. Partly
because of this discipline, but more perhaps as a gradual
result of the influence of a higher public sense on such
matters, drunkenness became so rare in the establishment
that the statement quoted at the beginning of the
present chapter seems to have been no idle boast.
Owen's young son, Robert Dale, tells us that one day in
his twelfth year {i.e. in 1813), when accompanying his
father on the daily visit to the mills, he saw '' at a
little distance on the path before us, a man who stopped
at intervals in his walk, and staggered from side to
side.
" ' Papa,' said I, ' look at that man. He must have
been taken suddenly ill.'
" ' What do you suppose is the matter with him,
Robert ? '
'' ' I don't know. I never saw any man act so. Is
he subject to fits .? Do you know him, papa } '
'' ' Yes, my dear, I know him. He is not subject
to fits, but he is a very unfortunate man.'
" ' What kind of illness has he ^. '
^ Second Essay on the Formation of Character, quoted in Auto-
biography, Vol. I., pp. 279-80.
86 ROBERT OWEN
" My father stopped, looked first at the man before
us, and then at nie. ' Thank God, my son,' he said
at last, ' that you have never before seen a drunken
man.' " ^
Not the least important of Owen's innovations was
the village store. The establishment of New Lanark
had sprung up suddenly, under artificial conditions,
apart from the usual channels of food-supply. The
population was thriftless ; and the retail shopkeepers
seem to have ministered to their thriftlessness by selling
their wares on credit, and necessarily at extravagant
prices. The articles sold were of poor quality, and
all the shops sold spirits. Owen started " a store on
behalf of the proprietors, purchasing food and clothing
of good quality wholesale, and retailing them at a
moderate profit to all who chose to purchase. The
prices charged, though, as Owen tells us, some 25 per
cent, lower than those of the private shopkeepers,
were yet sufificient to cover all the expenses of the
business, and leave a profit ot about £700 a year,
which was devoted entirely to the maintenance of the
schools. So that he was able to point out to the
Committee of 18 16, as he had no doubt already pointed
out to his partners, that the expenses of the schools
^ T/treadifi(f ?/iy Hay, p. 71. Owen did not, however, succeed in
entirely stopping the practice of drinking on New Year's Day. Fines were
inflicted for the irregularity, and a special holiday in the summer was
offered to all who would come to work as usual on New Year's Day,
instead of giving up the day to idleness and drink. But these measures
appear, even as late as 1814, to have met with little success (see John
Walker's letter dated December 26, 18 14, and the order in relation to
New Year's Day quoted in New Kxisknce, Part V., pp. Ixix-lxx.
* Or more probably improved and set going again a store already
started by Dale.
NEW LANARK 87
did not form a charge on the profits of the mills, but,
in the most literal sense, were borne by the people
themselves.^
But the innovation which aroused the most active
opposition was Owen's insistence upon cleanliness and
good order in the village streets, and in the houses of
the people. He found the streets unswept — a rubbish
heap or dunghill in front of each door — the houses
small, neglected, and dirty : the natural decay of the
fabric being expedited by the action of the tenants, who
in some cases would burn the window-shutters and
inside doors for firewood, and then decamp.^ Owen,
at the expense of the company, as it would seem,
enlarged, repaired, and, where necessary, rebuilt the
houses, removed the dunghills, and cleansed the streets.^
He further drew up a set of rules providing for
the observation of proper cleanliness, order, and good
behaviour on the part of all the inhabitants in future.
Under these rules (which are printed in full in the
Appendix to Part V. of The New Existence of Man upon
Earth) every house was to be cleaned once a week and
whitewashed at least once a year by the tenant ; the
tenants were further, in rotation, to provide for the
cleaning of the public stairs and the sweeping of the road-
way in front of their dwellings ; it was forbidden to
throw ashes and dirty water into the streets, or to keep
cattle, swine, poultry or dogs in the houses. There
were provisions for the prevention of trespass and
damage to the company's fences and other property.
^ Report of 1816, p. 22. See also Autobiograpliy, Vol. I., p. 63.
- New Existence, Part V. (1854), Appendix, p. xi.
^ Robert Owen at New Lanark (1839), p. 4.
88 ROBERT OWEN
In the winter months all doors were to be closed at
10.30, and no one was to be abroad without permission
after that hour. The minimum age for children to
begin work in the mills was fixed at ten, and from
five to ten years of age all children might attend, free
of charge, the school provided by the company.
Temperance in the use of liquors was enjoined.
The two final rules are of sufficient interest to be
quoted in full :
*' 18. That as there are a very great variety of
religious sects in the world (and which are probably
adapted to different constitutions under different cir-
cumstances, seeing there are many good and conscientious
characters in each), it is particularly recommended, as a
means of uniting the inhabitants of the village into one
family, that while each faithfully adheres to the principles
which he most approves, at the same time all shall think
charitably of their neighbours respecting their religious
opinions, and not presumptuously suppose that theirs
alone are right."
" 19. And, lastly. That all the village shall, to the
utmost of their power as far as is consistent with their
duty to God and society, endeavour, both by word and
deed, to make e\ery one happy with whom they have
any intercourse."
The government of the establishment, it will be seen,
was of a paternal kind. But Owen was not so ill-advised
as to attempt to enforce foreign standards of cleanliness
upon an unwilling peasantry by sheer despotism, however
benevolent. The constitution provided for some kind
of representative government. The village was divided
into wards, or ^Mieighbour divisions," each of which
NEW LANARK 89
chose by ballot a '^ principal.'* The principals, in turn,
met together and chose from among their number twelve
jurymen, who were charged with the twofold duty of
seeing that the regulations were duly understood and
observed, and of acting as a judicial board, to try offenders
and to mete out appropriate punishment. Some of these
delegates had, in the beginning of the new regime, no
enviable task to fulfil. From an anonymous pamphlet,
written by one who had himself been brought up in
Owen's time at New Lanark, we get a peep behind the
scenes.^ Owen " advised that they should appoint a
committee from amongst themselves, every week, to
inspect the houses in the village and to insert in a book,
to be given for that purpose, a faithful report of the
state of each house as they might happen to find it.
This recommendation w^as upon the whole pretty cordially
acceded to by the male part of the population, but the
rage and opposition it met with from the women, I well
remember, was unbounded. They almost unanimously
resolved to meet the visitants with locked doors. They
bestowed upon them the appellation of ' Bug Hunters,'
and Mr. Owen escaped not without his share of the
general odium."
Robert Dale Owen tells us that gradually the opposi-
tion was overcome, the force of example and the kindness
and tact of Owen and his wife doing much to bring about
the desired result. Meanwhile an example of order and
cleanliness was set by the master himself. " Within the
mills everything was punctiliously kept. Whenever I
visited them with my father, I observed that he picked
^ Robert Owen at New Lanark, etc.^ by one formerly a teacher at New
Lanark. Manchester, 1839.
90 ROBERT OWEN
up the smallest flocks of cotton from the floor,
handing them to some child near by, to put into
his waste-bag.
*' ' Papa,' said I one day, ' what does it signify — such
a little speck of cotton ? '
*' * The value of the cotton,' he replied, ' is nothing,
but the example is much. It is very important that
these people should acquire strict habits of order and
economy.' " ^
One instance of Owen's benevolent disposition must
be quoted at length, for it illustrates not less the paternal
attitude which he assumed towards his people, than the
filial response which it seems to have elicited. Surely
no man ot less admirable simplicity could have
ventured to propound, or have succeeded in imposing,
a device such as that described in the following
extract : —
" But that which I found to be the most efficient
check upon inferior conduct, was the contrivance of a
silent monitor for each one employed in the establishment.
This consisted of a four-sided piece of wood, about two
inches long and one broad, each side coloured — one side
black, another blue, the third yellow, and the fourth
white, tapered at the top, and finished with wire eyes,
to hang upon a hook with either side to the front. One
of these was suspended in a conspicuous place near to
each of the persons employed, and the colour at the
front told the conduct of the individual during the
preceding day, to tour degrees of comparison. Bad,
denoted by black and No. 4, — indifferent by blue, and
No. 3, — good by yellow, and No. 2, — and excellent by
^ Threading my W ay, p. 73.
NEW LANARK 91
white, and No. i.^ Then books of character were
provided for each department, in which the name of
each one employed in it was inserted in the front of
succeeding columns, which sufficed to mark by the
number the daily conduct, day by day, for two months ;
and these books were changed six times a year, and
were preserved ; by which arrangement I had the
conduct of each registered to four degrees of comparison
during every day of the week, Sundays excepted, for
every year they remained in my employment. The
superintendent of each department had the placing daily
of these silent monitors, and the master of the mill
regulated those of the superintendents in each mill. If
any one thought that the superintendent did not do
justice, he or she had a right to complain to me, or, in
my absence, to the master of the mill, before the number
denoting the character was entered in the register. But
such complaints very rarely occurred. The act of setting
down the number in the book of character, never to
be blotted out, might be likened to the supposed re-
cording angel marking the good and bad deeds of poor
human nature." ^
Owen tells us that the plan succeeded admirably, and
that, as the years went on, black and blue gave place to
yellow and white. But probably the plan was not put
into operation until he had succeeded in gaining the
confidence of the people by other measures.
^ Joseph Lancaster, who, as a Quaker, was opposed to corporal
punishment, used leather labels, stamped with gilt letters, to indicate
various degrees of merit and demerit amongst his scholars. It is possible
that Owen may have borrowed the idea of the silent monitor from this
source (see A Comparative View of the Plans of Education of Dr. Bell
and Mr. Lancaster, by Joseph Fox, London, i8c8).
' Autobiography, Vol. L, pp. 80, 81.
92 ROBERT OWEN
At the outset Owen had resolved to take on no
more parish apprentices, but to draw the necessary supply
of child labour from the population resident in Lanark,
and it does not appear that he ever found difficulty in
procuring the services of as manv children as were
required. As we have already seen, he fixed the limit
of ao^e at ten ; below that age the children might, if
the parents chose, attend the school, but there was no
work for them in the factory. On a point of scarcely
less importance he was compelled to defer to the wishes
of his partners. Dale had worked the mills thirteen
hours, with intervals of one and a half hours for meals.
Monstrous as those hours appear to us, especially when
we remember that a large proportion of those employed
were young children, they were too merciful for the
ordinary manufacturer of that day. Owen told the
Committee of 1816 that for some time during his
management the hours of work at the New Lanark Mills
were fixed at fourteen a day (including two hours intervals
for meals). It was not until January, 18 16, that he was
enabled to reduce the hours to twelve a day, with one
and a quarter hours for meals, leaving ten and three-
quarter hours for actual work. In other ways he found
his liberty of action during these early years hampered
by his partners : they on their part seem ultimately to
have taken alarm at the magnitude of his schemes for
bettering the condition of the operatives. They presented
him with a silver salver, but hinted disapproval of the
mixture of philanthropy and business. In the result
Owen agreed to purchase the mills from them at the
price of ^^84, 000. This was in 1809. During the ten
years of the partnership, Owen reckoned that the business
NEW LANARK 93
had produced, over and above interest at the rate of
5 per cent, on the capital invested, a dividend of about
j^6o,ooo, of which sum _^7,ooo had been expended in
payment of wages for the four months when the
machinery stood idle.^
Owen now formed a new partnership to purchase
and work the mills. One of his late partners, John
Atkinson, joined the new venture. The other members
were Dennistown and Alexander Campbell, sons-in-law
of Mr. Campbell of Jura, a relative of Mrs. Owen, and
Colin Campbell, an associate of Alexander Campbell.
But the new partners proved even less amenable than
their predecessors. Owen had planned to provide a
large schoolroom, lecture hall, dining-room, and other
public institutions. The building which was to serve
these various purposes — a huge structure 145 feet long
by 45 feet wide — had already been completed, at a
cost of some ^3,000 : the fittings and furniture were,
according to Owen's plan, to cost as much again. But
his partners objected to further expenditure on projects
not directly remunerative. They objected also to his
liberal scale of wages and salaries, and generally to his
schemes of social improvement. The differences became
in the course of two or three years so acute that Owen
once more offered to buy the concern at a reasonable
valuation. On their refusal to sell, he resigned his
position as managing director. Owen then proceeded
to draw up a pamphlet stating the history of New
Lanark ; what had already been done and what he had
hoped to do for furthering the cause of education and
^ Compare Statement Regarding the New Lanark Establishment, p. 9,
with R. Owen's Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 87.
94 ROBERT OWEN
improving the position of the people employed ; and
appealinnr to benevolent and wealthy men to join with
him in purchasing the business, not merely for the
immediate good to be effected to the population actually
employed in the mills, but also that the establishment
" might be a model and example to the manufacturing
community, which without some essential change in the
formation of their characters, threatened, and now still
more threatens, to revolutionise and ruin the empire." ^
A great part of the years 1812-13 was spent in
London, partly on the search for new partners, who
should be men of like mind with himself, partly on the
business of seeing through the press the first two of
his Essays on the Formation of Character. The following
letter, which bears the postmark ist February, 18 13 — the
earliest letter of Owen's which has been preserved — refers
to his doings in London at this time, and to the WTiting
of the Essays.
"To Mrs. Owen,
" Braxfield, Lanark.
"London, 34, Fenchurch Street.
" Monday evening.
'* Mr. Clegg's letter, which I have just received, gave
me, my dearest Caroline, the greatest pleasure, as it
informed me that you, our sisters, and all our dear pets
were well and Robert getting daily better." To know
that you arc well is the greatest pleasure I have, except
to hear that you are happy, as that includes something
still more than health, and I now look with the greatest
delight to my return, which I shall expedite by every
' Statement^ p. 4.
' Robert Dale, the eldest son, had a long and serious illness this year.
From a print after a draiving by Swart, published in 1822.
ROBERT OWEN.
-^i.p :--v; \'3F-r. I
y A^•D
NEW LANARK 95
means in my power. I have been from London
since Saturday morning, part of the time with Mr.
Lancaster at Labrador House, part with Mr. and Mrs.
Tom Borradaile and the Coles, whom our dearest Jane
and Julia know, and part with the celebrated and learned
Dr. Ireland, whom none of you'I daresay know — whatever
you may do hereafter. My time is therefore as fully
occupied as ever, and I have much to do yet before I
can leave the work which I have commenced. The
first part of it, however, comes out to-morrow, and the
second which I have in hand will finish all I intend to
do this journey. And it must afterwards find its level
and accomplish its own work. I shall however leave it
in very good hands.
'' But what am I to say, my dearest Caroline, to relieve
your anxieties in the meantime, particularly about my
first appearance before the public. All that just now
occurs to me to say is that it has been written with
care and read and inspected by men of the acknowledged
and finest abilities of all parties, and approved by all.
But the second is of far more importance in some
respects. But it will not contain any doctrines which
will not be admired ^ by the leaders of all the sects and
parties in the kingdom. You need not therefore have
any fears regarding my proceedings, which will soon prove
on what foundation they proceed. I am interrupted
by Mr. and Mrs. Borradaile, and to save post must hastily
conclude. With kind love and kisses to all our dear
boys and girls and sisters, with remembrances to all the
household. Tell [word undecipherable] Mr. Lancaster
* So apparently in the original — though "admitted " would make better
sense.
96 ROBERT OWEN
spoke to mc about his visit to London, which I cannot
object to. Mr. Clegg must supply him with money
for his jourtiev if he sets out before I return home,
but I will see Mr. Lancaster before 1 can say when he
ought to set out.
'' In haste, my dearest Caroline, I must conclude, with
kindest wishes for your happiness, and that you will
soon have all your wishes fulfilled.
" With the sincerest affection,
*' Your truly attached husband,
^'R. Owen."
In the result Owen succeeded in getting promises
of the capital — about ;^ 130,000 in all — required to
purchase the New Lanark Mills. The most famous of
the new partners was Jeremy Bentham, who consented
to receive Owen in person. " After some preliminary
communication with our mutual friends James Mill and
Francis Place, his then two chief counsellors, and some
correspondence between him and myself, it was at length
arrived at that I was to come to his hermit-like retreat
at a particular hour, and that 1 was, upon entering, to
proceed upstairs, and we were to meet half-way upon the
stairs. I pursued these instructions, and he, in great
trepidation, met me, and taking my hand, while his
whole frame was agitated with the excitement, he hastily
said — * Well ! well ! It is all over. We are introduced.
Come into my study.' " ^
* Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 96. Some fifteen years later young Robert
Dale Owen was invited to Bcntham's house. The philosopher's parting
words to him were, " God bless yoti, if there be such a Being, and, at all
events, my young friend, take care of yonxsQM."— {Threading my Way,
NEW LANARK 97
Of the other partners four were members of the
Society of Friends — William Allen, John Walker, Joseph
Fox, and Joseph Forster — and one, Michael Gibbs, a
member of the Church of England, and afterwards Lord
Mayor of London. Of all the new partners William
Allen seems to have taken the most active part in the
management of the affair. The proprietor of some large
chemical works, and himself a student of science, a
Fellow of the Royal Society, and lecturer on natural
and experimental philosophy at Guy's Hospital, zealous
in good works, especially in the cause of popular education
and social reform, he was before all things a devout, if
somewhat narrow-minded Christian.^
Robert Owen's views on religious questions were at
this time not so fully developed as in later years, or
he was at less pains to promulgate them. There is no
indication in the two Essays on the Formation of Character^
pubHshed in this year (18 13), that the author rejected
all religious revelation. At all events William Allen, in
December, 1813, seems to have had no forewarning that
he was about to ally himself with one whom he would
have considered an infidel. His hesitation and timidity
as to joining the partnership appear to have proceeded
rather from the excessive scrupulousness of a devout
^ Robert Dale Owen gives an amusing illustration ol Allen's strictness.
One day the youth was dining at Allen's house in Plough Court. The
host asked the guest, "Will thee have more roast beef?" Absorbed in
conversation, young Owen declined, but later asked leave to change his
mind, only to meet with the answer, " Robert, thee has already refused."
No second supply was forthcoming {Threading ?ny Way, p. 87).
Allen at about this time was editing the Philanthropist, a monthly journal
devoted to Social Reform, and especially to Education. He was one of
the trustees of the Duke of Kent's estates, and no doubt introduced
Owen to the Prince. At a later date Allen started an Agricultural Colony
and Industrial Schools at Lindfield in Sussex.
VOL. I. 7
98 ROBERT OWEN
and conscientious Christian about to embark, on an
enterprise of a novel kind.^ On December 27, 1813,
however, the matter was finally settled between Owen
on the one hand, and Allen, Walker, and Fox, on the
other.'
Owen's late partners, Atkinson and the Campbells,
had refused to sell the business at an agreed price, and
the whole concern was therefore advertised for sale
by " public roup." From the advertisement, which
appeared in the Glasgow Herald of December 24, 18 13,
we learn that the establishment consisted of four cotton-
mills, three of seven and one of six storeys, a long
building 454 ft. x 20, used as a storeroom ; a machine
shop ; a brass and iron foundry ; and another building
which is thus described :
" There is also another building of the following
dimensions, at present unoccupied, 145 ft. X 45 ft.
over the walls, containing a cellar 140 ft. long x 19
ft. broad, and 9 ft. high ; first floor^ above the cellars,
one room 140 X 40 X 11.6 high; second floor, 140
X 40 X 21 high. This building has been planned
to admit of an extensive store cellar, a public kitchen,
eating and exercise room, a school, lecture room, and
Church. All of which, it is supposed, may be fitted
up in a very compleat manner for a sum not exceeding
^2,500, and this arrangement may be formed so as to
' See Life of William Allen (1846), Vol. I., p. 180, — "much exercised
in mind about Now Lanark," and again, " I had much conflict of mind
on account of the responsibihty involved in it. I trust, however, I had
a degree of evidence that it was right."
' Bentham, apparently, came in after the purchase had actually been
completed (see letter dated January 8, 1814, from Allen to Owen, quoted
in New Existence, Tart V., p. Ixvi.).
NEW LANARK 99
create permanent and substantial benefits to the in-
habitants of the village, and to the proprietors of the
Mills."
The 31st December, 18 13, four days after Owen's
agreement with his new partners, was fixed on as the
date for the sale by auction. In the interval the old
partners had, according to Owen, spread rumours to
depreciate the value of the property, hoping to be enabled
to buy it in at much less than its real value, and
supposing that Owen, of whose recent proceedings they
appear to have been in ignorance, would be unable in
any event to find the purchase-money. The property
was put up at ^60,000, Owen having arranged with
his new friends not to let it go under ^120,000. The
price gradually mounted up, the old partners advancing
by bids of ^1,000 and Owen's solicitor capping each bid
with an advance of ;^ioo. The persistence of Owen's
representative seems to have disconcerted his opponents,
for their final bid was ^114,000, and the property was
in the event knocked down to Owen at ^114,100.^
Owen dispatched a mounted messenger to carry the
news to his wife at New Lanark, and a few days later, as
soon as the necessary business formalities had been
completed, followed himself with two of his new partners,
Joseph Fox and Michael Gibbs.^ The following extract
^ Owen tells us ^that his late partners had made so sure of the victory
.that they had invited their friends to a dinner to celebrate it. At the
dinner one of the guests, Colonel Hunter, knowing that his hosts had for
weeks past been running down the value of the property, ironically
proposed the toast of "Success to those who had sold for ^114,100 a
property which they had valued at ^40,000 only" {Autobiography,
Vol. I., p. 92).
' See extracts from their letters, alluding to their reception at New
Lanark, published in New Existence, Part. V., p. Ixvii.
793317 A
loo ROBERT OWEN
from a letter published in the Glasgow Herald of
January lo, 1814, describes the reception with which
they met. The letter is dated Lanark, January 5, 18 14.
" There were great rejoicings here yesterday on
account of Mr. Owen's return, after his purchase of
New Lanark. The Society of Free Masons at this
place, with colours flying and a band of music, ac-
companied by almost the whole of the inhabitants, met
Mr. Owen, immediately before his entrance into the
burgh of Lanark, and hailed him with the loudest
acclamations of joy ; his people took the horses from
his carriage and, a flag being placed in front, drew him
and his friends along, amid the plaudits of the sur-
rounding multitudes, until they reached Braxfield, where
his Lady and two of her sisters being prevailed upon
to enter the carriage, which was then uncovered, the
people with the most rapturous exultation proceeded to
draw them through all the streets of New Lanark, where
all were eager to testify their joy at his return. On being
set down at his own house, Mr. Owen, in a very
appropriate speech, expressed his (^acknowledgements to
his people for the warmth of their attachment, when
the air was again rent with the most enthusiastic bursts
of applause. Mr. Owen is so justly beloved by all the
inhabitants employed at New Lanark, and by people
of all ranks in the neighbourhood, that a general happi-
ness has been felt since the news arrived of his continuing
a proprietor of the mills. The houses were all illuminated
at New Lanark on Friday ^ night when the news came,
and all has been jubilee and animation with them ever
since."
' December 31, 1813.
NEW LANARK loi
It was not only Owen's own workpeople who took
part in this demonstration : the inhabitants of the town
of Old Lanark insisted on testifying their respect and
admiration for their neighbour by joining the crowd and
helping to draw the carriage through the streets. His
Quaker friends, Owen tells us, were much alarmed at
the first moment when they saw the multitude running
towards them on their nearing the town of Lanark, and
afterwards proportionately pleased with the affection
and gratitude manifested by the people.^ Owen himself,
we are told, warmly expostulated with those who pro-
posed to harness themselves to his carriage, protesting
that the working classes had already too long been treated
like the brutes.^
* Autobiography^ Vol. I., p. 97.
' Robert Owen at New Lanark ^ p. 16.
CHAPTER VI
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY
THE name of Robert Owen is little known to the
present generation as an educational reformer.
We find scant mention of him in Encyclopaedia articles
on Education or in histories of pedagogy. Yet whether
we look at the soundness and novelty of his theories,
the magnitude of the results actually achieved, or the
measure of his reputation and influence amongst his con-
temporaries, we are justified in awarding him a high place
amongst the pioneers of popular education. There are
two main causes for the undeserved oblivion which has
fallen on this, not the least fruitful and significant part
of his life's work. In the first place, Owen published
no formal treatise on pedagogy, unless indeed his Essays
on the Fonnatioji of Character may be classed in that
category ; he did not even find time to write a systematic
account of the scheme of education actually pursued in
the New Lanark schools, nor did any of his con-
temporaries, with one exception, think it worth while
to supply the omission. The only comprehensive ac-
count which we possess is to be found in a small book
written by his son, Robert Dale Owen, in 1824, which
seems to have attracted, in this country at any rate, less
notice than it deserved.
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 103
But the main cause for the rapid passing into oblivion
of Owen's work in this direction is, no doubt, to be
found in his own later history. It was the ambiguous
reputation of Owen the Socialist, Owen the Infidel, and
Owen the Spiritualist which eclipsed the fime of Owen
the founder of Infant-schools, and the pioneer in this
country of rational education.
The education of the children of the poor was
possibly more neglected in England at the beginning
of the last century than in any other civilised country.
The piety of former generations had endowed numerous
Grammar Schools for giving a liberal education to the
children of the well-to-do. Throughout the eighteenth
century a large number of charity schools had been
founded to teach the children of the poor to read and
write. But even the beggarly elements offered by these
charity schools were available only for a few. The
buildings could accommodate but a fraction of those who
needed their help. There was no one to make the
teaching offered attractive, or in default of such attraction
to compel the children to come. Moreover the parents
themselves were in many cases unwilling or unable to fore-
go their children's earnings. A large proportion therefore
of the children of this country could neither read nor
write. So late as 18 16 the Committee on the Education
of the Lower Orders in the Metropolis, presided over
-by Henry Brougham, concluded *' that a very large
number of children are wholly without the means of
instruction, although their parents appear to be generally
very desirous of obtaining that advantage for them."
Owen's partner William Allen, one of the witnesses
before the Committee, estimated the number of children
I04 ROBERT OWEN
in London alone at that date who were wholly without
education at over 100,000. The Lancastrian Association
had organised an actual census in two districts of London.
In the Covent Garden division they found that out of
4,790 children, 2,748 were wholly uneducated. The
result of a similar census in Spitalfields showed that out
of 5,953 children, there were 2,565 between six and
fourteen years of age without any education.^ These
figures applied to London alone. There was no reason
to suppose that things were better in the rest of
England ; and in the manufacturing districts, where,
as already shown, the whole energies of the children
were devoted from an early age to winning their bread,
the amount of education must have been almost in-
finitesimal.
The Committee of 1 8 1 6 was appointed as the result
of a long period of popular ferment on this question
of education. From the beginning of the nineteenth
century both parties in the State had been in strenuous
rivalry to found schools in the interest of their own
views and so capture the growing generation. The
Liberals and Nonconformists were first in the field. A
young Quaker named Lancaster, filled with zeal for
the education of the people, had begun in 1798 to teach
some poor children near his father's home in Southwark.
As his pupils grew in numbers he acted upon a plan
already formulated by Dr. Bell, an army chaplain at
Madras, and set his pupils to teach each other. By
this means he soon gathered nearly a thousand pupils
at his school. The problem of popular education at an
inexpensive rate seemed already solved. I'he Noncon-
' Report, pp. 36, 189.
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY
105
formists and the reforming party generally took up
Lancaster's scheme with enthusiasm, and the Royal
Lancastrian Association, afterwards known as the British
and Foreign Schools Society, was founded.
Amongst the most influential of Lancaster's early
patrons were some wealthy members of the Society of
Friends, under whose guidance the Bible was regularly
read and studied in the schools. But the Church party,
not satisfied with this undenominational instruction,
supported Dr. Bell, the original inventor of the moni-
torial system, and founded in opposition *' The National
Society for the Education of the Poor in the Principles
of the Established Church." Both parties collected
funds and established schools through the country. It
does not appear, however, that either Bell or Lancaster
aimed at any radical reform, beyond that already
mentioned for cheapening the machinery of popular
education. Reading, writing, and arithmetic still formed
the staple of the course, and these elements were still
taught by crude mechanical methods which exercised
the memory at the expense of the judgment and reasoning
powers.
The main object aimed at by both reformers was
necessarily economy. It was economy which sug-
gested to Bell setting the elder children to teach the
younger, and the use of sand instead of writing-paper.
Lancaster adopted both devices, but at a later date
substituted slates for sand. Both systems made large
use of a blackboard for giving instruction. Reading,
writing and arithmetic lessons seem commonly to have
been given viva voce^ the pupil writing the problem
down on the slate from dictation, or copying it from the
io6 ROBERT OWEN
blackboard — the expense of books for each scholar was
thus saved.
Lancaster is credited with the invention of syllabic
spelling and some minor reforms. But both his con-
tributions and those of Dr. Bell to the art of education
seem to have been for the most part of a mechanical
kind.^
It should be added that the plan, essential to
the proper carrying out of the monitorial scheme,
of having a large number of classes carried on simul-
taneously under the director's eye in one large room,
though no doubt economical, necessarily tended to impair
efficiency. Owen, who originally planned the arrange-
ment of his own schools at New Lanark somewhat on
this model, had come later to regret his action ; for,
as his son points out, experience soon showed that it
was difficult to grain and fix the attention of the children
when a number of separate centres of instruction were
carrying on business simultaneously in an immense room
ninety feet by forty.
Owen had at an early period given generous assistance
to both Lancaster and Bell. To the first he had sent
subscriptions amounting in all to a thousand pounds.
Later, when the Church party took up Dr. Bell, he had
offered them a similar sum if they would open their
schools without distinction of creed, and £soo if they
* See A Comparative View of the Plans of Education of Dr. Bell and
Mr. Lancaster, by Joseph Vox, 1808; and Address in Recommendation of
the Madras System of Education, by Rev. N. J. Hollingsworth, London,
1812. William Allen, before Brougham's Committee, estimated the cost
of conducting a school of 1,000 children on the Lancastrian plan at only
4^-. 6^/. a head. He mentions also that both Bell and Lancaster made one
book serve for the whole school {Report, p. 1 15).
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 107
refused to accept the condition. After some debate,
as Owen tells us, the smaller sum was accepted.^
In 1 8 12 Lancaster came to Glasgow and Owen took
the chair at a public dinner given in his honour. In
a brief speech he maintained the thesis that education,
'* so far at least as depends upon our operations, is the
primary source of all the good and evil, misery and
happiness, which exist in the world." For consider,
said he, the differences, bodily and mental, which are
found between different races of mankind, and different
individuals in the same race. " From whence do these
general bodily and mental differences proceed ? Are
they inherent in our nature, or do they arise from the
respective soils on which we are born ^ Evidently from
neither. They are wholly and solely the effects of that
education which I have described. Man becomes a wild
ferocious savage, a cannibal, or a highly civilised and
benevolent being, according to the circumstances in
which he may be placed from his birth."
*' Let us suppose," he proceeded, ^' an exchange of any
given number of children to be made at their birth
between the Society of Friends, of which our worthy
guest, Joseph Lancaster, is a member, and the loose
fraternity which inhabit St. Giles's in London ; the children
of the former would grow up like the members of the
latter, prepared for every degree of crime, while those
of the latter would become the same temperate good
moral characters as the former." ^ How momentous in
its consequences for good or evil, he concluded, is the
work of educating the youth of the nation.
The passage contains two assumptions, each of which
* Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 84 ; HoUingsworth, op. cit.
io8 ROBERT OWEN
would in modern times be held as highly controvertible
— that the differences between man and man are due
to differences in the environment, and that the conditions
of the environment are directly under human control.
These assumptions, expressed or understood, informed,
it need scarcely be pointed out, the advanced political
thinking of the last half, at least, of the eighteenth
century. They are implied in the Contra t Social ; they
justified the paper constitution of the Abbe Sieyes ;
they form the basis of the argument in Tom Paine's
Rights of Man and in Godwin's Political Justice ; they
are embodied in the American Declaration of Indepen-
dence ; nay, they are the unwritten postulates on which
Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity ultimately rest. They
found qualified expression in the writings even of so
sober and representative a thinker as Adam Smith :
" The difference of natural talents in different men is in
reality much less than we are aware of: and the very
different genius which appears to distinguish men of
different professions when grown up to maturity, is not,
upon many occasions, so much the cause as the effect
of the division of labour. The difference between the
most dissimilar characters, between a philosopher and a
common street porter, for example, seems to arise, not
so much from nature as from habit, custom and educa-
tion. When they came into the world, and for the
first six or eight years of their existence, they were very
much alike, and neither their parents nor their playfellows
could perceive any remarkable difference. About that
age or soon after, they come to be employed in very
different occupations. The difference of talents comes
then to be taken notice of, and widens by degrees, till
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 109
at last the vanity of the philosopher is willing to
acknowledge scarce any resemblance." ^
These conceptions, then, were more or less taken for
granted in much of the literature of the closing decade
of the eighteenth century, and Owen drank them in at
the most impressionable period of his intellectual life, the
years between 18 and 28, which he spent in Manchester.
That he read and studied at all systematically is im-
probable. We have seen that his school education ceased
before he was ten years of age. But by his own account
he was an eager reader of books both before and after
that date. He tells us that his hours of leisure at
Stamford were mostly devoted to reading. When he
came to Manchester his leisure was no doubt more
scanty ; ^ and his writings show little trace of wide,
much less of systematic reading.
His son's account fully accords with this view :
*' When I first remember him, he read a great deal,
but it was chiefly one or two London dailies, with other
periodicals as they came out. He was not, in any sense
of the word, a student ; one who made his own way
in life, unaided by a single dollar from the age of ten,
could not well be. I never found in his extensive
library a book with a marginal note, or even a pencil
mark of his, on a single page. He usually glanced over
books without mastering them ; often dismissing them
-with some such curt remark as that ' the radical errors
shared by all men made books of little value.' Except
statistical works, of which his favourite was Colquhoun's
* Resources of the British Empire,' I never remember
* Wealth of Nations, Book. I., Chap, iv,
' But see above, Chap, iii., p. 55.
no ROBERT OWEN
to have seen him occupied in taking notes from any-
book: whatever.
'^ In this way he worked out his problems for
human improvement to great disadvantage, missing a
thousand things that great minds had thought and
said before his time, and often mistaking ideas that
were truly his own, for novelties that no human being
had heretofore given to the world." ^
Owen thus got his ideas, as a self-educated man,
with little leisure for study, must do, from few, and
those mostly secondhand, sources. And he has the
characteristic defects of the self-educated thinker. His
conceptions are presented with a crudity and sharpness
of definition impossible for one who had continually
supplemented his own scanty store of observations and
reflections out of the accumulated riches of the past.
His ideas were no doubt already belated even at
the time when he wrote. In his exaggeration of the
importance of circumstances — that is, post-natal circum-
stances— in forming character, he is guided by the bias
of the eighteenth century thinkers. But the reaction
against the pre-Revolutionary philosophy had set in
long before 1813 : and the great conception of evolution
was even then dawning upon the world. Charles
Darwin, it is appropriate to remember, was born just
four years before the publication of the first Essay on
the Formation of Character^ BuftxDn, Goethe, Erasmus
Darwin had already written, and Lamarck was at the
time struggling with his speculations on the origin of
species. It is certain, apart from these great names,
that the plain facts of inheritance, though not, of course,
" Threading my Way, p. 67.
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY iii
bulking so largely as in modern thought, were even
then recognised as counting for much more than Owen
apparently had ever imagined. It is not that he
dehberately sets facts of this kind on one side, but
that he does not apparently recognise their bearing on
his argument. His mind was dominated by the one
idea, and held it in naked simplicity, which admitted
neither deduction nor qualification.
Again, it is to be remarked that his first years at
New Lanark shut him off to a great extent from such
intercourse with educated men as he had enjoyed at
Manchester ; and the extraordinary success of his efforts
for the regeneration of the miniature society over
which he exercised lordship confirmed and hardened
his views that Man was the creature of circumstance,
and the reconstruction of the world, when this novel
truth was firmly grasped, a mere question of the adapta-
tion of means to ends. So that he puts forward his
theories with the uncompromising directness of a child,
and with more than a child's self-confidence.
Some time in 1812 Owen had published, anony-
mously, the pamphlet already referred to — A Statement
regarding the New Lanark Establishment. During the
same year he wrote his first " Essay on the Principle of
the Formation of Human Character," and pubHshed
it early in 18 13 under the title of A New View of Society,
The second Essay appeared at the end of the same
year. Both were originally published anonymously.
The third and fourth Essays, though written about the
same time and circulated amongst a large number of
persons eminent in the social and political world, were
not published until July, 1816.
112 ROBERT OWEN
The key-note of the Essays is the proposition that
*' Any general character, from the best to the worsts from the
most ignorant to the most enlightened, may be given to any
community, even to the world at large, by the application
of proper means ; which means are to a great extent at
the command and under the control of those who have
influence in the affairs of menT ^ Thus by suitable
training any standard of conduct and any belief, however
elevating on the one hand, or absurd and injurious on
the other, can be impressed upon a human being.
*' Children are without exception passive and wonderfully
contrived compounds," which can be moulded into any
form at the pleasure of those who have control over
them in the plastic stages of infancy and childhood. They
are thus liable to be impressed, and as history shows us,
always have received the impression of the habits, senti-
ments, and beliefs held by their parents and guardians,
the impression being modified only by the circumstances
in which they are placed and, to some small extent, by
the particular organisation of each individual. From
this it follows that no person is responsible for his own
character and impulses, though the whole system of
society and the whole doctrine of religion have assumed
the contrary. No human being is properly the subject
of praise or blame, still less of reward or punishment.
Hence we may perceive the absurdity and glaring in-
justice of our penal laws : " How much longer shall we
continue to allow generation after generation to be taught
crime from their infancy, and, when so taught, hunt
' Autobiography, Vol I., p. 266. The Essajs in their original form
being now difficult to obtain, the references given in the present chapter
are to the reprint of them included in the Appendix to the tirst volume
of the Autobiography.
^^3iii
Tmo woodcuts from the 1834 reprint of Owen's Essays on the
FormaUon of the Human Character, illustrating the effect ot
bad and good circumstances respectively.
THE NEW YOfU:
roBLICIIBnARY
Ar^lO«, LENOX AND
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 113
them like beasts of the forest, until they are entangled
beyond escape in the toils and nets of the law ? when,
if the circumstances of those poor unpitied sufferers had
been reversed with those who are even surrounded with
the pomp and dignity of justice, these latter would have
been at the bar of the culprit, and the former would
have been in the judgment seat." ^
On the other hand, " the child who from infancy
has been rationally instructed in these principles, will
readily discover and trace whence the opinions and habits
of his associates have arisen, and why they possess them.
At the same age he will have acquired reason sufficient
to exhibit to him forcibly the irrationality of being angry
with an individual for possessing qualities which, as a
passive being during the formation of those qualities, he
had not the means of preventing." - He will thus be
moved to pity, not to anger, for those less fortunate
in their upbringing than himself A child so edu-
cated will be filled with a spirit of universal tolerance
and good will ; he will constantly desire to do
good to all men, even to those who hold themselves
his enemies. " Thus shortly^ directly^ and certainly
may mankind be taught the essence, and to attain
the ultimate object, of all former moral and religious
instruction." ^
To Owen it seemed that these principles and their
- corollaries, when thus clearly stated, were almost self-
evident. Nevertheless he appeals for corroborative
evidence to the past history of every nation, and in
particular relates in some detail the result of his own
1 Autobiography, Vol. I., pp. 274, 275.
' Ibid., p. 273. 3 itid., p. 273.
VOL. I. 8
114 ROBERT OWEN
experiment at putting these principles into practice at
New Lanark.
In the preface to the third Essay he makes an earnest
appeal to manufacturers and other employers of labour,
in their own interests no less than those of the nation
at large, to follow his example. He points out that
the difference between profit and loss in running a
manufactory is commonly held to depend largely on
the attention bestowed on the machinery and the proper
condition of the plant : " If then," he continues, " due
care as to the state of your inanimate machines can
produce such beneficial results, what may not be ex-
pected if you devote equal attention to your vital
machines, which are much more wonderfully con-
structed ?
*' When you shall acquire a right knowledge of
these, of their curious mechanism, of their self-adjusting
powers ; when the proper main-spring shall be applied
to their varied movements, — you will become conscious
of their real value, and you will readily be induced to
turn your thoughts more frequently from your inanimate
to your living machines ; you will discover that the
latter may be easily trained and directed to procure a
large increase of pecuniary gain, while you may also
derive from them high and substantial gratification.
" Will you then continue to expend large sums of
money to procure the best devised mechanism of wood,
brass, or iron ; to retain it in perfect repair ; to provide
the best substance for the prevention of unnecessary
friction, and to save it from falling into premature
decay ? Will you also devote years of intense applica-
tion to understand the connection of the various parts
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 115
of these lifeless machines, to improve their effective
powers, and to calculate with mathematical precision all
their minute and combined movements ? And when in
these transactions you estimate time by minutes, and
the money expended for the chance of increased gain
by fractions, will you not afford some of your attention
to consider whether a portion of your time and capital
would not be more advantageously applied to improve
your living machines ? From experience which cannot
deceive me, I venture to assure you, that your time
and money so applied, if directed by a true knowledge
of the subject, would return you, not five, ten, or
fifteen per cent, for your capital so expended, but often
fifty, and in many cases a hundred per cent." ^
But it is to Governments rather than to individuals
that Owen prefers to make his appeal. " On the ex-
perience of a life devoted to the subject, I hesitate not
to say, that the members of any community may by
degrees be trained to live without idleness^ without poverty ^
without crime ^ and without -punishment ; for each of these
is the effect of error in the various systems prevalent
throughout the world. They are all necessary consequences
of ignorance.'' "
That ignorance removed, nothing, he proclaimed,
forbids the immediate putting into effect of the principles
here first set forth in their entirety to the world — *' Shall
yet another year pass in which crime shall be forced on
the infant, who in ten, twenty, or thirty years hence
shall suffer DEATH for being taught that crime } Surely
it is impossible." ^ If such delay were permitted, it is
^ Autobiography^ Vol. I., pp. 260, 261.
2 Ibid., p 285, 3 ii^id^^ p, 286.
ii6 ROBERT OWEN
the makers of the law, and others in high places who
ouc[ht to suffer the penalty of the misdeed, rather than
the untrained or mistrained culprit.
In the fourth Essay, the sub-title of which runs,
'^ The Principles of the Former Essays applied to
Government," he indicates the measures which should
be adopted to reconstruct human society on the basis of
the New Views. The first step towards the introduction
of the New System is the establishment of a national
scheme of Education. That education must be universal;
no child in the whole Empire should be excluded from
its benefits. It should be unsectarian ; though Owen
would welcome the co-operation of the Church, and held
indeed that such co-operation was essential to the smooth
working of the scheme, he deprecated the teaching of
theological dogmas. Lastly, the national education must
be a real education, and not merely the teaching by rote
of the beggarly elements. He briefly reviews the systems
of education then on trial in the country — those of Bell,
Lancaster, and Whitbread — and shows how far they fall
short of the standard required.
" It must be evident to common observers, that
children may be taught, by either Dr. Bell's or Mr.
Lancaster's system, to read, write, account, and sew, and
yet acquire the worst habits, and have their minds
rendered irrational for life.
" Reading and writing are merely instruments by
which knowledge, either true or false, may be imparted ;
and, when given to children, are of little comparative
value, unless they are also taught how to make a proper
use of them. . ." (p. 318). "Enter any of the schools
denominated National, and request the master to show
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 117
the acquirements of the children. These are called out,
and he asks them theological questions to which men
of the most profound erudition cannot make a rational
reply ; the children, however, readily answer as they
had been previously instructed ; for memory, in this
mockery of learning, is all that is required.
**Thus the child whose natural faculty of comparing
ideas, or whose rational powers, shall be the soonest
destroyed, if, at the same time, he possess a memory
to retain incongruities without connexion, will become
what is termed the first scholar in the class ; and three-
fourths of the time which ought to be devoted to the
acquirement of useful instruction, will be really occupied
in destroying the mental powers of the children "
(P- 319)-
But the remodelling of our institutions need not
wait until the education of the rising generation on
rational principles shall have been completed. There is
much that an enlightened Government can do at once
to improve the circumstances which hinder and oppress
the men and women whose time for education is un-
happily almost over. First a Labour Bureau should be
established " for the purpose of obtaining regular and
accurate information relative to the value of and demand
for labour over the United Kingdoms" (p. 325) ; and
" it ought to be a primary duty of any Government that
-sincerely interests itself in the well-being of its subjects,
to provide perpetual employment of real national utility,
in which all who apply may be immediately occupied "
(p. 329). But Owen expressly disclaims interference
with private enterprise : his Labour Bureau is to provide
employment only for those otherwise unemployed. Such
ii8 ROBERT OWEN
employment he suggests will best be found in the
making and repairing of the public highways ; for, he
points out, it would probably be true national economy
to keep the roads in a much higher state of repair
than had been the case up to that time. Should this
source of employment prove insufficient, he suggests
that the unemployed might be set to work to construct
canals, harbours and docks, and even to build ships
(P- 3^9)-
These two, National Education and National Employ-
ment, are the principal and most urgent measures
necessary to the policy. But amongst minor reforms
Owen indicates the abolition of State Lotteries ; the
regulation of the drink traffic in the interests of the
Nation ; the reform and ultimate supersession of the
Poor Laws. Lastly, the Church must be purged. The
theological dogmas which " constitute its weakness and
create its danger" must be "withdrawn"; all tests
must be abolished, and all men invited again within the
fold, so as to constitute once more a truly National
Church. " For the first grand step towards effecting
any substantial improvement in these realms, without
injury to any part of the community, is to make it the
clear and decided interest of the Church to co-operate
cordially in all the projected ameliorations. Once found
a National Church on the true, unlimited, and genuine
principles of universal charity, and all the members of the
State will soon improve in every truly valuable quality " ^
(P- 322).
' Arnold Toyiibee held somewhat similar ideas on the need for
making the Church truly national by abolishing all doctrinal tests, and
securing the co-operation of clergy and laity. Sre the memoir prefixed
to tlie Lectures on the Industrial Kevolutiun, 1884.
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 119
In concluding, Owen indicates that there is yet one
more instalment of the truth to be revealed when the
time is ripe. " All that is now requisite, previous to
withdrawing the last mental bandage by which hitherto
the human race has been kept in darkness and misery,
is by calm and patient reasoning to tranquillise the public
mind, and thus prevent the evil effects which might
otherwise arise from the too sudden prospect of freely
enjoying rational liberty of mind " (p. 331).
In these words no doubt Owen foreshadowed his
famous denunciation of all the religions of the world, which
took place at the *' London Tavern" in August, 181 7.
Those who are familiar with the Political Justice
will recognise a striking similarity, extending in some
cases to the actual phrases employed, between Godwin's
philosophical conceptions and those expounded by Owen
twenty years later. Godwin had taught that *' the
characters of men originate in their external circum-
stances " ; that " children are a sort of raw material
put into our hands," to be moulded according to our
wishes ; ^ that, unlike the animals, in whose idiosyncrasies
inheritance plays a large part, " the original differences
ofmanandman . . . may be said to be almost nothing ;" ^
" there is for the most part no essential difference be-
tween the child of the lord and of the porter " : ^ that
the differences found to exist in after life are due partly
to the accident of the environment, partly to formal
education, partly to the educative influence of the political
and social system ; that man's character and destiny are
therefore largely determined by causes directly under
^ Political Justice y edition of 1798, Vol. I,, p. 47.
2 Ibid., p. 43. 3 Ibid., p. 37.
120 ROBERT OWEN
human control. Again, Godwin ascribes all error to
ignorance. '^ Remove the causes of this ignorance . . .
and the effects will cease. Show me in the clearest and
most unambiguous manner that a certain mode of
procedure is most reasonable in itself or most conducive
to my interests, and I shall infallibly pursue that mode." ^
Again, Godwin had taught that " the terms guilt, crime,
desert and accountableness, in the absolute and general
sense in which they have sometimes been applied,
have no place. ... So far as praise implies that the
man could have abstained from the virtuous action I
applaud, it belongs only to the delusive system of
liberty."^ It then *Wicious propensities " have for the
most part been implanted in human beings by " ill-con-
stituted Governments," it would be absurd to hold the
individuals responsible ; *' punishment can at no time
make part of any political system that is built upon the
principles of reason," and can at most be admitted as a
measure of temporary expediency.^
The Political Justice first appeared in 1793, towards
the beginning of Owen's residence in Manchester. The
book can hardly have escaped his notice ; and, though
I cannot find that he ever mentions it by name, it
seems tolerably certain that his philosophical views were
profoundly influenced by its teachings. Doubtless in
the twenty years which elapsed before the appearance
of the Essays on the Formation of Character^ Owen had so
made these views his own by reflection and observation that
he had forgotten whence his inspiration may have been
derived. But if, as seems probable, he owed much to
' Political Justice, edition of 1798, Vol. I., p. 45. » Ibid., pp. 394, 395.
' Ibid., Vol. 11., pp. 361-63.
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 121
Godwin, he was at any rate no servile follower of that
curiously passionless thinker. On the constructive
side of his speculations Owen parted company with
his master. Godwin would have had no Government
interference, no State employment of labour, no national
system even of education : and he would assuredly
have shuddered at the idea of co-operation with the
Church.
But there are indications that another influence than
Godwin's was working upon Owen at the time of the
writing of the Essays. Owen's subsequent publications
are commonly characterised by tediousness and monotony.
Mr. Holyoake has somewhere illustrated this later style
by a felicitous simile. Alluding to the well-known
saying that Montaigne's sentences were so alive that
if pricked they would bleed, he remarks that if you
tried to prick one of Owen's utterances on the '* System "
you would infallibly lose your needle in the cotton-
wool. But in these earliest Essays we find a certain
crispness and clearness of style. The fourth Essay in
particular gives us much more than this. Up to this
point Owen had dealt mainly with the exposition of the
general principles on which his " System " is based, and
with the account of his work at New Lanark. But in
the last Essay he presents us with a comprehensive and
clearly reasoned scheme of social reconstruction. The
-argument is marked by studied moderation of tone,
sobriety of judgment, and considerable insight into
pohtical possibilities. The whole composition reaches
a higher level than any of Owen's other utterances.
The explanation is probably to be found in a visit which
Owen, prior to the publication of the Essays, paid to
122 ROBERT OWEN
Francis Place, the radical tailor of Charing Cross.
Owen sought Place's aid in correcting the MS., and
from internal evidence it is probable that Place's hand
helped to guide the pen, at any rate in the writing of
this final Essay. ^
Place, writing in 1836, gives a shrewd and not
unkindly account of his visitor. Owen " introduced
himself to me, and I found him a man of kind manners
and good intentions, of an imperturbable temper, and
an enthusiastic desire to promote the happiness of man-
kind. A few interviews made us friends. . . He told
me he possessed the means, and was resolved to produce
a great change in the manners and habits of the whole
of the people, from the most exalted to the most de-
pressed. He found all our institutions at variance with
the welfare and happiness of the people, and had dis-
covered the true means of correcting all those errors
which prevented their having the fullest enjoyment
possible, and consequently of being wise and happy.
His project was simple, easy of adoption, and so plainly
efficacious that it must be embraced by every thinking
man the moment he was made to understand it. He
produced a manuscript, which he requested me to read
and correct for him. I went through it carefully, and
it was afterwards printed. . . . Mr. Owen then was,
and is still, persuaded that he was the first who had
ever observed that man was the creature of circumstances.
On this supposed discovery he founded his system.
Never having read a metaphysical book, nor held a
metaphysical conversation, nor having ever heard of the
* James iMill is said also to have assisted in the revision of the MSS.
(see Holyoake's History 0/ Cu-opv ration (First edition), Vol. 1., p. 57).
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 123
disputes respecting free-will and necessity, he had no
clear conception of his subject and his views were
obscure. Yet he had all along been preaching and
publishing and projecting and predicting in the fullest
conviction that he could command circumstances or create
them, and place man above their control when necessary.
He never was able to explain these absurd notions, and
therefore always required assent to them, telling those
who were not willing to take his words on trust that
it was their ignorance which prevented them from
assenting to these self-evident propositions."^
We cannot but recognise the essential justice and
sanity, within its limits, of Place's criticism, even whilst
we feel that it fails to mete out full justice to Owen's
character, and to recognise one supreme quality in which
the critic, more nearly perhaps than any other man
then living, resembled the man upon whom he passed
judgment. Born in the same year, trained in the same
stern school — though Owen's education there lacked the
completeness which years of adversity had given to
Place's character — inheritors, even though one of them
never realised his debt, of the same great traditions,
political, religious, and philosophic, Francis Place and
Robert Owen alike excelled by reason of their untiring
faith in the possibilities of human progress. This faith
was the motive-power of both lives until the end. But
m Place it was guided and subordinated by an intellect
of rare quality, which was quick to see and resolute
to use the small occasions which presented themselves
from day to day for building up the gradual edifice of
' From the Place MSS. in the British Museum, 27, 791 (264-68),
quoted in the Life of Francis Place, by Graham Wallas, pp. 63, 64.
124 ROBERT OWEN
national treedom. With Owen that faith burned crenerous
and uncontrollable as the sun, and like the sun, most
ot its light and heat might seem to have run to waste.
If the realised achievements of the one man are weighed
against those of the other, the higher rank would perhaps
be assigned to Francis Place. But perhaps the other's
claim to our remembrance lies less in the things which
he did — substantial though his achievements were — than in
the hopes which he inspired, the faith which his example
kept alive. For the sun of that faith was never shorn
of a single ray, nor suffered even a momentary eclipse.
When he published his New View of Society^ he
looked for the regeneration of the world to begin on
the morrow : throughout his long life that high vision,
ever receding as he advanced, was still before his eyes :
and he died at the age of eighty-seven happy in the
belief that the millennium was even then knocking at
the door.
The publication of the first two Essays, together with
the growing fame of his work at New Lanark, brought
Owen's name prominently before the public, and was
the means of introducing him to many of the leading
men of the day. He had an interview with Lord
Liverpool, the Prime Minister, who introduced him to
Lady Liverpool, that she might express to Owen her
warm approval of the Essays. Lord Sidmouth, then
Home Secretary, not content with expressing his own
sympathy, undertook to circulate the privately printed
edition containing the two later Essays amongst the
Governments and learned bodies of Europe and America.
The Archbishop of Canterbury (Sutton) invited him
to Lambeth that Owen miirht read to him the two
A NEW VIEW OF SOCIETY 125
later Essays whilst still in MS., and afterwards, Owen
tells us, expressed a desire to correspond with their author,
that he might hear more of the subject. Amongst his
other acquaintances of this time were the Archbishop
of Armagh, several bishops, Clarkson, WiJberforce,
Zachary Macaulay, Sir Thomas Bernard and other
philanthropists, Malthus, James Mill, Ricardo, Sir James
Mackintosh, Colonel Torrens, Place, and Godwin. A
copy of the Essays even reached Napoleon in his retire-
ment at Elba, and Owen expresses his belief that the
destinies of Europe might have been changed if the Allied
Sovereigns had allowed the Exile to return peaceably
to his throne, and thence carry into effect the good
resolutions with which the New View of Society had
inspired him.
Owen's account of all these interviews and transactions
was written in extreme old age, and details with the
na'ive vanity of second childhood the gracious speeches
and compliments made to him by these eminent person-
ages. It is difficult to take his account of the matter
quite seriously, or to suppose that either the Archbishop
or the Home Secretary set so high a value on these
revelations and proposals for social reconstruction as
Owen would have us believe. But apart altogether from
natural courtesy, it is probable that Owen's unaffected
sincerity, the goodwill to all mankind which radiated from
. him, and the knowledge of the great things which he
had already done at New Lanark, drew men towards
him, and made them welcome one who must have proved
merely a colossal bore if he had not been, as Leslie
Stephen has finely said, of the very salt of the earth.
CHAPTER VII
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS
FROM what has been said in the last chapter it
will appear that it would be unprofitable to enquire
too closely how far originality can be claimed for Owen's
system of education. Ultimately, no doubt, like all
other educational reformers since the French Revolution,
he derived his inspiration from Rousseau, or from the
movement of thought of which Rousseau is the most
conspicuous embodiment. The general similarity of his
ideas with those of Rousseau and of Rousseau's most
prominent disciple, Pestalozzi, leave no room for doubt
on this point. But the debt on Owen's part was probably
unrecognised. There is no allusion to Rousseau in
any of his writings ; he no doubt drank in the Genevan
prophet's ideas at second-hand, and was ignorant even
at the time of their source. Of Pestalozzi he does not
seem to have heard until he went, in 1818, to the
Continent in company with Professor Pictet, and there
visited the schools of Oberlin at Fribourg, of Fellenbcrg
at Hofwyl, and of Pestalozzi himself at Yvcrdun. Owen
warmly approved '' the truly catholic spirit " in which
Oberlin conducted his school for the children of the
poor. But he seems to have taken much pains to
demonstrate to the good Father the imperative necessity
xa6
^i^'SLIC LIBRARY
A'lUM. LENOX AND
Ui-ytiN fOUNDATlUNS
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 127
of taking children whilst still in their earliest years, for,
said he, " to a great extent the character is made or
marred before children enter the usual schoolroom." ^
Owen was obviously unaware when, in his extreme old
age, he wrote his account of this visit to Fribourg,
that Oberlin had anticipated him by some forty years
in founding infant schools. In the early years of his
pastorate in the Ban de la Roche, Oberlin had established
such a school, with young women to act as conductrices.
The children were taken at a quite tender age, when
too young for formal lessons, were made to sit on forms,
and taught to knit, spin, and sew, or to look at pictures
of sacred subjects. They were especially — a significant
foreshadowing of one of Owen's favourite devices —
taught to interest themselves in maps, amongst them a
large scale-map of the Ban de la Roche, in which each
child learnt to find its father's house. The children
were further taught to recite short lessons after the
teachers.^
With Fellenberg's establishment, which they next
visited in the course of this tour, Owen was so pleased
that a few months later he sent his two elder boys,
Robert Dale and William, to be educated there. But
the impression produced by the Yverdun School was
not so favourable. Here is his own account of the
visit :
- " Our next visit was to Yverdun, to see the advance
made by Pestalozzi — another good and benevolent man,
acting for the benefit of his poor children to the extent
of his knowledge and means. He was doing, he said,
' Au/obiog?uphy, Vol. I., p. 175.
2 Vie d'Obej'Hn (Paris, 1845), P- i'?-
128 ROBERT OWEN
all he could to cultivate the heart, the head, and the
hands of his pupils. His theory was good, but his
means and experience were very limited, and his principles
were those of the old system. His language was a
confused patois, which Professor Pictet could but im-
perfectly understand. His goodness of heart and
benevolence of intention were evident in what he had
done under the disadvantages which he had to encounter.
His school, however, was one step in advance of ordinary
schools, or the old routine schools for the poor in
common society, and we were pleased with it as being
this one step in advance, for the rudiments of common
school education for the poor, without attention to their
dispositions and habits, and without teaching them useful
occupation, by which to earn a living, are of little real
utility. We left him, being much pleased with the
honest homely simplicity of the old man. His one step
beyond the usual routine had attracted and was attracting
the attention of many who had previously known only
the common routine."
Pestalozzi throughout his life had been hampered by
narrow means and by his own lack of organising power,
and Owen's visit came just at the darkest hour for
the old man. The Institute at Yverdun was then in
great financial straits ; owing to jealousies among the
staff, the majority of Pestalozzi's disciples and colleagues
and a large number of pupils had already left the
school, or were about to leave ; and Pestalozzi himself
was almost in despair. Owen's unfavourable impression
was therefore, no doubt, superficially justified. Never-
theless it is probable that he derived some useful
ideas from the visit. And indeed the germs of many
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 129
of Owen's ideas on education were no doubt derived
from his tour in 1818. A hostile witness already
quoted, the Rev. John Aiton, says, *' His mode of
education is a jumble of Dr. Bell's and Mr. Lancaster's
with hints from M. Fellenberg, Pere Girard, Pestalozzi
and others."^ Owen himself in 181 6 — shortly before
the Continental tour just described — was not disposed
to claim originality for his ideas. In the evidence before
the Factory Committee he is content to describe his
educational system as " a combination of what appears
to me the best parts of the National and Lancasterian
systems, with some little additions which have suggested
themselves." ^ But in this matter Owen appears to
have " builded wiser than he knew." He can have
owed but little to either Bell or Lancaster. He dis-
trusted the system of teaching by rote, and he regarded
it as essential that the children should have more of
the individual attention of the master than was possible
under the monitorial system.^ Owen's educational ideas
were certainly far in advance of his contemporaries in
these islands, and his enterprise at New Lanark deserves
to be commemorated as furnishing a model in some
respects too far in advance of the time to be generally
adopted even now.
It was not, however, until 18 16 — the year which
saw the beginning of Froebel's work at Griesheim and
.Brougham's Select Committee on Education in this
country — that Owen was able to carrry out his ideas
^ A Refutation of Mr. Owens System^ p. ii.
' See his evidence {Report, p. 26). See also the fuller statement of
his system given by him before Lord Brougham's Committee of the same
year (p. 238).
' See his evidence before Lord Brougham's Committee (pp. 238 242).
VOL. I. 9
I30 ROBERT OWEN
on a liberal scale. Up till 1813 all his schemes for
the improvement of the people at New Lanark had to
be adjusted to meet the views of partners who were
mainly intent on money-getting. Nevertheless he had,
as already stated, succeeded prior to the dissolution of
partnership in erecting, at a cost ot ^^3,000, a building
of three storeys, which was to serve amongst other
purposes for schools and lectures. After 1813, with
the cordial goodwill and assistance of his Quaker
partners, Owen set to work to put up a new building
to be used exclusively for school classes, lectures,
concerts and recreation generally. The building was
formally opened on January i, 18 16. In an address of
considerable length, mercifully broken by a brief musical
interlude, Owen expounded the views already set forth
in his Essays on the Formation of Character, dwelling
especially on the importance of right education from
the earliest years as a means to the regeneration ot
mankind. "What ideas," he said, "individuals may
attach to the term Millennium, I know not ; but I
know that society may be formed so as to exist with-
out crime, without poverty, with health greatly im-
proved, with little, if any, misery, and with intelligence
and happiness increased a hundred-fold ; and no obstacle
whatsoever intervenes at this moment, except ignorance,
to prevent such a state of society from becoming
universal." ^
The Institution tor the Formation of Character is
still standing ; it is the only one of the mill buildings
on the hither side of the lade which brings the water
from the river to work the mills. It is a building ot
' Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 349.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 131
two storeys ; the lower storey is at the present time
used as kitchens and dining-room for the mill-hands,
and one room on the upper floor is fitted up as a
concert hall and lecture-room. Until the establishment
of Board Schools in Scotland, the building continued to
be used as a school for the children of those working
in the mills.
The upper floor, in Owen's time, was divided into
two rooms, one about ninety and the other between forty
and fifty feet long. The breadth is about forty ^ and the
height twenty feet. To quote Robert Dale Owen's
description, written in 1824 :
" The principal school-room is fitted up with desks
and forms, on the Lancasterian plan, having a free
passage down the centre of the room. It is surrounded,
except at one end, where a pulpit stands, with galleries,
which are convenient when this room is used, as it
frequently is, either as a lecture-room or place of
worship.
" The other and smaller apartment on the second
floor has the walls hung round with representations of
the most striking zoological and mineralogical specimens,
including quadrupeds, birds, fishes, reptiles, insects,
shells, minerals, etc. At one end there is a gallery,
adapted for the purpose of an orchestra, and at the
other end are hung very large representations of the two
-hemispheres ; each separate country, as well as the
various seas, islands, etc., being difl^erently coloured,
but without any names attached to them. This room
is used as a lecture- and ball-room, and it is here that
^ According to Robert Dale Owen {Educatio7i at New Lanark^ p. 28)
my own measurements make it nearly forty-five.
13'
ROBERT OWEN
the dancing and singing lessons are daily given. It
is likewise occasionally used as a reading-room for some
of the classes.
'' The lower storey is divided into three apartments,
of nearly equal dimensions, twelve feet high, and sup-
ported by hollow iron pillars, serving at the same time
as conductors in winter for heated air, which issues
through the floor of the upper storey, and by which
means the whole building may, with care, be kept at
any required temperature. It is in these three apart-
ments that the younger classes are taught reading,
natural history, and geography."
The whole of the building was opened in the
evenings for the use of children and adults who had
been working in the mills during the day ; further,
there were in the evenings periodical singing and dancing
classes, lectures, etc.
The clearest account of the system of infant
education pursued at New Lanark is given by Owen
himself.
The Infant School was, he tells us, opened on
January 2, 1816. ^ All children above a year old*
were, if the parents were willing, to be sent to the
school. Owen himself during the first few months of
its establishment was constantly in the schools, and took
pains to win the confidence and affection of all the
children. The selection of teachers for the infants had
exercised him much ; he felt it would be worse than
useless to take persons whose only ideas of education
* Xew Kxi^itencCy Part V., p. liii.
' In practice it would seem from occasional rcl'crences that a some-
what hi;'hcr limit was obscrvcil.
1
4 m
'Ill 1
Jj^l
,, Ti 1
\ :E :.ii"W Yua^ ^
rUELIC LI3"ARY
AflOH, I-tNOX AND
.i.Ui_N i:uU:; UAI IONS
H L
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 133
were concerned with books. He needed those who
loved children and would have unlimited patience with
them, and who would moreover be willing unre-
servedly to follow Owen's instructions as regards the
things to be taught and the methods of teaching. His
choice finally fell upon one James Buchanan, a simple-
hearted weaver, who is happily described as having been
" previously trained by his wife to perfect submission
to her will." With him was joined a young woman of
seventeen, named Molly Young. Owen found in these
persons sufficiently pliant instruments of his designs.
His first instruction to them was never on any provoca-
tion to use harsh words or actions to the children.
Further, whilst showing in themselves an example of
uniform kindness, they were to endeavour by every
means in their power to inculcate a like spirit of loving
kindness in the children in all their dealings with each
other.
''The children," he proceeds, "were not to be
annoyed with books ; but were to be taught the uses
and nature or qualities of the common things around
them, by familiar conversation when the children's
curiosity was excited so as to induce them to ask ques-
tions respecting them. . . . The schoolroom for the
infants' instruction was . . . furnished with paintings,
chiefly of animals, with maps, and often supplied with
natural objects from the gardens, fields, and woods, —
the examination and explanation of which always
excited their curiosity and created an animated conver-
sation between the children and their instructors, now
themselves acquiring new knowledge by attempting
to instruct their young friends, as I always taught
134 ROBERT OWEN
them to think their pupils were, and to treat them
as such.
" The children at four and above that age showed
an eager desire to understand the use of the maps
of the four quarters of the world upon a large scale
purposely hung in the room to attract their attention.
Buchanan, their master, was first taught their use, and
then how to instruct the children for their amusement
— for with these infants everything was made to be
amusement.
** It was most encouraging and delightful to see the
progress which these infants and children made in real
knowledge, without the use of books. And when the
best means of instruction or forming character shall be
known, I doubt whether books will be ever used before
children attain their tenth year. And yet without books
they will have a superior character formed for them
at ten.
" After some short time," he proceeds, the infants
subjected to this training, "were unlike all children of
such situated parents, and indeed unlike the children of
any class in society. Those at two years of age and
above had commenced dancing lessons, and those of
four years of age and upwards singing lessons — both
under a good teacher. Both sexes were also drilled,
and became efficient in the military exercises, being
formed into divisions, led by young drummers and
fifers, and they became very expert and perfect in these
exercises." ^
Of the general principles on which the scheme of
education was founded, and of the methods employed in
' Autobiography^ \'ol I., pj). 140, 141.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 135
the teaching of the older children — from about five to
ten or twelve — a clear account is given by Robert Dale
Owen in his Outlines of the System of Education at New
Lanark^ published at Glasgow in 1824. The system
had then been at work for upwards of eight years — long
enough to enable the results to be seen and weighed. On
the other hand, the children were only in school for some
five hours a day and were subject in family life " to the
counteracting influence of an association with persons
who had not received similar education." Moreover the
parents, though they were at liberty to leave their
children at school until twelve years of age, generally
withdrew them at ten, to send them into the mills.
Even after they had begun full work in the mills, how-
ever, the children were at liberty to attend the evening
schools, and most of them seem to have availed them-
selves of the privileges offered. The education, it should
be noted, was practically free, the parents being required
to contribute only 3^. a month for each child — a sum
insufficient, it may be surmised, to pay for the con-
sumption of books, ink, and paper.^
Prior to the shortening of the hours of work, the
average attendance at the evening schools was less than
one hundred a night. But after the reduction on
January i, 1816, from eleven and three-quarters to
ten and three-quarter hours a day, the attendance rose
rapidly. The average was 380 a night in January, 1816,
386 in February, and 396 in March. The following
^ The actual cost of the schools in 1816 was ^700 a year, viz.
£SS^ for salaries of a Head Master and ten assistants, and ^150
for lighting, heating, and materials. (Evidence given before Lord
Brougham's Committee, p. 241.) But this does not include rent and
maintenance.
136
ROBERT OWEN
table gives the distribution of the scholars by age
and sex :
Boys
Girls ...
Front the General Register.
Preparatory class.
Reading, writing,
. arithmetic, music,
dancing, and mili-
tary exercises.
Preparator>' class.
•\
Reading, writing,
arithmetic, sew-
ing, dancing, and
music.
Average attend-
ance, 622 daily.'
AGE.
DAY.
EVENING
TOTAL.
3-6
6-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
3-6
6-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
41
104
145
174
129
311
39
90
124
49
...
220
39
274
485
759
The general principle underlying the whole of the
New Lanark system was the exclusion of all artificial
rewards or punishments. Owen held that such artificial
incentives to action are harmful as disguising the opera-
tion of natural and social laws, substituting false ideals
and erroneous notions of the world, and generally leaving
the character weak and unstable when the artificial
system ceases to operate. There were at New Lanark
no prizes for industry or good conduct ; no child was
punished for idleness or disobedience. The scholars were
taught to find the best incentive to industry in the
pleasure of learning, and in the spirit of innocent
emulation which springs naturally when children are
learning in company ; amiability and good conduct
* Keport ol Factory Committee of 1816, pp. 40, 66, 91, 92.
THE NEW EANARK SCHOOLS 137
brought their own reward in the friendly feeling which
they called forth in response both from teachers and
fellow-pupils ; and where everything was done in kind-
ness, and all restraints were known to be reasonable,
and most were imposed in the interests of the children
themselves, there was little temptation to disobedience.
Such at any rate was the theory on which the schools
were governed ; and by the general testimony of those
who saw the system in action, children so amiable and
gentle were never seen before.
As regards the formal work of education, the object
aimed at was to make every subject as attractive as
possible ; to teach as much as possible by conversation
and by maps, pictures, and natural objects ; and never
to allow the attention to become wearied. With that
end no lesson was allowed to exceed three-quarters of an
hour in duration.
In deference to the wishes of the parents, the children
began to learn reading at a very early age. Owen, in
this following Rousseau, would have wished to defer
such instruction until the children should have learnt
to value the artificial signs of written language not for
themselves, but as a means of wider knowledge. A great
difficulty was to find books suited for the youthful
readers. Miss Edgeworth's tales were judged to be
among the best ; '' but even those contain too much
of praise and blame to admit of their being regarded as
unexceptionable." Much use was made, too, of voyages
and travels. These were illustrated by maps and inter-
spersed with anecdotes, and the children were questioned
on what they read, and were thus taught in all cases
to look on the art of reading as a means to an end,
138 ROBERT OWEN
rather than as an end in itself. In deference, again, to
the wishes of the parents, and of Owen's partners, the
children at an early age were taught to read the Bible
and the Catechism of the Scotch Church.
In writing, the same general principles were observed.
The children as soon as possible deserted copies for
current handwriting ; and the sentences written were
made wherever practicable to have some reference to their
other studies, so as to retain their interest.
Arithmetic was at the outset taught on the plan
generally adopted at that time in Scotland ; but later,
Dale Owen tells us, Pestalozzi's system of mental arith-
metic was introduced.^
But the characteristic feature of the system of educa-
tion at New Lanark was the lecture on natural science,
geography or history. The class attending these
lectures would consist of forty or fifty children. The
lecture would be illustrated, as far as the subject would
admit, by maps, pictures, diagrams, etc., and occasionally
adorned by moral lessons. The lecture would be short,
so as not to weary the attention of the youthful audience;
and the children would be questioned by the lecturer, and
would be encouraged themselves to ask questions in turn.
In this manner the study of geography, to many of
' Pestalozzi's system was founded on sense-impression. The cliild
learnt the elementary processes of arithmetic from a Table of Units, in
which each unit was re[)restmted by a line. He was thus enabled to see
the results of addition, subtraction, etc. In the same way he learnt to
understand fractions by studying tables of squares, in which the squares
were divided into two, three, or more equal parts. Their knowledge of
figures being thus firmly based upon concrete sense-impressions,
I'estalozzi's pupils are said to have attained extraordinary facility in
mental arithmetic (see De Guimps's Life of Pestalozzi^ translated by
John Russell, 1890, pp. 230, 413, etc.).
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 139
the less favoured children of a later day the dreariest
remembrance of their childhood, was made interesting
and attractive by frequent reference to the large coloured
maps hung on the walls, by descriptions of the natural
scenery and climatic conditions of each region, of the
inhabitants and their appearance, their dress, manners
and customs, and mode of life. But the study of
geography was also made to point with peculiar emphasis
a valuable moral lesson. For —
'' In this manner are circumstances which induce
national peculiarities and national vices exhibited to
them ; and the question will naturally arise in their
minds : * Is it not highly probable that we ourselves,
had we lived in such a country, should have escaped
neither its peculiarities, nor its vices — that we should
have adopted the notions and prejudices there prevalent ?
In fact is it not evident that we might have been
cannibals or Hindoos, just as the circumstances of our
birth should have placed us in Hindostan, where the
killing of an animal becomes a heinous crime ; or amongst
some savage tribe where to torture a fellow creature,
and to feast on his dead body, is accounted a glorious
action ? ' A child who has once felt what the true
answer to such a question must be, cannot remain un-
charitable or intolerant." ^
It was perhaps because of the moral significance thus
made to attach to it, that the study of geography formed
so prominent a part of the education at New Lanark,
especially with the younger children. Here is Robert
Owen's account of the manner in which the study was
pursued.
^ Outlines of Educatioji at New Lanark^ p. 48.
I40 ROBERT OWEN
*' Their lessons in geography were no less amusing
to the children themselves and interesting to strangers.
At a very early age they were instructed in classes on
maps of the four quarters of the world, and after
becoming expert in a knowledge of these, all the classes
were united in one large class- and lecture-room, to go
through these exercises on a map of the world so large
as almost to cover the end of the room. On this map
were delineated the usual divisions of the best maps,
except that there were no names of countries or cities
or towns ; but for the cities and towns were small but
distinct circles to denote their places — the classes united
for this purpose generally consisted of about one hundred
and fifty, forming as large a circle as could be placed
to see the map. A light white wand was provided,
sufficiently long to point to the highest part of the
map by the youngest child. The lesson commenced by
one of the children taking the wand to point with. Then
one of them would ask him to point to such a district,
place, island, city, or town. This would be done gener-
ally many times in succession ; but when the holder
of the wand was at fault, and could not point to the
place asked for, he had to resign the wand to his
questioner, who had to go through the same process.
This by degrees became most amusing to the children,
who soon learned to ask for the least-thought-of districts
and places that they might puzzle the holder of the
wand, and obtain it from him. This was at once a good
lesson for one hundred and fifty — keeping the attention
of all alive during the lesson. The lookers-on were
as much amused, and many as much instructed as the
children, who thus at an early age became so efficient,
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 141
that one of our Admirals, who had sailed round the
world, said he could not answer many of the questions
which some of these children not six years old readily
replied to, giving the places most correctly." ^
Even in the study of history, ancient and modern,
the same method was pursued, and the eye was called
upon to aid the ear. *' Seven large maps or tables, laid
out on the principle of the Stream of Time, and which
were originally purchased from Miss Whitwell, a lady
who formerly conducted a respectable seminary in London,
are hung round the spacious room. These being made
of canvass, may be rolled up at pleasure. On the Streams,
each of which is differently coloured, and represents a
nation, are painted the principal events which occur in
the history of those nations. Each century is closed by
a horizontal line, drawn across the map. By means of
these maps, the children are taught the outlines of Ancient
and Modern History, with ease to themselves, and
without being liable to confound different events, or
different nations. On hearing of any two events, for
instance, the child has but to recollect the situation
on the tables of the paintings, by which those are repre-
sented, in order to be furnished at once with their chrono-
logical relation to each other. If the events are con-
temporary, he will instantly perceive it." ^
In addition to the formal literary education described,
the children were taught to sing and to dance, and
were drilled in a few simple military evolutions. It
was these exercises, which formed part of the daily
education of the children from their earliest years,
' Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 144.
2 Outline of the System of Education at New Lanark, p. 50.
142 ROBERT OWEN
which most impressed the visitors to New Lanark,
as will be seen from the extracts quoted below. The
children, it should be added, were given a distinctive
dress, which is thus described by Robert Dale Owen :
*^ The dress worn by the children in the day school,
both boys and girls, is composed of strong white cotton
cloth of the best quality which can be procured.
It is formed in the shape of a Roman tunic, and
reaches in the boys' dresses to the knee, and in those
of the girls to the ancle. These dresses are changed
three times a week, that they may be kept perfectly
clean and neat."^
Such in outline was the system of education at New
Lanark under Owen's guidance. h\ order to complete
the picture, I will quote a few extracts from some of the
accounts left on record by the numerous visitors to the
place in the period from 1816 to 1826.
In March, 18 18, John Griscom, Professor of Chemistry
and Natural Philosophy in the New York Institute, in
the course of a tour in Europe, in which he inspected
the poor colonies in Holland and other social experiments
of the kind, came to New Lanark and stayed a night with
Owen. He was most favourably impressed with all that
he saw in the establishment. Of his host he writes : '' 1
know no man of equal celebrity, whose manners are less
imposing, and who has more of the candour and openness
ot a child." Professor Griscom gives a detailed account
' Outline of the System of Education at New /Mnark, p. 33. An
anonymous writer who visited New Lanark in August, 1822, describes
the whole dress of the boys as consisting of a shirt, and a plaid jacket
reaching almost to the knees. Other writers mention a tartan kilt as
forming a conspicuous part of the boys' dress. Possibly the cotton tunic
was only fur summer wear (see Xew Existence, I'art V., p. xxviii).
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 143
of the whole school, from which I extract a passage
relating to the infant school.
" One apartment of the school afforded a novel and
pleasing spectacle. It consisted of a great number of
children, from one to three or four years of age. They
are assembled in a large room, under the care of a
judicious female, who allows them to amuse themselves
with various selected toys, and occasionally collects the
oldest into a class, and teaches them their letters. They
appeared perfectly happy, and as we entered the little
creatures ran in groups to seize their benefactor by
the hand, or to pull him by the coat, with the most
artless simplicity. This baby school is of great con-
sequence to the establishment, for it enables the mothers
to shut up their houses in security, and to attend to
their duties in the factory, without concern for their
families." ^
Another writer, who visited New Lanark in 1822, says
that " the moment Owen came into the court where the
infants were assembled, they ran in crowds to meet their
benefactor, and stretched out their little hands to welcome
him or looked up with looks of gratitude as he passed.
There were some too young to walk alone, and these
were seen endeavouring with the greatest anxiety to
get forward by the assistance of the wall, or whoever
would help them."^
At a later date we have an account from another
American visitor. The following description is taken
from the editorial correspondence of the New York
^ A Year in Europe^ by John Griscom, Vol. II., p. 385. New
York, 1823.
^ Account of a visit in August, 1822, published in the Dubliti Report
quoted in A'eiu Existence, Part V., p. xxxi.
144 ROBERT OWEN
Statesman, May 20, 1826.^ The date of the visit
was November, 1825. Owen at the time was in America,
and the visitor was shown round the establishment by
the superintendent.
*' He first introduced us into a hirge hall, containing
much of the apparatus used in Mr. Owen's system of
education. Among other articles were large historical
charts, covering the walls of the apartment, — a folio
volume of topographical delineations of the principal
towns in Scotland, — a terrestrial globe six feet in diameter,
— and a suite of emblems designed to illustrate the
principles of English grammar. The last invention has
at least the merit of being ingenious. It consists in
personifying the parts of speech, and in assigning to each
its relative importance according to the military system.
General Noun figures in his cocked hat, sword, and double
epaulettes. By his side stands Colonel Verb, and so on
down to Corporal Adverb.
" From this vestibule of the establishment the super-
intendent took us upstairs to the large dancing-hall,
which opens precisely at seven o'clock every morning.
Here we found some eighty or a hundred children of
both sexes, at an average age of about ten, paraded on
the floor, under the charge of a dancing-master, and
moving in measured steps to the music of an orchestra.
They were all in uniform — the boys wearing Highland
kilts of plaid, and the girls ginghams of a different
figure. Both sexes met the floor with naked feet. After
undergoing sundry drill in marches and counter-marches,
they were directed to take partners for cotillons, to
' Quoted in New Harmony GazetU, Vol. 1., p. 317, and in New
Existence, Part V., pp. xl., xli.
F'JDLIC 1.13 ARY
A:^lCa^. LLINOX AND
. , Ul-N ruUNUAilUNS
H L
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 145
which were added strathspeys, reels, and other national
dances.
" Next came a concert of music. The children were
paraded in battalia, and sang half a dozen of the finest
Scotch songs in full chorus. So far as I am a judge,
they made no discords, and the effect was certainly
pleasing as well as imposing. Music is learned upon
the Lancasterian plan,^ from a large roll many yards
in extent, containing the gamut, with the addition of
select tunes. It is placed in a conspicuous part of the
room, where the notes can be distinctly seen at the same
moment by every pupil. The words are committed to
memory from printed cards, embracing a selection of
the best songs. Perfect order, decorum and good feeling
seemed to prevail among the children, who are taken
promiscuously from the families of the labourers.
" From the ball-room, we proceeded to the other
departments of the school, and heard classes go through
with their recitations in geography and botany. The
former is taught entirely by maps, and the latter by
transparent plates. In both the children answered with
surprising promptness and accuracy. Girls of twelve
years old appear to be perfectly versed in the Linnasan
system of classification, and able at a glance, not only to
give the technical names of the parts of a plant, but to
reduce it to its genus and species. How far such know-
ledge is acquired by rote ; what effect the discipline has
upon the mind ; and whether some of the branches
taught are relatively the most important, are questions
^ The plan according to Owen was not Lancasterian {New Existeiice^
Part v., p. xliii.). But by this date the regulations of January, 1824, had
presumably come into force, and the master would in that case be a
Lancasterian. See below.
VOL. I 10
146 ROBERT OWEN
upon the discussion of which 1 am not disposed to enter.
My general impression, however, was, that while Mr.
Owen's system is calculated to divest large manufacturing
establishments of their terrors, by removing gross ignor-
ance, vulgarity of maimers, and vicious habits, and by
substituting in their places the decencies and refinements
of good society, it is somewhat deficient in those branches
which qualif)' the young mind for the more serious duties
and avocations of life."
In quoting this account in the Appendix to Part V.
of The New Existence of Man upon Earthy Owen explains
that the writer had evidently not comprehended the
whole scheme of instruction of New Lanark, which
included not merely reading, writing, arithmetic, sewing,
knitting, etc., but also practical instruction in the arrange-
ment and management of domestic concerns, and in
various useful arts, as well as the moral education which
formed the backbone of the whole scheme.
As regards the general effect of the New Lanark
system of education on the conduct and character of the
children, we have some very striking testimony.
Thus James Smith, in his Excursions in Scotland
in 1820 : ^
"It has been a great object with Robert Owen to
extinguish the government by fear ; and in the attain-
ment of this he has been very successful, even with
the youngest of his flock. It was singularly gratifying
to observe, wherever we met with any of the children,
with what delighted looks they received him. I may
further state that in all my observations on the children,
in the schools, at their play, or elsewhere, I did not
• Published in 1824. (Juotcd in New Existence, Part V., p. xxxvii.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 147
see one angry look or gesture. There was, on the
contrary, a harmony in all their intercourse, of which I
can scarcely speak too highly."
I will conclude by quoting from two reports of a
more representative character testifying to the excellent
results of the training afforded to the children " in
this happy village," as the first report styles it.
In 1 8 19 the Guardians of the Poor in the township
of Leeds appointed a deputation to report upon the
system of education pursued at New Lanark. The
deputation, which consisted of three men, Edward Baines,
of the Leeds Mercury^ Robert Oastler and John Cawood,
visited New Lanark in August. They found that the
number of children between two and ten years of age
was 380 ; and they reported that —
''These latter are receiving daily instructions in the
schools ; and by showing to them a spirit of kindness
and impressing them with a sense of their duty (with-
out the hope of reward or the fear of punishment),
they are making satisfactory progress in reading, writing,
and accounts, as well as in music and dancing, in
addition to which the girls are taught to sew.
" In the education of the children the thing that is
most remarkable is the general spirit of kindness and
affection which is shown towards them, and the entire
absence of everything that is likely to give them bad
habits, with the presence of whatever is calculated to
inspire them with good ones ; the consequence is, that
they appear like one well-regulated family, united together
by the ties of the closest affection. We heard no quarrels
from the youngest to the eldest ; and so strongly
impressed are they with the conviction that their interest
148 ROBERT OWEN
and duty are the same, and that to be happy themselves
it is necessary to make those happy bv whom they are
surrounded, that they had no strife but in offices of
kindness. With such dispositions, and with their young
minds well stored with useful knowledge, it appeared
to us that if it should be their destiny to go out to
service or to be apprenticed, the fiimilies in which they
are fixed would find them an acquisition instead of a
burden ; and we could not avoid the expression of a
wish that the orphan children in our Workhouses had
the same advantage of moral and religious instruction,
and the same prospect of being made happy themselves
and useful to the families in which they are placed."
Of the children who had already passed through
the schools and were now employed in the mills through
the day, with the opportunity, if they wished, of attend-
ing school for i-^- hours in the evening, the deputation
writes :
" The deportment of these young people, owing
probably to the advantages of their early training, is
very exemplary. In business they are regular and diligent,
and in their manners they are mild and engaging." ^
The Duke of Kent, father of Queen Victoria, was
one of Owen's warmest friends and patrons. In this
same year, 1819, he deputed his physician. Dr. H.
Grey Macnab, to visit New Lanark and report upon
the whole establishment there. Owen's outspoken
denunciation of all religions had created strong antagonism
to him in many quarters. Macnab himself, as he explains
in his book, was somewhat prejudiced against Owen
because of the want of judgment and proportion shown
' Quoted in New Existence, Part V., pp. xxiv, xxv.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 149
in his writings. He was not even convinced of Owen's
sincerity, and was by no means prepared to take his
success as a practical reformer on his own uncorroborated
testimony. The Duke, who knew Owen's real worth,
no doubt promoted the enquiry less for his own satis-
faction than as a means of dispelling the public prejudice.
Macnab, a man perhaps of too kindly and emotional
a temperament for the exercise of dispassionate criticism,
found all his doubts dissolve away under the genial
influence of the place, and blessed the undertaking
altogether. Of the school and the children he can
scarcely trust himself to speak : —
" The children and youth in this delightful colony
are superior in point of conduct and character to all
the children and youth I have ever seen. The maxim
of our poet, that nature unadorned is most adorned,
is recalled to the mind on being amongst these promising
candidates for honour and happiness. I shall not attempt
to give a faithful description of the beautiful fruits of
the social affections displayed in the young, innocent,
and fascinating countenances of these happy children
and youths.
" The pen of a Milton and the pencil of a Rubens
could not do justice to such a picture ; all, therefore,
I shall say here is, that the first two days I was at
New Lanark were days of pure enjoyment. The effects
. produced on my mind were such, that during that time
I was actually disqualified for examining coolly and
deliberately the very objects of my visit : and it is a
fact, that my stay at New Lanark was prolonged chiefly
owing to this circumstance."
Of the character of the inhabitants as a whole he
150
ROBERT OWEN
writes that he found at New Lanark *' more of the social
virtues and less of the reigning vices . . . than will
be found in any community of the same population in
any part of the civilised world." ^
From this brief statement it is not difficult to infer
that Owen's inspiration, as already said, was derived
mainly from Rousseau." A return to Nature has been
the cry of all educational reformers. But Owen's return
to Nature, in the abolition of all rewards and punish-
ments, and the replacement of these arbitrary incentives
to virtue by a demonstration of the natural consequences
of social and unsocial conduct, was more radical than that
of any other reformer save Rousseau. We can almost
hear the tones of the instructor of the infant Emile.
From Rousseau also came the principle that knowledge ot
the things themselves should precede knowledge of their
signs in written or printed language. Rousseau would
' The New Views of Mr. Owcft of Lanark, impartially considered^
etc., by Henry Grey Macnab, M.D. London, 1819.
* How much of the details of his system Owen derived from
Rousseau's most prominent disciples, and his own contemporaries,
Oberlin and Pestalozzi, it is difficult to say. As we saw at the beginninjj
of this chapter, Oberlin had made geography a prominent feature in
his course. He had also started infant schools long before Owen. But
Owen foreshadowed his infant school in his Xew View of Society, and
actually opened it in 1816, tiie year before what was apparently his
only visit to Oberlin's establishment. Whether he had previously heard
of Oberlin's experiment does not appear: and the point is, any way»
of no great importance. At any rate Owen was the first to establish
an infant school in these islands. Thus S. Wilderspin writes: "The
first Infant School that was heard of in this country {sc. England) was
established at Westminster in the year 1819 : the master of that institution
is J. Buchanan, who came from Mr. Owen's establishment at New
Lanark, where an Infant School had previously been founded by that
gentleman *' {Importance of Educatifig the Infant Poor, second edition
1824, p. 23). Dr. Thomas Pole? {Ohsen>atinn'i on Infant Schools, Bristol,
1823) writes to a similar effect. Subseq\iently Brougliain, ?nore suo,
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 151
have had Emile learn to read and write only when he
was twelve years old. Owen, in a passage already quoted,
would have preferred to postpone this branch of
instruction at any rate until the child was ten years
old. But in this matter he was forced, like others who
have endeavoured to put educational reforms into practice,
to reckon with the parents. Owen probably had to
contend also with his partners, who were no doubt of
opinion that the full benefit of the Scriptures could only
be gathered by the youthful student who could read
them for himself.
There is one point of some weight in which Owen's
system of education appears to have been lacking.
Rousseau had insisted upon the importance of finding
work for the hands, especially of young children.
Pestalozzi had always seen the importance of manual
exercises. At Stanz he had tried " to connect study with
seems to have claimed the honour for the Westminster School referred
to, on the ground that Owen's infant school being attached to a
manufactory, did not count (see Practical Educationists, by James
Leitch, Glasgow 1876, p. 166). But in later utterances Brougham gave
full credit to Owen. There are several points in which Owen's practice
resembles Pestalozzi. Thus singing played an important part in Pestalozzi's
system of training. The children in his schools learnt to sing as they
learned to talk, by imitation (De Guimps, Life of Pestalozzi, translated by
J. Russell, p. 415). In this connection it is interesting to note that it was
one of Pestalozzi's methods to make the children repeat statements in
chorus so as to fix facts in their memory. One of the visitors to New
Lanark notes that the children there would answer the lecturer's ques-
tions simultaneously, and this "simultaneous answering," he notes, was
'•executed by so many with great precision" {New Existe7tcey Part V.,
p. xxvii). Military exercises, again, formed part of the regular curriculum
at Yverdun. (It is to be noted, however, that in the Third Essay on the
Formatio7i of Character, Owen had dwelt upon the importance of drilling
the boys, both as discipline, and as a first step in mihtary training {Auto-
biography, Vol. L, p. 303).) We have already seen that at a later period
Owen borrowed Pestalozzi's method of mental arithmetic.
152
ROBERT OWEN
manual labour, the school with the workshop " ; at
Yverdun drawing formed an important feature in the
course ; the pupils were also taught to construct geo-
metrical solids in cardboard, to make clay models of
the neighbouring river-valley, and so on. But Owen
seems to have paid little attention to this particular
requirement. The claims of eye and ear were abundantly
satisfied ; the voice found employment in singing and
speaking ; the bodies of the children were exercised in
drilling and dancing. But no provision seems to have
been made for drawing, modelling or constructive work
of any kind. We hear, indeed, of toys and games for
the younger children ; but not of any systematic em-
ployment. No doubt the time was not yet fully ripe
for the idea. Froebers first Kindergarten was not opened
until 1837. Possibly also Owen may have thought the
numerous calls of domestic life and, later, the work of
the mills, would provide all the manual exercise required.
The girls were taught sewing and knitting : but to
teach drawing, modelling, or any mechanical art,
except by way of apprenticeship to a trade, would no
doubt have involved expense, both for staff and
materials, which his partners might have been unwilling
to sanction.
For the rest, whatever part of Owen's system may
have been due to inspiration from other minds, whatever
defects we may find in the execution of the scheme, the
two things needtul tor the results achieved were all his
own — the spirit of unwearied loving-kindness, and the
strong simplicity which was able to keep its regard fixed
on the highest issues of life and character.
So matters went on for about eight years. From
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 153
the outset there had been difficulties between Owen and
his partners. As already said, the most active of them
were devout Quakers, of whom two, WilHam Allen and
Joseph Fox, had taken a prominent part in supporting
the Lancasterian Association, afterwards the British and
Foreign Schools Society. On the committee of that
Society they had fought hard and continuously for the
full representation of their religious views ; they had
indeed at one time persuaded the committee to pass a
rule that no reading lesson should be given in the schools,
except from the Bible. -^
To men of this stamp Owen's religious views were
monstrous and intolerable. It is probable that at the
outset they had not fully realised the thorough-going
nature of his " infidelity." But enlightenment on this
point came very early in the history of the partnership.
In August, 18 14, Allen dined at Braxfieldand had '' much
painful conversation on the subject of Owen's peculiar
opinions " ; ^ and misunderstanding was no longer possible
after the declaration of August 21, 181 7, in the London
Tavern. The partners nevertheless continued for some
years longer to give Owen a very free hand in his educa-
tional reforms. " But, as we read in Allen's diary, there were
constant searchings of heart. The Bible and Catechism
were, no doubt, as prescribed by the articles of partner-
ship, regularly read and taught in the schools both on
weekdays and Sundays. But Owen was without wisdom
of the worldly kind ; he made no secret of his opinions,
and could not, probably, be withheld from preaching
them at all seasons and to all men. In one respect,
^ Life of Francis Place, by Graham Wallas, p. 105.
' Life of William Allen, Vol. I., p. 209.
154 ROBERT OWEN
indeed, the Quakers seem to have done Owen an in-
justice. As fanatical in his beliet as they in theirs, he
was gifted with a tolerance, the direct outcome of his
opinions, which was outside the comprehension of men
like Fox and Allen. It probably did not need the
urgency of his partners to permit the reading ot the
Bible and other religious teaching in his schools. The
fact that the parents generally wished it, and would
have been uneasy and mistrustful if such teaching had
been omitted, would no doubt have been sufficient in-
ducement. But Allen and Fok may well have feared
that even the Shorter Catechism might prove too
frail a defence against the daily spectacle of infidelity
in high places. Moreover, there were other features
in the scheme which were objectionable. Singing,
dancing, and military drill were all abhorrent to the
religious views of the Society of Friends. They may
even be pardoned if they took exception to the
lectures on geography, with their accompanying moral
lessons.
Lastly, the New Lanark establishment for eight years
had been a place of pilgrimage for royalties, statesmen,
philanthropists, reformers, socialists, and humanitarian
enthusiasts of all kinds. The pilgrims had come from
every country, to the number, it is said, of thirty a
day for months at a time.^ Such a constant influx of
visitors, each of whom would require to be shown over
the whole establishment, was no doubt bad for business.
It was very likely, also, bad for the children themselves ;
and it would tend to warp the scheme of education and
to thrust the purely spectacular parts, the singing,
' New Existence, Part. V., p. xxxviii.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 155
dancing, and drilling, into undue prominence/ Apart
from the fact that these spectacular parts were precisely
what the Quakers objected to, the whole business afforded
an advertisement to Owen's rationalist views which must
have been peculiarly distasteful to sincere if somewhat
fanatical Christians. That men of such opposite views
should have sunk their differences for the common
good, and have worked together in some kind of
harmony for so many years is surely creditable to the
common sense and humanity of both parties. But the
end was bound to come.
There had been, as said, sharp differences of opinion
from the outset. Thus Allen writes in his diary for the
month of September, 18 14: "Sat down with R. Owen
and J. Fox to a most important discussion of several
points in the articles of partnership, particularly those
relating to the training of the children and the use of
the Holy Scriptures. This latter Fox and I made a
sine qua non^ at least as far as we are concerned, and
Owen at length yielded." ^
In 1 8 1 8 Allen and Foster visited Lanark " to dis-
cover whether any attempt is making there to weaken
the faith of the people in divine revelation." ^ They
found that Owen had at first refused leave to the people
to found a Bible Society ; it was, however, established
later, and Mrs. Owen and the family subscribed to it.
From two ministers in the town the partners received
^ Aiton, in the work already quoted, criticises the results of Owen's
educational system, and endeavours to show that owing to the scant
attention paid to reading, writing and arithmetic, the children forgot
these accomplishments within a few years of leaving school.
^ Life of WilUa77i Allen, Vol. I., p. 209.
^ Ibid., p. 344, letter to William VVilberforce.
156 ROBERT OWEN
a good report of the morality and sobriety of the
people at New Eaiiark, and the cheering intelligence
that Owen's principles appeared to have taken no
root in the population. Allen tells us that he
asked one ot these gentlemen to visit the schools
periodically and to let him know if the Scripture
reading were neglected. The same evening Allen
relieved his mind by addressing the people for three-
quarters of an hour at a meeting in the large room
of the Institution. ^
In July, 1822, the London proprietors seem again
to have become uneasy, and appointed Allen, Foster, and
Gibbs to investigate the state of New Lanark. They
reported that the people read the Bible and many other
religious books regularly, but that the system of educa-
tion stood much in need of revision. Allen himself was
rendered " so miserable by the manner in which the
important business of education had been carried on that
he had decided on withdrawing," unless it could be set
right.^ He told Owen that he and the other partners
were determined " to prevent him from making New
Lanark an infidel establishment." ^ Thereafter discussions
and negotiations for the reform of the schools proceeded
for some months between Owen and his London partners,
and finally, on January 21, 1824, the Firm of Robert
Owen and Co. put their signatures to a series of re-
solutions, providing for the dismissal of some of the
old teachers, and the appointment of a new master,
John Daniel, who was to instruct the children from
* Life of Williavi Allen, Vol. I., p. 346.
» Ibid., Vol. II., p. 237.
3 Op. at., p. 363.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 157
the age of six years old and upwards according to the
system of education practised by the British and Foreign
Schools Society. Dancing was no longer to be taught
at the expense of the company, nor singing and music
" with the exception of instruction in psalmody." There
was also to be a public reading of the Holy Scriptures
" and other religious exercises " on one evening a week.
Allen was a lecturer on natural and experimental
philosophy at Guy's Hospital, and it was doubtless owing
to his influence that provision was still to be made for
the teaching of natural science. There was to be a
lecture twice a week in the evening, at which the whole
population could attend, on chemistry, mechanics, and
other branches of " Experimental Philosophy and Natural
History " ; and suitable apparatus was to be provided
for illustrating these lectures. But there was to be no
more moral geography. And even the national dress of
Scotland fell under the Quaker ban. One resolution
reads :
" That having considered the dress of the children,
we are of opinion that decency requires that all males as
they arrive at the age of six years should wear trousers
or drawers ; we agree, therefore, that they shall be
required to be so clothed." ^
Such was the ending of a great educational experiment.
But perhaps a juster verdict would substitute transforma-
tion for ending. Owen's partners were, like himself, men
of views too liberal for general acceptance by their
contemporaries ; they were as sincere as he in their
desire to give education to all ; and perhaps they did
not greatly differ as to the means. In some respects
^ New Existence, Part. V., p. viii.
158 ROBERT OWEN
it is likely that their views were sounder, because more
moderate, than Owen's.'
At all events the schools at New Lanark continued
to flourish, first under the original partners, later under
the successor of one of them, John Walker, until the
institution of Board Schools in Scotland in 1872. And
dancing was still permitted, and still apparently taught,
though whether at the company's expense or not does
not appear. When I visited New Lanark for the first
time in the spring of 1903, my guide, John Campbell
Melrose, told me that in his boyhood, some thirty years
back, he and the other children still danced every
morning^ from 7.15 to 8 a.m. The dancing-room was
one of the upper rooms in the old building, and the
name of the last dancing-master was David Dunn.
According to my guide, the paintings and maps were
only taken down when the school gave place to a Board
School. A number of large cardboard plates of flowers
and plants were still to be seen at the time of my visit ;
a few geometrical models and other things ; and especially
' The new rules of January, 1824, were apparently not carried into
effect very promptly, or else the new system differed in effect but little
from the old ; for the writer in the New York Statesman (see the
account quoted above in the text) describes a visit paid in November,
182$, at which he witnessed singing, dancing, drilling — and kilts !
A correspondent writing to Owen on August 27, 1831, says: "On
Saturday last I made a pilgrimage to New Lanark, and was delighted
with the place. The Institution is still conducted upon principles superior
to those of any other establishment in the Kingdom : but the inhabitants
are less happy than they were, and with one voice they lament the
absence of their great benefactor " (letter from Masscy Dawson, Manchester
Collection).
A writer in the Glasgow Free Press in 1833 (quoted in The Crisis^ Vol.
III., p. 29) gives a similar account, and mentions in particular that singing
and dancing were still taught, and that visitors still came in great
numbers to see the factor}' and the schools.
THE NEW LANARK SCHOOLS 159
four of the original linen rolls, which used to be hung
on the walls, wound on rollers like a map. They were
three or four feet wide and the largest was perhaps forty
feet in length. Two of these rolls were filled with
musical notation and tunes. The other two were
covered with pictures, painted in oils, illustrating various
members of the animal kingdom. There were zoophytes,
worms, shells, Crustacea, insects of the several orders,
batrachia, reptiles, and at the torn end of one roll a tiger
rampant in his jungle.
And between the town of Old Lanark and the mills
I passed a Board School, and saw some hundred little
Scotch laddies — having, alas ! boots and knickerbockers
in place of bare feet and kilts — formed in fours and
marching in quick time round the school-yard. So that
in this, at all events, Owen's foresight has been justified.
Owen's experiment at New Lanark bore early fruit
in another direction. Among his friends at the time
was Henry Brougham, afterwards Lord Chancellor.
Brougham was much impressed by the success of the
infant schools at New Lanark, and thought that an
Listitution of the kind might do still better service
amongst the poor in a crowded city. He therefore
formed a committee which included, amongst others,
Owen's partner, John Walker, Henry Hase, Lord
Lansdowne, Thomas Babington and Zachary Macaulay,
and in 1819 an infant school was opened at Brewers'
Green, Westminster. Owen cordially co-operated with
the committee, and gave them the best help in his power
by sending down from New Lanark the weaver, James
Buchanan, whom he had selected and trained to act as
master of his own school. Owen himself, on his first
i6o ROBERT OWEN
visit to the Westminster school, was by no means favourably
impressed. He found that Buchanan had lost his influence
over the children, and that Mrs. Buchanan had been
called in, to terrify them with a whip. However that
may be, the Westniinster school grew and flourished,
and was the parent of many more. Samuel Wilderspin
visited the school and pondered over all that he saw
there. A few years later, in 1824, the London Infant
School Society was founded, and Wilderspin was engaged
to lecture on the movement, and to assist in founding
similar schools throughout the Metropolis.^
' See Owen's Life, Vol. I., p. 152, etc. Obsen'aiious on I ttf ant Schools,
by Thomas Pole, Bristol, 1823. hnportance of Educating the Infant
Poor, by S. Wilderspin, London, 1824. Practical Educationists^ by James
Leitch, Glasgow, 1S76, pp. \66seqq.
CHAPTER VIII
JV£IV LANARK (continued)
THE Institution for the Formation of Character, and
the schools carried on in connection with it, formed
the most conspicuous and probably the most important
part of Owen's work at New Lanark. But, as already
intimated, he carried out many other reforms with most
beneficial results to the health and morals of the people.
Owing to the difficulties which he experienced in per-
suading his earlier partners to devote any share of their
profits to unproductive expenditure of any kind, his
measures could in the first years of his management
only be carried out piecemeal, as occasion served, and
it was not until after 1813 that he was really given a
free hand. It is not always possible to discover from
the accounts left to us, how far the reforms which he
contemplated had actually been carried into effect before
1816 ; and it will be convenient, therefore, briefly to
summarise, from his own later statements, and from
various descriptions written by visitors to the mills in
the period from 18 16 onwards, the final results of his
labours. Of the schools, and the lectures and other
entertainments given in the evenings, enough has been
already said in the last chapter. But it should perhaps
be mentioned that the schools were open freely, not
VOL. I. 161 II
1 62 ROBERT OWEN
only to the children of the New Lanark operatives, but
to any children from the Old Town whose parents chose
to take advantage of Owen's liberality.
Hours of Labour. — In Dale's time, and Dale, as already
said, was probably the most humane employer of his day,
the work had been spread over thirteen hours, from
6 a.m. to 7 p.m., with intervals of half an hour for
breakfast and three-quarters of an hour for dinner,
leaving eleven and three-quarter hours of actual work.
During some part of the period between i 8oo and 1813
Owen seems to have been compelled by his partners to
raise the hours to fourteen a day.^ They had been again
reduced to thirteen before 18 16, and on the ist of
January of that year they were still further cut down
to twelve, with the same meal intervals as before, leaving
ten and three-quarter hours of actual work." Even these
shortened hours were in Owen's view too long. As he
told the Committee of 18 16, he would have preferred
that there should be at most ten working hours in
the day.
When the hours of labour were shortened, the wages
of the operatives were left unchanged. But as about
half the work in the mills was piece-work, the measure
had the effect, at first at any rate, of reducing the earnings
of the piece-workers.^ That nevertheless the measure
was cordially welcomed bv the operatives is proved
by the fact that a year after its introduction, in January,
' Owen's Evidence before the Factory Committee of 1816, p. 39.
' In the debate in the House of Commons on the Factory Act of 1819,
the hours at New Lanark are generally referred to as ten and a half,
and it seems possible that they were later actually reduced to that
amount.
» Ibid., p. 28.
NEW LANARK 163
1 8 17, they tendered an address of thanks to Owen and
proposed further to present him with a piece of plate.
This latter, however, he refused to accept, and the money
subscribed was accordingly handed over for charitable
purposes. Again, in the following year, a petition was
presented in the House of Commons from the operatives
at New Lanark, in favour of the Factory Bill then before
the House. In this petition the workers claimed that
they did more work in ten and three-quarter hours
than others in twelve or thirteen, because of their
increased zeal and activity.^ Of the actual effect of the
shortened hours on production Owen gives us no precise
information. He expresses, indeed, to the Committee of
1 8 16 his conviction that manufacturers would not lose
by reason of shortened hours of production ; that such
shortened hours would " hardly make a perceptible
difference in the prime cost of any article." But he had
no figures to give : and it is clear that he reckoned
any slight increase in the cost of production as insig-
nificant in comparison with the improved health and
enlarged opportunities of instruction afforded to the
workers.^
Fortunately there is a document in the Manchester
Collection which throws some light upon the effect on
production of the shortened hours of labour. In 1822
Owen's son Robert, at his father's request, prepared a
statement, which is given below, of the total wages and
produce of the mills for the eight years from 18 14 to
1 821. It will be seen that in the year 18 16 — the first
year of the shortened hours — the gross wages of the
operatives show an increase of about three per cent., whilst
^ Hansard, Vol. 37, p. 1182. ' Evidence, p. 21.
164
ROBERT OWEN
the wages of the mechanics and the salaries of the
superintendents, etc., have risen in a much higher pro-
portion. During the same period the produce has actually
fallen in weight to the extent of nearly eight per cent.,
though, as a finer quality of yarn was produced, the
actual fall in value was probably much less. In the
following year, i 8 1 7, the gross wages of the operatives
have again risen, to the extent of two and a half per cent.
On the other hand, the wages of superintendence have
decreased and the produce shows a much larger pro-
portionate increase, so that much of the loss on the
previous year's working appears to have been made
good. We must share Robert Dale Owen's regret that
time did not permit of the value of the produce being
included in the statement, for the money value would
probably have afforded a more precise measure than either
pounds or hanks of the productiveness of labour under
the new conditions. I have added an analysis of the
table showing for each year the amount in pounds and
hanks represented by ^i sterling of the operatives' and
of the gross wages respectively.
Statement of Wages and Produce in the Years
1814 TO 1821.
YEAR.
MILL
WAGES.
MECH.
WAGES.
SALARY
ACCOUNT.
TOTAL OF
WAGES.
LB.
HANKS.
1814
I815
1816
I817
1818
I819
1820
I82I
22,096
22,811
23,509
24,171
23.472
24,596
25.292
23,675
2,627
3,051
3,570
3,661
3.495
3.674
3,860
3.382
2,747
2,710
3,131
2,933
2,953
2,957
3.124
2,940
C
27,471
28,572
30,211 ;
30,766 i
29,921 1
31,228
32,277 1
29,997 1
1,385.390
1,451.947
1,339.434
1.424,513
1,457.096
1,465,445
1,459,094
1,377.580
34.675.088
35.696,543
35.582.271
36,834.150
35.2i3.li4
36,511.553
39.799-479
37.184,722
NEW LANARK
165
Analysis of Statement of Wages and Produce in the
Years 1814 to 1821.
YEAR.
jQl OF MILL WAGES PRODUCES
£1 OF TOTAL WAGES PRODUCES
LB.
HANKS.
LB.
HANK3.
I814
I815
i8i6
1817
1818
1819
1820'
1821'
62-7
63-6
56-9
58-9
62-1
59-6
57-7
58-2
1569-3
15649
^513-1
1523-9
1500-2
14844
1573-6
I579-I
50-4
50-8
443
46-3
487
469
45-2
45-9
1262-2
1249-4
II77-8
1197-2
1176-9
1169-2
I233-I
12396
Child Labour. — As already said, Owen raised the
lower limit of age for the employment of children
to ten years. He would have preferred that no
children should be employed in the mills until twelve,
and allowed any children whose parents wished it
to remain in the schools until that age. But the
privilege was rarely if ever taken advantage of ; the
parents were no doubt unable to forego the children's
earnings.
JVages. — The deputation despatched in 1 8 1 9 by the
Guardians of the Poor at Leeds comment in their report
on the lowness of the wages paid. The average weekly
wages at New Lanark for youths under eighteen was
4^. 3^., and for girls under eighteen y. 5^. For men
the average was 9^. iid. 2, week and for women 6s.
The average earnings of piece-workers were 25 to
50 per cent, higher in each case. Macnab points out -
that Owen paid his workpeople lower wages than were
commonly paid in similar establishments elsewhere.
^ One of the mills was burnt down at the end of November, 1819.
' Op. cit., p. 130.
i66 ROBERT 0\\^N
And Owen himself before the Committee of 1816 gives
testimony to the same effect.^ Owen cites the case of
a man who had been earning i8j. a week at New
Lanark, and left to earn a guinea a week in some
mills at Glasgow. Shortly afterwards he applied to
be taken on again at New Lanark ; and, his old place
having been filled up, he was glad to accept an inferior
position at only 14J. a week.
There was also the public store, established originally
by Dale, but enlarged and improved under Owen's
management. Provisions, clothing, etc., of all the best
qualities were purchased wholesale, and retailed at prices
some twenty per cent, or more below that charged at
ordinary shops for articles of inferior quality. The
profit realised by the sales amounted nevertheless
to about £100 a year — sufficient, as Owen told the
Committee of 181 6, to defray the entire cost of the
schools.^
The working classes of Scotland, it may be hazarded,
are not more given to sobriety than the working classes
of other nations. Nor were the people of Lanark before
Owen's advent in any way superior in this respect to
their fellow-countrymen generally. The worthy gentleman
who wrote a report on Lanark for Sinclair's Statistical
Account of Scotland puts the matter in delicate and scarcely
* Evidence, pp. 22, 23. Before the same Committee Adam Bogle,
partner in a Glasgow firm of cotton-spinners, gave evidence that in
their mule-twist factory the average wages (men, women and children)
per head were 9.9. %d. a week. He does not say how many children
were included in the total, but probably not less than half {Report,
p. 166).
' That is, exclusive of rent. \N'ritinR in 1849, however, Owen estimated
the cost of the schools to the company at £\,200 a year. See New
Existence, Part \'., p. 62.
NEW LANARK 167
ambiguous language. The 'people of Lanark, he says,
" are naturally generous, hospitable and fond of strangers,
which induces them sometimes to make free with the
bottle," and he adds that whilst "drunkenness among
the better class of inhabitants is of late rather unusual,
it is less so among the others." Owen, as we have
already seen, recognised the evil, and showed equal
courage and sagacity in the methods which he adopted
for remedying it. He found that the people got their
supplies of food and also of spirits from several small
retail shops.^ Owen felt, no doubt, that it would be
impracticable to enforce total abstinence among his people.
He boldly accepted the situation, therefore, and included
whiskey amongst the articles to be obtained at the public
store. Probably, as Macnab suggests, he trusted largely
to the effects of publicity to shame the workers into
sobriety. Possibly also there was some restriction as
to the hours of sale and as to the amount to be purchased.
From a passage in evidence before the Committee of
18 16, it appears that the amount of whiskey purchased
was entered in the purchaser's pass-book" — no doubt in
order that payment might be deducted from the wages.
It is unlikely that whiskey was treated exceptionally in
^ Life^ Vol, I., p. 65. Robert Dale Owen {Threading my Way, p. 70)
says that in Dale's time no grog-shops were permitted in the village, but
that the people got their drink from the Old Town. This account of the
matter is perhaps not inconsistent with the statement in tjie text ; the
small shops referred to may have been in Old Lanark. At any rate
there is general agreement that drunkenness was very prevalent in
Dale's time.
' Reporty p. 167. The person referred to, a woman, had left New
Lanark after three years' employment there, ostensibly because she did
not like dancing. But inspection of her pass-book suggested another
explanation. For the first six months of her employment her expenditure
on whiskey was only 15. lod. \ in the last six months it had risen to 22j",
i68 ROBERT OWEN
this respect, so that it seems probable that all article
could thus be obtained on short credit at the stores ;
and the use of money would thus be avoided, whilst
a check would readily be instituted on undue consumption
of intoxicants.
But Owen did not, at any rate in the earlier years
of the experiment, trust exclusively to measures of this
kind for repressing intemperance. He employed watch-
men to patrol the streets and report any case of
drunkenness. The offenders were fined for the first and
second offence, and were liable to dismissal on the third
occasion.^ By general testimony his efforts met with
complete success, and New Lanark appears to have been
the soberest village in Scotland. It was also one of the
most moral. We have unfortunately no statistics of the
number of illegitimate births at New Lanark in Dale's
time, but it is certain that Dale did his best to repress
immorality. Owen, however, tells us that on his first
coming he found the number of illegitimate children
considerable, and that *' they increased for two or three
years." * He then instituted a system of fines, and made
the father in each case contribute 2s. and the mother
15. weekly to a Poor Fund. By this and other
means the number of births out of wedlock was greatly
diminished. In 1819 the Leeds Deputation state that
* the moral habits of the people are very exemplary,"
and furnish confirmation of the statement in the fact
that during the previous nine and a half years,
with 1,380 women, there had been only twenty-eight
' Threading my Way, p. 70.
• Report^ p. 40. The statement in inverted commas probably does
not mean that the rate of illegitimate births increased.
NEW LANARK 169
illegitimate births, and the father was in most cases
non-resident/
Amongst minor benefits Owen provided medical
attendance for all at New Lanark.^ There was also a
Sick Fund, which the workpeople themselves maintained,
each person contributing for the purpose a sixtieth part
of his wages ; ^ and a Savings Bank, the deposits
in which during the year 181 8 amounted to over
^3,000/ Owen had also contemplated establishing
public kitchens and eating-rooms, and had designed
to set aside part of the old school-buildings for
the purpose. He estimated that the workpeople
would save ^4,000 or ^5,000 a year by this means.^
* According to Aiton {pp. di.y p. 22) the Lanark Presbytery in 1823
reported that the moral state of New Lanark was no better under
Owen than under " the late excellent Mr. Dale." But the testimony
is a mere vague expression of belief: and the witnesses can hardly
be held impartial.
' Robert Owen at New Lanark, p. 13 ; Macnab, p. 99.
3 Life, Vol. L, p. 281. The management of this Sick Fund in the
later years of Owen's residence at New Lanark appears to have caused
some friction. In November, 1823, some of the workpeople appealed
to the London partners in the following terms : " That you (the other
partners) be sohcited to inform us whether a friendly invitation or a
determined compulsion shall hereafter constitute the Society. That you
be presented with a statement of the whole proceedings — by perusing
which you will readily perceive our fundamental grievance. . . . Mr.
Owen's usurpation of managing the Society agreeably to his own views,
in opposition to what he certainly knows to be ours. And further
we view it as a grievance of considerable magnitude to be compelled by
Mr. Owen to adopt what measures soever he may be pleased to suggest
on matters that entirely belong to us. Such a course of procedure is
most repugnant to our minds as men, and degrading to our characters as
free-born sons of highly favoured Britain " (quoted by Aiton, op. cit., p. 37).
The benevolence of the most benevolent of despots will not always
reconcile his subjects to the loss of freedom.
* Report of the Leeds Deputation.
^ Griscom, A Year in Europe, Vol. IL, p. 384. Griscom's visit was
paid in 1819.
I70 ROBERT OWEN
But it does not appear that the intention was ever
carried out.^
Among other material benefits conferred upon the
population during Owen's management must be mentioned
the improvement in the dwelling-houses and in the
general hygiene of the village mentioned in Chapter V.,
the throwing open of the woods near the village, and
the construction of walks through them.
But all these tangible gifts formed the lesser part of the
debt which the inhabitants of New Lanark owed to their
employer's paternal government. There was something
else than the cash nexus to bind the community together.
The sincerity and benevolence of Owen's character were
reflected in all around. It was not only the cleanliness,
sobriety, and order of the village which impressed the
frequent visitors ; but the spirit of happiness and good-
will which prevailed everywhere. The Leeds Deputation
gives straightforward testimony to this effect : —
" Mr. Owen's establishment is essentially a manu-
facturing establishment, conducted in a manner superior
to any other the deputation ever witnessed, and dispensing
more happiness than perhaps any other institution in
the kingdom where so many poor persons are employed ;
and is founded on an admirable system of moral
regulation. . . . Public-houses and other resorts of
the vicious arc nowhere to be found in this happy
village ; and the absence of their contaminating influence
is strikingly exemplified in the contrast of manners and
of conduct between the inhabitants of New Lanark,
' The scheme is still spoken of in the future tense by a visitor to
New Lanark in 1822 (see the account quoted from the " Dublin Report "
in New Existence, Part V., p. xxx.), and the agreement of 1824 mentions
the public kitchens as still uncompleted.
NEW LANARK 171
and of most (we fear we may say all) other manufacturing
places. ... In the adult inhabitants of New Lanark
we saw much to commend. In general they appeared
clean, healthy, and sober. Intoxication, the parent of
so many vices and so much misery, is indeed almost
unknown here. The consequence is that they are
well-clad, and well-fed, and their dwellings are in-
viting. . . .
" In this well-regulated colony, where almost every-
thing is made, wanted by either the manufactory or its
inhabitants, no cursing or swearing is anywhere to be
heard. There are no quarrelsome men or brawling
women. . . . The Scotch character has in it, no doubt,
something that disposes to a more exemplary observance
of the Sabbath than is generally to be met with in
England ; but this circumstance apart, it is quite manifest
that the New Lanark system has a tendency to improve
the religious character ; and so groundless are the ap-
prehensions expressed on the score of religion suffering
injury by the prevalence of these establishments, that we
accord with Mr. Owen in his assertion that the inhabitants
of that place form a more religious community than any
manufacturing establishment in the United Kingdom.
This effect arises out of the circumstances by which they
are surrounded, and is wholly independent of any
sentiment on religious subjects entertained by Mr. Owen
himself" ^
To this last clause we may add the testimony of Sir
William de Crespigny, who described at a meeting of the
British and Foreign Philanthropic Society on June i,
1822, a visit which he had paid to New Lanark. After
^ New Existence, Part V., pp. xxiv-vi,
172 ROBERT OWEN
dwelling on the obvious health and happiness of the
children, he went on to speak of the reading of the Bible
in the schools, and of the diligence of the inhabitants
in attending public worship on Sunday, adding, " I never
saw more propriety, good conduct and devotion in any
place." ^
The publication, in 1813, of Owen's Essays on the
Formation of Character had as already said made him
acquainted with many of the leading men of the day —
bishops, statesmen, economists, and philanthropists. Later,
his evidence before the Committee of 18 16 on Factory
Children, his addresses at the '' City of London Tavern "
in 1 817, and his incessant activity after that date in
promulgating his plans for the regeneration of society,
carried his name over all Europe. Every one who was
interested in education or social reform came to New
Lanark to see the great social experiment there in pro-
cess. During the ten years from 181 5 to 1825, when
Owen practically severed his connection with the Scotch
factory, the names recorded in the Visitors' Book
numbered nearly 20,000.^ To quote Owen's own
catalogue, the visitors included *' Princes John and
Maximilian of Austria, Foreign Ambassadors — many
Bishops and Clergy innumerable — almost all our own
nobility — learned men of all professions from all countries
— and wealthy travellers for pleasure or knowledge of
• New Existence, I'art V., p. xxxv. So that the verdict of the old
Scotchwoman whom Bulwcr Lytton interviewed at New Lanark, was
as irrelevant as it was ungenerous. " ' The Bairns,* said the old lady,
' turned out vera ill. They had never been taught this ' — laying her hands
on the Bible."— Lytton's Li/e, Vol. I., p. 303 (quoted by 5. Walpole,
History, Vol. IV., p. 377)-
' Tlircading my Way, p. 115,
NEW LANARK 173
every description." Not the least interesting amongst
this crowd of pilgrims was the Grand Duke Nicholas,
afterwards Nicholas I., Czar of Russia, who visited New
Lanark with his suite in 18 16, and stayed for a night
as Owen's guest at his house, Braxfield. The village
band met the Duke on the outskirts of the Old Town,
and escorted him to the mills. The compliment, as we
learn from Robert Dale Owen, was not appreciated,
though the Duke himself was too well-bred to show
that his ear had been irked by indifferent music/ The
Duke, then in his twentieth year, made a very agreeable
impression on Owen and his family. He went all round
the mills, asking questions and seeming to be unaffectedly
interested in all that he saw and heard. He even
" listened with marked attention for two hours and more
to an exposition by Robert Owen of his peculiar views
for the improvement of mankind."
With one of Owen's younger sons, David Dale, at
that time nine or ten years old, he was so favourably
impressed that he intimated a desire to take him to
Russia and find him a place at his Court. He gave
a more striking practical proof of the pleasure he had
derived from his visit, and of his approval of his host's
methods for reforming the world. For, knowing of the
then prevalent apprehension amongst British statesmen
and economists that our little islands were over-peopled,
he suggested that Owen himself should come to Russia
and bring two millions of the surplus population with
him. Both offers were gratefully declined.
^ op. cii., p. 116. The date of the visit was December 26. The Grand
Duke left on the following day for Moffat (see the Tiities, January i, 1817).
There is a brief account of the visit in the Russian State archives, which
my friend M. Petrovo-Solovovo has kindly searched for me.
174 ROBERT OWEN
One trifling incident connected with the Duke's
visit is worth recording here, as illustrating Owen's
character.
" The crest of our family," writes Owen's son, *' two
eagles' heads, had been, as is customary, engraved on
our service of plate. At supper, one of the Duke's
suite, handing a silver fork to him, called his attention
to the engraving as being almost an exact copy of the
double eagle, part of the blazon of the Russian coat of
arms. Some jest as to right of property having passed
in connection with the matter, and attracted my father's
attention, it suggested a gift to his guest. Accordingly,
next morning, " he had a silver dessert-set packed up,
and handed, just as the party were starting oif, to one
of the attendants, together with a letter begging the
Duke's acceptance of it as a memento of his visit to
New Lanark.
" My mother, good sensible matron, took exception
to any such proceeding. In the case of a friend to
whom wc owed kindness or gratitude, or to any one
who would value the offering for the donor's sake, she
would not have grudged her nice forks and spoons, but
to the possessor of thousands, a two days' acquaintance,
who was not likely to bestow a second thought on
the things ! — in all which I cordially agreed with
her, especially when I found William Sheddon, our
butler, lamenting over his empty cases, the gHttering
contents of which had often excited my childish
admiration." ^
Before we leave New Lanark some account of Owen's
home life there — the only place where after childhood
' Threading tny M ay^ pp. 119, 120.
NEW LANARK 175
he ever found a home — may appropriately be given.
On their first coming to New Lanark, Owen and his
young wife had settled in the cottage situated in the
centre of the village — the same in which Caroline Dale
and her sisters had been wont to spend their summers
before her marriage. The winters, in the early years
of married life, were spent in Mr. Dale's house in
Charlotte Street, Glasgow ; Owen himself when necessary
riding between Glasgow and New Lanark. In a few
years, however, as his establishment outgrew the modest
dimensions of the cottage, Owen tells that he took on
lease from Lord Braxfield,^ one of the Lords of Sessions,
a large house situated about two furlongs from the
mills, called Braxfield House, still continuing to live in
Charlotte Street during the winter.
Braxfield House stands in the midst of large and
well-wooded grounds on the banks of the river. In
front the grounds slope gently down to the water.
Behind the house, the woods rise at a sharper angle to
the table-land above. Here Owen lived for many years
with his family ; and here he was wont to entertain the
distinguished visitors who came from all parts of the
earth to see New Lanark. His family consisted of four
sons — Robert Dale, William Dale, David Dale, and
Richard — and three daughters, Anne Caroline, Jane Dale,
and Mary.^ Besides these Mrs. Owen's four younger
sisters, after their father's death, for many years made
their home at Braxfield, residing there when they were
not at school in London.
^ Robert Macqueen, the famous Lord Justice Clerk, died in May,
1799, so that Owen's lease must have been granted by Lord Braxfield's
representatives.
' Another son, the first-born, had died in infancy.
176 ROBERT OWEN
The eldest son, Robert Dale Owen, born on Nov. 7,
1 801, has in his Autobiography/ from which we
have already had frequent occasion to quote, given a
delightful picture of the family life at Braxfield. Unlike
some who have set out to reform the world, Robert
Owen carried out his principles in the family circle.
Though his wife used laughingly to tax him with loving
the children at the mill better than his own, there seems to
have been affection enough to go round. His unvarying
kindness to all seems to have been the dominant feature of
his character. He was lenient even to trespassers. His
son tells us how he and his father, strolling one Sunday
near the river in front of Braxfield, came upon two of
the mill hands — a young man and woman — who had
trespassed on Owen's private grounds, and how Owen
turned away rather than disturb an innocent courtship.
An anonymous writer who had been brought up in
New Lanark from boyhood, and ultimately became a
teacher in the schools, gives another instance to the
same effect. As a boy he had gone with a young
companion to the Braxfield wood to cut shinties (sticks)
for themselves. Whilst intent upon their lawless pro-
ceedings they felt a touch upon the shoulder. '' Who
can tell the perturbed state of our minds when, suddenly
turning round, we found it to be none other than
Mr. Owen himself ! W^e dropped our knives, hung
down our heads, and made no reply. To run away
was out of the question, for he knew us both. He,
however, broke silence by thus addressing us : * Now
if you had been early trained by precept, but more
especially by a strict and rigorous example, to know
' Threading ftiy Way, London, 1874.
\
NEW LANARK 177
and feel that your present conduct was bad, I should
not now have found you thus employed ; but the blame
is not justly yours, but is attached to your parents, and
those more advanced in years, who by their example
lead you on to think and act in a similar way to
themselves. I shall say no more to you ; take the
branches with you that you have cut, and should you
again stand in need of anything of this kind for your
amusement, first make application to me, and having
gained my consent, you will then have nothing to fear
from my presence.' Such was the purport of this short
lecture to the two little culprits in the midst of his
woods, and having said so, he left us." ^
But Owen was always consistent in his views.
Neither men nor babies are the proper subjects of praise
and blame : and therefore babies must not be whipped
into obedience. When the infant Robert screamed, as
he frequently did, in a fit of temper, his father desired
that he should not be slapped or shaken or even scolded,
but should be set down on the nursery floor and left
to scream himself out. So it was done ; and the cure
proved effectual. No blow was ever struck in anger
in that house. There was no punishment in the Brax-
field nursery, but also no praise. Children, like men,
were the creatures of circumstance, and should not be
praised any more than blamed, for doing what they
could not help. Approval was testified only by a
smile or a caress. The effect of this austere regime
was that the first words of praise received from
1 Robert Owen at New Lanark, p. 8. Perhaps the reader will think
that to be compelled to listen to such a portentous homily was punishment
enough. The writer has fairly caught the trick of Robert Owen's style :
but no doubt the actual speech is Thucydidean — in all but brevity.
VOL. I, 12
178 ROBERT OWEN
an outsider produced in the youthful Robert an
overwhelming effect. But the boy had his father's
good sense, and the effect on the whole seems to have
been salutary.^
Robert Owen throughout his life, partly as we have
already seen from necessity, partly no doubt from taste,
was studiously simple in his eating and drinking. A
like simplicity was enforced upon his children. The
breakfiist was of porridge and milk only, the supper
of bread and milk ; the dinner consisted of one helping
of meat, one of pudding, and as much oatmeal cake
as they wanted. They were allowed neither tea, coffee,
nor of course, wine or beer. Their great weekly feast,
the young Robert tells us, was in the housekeeper's
room on Sunday. That kindly lady, Miss Wilson,
invited the children each week to a banquet, where the
table was spread with toast and sweet biscuits, and tea
suitably diluted was served for drink. Hence, amongst
the junior members of the Owen family, Sunday was
known as the toast-biscuit-tea-day. Robert tells us
much of Miss Wilson and her kindness to the children ;
of the one-armed postman who brought the letters,
and taught the children to blow soap-bubbles from a
clay pipe ; of the wicked boot-boy Sandy who maliciously
broke the pipe ; and how the punishment which was
meant for Sandy descended upon Miss Wilson's innocent
head. He tells us too of his own exploits in driving
and shooting crows, and riding to hounds ; of the mimic
combats between his younger brother and himself, e?i-
acting respectively the roles of Hector and Ajax ; of
the dancing-master who taught them Scotch reels and
' Thrciiding my Way, p. 47.
NEW LANARK 179
the cotillon, and who tried to teach them the minuet ;
of the handsome young French prisoner of war, Monsieur
Levasseur, who taught the two older boys French, and
dared to aspire to the hand of their Aunt Mary, Mrs.
Owen's sister ; of fox-hunting parsons ; of Miss
Edgeworth's brother and other interesting visitors. All
these histories of a child's life nearly a century ago
are told with that winning simplicity which was part
of Robert Dale Owen's inheritance from his father.
He gives us a picture of a happy home and a family
united by ties of the closest affection, which was proof
even against religious differences.
Owen throughout his adult life professed some
form of Deism ; and the question of theology naturally
presented difficulties in the domestic circle. But these
were smoothed over to a great extent by his large-
hearted tolerance. We have already seen how, in the
management of the schools, he respected the religious
views of the parents. Griscom relates that on the first
morning after his arrival at Braxfield the servant brought
in a Bible with the hot water.^ So with his father-in-
law, Mr. Dale, despite their profound differences in
matters of opinion, Owen seems to have lived on terms
not merely of tolerance but of mutual respect and warm
affection. They had, he tells us, many prolonged dis-
cussions, in which each failed to move the other, but
learnt to respect his antagonist's strength and sincerity.
At most. Dale would allow himself to say to Owen,
in affectionate banter, " Thou needest be very right,
for thou art very positive." ^
^ A Yea?- in Europe, Vol. II., p. 382.
^ Autobiography^ Vol_. J,, p. 72.
i8o ROBERT OWEN
Dale's daughter naturally inherited her father's faith,
and remained a devout Presbyterian throughout her life.
Owen left the education of the children in her hands,
and loyally withheld from them, as long as he could,
his own differing views. Thus Robert Dale Owen
writes :
" 1 recollect, one day when he had been explaining
to me how seeds produced plants and trees, that 1 asked
him where the very, very first seeds came from, and that
his answer did not go to shake my faith in the Mosaic
account of the Creation. I remember, too, that on
another occasion, fresh from my mother's lesson on the
almighty and all-pervading power of the Creator, who
made the sun to shine and all things to live and grow,
I inquired of my father whether God went under the
roots of the trees and pushed them up. But my father,
in reply, only smiled and said he did not know how
it was done." ^
But the son's eyes were soon afterwards opened to
the father's " infidelity " by hearing him, in a discussion
with a bishop who chanced to be their guest, controvert
the doctrine of man's natural depravity. The youthful
Robert came to the assistance of the Church militant,
receiving at the time some ill-judged praise from his
ally, and the next morning a severe rebuke from his
mother on the sinfulness of self-sufficiency in small boys.
But as soon as the boy realised the nature of his father's
opinions, he was filled with an earnest desire for his
conversion. A true son of his father, young Robert at
the age of eleven had a firm belief in his mission, and
unbounded confidence in the efficacy of arguments, and
' Threading my 11 ay, p. 54.
NEW LANARK i8i
his own arguments in particular, for the conversion of
opinion and the influencing of conduct.
So, nothing doubting, he set about to teach his father
the error of his ways :
" I recollect, to this day, the spot on which I
commenced my long-projected undertaking. It was on
a path which skirted, on the farther side, the lawn in
front of our house and led to the garden. I could point
out the very tree we were passing when — with some
misgivings, now that it was to be put to the test — I
sounded my father by first asking him what he thought
about Jesus Christ. His reply was to the effect that T
would do well to heed His teachings, especially those
relating to charity and to our loving one another.
" This was well enough, as far as it went ; but it did
not at all satisfy me. So, with some trepidation, I put
the question direct, whether my father disbelieved that
Christ was the Son of God ?
" He looked a little surprised and did not answer
immediately.
<« ' Why do you ask that question, my son ? ' he said
at last.
" ' Because I am sure — ' I began eagerly.
" * That He is God's Son ? ' asked my father,
smiling.
'''Yes, I am.'
'* ' Did you ever hear of the Mahometans ? ' said my
father, while I had paused to collect my proofs.
" I replied that I had heard of such a people who
lived somewhere, far off.
*' ' Do you know what their religion is ? '
" ' No.'
1 82 ROBERT OWEN
" * They believe that Christ is not the Son of God,
but that another person, called Mahomet, was God's
chosen prophet.'
"^ Do they not believe the Bible? ' asked I, somewhat
aghast.
'* ' No. Mahomet wrote a book called the Koran ;
and Mahometans believe it to be the word of God.
That book tells them that God sent Mahomet to preach
the gospel to them, and to save their souls.'
'' Wonders crowded fast upon me. A rival Bible and
a rival Saviour ! Could it be ^ I asked, * Are you
quite sure this is true, papa ? '
*' ' Yes, my dear, I am quite sure.'
" ' But I suppose there are very few Mahometans :
not near — ncdr so many of them as of Christians.'
'' ' Do you call Catholics Christians, Robert.'' '
*' ' O no, papa. The Pope is Antichrist.'
" My father smiled. ' Then by Christians you mean
Protestants ^ '
'' ' Yes.'
" ' Well, there are many more Mahometans than
Protestants in the world : about a hundred and forty
million Mahometans, and less than a hundred million
Protestants.'
" ' I thought almost everybody believed in Christ,
as mamma does.'
'^ ' There are probably twelve hundred millions of
people in the world. So, out of every twelve persons
only one is a Protestant. Are you qui/e sure that the
one is right and the eleven wrong ? '
"My creed, based on authority, was toppling. I had
no answer ready. During the rest of the walk I remained
NEW LANARK 183
almost silent, engrossed with new ideas, and replying
chiefly in monosyllables when spoken to.
" And so ended this notable scheme of mine for my
father's conversion." ^
Ultimately Robert Dale Owen came to share his
father's views on religious and social questions, and for
some years worked with him as his staunchest disciple
and ally.
* Threading my IVay, pp. 60, 61.
CHAPTER IX
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT
OWJ^^X had whilst still quite a young man won a
name in the cotton trade for the fineness and
excellence of the yarns spun under his management.
At a somewhat later date we find him taking a prominent
place in the councils of the trade. In 1803 he was a
member of the Committee of Management of the Board
representing the Cotton industry ; and at a meeting of
the Committee on February 2 of that year he pre-
sented a report entitled *' Observations on the Cotton
Trade of Great Britain and on the late Duties on the
Importation of Cotton Wool." There was at the time
much dissatisfaction amongst the cotton lords. The
import duties on raw cotton which had been in force
since 1798 had been repealed in I 80 1, and again imposed,
with additions, in 1802. Owen's paper begins by setting
out briefly some statistics of the trade, with an estimate
that the wages paid during the previous year amounted
to no less than thirteen million pounds sterling. From
these figures he deduces the importance of the industry
to the country at large, and the serious results which
must ensue on any diminution in its prosperity. He
concludes with a temperate and carefully reasoned
argument demonstrating the impolicy ot a tax upon raw
material and the risk that the trade would thereby be
184
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 185
driven into foreign countries, some of which were already
in a position to obtain labour, and now also raw material,
at a cheaper rate than Great Britain.
Owen's argument was no doubt sound. But pro-
bably the Government felt that the cotton-spinners were
making such enormous profits that even a tax upon raw
material which amounted in some cases, according to
Owen's calculations, to as much as 20 per cent.,^ could
not do them much harm, and must bring in something
to the coffers of a nation impoverished by long war.
At any rate they were not influenced by Owen's
reasoning, for in the course of this same year, 1803,
the duties were raised by more than 50 per cent."
Twelve years later the duties on raw cotton, wher-
ever originating, were i6s. iid. the 100 lb., and a
meeting was summoned by the Lord Provost of Glasgow
at the end of January, 18 15, to agitate for a repeal of
this heavy taxation. Owen spoke at the meeting, which
^ The highest duty on cotton in 1802 was 15^. the 100 lb., the lowest
price quoted about lod. a lb. — which would represent a duty of 18
per cent, ad valore7?t. (See the Tables given in Baines's Hist07y of the
Cotton Matiiifacture, pp. 313, 326.)
2 Duties on Raw Cotton.
1802, 1803.
East Indies £^ i6s. per cent. '
ad val.
Turkey and United
16s. Sd. per
100 lb.
25^. per 100
lb.
States ys. lod. per 100 lb.
British plantations ... los. 6d. „ „
Any other place ... 155-. „ „
Baines, ^oc at.
Half of the new duties levied in 1803 consisted of a special war
tax, 8.y. 4.d. the 100 lb. on British, American, and Turkish cotton, and
12^. 6d. on all other cotton, imposed by the Act 43 George III.
c. 70.
1 86 ROBERT OWEN
was held in the Tontine Hall, and as his remarks met
with a reception not altogether tavourahle, he repeated
them a day or two later in the form of a letter to the
the Glasgow Chronicle. In this later pronouncement he
begins by restating the arguments which he had used
twelve years before, setting forth the importance ot the
cotton trade to the nation, and the imprudence, in view
of the keen competition with other countries, of imposing
a heavy tax upon the raw material. So tar, as he tells
us in his Autohiografhy^ his speech met with the full
assent of the meeting.
But he failed to carry the meeting with him when
he went on to draw their attention to another aspect
of the question. The cotton manufacture with its vast
profits was not, he pointed out, of unmixed benefit to
the nation : " 1 know from personal experience that the
labouring classes were much more happy in their agri-
cultural pursuits, than they can be while engaged, as
they now are, in most branches of the cotton manufacture.
The lamentable results, however, can be known only by
experience ; and now the experience is acquired, it is
too late to retrace our steps. Were we inclined, we
cannot now return to our former state ; for without the
cotton trade, our increased population cannot be supported,
the interest of the national debt paid, nor the expenses
of our fleets and armies defrayed. Our existence as an
independent power, now, I regret to say, depends on
the continuance of this trade, because no other can be
substituted in its place. True indeed it is, that the
main pillar and prop of the political greatness of our
country is a manufacture which, as it is now carried on,
is destructive of the health, morals, and social comforts
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 187
of the mass of the people engaged in it. It is only
since the introduction of the cotton trade, that children
at an age before they have acquired strength of body or
mental instruction, have been forced into cotton-mills —
those receptacles, in too many cases, for living human
skeletons, almost disrobed of intellect, where, as the
business is often now conducted, they linger out a few
years of miserable existence, acquiring every bad habit,
which they disseminate throughout Society. It is only
since the introduction of this trade, that children, and
even grown people, were required to labour more than
twelve hours in the day, including the time allotted for
meals. It is only since the introduction of this trade
that the sole recreation of the labourer is to be found in
the pot-house or gin-shop. It is only since the intro-
duction of this baneful trade that poverty, crime, and
misery have made rapid and fearful strides throughout
the community." ^
He concluded by urging those present, in approach-
ing the Legislature with an appeal for the remission of
the tax, not to forget the interests of those by whom
^ Atitobiography, Vol. Ia., pp. i6, 17. Owen of course exaggerated
the extent of the change for the worse. He shared the common illusion of
Socialists, who have always seen the vision of a golden age in the past —
a vision which continually recedes as we seek to examine it more closely.
There had been poverty, drink, and crime in these islands before the inven-
tions of Crompton and Arkwright; men, women, and children had laboured
beyond their strength before the coming of the factory system. But
Owen was nevertheless substantially in the right. The long hours and
excessive toil had become systematised, and had received toleration,
if not actual legal recognition, for the first time under the great industry.
Moreover, in the past the children for the most part had worked together
with their parents, under their parents' roof, in a common cause and for
a bare livelihood: the new system saw the passionless oppression of
children forced to labour in the house of a stranger — and to heap up
profits in which they had no share.
1 88 ROBERT OWEN
their profits were made. He suggested that statutory
powers should be sought —
(i) To prevent children from being employed in cotton-
mills until twelve years of age.
(2) To fix the hours of work at twelve a day, including
intervals of one and a half hours for meals — i.e. ten
and a half hours actual work.
(3) For an educational test before the admission of
a child to the mills.
Later in the same year, in a pamphlet, Observations
on the Effect of the Manufacturing System^ Owen
expanded the argument of the address. He begins
by sketching the rapid development of the industrial
system of the country, and the changes it had worked
in the conditions of labour and the relations generally
between rich and poor. Only a generation ago, he
writes, the poorest parents thought the age of fourteen
was early enough for their children to begin work, and
even that work was performed under reasonable human
conditions, which permitted of leisure, recreation, and
the enjoyment of home life. Then, too, the old feudal
relations between rich and poor still subsisted ; they
shared to some extent the same surroundings, even the
same amusements, and neither could be indifferent to
the weltare and happiness of the other. Now all is
changed. The poor man " sees all around him hurrying
forward, at a mail-coach speed, to acquire individual
wealth, regardless of him, his comforts, his wants, or
even his sufferings, except by way of a degrading parish
charity, fitted only to steel the heart of man against his
fellows, or to form the tyrant and the slave. To-day
he labours for one master, to-morrow for a second, then
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 189
for a third and a fourth, until all ties between employers
and employed are frittered down to the consideration
of what immediate gain each can derive from the other.
The employer regards the employed as mere instruments
of gain, while these acquire a gross ferocity of character,
which, if legislative measures shall not be judiciously
devised to prevent its increase, and ameliorate the con-
dition of this class, will sooner or later plunge the country
into a formidable and perhaps inextricable state of
danger." ^
As a remedy for the state thus pictured he suggests
an Act of Parliament to regulate the conditions of child
labour in factories. The provisions of the suggested Act
are identical with those already indicated in his speech
at the Tontine, except that he now proposes that between
ten and twelve years of age children might be employed
for six hours a day in the factory, the remaining hours
to be spent in school — the modern system of half-
timers.
In the pursuance of his campaign, Owen sent copies
of his proposals to all the members of both Houses of
Parliament,^ and subsequently came up to London to
interview members of the Government and others. On
the question of taxation he was referred to Mr. Nicholas
Vansittart (afterwards Lord Bexley), who was then
^ Aiitobiogi'aphy ^ Vol. Ia., pp. 40, 41.
2 Owen states {Autobiogfaphy, Vol. I., p. 114) that the document thus
distributed was the address read at the Glasgow meeting ; but it seems
more probable that it was the pamphlet published afterwards. The later
document is a formal and reasoned appeal for legislation on behalf of the
operatives ; whereas the address, which deals also with the effects of the
tax, was obviously composed with an eye to the particular audience before
whom it purports to have been delivered, and contains some rhetorical
passages which were omitted from the pamphlet.
I90 ROBERT OWEN
Chancellor of the Exchequer. Owen tell us that
Vansittart questioned him on the cotton trade, and that
the minister " blushed like a sensitive maiden " at some
remark which betrayed his own ignorance of the subject
— a likely enough incident, for Vansittart by common
consent was not a strong finance minister. Owen adds :
*' The tax was fourpence per pound, and he said he would
remit the whole, except to the amount oF a small portion
of a penny, which he said would be retained for some
Government object or arrangement." ^ This statement
is not quite accurate. The tax at the beginning of 1815
was 165. lid. per 100 lb. (or just 2d. a pound), with
an extra 3^. which perhaps stood for registration
duty ; and it was reduced in the course of the year
to 8j. ']d. for cotton imported in British ships, or id.
the pound + 3^. In other words the special war tax
of 8j. 4^. the 100 lb. which had been imposed in 1803
was remitted.^
Owen's efforts on behalf of the children were not
so immediately fruitful. The Government expressed
themselves as sympathetic, but they would not take up
the measure. Owen found much support, however,
amongst members of both Houses, amongst whom Lord
Tascclles, the eldest son of Lord Harewood, is specially
named as having ably seconded Owen's efforts.^ It was
ultimately agreed to ask Sir Robert Peel to take charge
' Autobiography, Vol. I., p. 115.
' Sec the Chancellor of the Exchequer's speech in tiie House of
Commons March 15, 181 5, from which it appears that the war duties
were continued on every article except cotton.
^ Lord Lascelles afterwards saw reason to change his mind. For in
ihc df'batf^s in the House of Commons in i8l8 he is one of the most
prominent opponents of the Bill.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 191
of the Bill, and he consented. The choice was a
fortunate one. Sir Robert Peel, father of the well-
known statesman of that name, and himself the son of
a yeoman, had amassed a large fortune from cotton-
spinning. In consequence of some abuses which had
come to light in his own factory some sixteen or
seventeen years before, and which had caused much
scandal, he had in 1802 introduced and succeeded
in passing into law the " Health and Morals of
Apprentices Act" (42 George III. c. 73). The Act
applied only to apprentices, i.e. children apprenticed
from the workhouse — the children of the State — and
its chief provisions were to prohibit nightwork and
to limit the hours of labour to twelve a day. The
Act also made provision for the teaching of reading,
writing, and arithmetic, for religious instruction, and for
the periodical whitewashing of factories.
The Bill to which Sir Robert Peel, at Owen's instance,
undertook to act as foster-father was of much wider
scope. First and chiefly, it was to apply, not only to
those children who were the special charge of the State,
but to all children alike.
It provided (a) that no child should be employed in
a mill or factory below the age of ten.
(I?) That no person under eighteen should be em-
ployed for more than 12J hours in the day, of which
no more than io|- might be given to actual work,
leaving li for meals and ^ for instruction.
(c) The 12-i- hours were to be comprised between
5 a.m and 9 p.m.
(<^) Instruction was to be given for half an hour a
day for the first four years.
92
ROBERT OWEN
(e) The justices were empowered to appoint duly-
qualified iiispectors and to pay them for their services/
The Bill was introduced on June 6, 1815, and
Peel, in moving the first reading, explained that it was
only an experimental measure, not intended to pass that
Session. His object in bringing it forward at this time
was that it might be printed and circulated for the
purposes of discussion and consideration.
Nothing more was done that year, but on April 3
of the following year, 1816, Sir Robert Peel returned
to the subject, and moved the appointment of a Com-
mittee to take evidence and report upon the state of
children employed in manufactories. The motion was
accepted, the Committee was appointed, and set itself at
once to hear evidence.
In the interval between the introduction of the Bill
and the appointment of the Committee in the following
year, Owen had proceeded on a tour of inspection
throughout England and Scotland, visiting the mills in
each town to which he came, for the purpose apparently of
collecting evidence to show the need for legislation. On
this journey he was accompanied by his eldest son, then a
boy of about fifteen. Young Owen was profoundly and
permanently impressed by his experiences on this journey ;^
' I have taken this summary of the chief provisions of the Bill froin
the draft printed in full in Vol. Ia of Owen's Autobiography, pp. 23
se(/g. But Sir R. Peel in introducing the Bill into the House of Commons
is reported (Hansard) as describing provision for 12^ hours, of which ten
were to be given to work, and 2^ to meals and instruction.
' See Threaditi^ my Way, pp. loi, 102. Robert Dale Owen says the
journey was undertakt-n in the summer of 181 5, and Owen himself refers
{Evidence, p. 24) to the journey as having taken place in the previous year,
i.e. 181 5. But he seems to have vi.sitcd Sid^wick'.-; mill, near v^kipton,
in April, 18 16. (See Evidence, p. 38 1).
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 193
and no doubt the travellers, even in this brief visit,
saw and heard enough to justify, in the eyes of a
more reasonable posterity, the intervention of the
strong arm of the law, to enforce what ordinary
humanity had failed to persuade. But tactically the
journey was probably a mistake. Owen's position as
a witness on his own ground was unique and practically
unassailable. He had demonstrated in his own factory —
and that factory worked under conditions generally
reckoned the most adverse, with water, that is, and not
steam as the motive-power — that it was possible to
shorten the hours of labour and to restrict the em-
ployment of young children, and yet to make profits
sufficient even for avarice. But for a master manufacturer,
however pure his motives, to play the spy on the con-
ditions of working in other factories was an invidious
business. And after all, the evidence he collected was
of little value for the purpose which he had in view —
if indeed he had designed to place it before the Com-
mittee of the House of Commons. He could give
only the general impressions which he had formed in
a hurried inspection of the health , or ill-health of the
children, the temperature of the rooms, the ages of
those employed. And on the last point, and also as
regards the hours worked, he was necessarily dependent
almost entirely on hearsay evidence.
Owen was the most important witness examined by
the Committee of 18 16, having appeared before it no
fewer than six times, whilst his evidence occupies as
much as twenty-four pages of the Blue-book. Much
of this evidence has already been cited in previous
chapters, and need here only be summarised. He told
VOL. I. 13
194 ROBERT OWEN
the Committee that he employed no children under ten,
and would prefer to raise the age of entrance to twelve,
allowing the children, however, to work half-time between
ten and twelve. The hours worked at New Lanark
were ten and three-quarters exclusive of meal-times,
and he would like to have them fixed at ten or at
most ten and a half a day. Before the age of ten,
and tor halt their time between ten and twelve, he
would have the childen attend school ; and to ensure their
doing so, he would insist upon an adequate educational
test — in reading, writing, and arithmetic and, for girls,
in sewing also — as a condition of admission to work
in a cotton-factory. He did not anticipate, as suggested
by various members of the Committee, if the children
were not allowed to work until ten years of age, and
were called upon to work only ten and a half hours
a days after that period, that their abundant leisure
would necessarily lead them to become hopelessly idle
and vicious. Nor did he regard working-class parents
as deficient in natural affections, or admit that the
limitation by law of ages and hours* of labour for
children carried with it that implication.
There is unfortunately no indication of the particular
members of the Committee who asked each question ;
but it is obvious from the character of the examination
that some of the members were strongly hostile to
Owen's views, and that he was unscrupulously plied
with question after question, in the hope of putting
him to confusion. Sometimes it would seem that his
opponents succeeded in their aim ; but on the other
hand, he occasionally surprises us by replies of unex-
pected pungency. Thus, when repeatedly and unfairly
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 195
pressed as to the number of children under ten years
of age then employed in manufactories throughout the
Kingdom — a point upon which he of necessity disclaimed
any accurate information — he ultimately replied, *' I
conceive the number would be in exact {sc. inverse)
proportion to the knowledge which the proprietors
have of their own interest, and the interest of the
children " (p. 86). Again, after having emphatically
expressed his opinion that the health of the children
and young people was injured by the long hours which
they were compelled to work, he was asked :
" Do you not conceive that it is injurious to the
manufacturer to hazard, by overwork, the health of the
people he employs ? '' His reply is brief and to the
point : '' If those persons were purchased by the manu-
facturer I should say decisively, ' yes ' ; but as they are
not purchased by the manufacturer, and the country must
bear all the loss of their strength and their energy, it
does not appear, at first sight, to be the interest of
the manufacturer to do so," i.e. to spare them (p. 28).
But Owen was by no means an ideal witness for the
cause which he had at heart. There was more than one
weak point in his armour, of which his enemies did not
fail to take advantage. The evidence which he had
collected in the tour of inspection above referred to was
not of a kind which would stand critical examination
by a committee of experts. His statement, for instance,
"that he observed a " marked and decided difference in
the countenances and conduct of the children " in
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, where they did not begin work
until twelve or fourteen, as compared with the children
in Manchester, who had gone to the mills when six or
196 ROBERT OWEN
seven years of age, may or may not have been well-
founded, but was not calculated to impress the Committee.
And in one case a definite statement of Owen's was
authoritatively contradicted. Owen asserted, as a fact
within his knowledge, that on the first introduction, in
the previous year, of the Bill a number of children
under ten years of age had been discharged from mills
throughout the country. Pressed to give a particular
instance, he named Mr. Sidgwick's mills at Skipton, and
stated that he had received information to that effect
from the lips of Sidgwick's nephew. At a later date he
repeated this statement (pp. 86 and 113). Mr. William
Sidgwick, junior, in his examination, read to the Committee
contemporary notes of his interview with Owen, written
for the information of his uncle, who was absent at the
time of Owen's visit. In these notes it is recorded that
only one child under ten years of age was at the time
of Owen's visit employed at the mill, and no mention
is made of any children having been discharged. In his
further evidence Mr. Sidgwick expressly denied that any
statement to that effect was made by him to Owen, or that
any children had been discharged as suggested (pp. 381,
382). It would appear probable, therefore, either that
Owen misunderstood something said by Mr. Sidgwick, or
that, relying as he apparently did on his memory, he had
attached the incident to the wrong place and person —
a thing which might easily happen in the course of a
tour of some weeks. But the episode no doubt had
a damaging effect.^
' The charge in itself was probable enough. There were ugly stories
two or three years later of sickly and deformed youtlis having been
hxjrriedly dismissed from certain Manchester cotton-mills ; of the children
having been cleaned up and the men ordered to shave ; the rooms scoured
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 197
Owen was also open to attack in another quarter.
His religious views were by this time becoming notorious,
and his enemies did not scruple to use the weapon thus
placed in their hands. He was questioned as to the
religious instruction given to the children at New Lanark ;
as to their attendance at Sunday school and at church ;
as to their examination in the Bible and Catechism ;
and as to his own private religious opinions. Little of
this examination appears in the published minutes of
evidence (see p. 26). But Owen tells us that he had
to submit to a long and vindictive cross-examination
from Mr. (afterwards Sir George) Philips, one of the
wealthy cotton-spinners on the Committee, on his private
opinions and beliefs. The animus was so manifest, and
the tone of the questioner so insolent, that Owen's son,
who accompanied his father to the meetings of the
Committee, was unable to hold back his tears. It appears
that on the motion of Lord Brougham the record of
this impertinent episode was expunged from the minutes.^
The part of his evidence, however, which aroused
the keenest interest at the time, and later, in the debates
in both Houses on the Bill and in the warfare by
newspapers and pamphlets outside, gave rise to the most
and the windows opened to reduce the temperature — all in preparation
for an inspection of the factories by some medical man selected for the
purpose by the proprietors. (See Evidence before the Lords' Committee of
1819, pp. 181-216.)
^ Autobiography^ Vol. I., p. 121. Threading my Way, p. 103. Owen
;adds that the opponents of the Bill sent emissaries down to New Lanark
to interview the parish minister and other persons, with a view of
obtaining damaging evidence as to his "infidelity" and other unpopular
opinions. Owen probably exaggerated the importance of the enterprise,
which in any case seems legitimate enough in political warfare of this
kind. At any rate nothing came of it. {S&q. Autobiography, Vol. I., pp.
117-20.)
198 ROBERT OWEN
embittered controversy, was that which dealt with the
economic effect of the shortened hours of labour.
Owen's statements on this point are not very expHcit.
He moved in a different world from that of the wealthy
cotton-spinners who tried to browbeat him before the
Committee. Neither he nor his later partners were
concerned exclusively with money-getting and the risks
of foreign competition. He was profoundly impressed
with the evils which the mad race for wealth had already
brought upon the workers, and in his publication of
January, i^^i5, already referred to, he had written —
" Perish the cotton trade, perish even the political
superiority of our country (if it depends on the cotton
trade), rather than they shall be upheld by the sacrifice
of everything valuable in life by those who are the means
of supporting them." ^
When therefore the Committee asked him whether
the manufacturers would not be likely to suffer loss in
consequence of the shortened hours, he replied with
cheerful and indifferent optimism. When questioned,
further, what benefits he expected from the measure, he
made answer, " A very considerable improvement in the
health of the operatives, both young and old ; a very
considerable improvement in the instruction of the rising
generation ; and a very considerable diminution in the
poor rates of the country." " A man who could so
lightly contemplate interference with England's monopoly
of the world's markets, for the sake of anything so
irrelevant as the honour of the country, or the education
' From the sjiecch at the Glasgow Meeting, Autobiography, Vol. Ia,
p. 18.
' See Evidence, p. 21.
cr('// y
r^
/ r^/
A..,^-, ,„■,■,. .v,,./ ,,/../// ^'
From a Ittltogiapli in llie Hrilish Miiscitni (tirnhxlcd).
ROBERT OWEN.
A iOR, Li'.NOX A.ND i
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 199
and well-being of the children of the poor, was clearly
dangerous in the eyes of men who had long ago, in
Lord Salisbury's phrase, written these things off their
books as unmarketable commodities. At any rate the
Committee seem to have judged it best after the last
answer to let him alone for the time.
Later, however, they returned to the subject, and
Owen was closely questioned as to the exact effects of
the shortened hours upon the product of his own mills.
The hours at New Lanark had been reduced, it will
be remembered, from eleven and three-quarters to
ten and three-quarters a day on January i , 1 8 1 6, so
that at the time of this examination. May 7 of the same
year, the new arrangement had only been working for
about four months. Owen explained in answer to
questions that the difference in the amount produced
was much less in proportion than the difference in the
hours worked, and according to his calculations " the
present loss is not more than one farthing in twenty
pence." He added that a daily return of the actual
quantity of yarn spun had been kept for years past,
and that these returns showed a gradual increase in the
produce from January i up to the date at which he
was speaking. Owen spoke from memory, as he had not
got these returns by him at the time, and unfortunately
they were not afterwards put in as evidence. Asked how
he accounted for the fact that the falling off in the daily
product was less proportionately than the reduction in
hours of working, he replied that he attributed it to
the effect of the shortened hours on the physical and
moral well-being of the operatives. Coming to details,
he explained that the machinery would be worked at
200 ROBERT OWEN
a higher rate, in proportion as the workpeople were more
active and attentive to their duties. He was unable to
say whether as a matter of fact the pace of the
machinery at New Lanark had been quickened since
the beginning of the year. Even without such quickening,
however, he considered that " a larger quantity may be
produced by a greater attention of the hands while the
machinery is at work, in preventing breakage and by
not losing any time in commencing in the morning, at
meals, or when stopping at night ; from the greater
desire of the individuals to perform their duty con-
scientiously ; from the great wish to make up for any
supposed or probable loss that the proprietors might
sustain in consequence of giving this amelioration to the
workpeople ; such conduct to workpeople is the most
likely to make them conscientious, and to obtain more
from them than when they are forced to do their duty." ^
The impression produced by his answers is that he
had not thought out this aspect of the subject : that he
was in tact tolerably indifferent, singular as such a per-
version of sentiment must have appeared to his brother
manufacturers, to economic niceties of the kind. The
mills at any rate produced, and were likely to continue
to produce, a surplus sufficiently large to satisfy himself
and his new partners ; and they were content that the
workers should share in the benefit, without enquiring
too closely into the balance of profit and loss."
The Committee of 1 8 1 6 presented no report to the
House, and no further action was taken on the Bill until
' Evidence, p. 94.
' Some later fif^^res showing the effect of the siiortened hours on
production are quoted above pp. 164, 16$.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 201
1 81 8, when it was again introduced by Sir Robert Peel.
Owen ascribes this untimely delay to Sir Robert's desire
to conciliate his brother manufacturers ; and Samuel Kydd
takes the same view.^ Sir Robert Peel himself explained
the delay as due to his own ill-health ; and it is
perhaps not inconsistent with the view held by Owen
and Kydd that the opponents of the Bill professed them-
selves unwilling to accept the plea of ill-health as an
adequate explanation of the delay in proceeding with the
measure.^ At any rate the Bill ultimately passed through
the House of Commons in the Session of 181 8, the
second reading being carried by a majority of 91 to 26.
But when the Bill reached the Upper House their
Lordships professed themselves not satisfied that the
need for any such restrictive legislation had been made
out, and proceeded after some delay to appoint a
Committee of their own, which sat and heard evidence
in 181 8 and the following year.
It is not necessary for our present purpose to enter
at length into the history of this piece of legislation,
or to analyse the evidence adduced before the Lords'
Committee of 1818 and 18 19. Owen's personal efforts
on behalf of the Bill came to an end with the Committee
of 1 81 6, his activities after that year, as will appear in
subsequent chapters, being diverted into other channels.^
^ Owen's Autobiography, Vol. I., p. ii6; History of the Factory
Movement, by "Alfred," Vol. I., p. 44.
' Remarks were made in the House of Commons to this effect. See
also Lord Lauderdale's speech in the House of Lords on May 14, 1818.
' In March, 181 8, however, he published two letters, addressed
respectively to Lord Liverpool and to British master manufacturers, on the
Employment of Children in Factories {Life, Vol. I a, pp. 185, 197), in
which he recapitulated his arguments. His work in this connection was,
however, as he tells us, taken up by Gould, Oastler, and others after 18 16.
202 ROBERT OWEN
And in any case Owen could give no evidence of value
as to the existence of the abuses which the Bill was
intended to remedy. The passage of the Bill was
stubbornly contested in both Houses and in the outside
Press. The arguments of its opponents may be briefly
summed up under five main heads.
(i) That no case had been made out for the Bill,
and that the majority of masters were already doing
of their own free will all that the Bill required.
As regards the prohibition of night-duty, this was
probably true. Since the introduction of the steam-
engine there was no longer the same necessity for
economising the motive-power. Moreover, mills were
more commonly erected in large towns, and all-night
working had ceased to be fashionable. Owen's neighbour,
Finlay, a well-known Glasgow mill-owner, replying to
Sir Robert PeeFs motion for the appointment of the
Committee of 1816, said that in Scotch mills the children
did not begin work until ten years of age. But they
certainly began much earlier in Lancashire. As to the
healthiness of the cotton-factories, the evidence adduced
by the masters proved too much. The death-rate in
Finlay's mill, for instance, was given as a little over two
per thousand. As Peel the younger said in the House,
if we were to accept such statistics as relevant, the logical
issue would be for the Government to build cotton-mills
to act as sanatoria — for the average mill seemed at least
six times as healthy as what had hitherto been deemed
the most salubrious spots in the Kingdom.^
(2) The Bill sought to establish a new principle, by
intervening between parent and child. It must then
' Hansard, April 27, 181 8.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 203
necessarily weaken the authority of the parents, and cast
an undeserved stigma upon them, by accusing them
indirectly of avarice and cruelty.^
(3) England's predominance in the markets of the
world would be endangered.
(4) Wages must be reduced pari passu with the
proposed reduction of the hours — or at an even greater
rate to allow of the capitalist recouping himself for
the diminished returns from his capital expenditure^ —
and hence increased poverty and wretchedness would be
the direct result of this short-sighted measure.
(5) " All experience proves that in the lower orders
the deterioration of morals increases with the quantity
of unemployed time of which they have the command."
Thus by shortening the hours of labour, the Bill
" necessarily tends to produce immorality and crime
among the adults." Nay, these tender-hearted employers
were much concerned for the future of the children
themselves, if they should be left in idleness and vice
until the mature age of ten, instead of being placed from
their earliest years under the wholesome discipline of
the factory.^
^ " The Bill went to say that poor parents were not to be entrusted
with the management of their own children." — Mr. Curwen in the House
of Commons.
The Bill would bring disunion between master and workman and
between parent and child — "What effect must it have upon a child
to perceive that those to whom his interests ought to be most dear
were not considered by the Legislature as fit to be trusted with the
regulation of his conduct." — Lord Stanley in the House of Commons,
April, 27, 1818.
* Evidence of 1816, p. 167.
' Thus Owen is asked by the Committee of \Zi6 {Report, p. 23), " Would
not there be a danger [if the children are not employed in the mills before
ten] of their acquiring by that time vicious habits, for want of regular occupa-
tion ? " This and the other arguments summarised in the text are reproduced
204 ROBERT OWEN
The arguments under the headings (2), (3), and (4)
had, it must be admitted, some weight. Everything
depended, therefore, upon the evidence adduced to show
the need for legislative restriction, and that evidence,
to the dispassionate enquirer of a later date, seems
conclusive.
(a) As to the age at which the children were
employed, a Committee of Manchester mill-owners
put before the Lords' Committee of 1818 lists of all
the persons employed in their mills, showing in each
case the age at the time ot the census, the age at
entry, and the state of health, etc., of the person
employed. These lists, prepared in the interests of
the masters, may be supposed to show the case at any
rate not at the worst. P>om an analysis of the figures
it appears that of the 4,938 persons employed in these
selected mills at the time of the census (about April,
1818), 80 were under nine years of age, 764 between
nine and eleven ; and 2,896, or nearly three-fifths of
the whole number, were still under twenty years of
age. Further, of these 4,938 persons, no fewer than
1,658, or one-third of the whole number, had begun
work in a cotton-mill below nine years of age, and
another third between that age and eleven.^
again and again in the debates and in the pamphlet literature of the
period. The quotation in the text under heading (5) is from an anonymous
pamphlet published in London in 1818 entitled An Inquiry into the
Principles and Tendency of the Bill, etc., which gives an able and exhaustive
statement of the arguments and evidence relied upon by the opponents of
legislation.
' The figures themselves arc given in the appendices to the evidence
taken before the Committee of 1818: the summary and analysis given
in the text are quoted from an anonymous pamphlet, Ohstniations
as to ages of persons employed in the Cotton Mills in Manchester,
1819.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 205
(b) As to the hours of duty, Sir Robert Peel stated
in moving the appointment of the Committee of 18 16,
that the hours of work were often fifteen or sixteen
a day/ and the evidence taken before that and subsequent
Committees abundantly confirmed this statement.
In view of these two salient facts — the tender age
at which children habitually began to work, and the
long hours of confinement in close rooms at a high
temperature day after day and year after year, medical
evidence as to the effects on health and physique would
seem hardly necessary. Nevertheless there were many
medical men found to testify, in the interests of the
masters, to the healthy nature of the employment. One
medical man, Dr. Edward Holme, stated before the
Committee of 1 8 1 8 that he could not say that it would
be more injurious for a child to work in the mills by
night than in the daytime ; nor that the health of young
children would be likely to suffer from standing twelve
hours a day at their work ; nor from eating their meals
whilst so standing and working.
Another, Thomas Wilson, did not think it likely
to be injurious to the health of a thinly clad child, after
working twelve hours in a room at a temperature of
seventy-six degrees, to come out into a winter night ;
nor that the health of the children was likely to suffer
from constantly breathing and taking their meals in
an atmosphere heavily charged with cotton- fluff; nor
that the continual spitting to get rid of the fluff was
likely to prove prejudicial.
* Hansard, April 3, 1816. In fairness to the masters it should
be stated that the fifteen or sixteen hours' daily attendance at the factory
usually included certain intervals for meals, at any rate for adults. The
children were frequently left to clean the machinery in the dinner hour.
2o6 ROBERT OWEN
More than one witness deposed that the children
employed under such conditions in the cotton-mills
were as healthy, or healthier than children in any other
occupation, not excepting agriculture.^
But it is scarcely necessary to pursue the subject,
or to repeat the evidence in favour of the Bill. An
outline of the nature of the facts brought forward in
1816 to prove the injurious effect of the long hours and
general conditions of the work upon the health of the
children has been already given in Chapter IV. Addi-
tional facts and figures of a like nature were adduced
before the Committees of 181 8 and 1819, to strengthen
a case already sufficiently damning. The accumulation
of evidence was at length sufficient to satisfy the House
of Lords that there was need of legislation. The Bill
finally passed into law in the summer of 18 19; but
its original provisions had been whittled down to
conciliate the forces of the opposition. The draft
measure of 1 8 1 5 was intended to apply to ^' cotton,
woollen, flax and other mills." But the Act of 18 19
applied to cotton-mills only. The lower limit of age
for the employment of children was in the event fixed
at nine years, instead of ten, and the children ceased
to be " young persons " at sixteen instead of eighteen
years of age. The hours of labour of such young
persons were to be twelve instead of ten and a halt a day,
exclusive of meal times. The provision for education
was cut out altogether. The masters generally had no
desire to work their mills at night, and so the principle
' See especially the first sixty pages of evidence tendered before
the Lords' Committee of 1818, and evidence of Bingley and Keighley
doctors quoted before the Committee of 1816 {Repent, p. 15).
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 207
of working by day only was allowed to pass unchallenged.
The hours within which work was permitted were fixed
at 5 a.m. to 9 p.m.
But perhaps the most serious alteration from the
original draft was in the provision for enforcing the due
observance of the law. It was notorious that the Act
of 1 802 had been in many parts of Great Britain a dead
letter, because of the inadequate provision for inspection
and the inadequate penalties prescribed. The duty of
seeing that the law was obeyed had by that Act been
imposed upon visitors appointed by the justices of
the peace, one of whom should be a justice and
one a clergyman. Naturally many of the mill-
owners themselves sat on the bench, and the visiting
justice and clergyman were not likely to be too
hard on their friends and neighbours, especially as
they received no payment for their rather unpleasant
duties.
In Scotland the magistrates had gone so far as to
disregard the Act of 1802 altogether — the only excuse
tendered for non-compliance with the law being that
Epiphany and Midsummer, the dates mentioned for the
appointment of visitors and the returns, were terms
unknown in Scottish procedure. The one exception
was Owen's own county of Lanark, and that exception
applied only to a single year. In June, 1 810, the Quarter
Sessions of the Lower Ward of Lanarkshire appointed
a visiting committee of eight, who reported a year
later that they had inspected several mills, and found
that the requirements of the Act as regards periodical
whitewashing, the exhibition of a copy of the Act, the
hours of labour, and the attendance at divine service,
2o8 ROBERT OWEN
were not being observed. Thereupon the clerk of the
peace was duly empowered, in accordance with the
provisions of the Act, to levy upon the offending owners,
each of whom was probably making a profit reckoned
by thousands or tens of thousands a year, a fine of
two guineas ! ^
In order that this legislative farce might not be
repeated, a clause was inserted in the original draft of
1815 empowering the justices in quarter sessions to
appoint any duly qualified persons, not having an
interest in the mills, to act as inspectors, and to pay
them for their services. In introducing the Bill in 1815
Peel explained to the House that the inspection made
under the Act of 1 802 had been very remiss, and
laid stress upon the necessity for appointing properly
qualified and paid inspectors. But in the Act finally
passed in 1819 no provision whatever was made for
inspection, and the recovery of the penalties prescribed
was left to the common informer.
With the sting thus taken out, the Act of 1819
appears to have been little more efl^ective than its
predecessor. It was not until 1833, when, under the
Act of that year, provision was made for the appoint-
ment by the Government of paid inspectors, that it was
found practicable to give full effect to the intentions
of the Legislature. But the Act of 1819 marks the
first — and the most important — step in the long pro-
cession of Factory Acts. Under it for the first time
the State assumed the rights of parent and guardian
• Account of Cation and IVoollen Mills and Factories . . . entered
at the Epiphany Sessions in each year from 1S03 to 181 8, H. L., 1819^
Vol. XIII.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 209
to the children of the free, and took upon itself to
prescribe their hours of work and the general conditions
of their labour. Of the long struggle that followed,
decade after decade almost down to our own day, there
is no need to speak here. Owen had no share in the
later legislation.
But it may be claimed for him that he first forced
the State to open its eyes to the new duties which the
changing circumstances of the time were thrusting upon
it : that he was in fact the pioneer of factory legislation
in this country. The record on this point is clear ;
though, as with his services to the cause of education,
Owen's own later career has obscured the fame which
is his due. We have seen, first, what measures he had
taken, as soon as his hands were free, to lighten the
labours of the children in his own mills at New Lanark.
We have seen, next, that in his speech at Glasgow in
January, 1815, and in his pamphlet published later in
the same year, he proposed legislation on the precise
lines afterwards embodied in the Bill introduced by
Sir Robert Peel in the House of Commons in June,
1 81 5. That Owen was directly responsible for the
drafting of that Bill, and for its introduction by Peel,
is sufficiently proved by the numerous references to
him in the debates and in the outside press. The
friends of the Bill were silent, indeed, except when
directly challenged, on Owen's share in the matter ; but
its opponents were proportionately insistent upon giving
him the credit of the measure.
The reason is obvious. When, in 18 15, Owen first
commenced the agitation on the subject, he was known
to the world as a philanthropic mill-owner, and an
VOL. I. 14
2IO ROBERT OWEN
enthusiast in the cause of popular education ; a man
who preached social reform, and who gave unsparingly
of his time and means in order to practise what he
preached. But when the Bill came before the House
for serious consideration in 1818, Owen's name un-
fortunately stood for something more than this. He
had shocked the conventionally religious by his tervid
denunciation of all the creeds ; and by the extravagance
of his remedies for social evils he had repelled the
sympathies of many whose religious prejudices were
unaffected. Lord Lascelles, therefore, in opposing the
Bill/ thought it well to remind the House that the
measure did not originate with Sir Robert Peel, but
with a gentleman who had for the last twelve months
" made much noise in the public prints," and who had
said, from his own experience at New Lanark, that a
reduction in the hours of labour, so far from diminishing
the product rather tended to increase it — a proposition
beyond Lord Lascelles' powers of comprehension. Peel
the younger in replying urged that Lascelles ought not
to oppose the Bill because a gentleman with speculative
opinions in political economy was supposed to have
brought it forward. '^ Whether that gentleman was
concerned in it or not was a matter of indifference to
him (the speaker) and he called upon the House not
to reject a judicious measure, because it might have
the misfortune to be supported by an indiscreet
advocate." "
Again, in the House of Lords on February 25, 1S19,
the Earl of Lauderdale, in opposing the Bill, said that
' Hansard for April 27, 1818, p. 351.
• Loc. cit., p. 352.
THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 211
*' Sir Robert Peel had never thought of this measure until
Mr. Owen had recommended it to him." ^
Again, the writer of a pamphlet against the Bill,
already quoted, says : " Late years have been wonder-
fully prolific of ostentatious and useless schemes of
philanthropy, from Member Evans and his nation of
happy landholders, to Mr. Owen with the Millennium
dawning over the ruins of Christianity in a cotton-mill."
The Bill " is in truth a part of Mr. Owen's dreams ; he
was its father, though Sir Robert Peel has graciously
become its god-father and taken upon himself the dis-
charge of the parental duties. Such a descent might
justify us in expecting a few extravagances in the
child, but the reality has far exceeded our expecta-
tions." ^
And though Owen in later years forsook the battle-
field, and betook himself to a cloudy land where the
laws of political economy do not operate, it should not
be forgotten that the first victory in the long campaign
was due to him, so far at least as any achievement of
the kind can be credited to the efforts and example of
any single man.^
^ Hansard, loc. cit., p. 655.
' An Inquiry into the Priiiciplesand Tendency of the Bill, etc.^ London,
1818, p. 31.
^ Owen was actually the occasion of another minor piece of factory
legislation. On November 26, 18 19, one of the mills at New Lanark
was burnt down {Times, December 2, 18 19). On December 7, Sir R. Peel
introduced a Bill to allow of working by night in cotton-factories so as
to prevent loss of employment, after a fire or other accident. Lord
A. Hamilton and Finlay both taunted the mover with introducing the
Bill specially to meet Owen's case. The Bill passed into law in the
following year (60 George IIL c. 5).
CHAPTER X
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED
IN July, 1815, the long war came to an end. But
peace did not at once bring plenty to these islands.
Throughout the twenty years of war Great Britain had
held the lion's share of the carrying trade and the
commerce of the world. Her crafts and manufactures
had thriven on the distress and poverty of the Continent :
her wares had almost monopolised the European market.
But now all this was changed. The Continental industries
revived, and Britain's foreign trade was proportionately
curtailed. Further, the island labour market was dis-
turbed by the sudden disbandment of the huge military
and naval forces, and the return to domestic industries
of some 200,000 able-bodied men. Thus a shrinking
market coincided with an enormous influx of unskilled
labourers. It is not to be wondered at that wages rapidly
fell and that distress and hunger were felt throughout
the land for some years to come.
Wages fell most rapidly in agriculture and in the
textile trades : in some cases they were reduced in a
twelvemonth to less than half their former amount.
Thus the wages of weavers in Bolton fell from 14J. in
1815 to I2J. in 1816 and 95. in 1817; in Forfarshire
they fell from 13J. in 181 5 to 6j. in 1817 ; and in
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 213
Glasgow during the same period from lis. Gd. to 5J. Gd.
Exact particulars of the wages of agricultural labourers
are more difficult to ascertain, because at this time the
less than living wage paid by the farmer was commonly
supplemented out of the poor rates. But near Glasgow
the wages of labourers fell from lu. a week in 18 16 to
7i. Gd, in 1 81 9; in Middlesex they remained at 15^.
until 1 8 1 8, and fell rapidly after that year until they
stood at \os. in 1822.^ To add to the disturbance of
industrial conditions and general distress which the con-
clusion of the war must inevitably have brought in its
train, the summer of 18 16 proved exceptionally wet,
and the price of corn rose rapidly. It had stood at 63J.
a quarter in 181 5 ; it rose in 1816 to 76^., and in the
following year to 94^. Concurrently the gross amount
of the poor rates, which had been, in round numbers,
^5,400,000 in 1815, rose in 181 7 to _£6, 900,000, and
in 1 8 1 8 to ^7,870,000.^ Numbers of people were thrown
out of employment and reduced to penury and starvation.
Owen tells us that though he was able to keep the mills
at New Lanark working, he had to turn away daily many
applicants for work whom he was unable to help.
In the private correspondence of the period, in debates
in the House of Commons, in the evidence before the
Poor Law Committee of 1 8 1 7, we read of many parishes
where considerably more than half the inhabitants were
on the poor rates : of poor rates exceeding 20J. in the
pound : of farms which no man would cultivate even
rent free : of cottages abandoned, of whole parishes
^ See the tables given in Porter's Progress of the Nation, edition of
185 1, pp. 444, 445.
2 Ibid.y p. 90.
2 14 ROBERT OWEN
deserted, of homeless people worn with hunger wandering
over the country in search of work.
There were disturbances, demonstrations, rick-burn-
ings, and smashing of machinery throughout the country.
Five men were hanged in 1816 for riots at Ely. At
the end of the same year there was a turbulent
meeting in Spa Fields. The mob broke into a gun-
smith's shop in Snow Hill, possessed themselves of
the fire-arms, and threatened the city. The riot was
suppressed by the police ; the ringleaders were tried
for hio;h treason and acquitted. Meanwhile the newly
christened Radicals, led by Major Cartwright, Cobbett,
Hone, Wooler, Hunt and others, were demanding
universal suffrage, annual parliaments, and reform of
the parliamentary machinery generally. The Govern-
ment became alarmed at the disturbed state of the
country and the general agitation for reform ; at the
growth of the Hampden and the Spencean Clubs, and
other political organisations. Select Committees of both
Houses of Parliament sat early in 181 7 to consider
the state of the country. The Habeas Corpus Act was
suspended and several repressive Acts were passed, of
which the chief aimed at suppressing as far as possible
the right of public meeting.
Such, then, was the state of the country and the
temper of the public mind in 181 6 and 181 7, when
Robert Owen first promulgated his scheme of social
salvation. He was known to the world as a successful
manufacturer, who had done much to improve the pro-
cesses of fine-cotton spinning : a hard-headed man of
business, who had for a score of years conducted large
industrial concerns at enormous profit to himself and
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED ^15
his partners. He stood high, too, in the business world
as a man of sterling honesty, who was unwilling to be
too sharp in a bargain, or to take advantage of a
customer's ignorance. Macnab tells us that it was Owen's
habitual practice when he foresaw a fall in the price
of yarn, to ask his customers whether they would not
wish any orders which might be in hand to be deferred
so that they might take advantage of the lower prices ;
and in the same way, he would write to his corre-
spondents before a rise, and urge them to buy.^
Further he was known as a man of liberal views who
had given much of his time and money to improving
the condition of those who worked under him. And
he was this very year, 1816, giving important evidence
before two Commitees of the House of Commons, on
popular education and on the state of children in
factories. Such a man was sure of a respectful hearing
for any views which he might put forward.
In the summer of 18 16 a public meeting was con-
vened by the Association for the Relief of the Manu-
facturing and Labouring Poor, under the presidency of
the Duke of York, to consider measures for the relief
of the prevalent distress. Owen had breakfasted on the
day of the meeting with one of his episcopal friends,
Bathurst, Bishop of Norwich, and was entrusted by
his host, who was unable himself to attend the meeting,
with a subscription of ten pounds for the fund which
was to be raised. The meeting appointed a committee,
under the chairmanship of the Archbishop of Canterbury,
to consider practical measures of relief, and Owen's
name was naturally placed on the list of members.
^ Mac7iab, p. 131.
2i6 ROBERT OWEN
The committee met next day, and, after many economists
and public men had spoken on the subject, the
chairman, who, as we have already seen, was ac-
cjuainted with Owen and his views, invited him also
to address the meeting. Owen having at that time
little experience in public speaking, felt, as he tells
us, considerable reluctance in complying with the request.
But he had reflected to some purpose on the subject,
and he seems to have acquitted himself well. His speech
insisted upon two points : that the immediate occasion
of the distress was the sudden cessation of the extra-
ordinary demand created by the war, or in his own words
— " on the day on which peace was signed the great
customer of the producers died" : ^ and that the permanent
underlying cause was the displacement, within the past
generation, of human labour by machinery. Pressed to
state his remedy for this state of things, Owen consented
to draw up a report and present it to a later meeting of
the committee. The report was completed in the spring
of the following year, and Owen duly presented it to
the Archbishop's committee, and outlined the nature
of his proposals. In the meantime, however, a Select
Committee, under the chairmanship of Sturges Bourne,
had been appointed by the House of Commons to report
on the administration of the Poor Laws, and had actually
commenced to take evidence in February, 1817. The
subject-matter of Owen's report appeared more germane
to the enquiries of the Select Committee, and Owen was
requested to present it to that body. He accordingly
oflxTed himself, through Brougham, who was himself a
member, as a witness before the Committee. A day,
• Autobiography^ Vol. I., p. 124.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 217
as he tells us, was appointed for his examination : but
after long deliberation the Committee finally decided not
to take his evidence.
This Report, which was presented to the Select
Committee in a covering letter dated 49, Bedford Square/
London, March 12, 1817, contains the first sketch of
Robert Owen's celebrated *' Plan " for the regeneration of
the world. It purports to be simply a development
of the proposals already put forward in the ISJew View
of Society for the provision by the State of useful work
for the unemployed. But it is, as will be seen, a
development on lines which could scarcely have been
foreseen by any reader of the earlier essays.
The Report begins by enlarging the argument of
Owen's speech before the Archbishop's committee. The
ultimate cause of the distress, he claimed, was the displace-
ment of human labour by machinery. In Great Britain
alone, he contended, machinery represented the labour of
more than a hundred millions " of the most industrious
human beings " ; and as machinery was far cheaper in
the working, it must, in the nature of things, continually
tend to displace more and more the merely human
labourer. Either therefore we must curtail the use of
machinery, or we must suffer millions of our fellow-
countrymen to starve to death ; or, finally, " Advan-
tageous occupation must be found for the poor and un-
employed working classes, to whose labour mechanism
must be rendered subservient, instead of being applied,
as at present, to supersede it." ^
^ The town-house of Owen's partner, Mr. W^alker (see Autobiography^
Vol. L, p. 180).
' Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 55.
21 8 ROBERT OWEN
The poor, however, are, he points out, already
seriously demoralised by enforced ignorance and idleness ;
and any pliin devised for the permanent amelioration of
their condition must include measures for educating all,
and especially the children, in good and useful habits.
Such a phui must, then, ''combine means to prevent
their children from acquiring bad habits, and to give
them good ones — to provide useful training and instruction
for them — to provide proper labour for the adults — to
direct thc'r labour and expenditure so as to produce
the greatest benefit to themselves and to society ; and
to place them under such circumstances as shall remove
them from unnecessary temptations, and closely unite
their interest and duty." ^
Obviously, to secure superintendence which should
be at once effective and economical, the establish-
ment must not be very small, for then the cost
of superintendence would be relatively high ; nor
very large, for then it would cease to be effective.
In practice an establishment consisting of from 500
to 1,500 persons would, Owen indicates, be most
suitable.
The Report was accompanied by a drawing, to which
the attention of the Committee was to have been directed,
representing one of the proposed establishments, with its
appendages and a suitable quantity of land. The main
building is represented as a large quadrangle, of which
three sides were to be occupied by tenements or flats,
of four rooms each, each room to accommodate a married
couple and two children. The fourth side comprised
dormitories for all the children above three years of age,
' Autobiorrraphy, Vol. 1a, p. 57,
if.m
i.in:
ARY
X A- D
H L
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 219
an infirmary, and a guest-house. The buildings in the
middle of each of the other three sides of the quadrangle
contained apartments for the superintendents, school-
masters, clergymen, surgeons, and for store-rooms, etc.
A row of buildings in the centre, dividing the quadrangle
into two equal parts, contained accommodation for
kitchens, dining-rooms, schools, lecture-room, and a place
for public worship. The space within the quadrangle
was to be planted with trees and laid out as gardens
and playgrounds.
Other gardens surrounded the quadrangle on the
outside, and beyond these were the stables, laundries,
manufactories, and farm buildings, all duly represented
on the plan. This model establishment was designed to
accommodate 1,200 persons, "men, women, and children,
of all ages, capacities, and dispositions ; most of them
very ignorant ; many with bad and vicious habits,
possessing only the ordinary bodily and mental faculties
of human beings, and who require to be supported out
of the funds appropriated to the maintenance of the
poor — individuals who are at present not only useless
and a direct burden on the public, but whose moral
influence is highly pernicious. . . ." ^
It was intended that the community should be, as
far as possible, self-sufficing ; and for this purpose its
members were to engage in various branches of manu-
facture as well as in agriculture. All were to work at
suitable tasks, according to their ability, except that the
children were to attend school the first few years of life,
and only gradually take part in manual labour, working
as half-timers in the first instance.
* Autobiog?'aphy, Vol. Ia, p. 59.
no
ROBERT OWEN
The estimated expenditure is shown in the following
table —
Schedule of Expenses for Forminc, an Estalmshmlnt for
1,200 Men, Women, and Ciuldken.
If the land he purchased.
1,200 acres of land at ^30 per acre
Lodging apartments for 1,200 persons .
Three public buildings within the square
Manufactory, slaughter-house, and washing-house
Furnisliing 300 lodging-rooms, at ^8 each .
Furnishing kitchen, schools, and dormitories
Two farming establishments, with corn-mill, and
and brewing appendages
Making the interior of the square and roads
Stock for the farm under spade cultivation
Contingencies and extras ....
malting
36,000
17,000
11,000
8,000
2,400
3,000
5,000
3,000
4,000
6,600
^96,000.*
Or the land might be rented, in which case a capital
sum of ^6o,coo would suffice. The necessary capital
might be furnished by private subscription ; or, by
the parochial authorities ; or, best of all, by the central
Government. Of the financial success of such establish-
ments Owen had no doubt, though he dismisses the
point in an airy sentence — " Thus the unemployed poor
may be put in a condition to maintain themselves and,
as may be easily conceived, quickly to repay the capital
advanced, if thought necessary."
The adoption of the plan is urged upon the Govern-
ment as the best solution of the problem of the
unemployed ; as the simplest and most effectual method
for giving a real education to the children of the poor ;
as a means ot enabling a much greater population to be
' Autobio;j;raphy, \\il. Ia, {>. 60,
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 221
supported in a given area than under any other condi-
tions ; and finally as being " so easy, that it may be
put into practice with less ability and exertion than are
necessary to establish a new manufacture in a new
situation." ^
Such is the famous '' Plan " as originally sketched
out in the Report offered to the committee on the Poor
Laws. It will be seen that it purports to be little more
than a scheme for finding employment for those who
could not find it for themselves ; and for educating the
children of those who could not themselves pay the cost
of schooling. In other words it aimed at carrying out
what appears to have been the intention of the
Elizabethan Poor Laws.^ As a great part of the Select
Committee's Report is given up to showing the dis-
astrous results which must follow from the State under-
taking the duty of finding work for all, their reluctance
to entertain a scheme of this nature, holding out such
magnificent promises, and so careless of the cost of their
fulfilment, can be readily understood.
Frustrated in the attempt to gain publicity for his
views through the Committee, Owen had recourse to
the press. The Report was printed in full in No. XXV.
of the Philanthropist, a periodical edited by his partner
William Allen. It also appeared in the Times and the
Morning Post of April 9, 18 17, occupying in each case
several columns of the paper. The Times refers to the
scheme as a substitute for the system of English Poor
Laws, and expresses doubt of its practicability on the
ground of the expense involved. On May 29 the Times
^ Atdobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 64.
^ See Report of the Select Committee of 18 17, pp. 16-18.
22 2 ROBERT OWEN
published a further letter from Owen vindicating his
proposals. The tone of the editorial on this occasion
is decidedly more encouraging. The writer points out
that *' Mr. Owen is not a theorist only, but a man long
and practically familiarised to the management of the
poor : we are most desirous that a trial should be made
of his plan in at least one instance." The Morning Post
is even more friendly. It refers to Owen as '* a real
patriot and exemplary philanthropist," and in its issue
of May 5, contrasts Owen's scheme favourably with
a proposal put forward by Mr. Curwen, M.P., for the
establishment of universal Savings Banks. On July 24
a small meeting of rich merchants and others was
summoned by special invitation to the " George and
Vulture," a City tavern, to hear Owen expound his plans
for the employment of the poor ; and a committee was
formed to consider the scheme and collect subscriptions.^
On the day following the meeting Owen began to WTite
a long letter, which was published in the Times on the
30th of that month, and occupies just over five columns
of close print in that journal. A short leader calling
attention to the letter deprecates the illiberal attacks of
a personal nature which had been made upon '' this
ardent philanthropist." These attacks, which appear to
have been directed against his religious views, were barely
noticed by Owen." But he sets himself to answer in
detail other objections which had been or might
' See the report in the Times, July 25, 181 7.
' In his ktter published in the Times of May 29, Owen had
mentioned that his friend Mr. Southey had attacked his plan as not
being founded on religion. Owen in reply contents himself with saying
that " he understands true religion to be devoid of all sectarian notions,"
and that in his proposed establishments there would be full liberty for
each to worship as he chose.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 223
be made to the scheme, by means of an imaginary
cross-examination, in which he naturally rides triumphant
over all the arguments of his adversary. But the ghostly
catechist does not put the one question which must have
first suggested itself to any critic of flesh and blood —
what will the scheme cost ? There is no reference to this
crucial point beyond a few casual assurances to encourage
the doubters, such as *' they will then [sc, after establishing
their own material and moral welfare] proceed to create
that surplus which will be necessary to repay the interest
of the capital expended in the purchase of the establish-
ment," and again, '' every shilling . . . will return five
per cent, interest for the capital expended."
But apart from this noteworthy omission — noteworthy,
above all, in one who had proved himself a successful
man of business — Owen states fairly enough the main
objections commonly urged against such a scheme as
his, and his answers, if not convincing to the average
sensual man, are informed with a kind of celestial
common sense which was certainly more inspiring than
the classical economy of the period ; and, perhaps, in
the last analysis not much more remote from the facts
of human nature.
Thus when the ghostly catechist asks : — " But will
men in a community of mutual and combined interests
be as industrious as when employed for their individual
gain.'*" Owen replies that where the experiment has
been tried men have been found to work with more
enthusiasm for their common interest, than for the sole
profit of a master ; and further that it would be easy
on his method to instil into the children the principles
of industry and zeal for the common good.
224 ROBERT OWEN
Again, the catechist asks, " Will not your model
village of co-opcration produce a dull unitormity of
character ? " And Owen replies, *' No, for men brought
up from birth in circumstances so favourable would
become not a tlull uniform race, but beings full of
health, activity, and energy, with ample leisure, and
such freedom from petty cares and restrictions as
would enable them to develop to the full their noblest
powers."
Again, the question is asked, " But should many of
these villages be founded, will they not increase the
products of agricultural and manufacturing labour, which
are already too abundant, until no market can be found
for them, and thus injure the present agriculture, manu-
factures, and commerce of the country ? "
And the reply is given : '' Is it possible that there
can be too many productions desirable and useful to
society ? and is it not to the interest of all, that they
should be produced with the least expense and labour,
and with the smallest degree of misery and moral
degradation to the working classes ; and, of course,
in the greatest abundance to the higher classes, in return
for their wealth ? It is surely to the interest of all, that
everything should be produced with the least expense
of labour, and so as to realise the largest portion of
comfort to the producing classes."
Once more the catechist asks, " Will not these
establishments tend to increase population, beyond the
means of subsistence, too rapidly for the well-being of
society? "
Owen's reply to this, the most searching objection,
probably, of all which he had to meet, is in effect that
F'OR THE UNEMPLOYED il^
the fear of population overtaking the means of subsistence
is a chimera, arising entirely out of the faulty arrange-
ments of existing society. Land, labour, and capital
under proper direction may be made to produce fourfold
what they do at present. Each labourer could readily
produce food which would amount to more than ten
times his own consumption, and the fear of over-
population might be deferred until such time as the
whole surface of the earth is one cultured garden-plot.^
In a postscript to this letter, already of portentous
length, Owen describes a visit which he had paid the
previous day (July 25, 18 17) to Newgate. He was
much impressed with the effect produced by the labours
of Elizabeth Fry and her associates on the female inmates.
Amongst the women he found order, cleanliness, good
habits, and even some degree of comfort and cheerfulness.
On the male side, where no such beneficent influence
had been exerted, he finds the men and boys hopeless,
degraded, and looked upon by all who had to do with
them as utterly irreclaimable. And yet a few months
before his visit the women, as he was assured by the
prison officials, had seemed as completely lost to all
sense of decency, as completely wanting in the ordinary
social instincts, as wretched and as hopeless as the men.
^ It has been stated by G. J. Holyoake {Sz'xify Years of an Agitators
Life, Vol. I., p. 129) that Owen at a later period changed his views on
the population question and became an advocate of prudential restriction
on families. Holyoake gives no reference to Owen's published writings
in support of his statement, and I can find no evidence for it. It is
certain that when he wrote the Book of the New Moral JVorld, some
twenty years later, Owen still held the view that restrictions on the
growth of population were unnecessary (see below, Chapter xxi.).
Robert Dale Owen, however, became noted as an exponent of neo-
Malthusian views.
VOL. I.
15
226 ROBERT OWEN
Owen draws the obvious moral, that human nature Is
plastic to good influences as well as to bad ones : and
that if these wretched prisoners had sinned, the blame
is not theirs but that of the community. Here, said
he, I saw a boy only sixteen years of age, in double
irons. A great crime had been committed, but — my
Lord Sidmouth ^ will forgive me — it is he who ought to
have been double-ironed in place of the boy.
In a second letter, which occupied one entire page of
the limes on August 9, Owen contrasts in detail
the numerous advantages of life in his proposed villages
as compared with the present conditions of existence
of the poor in manuficturing towns, leading up to
the conclusion " that the manufacturing towns are
the abode of poverty, vice, crime and misery, while
the proposed villages will ever be the abode of
abundance, active intelligence, correct conduct, and
happiness." "
These two letters preluded an address delivered in
the "City of London Tavern" on August 14, 1817,
in which Owen further developed and defended his plan.
The address is remarkable for the extraordinary con-
fidence which the speaker displays that by his way, and
by his way only, can social salvation be found. Never
was inspired prophet more sure of the faith that was in
him : and never, it may be added, did prophet display
a more exasperating tolerance towards those who difl^cred
from him.
*' The principles and plan are even now so fixed and
permanent, that hereafter the combined power of the
' Then I lomc Secretary.
* Autobiography, Vol. I a, p. 92.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 227
world will be found utterly Incompetent to extract them
from the public mind. It will from this hour go on
with an increasing celerity. ' Silence will not retard
its course, and opposition will give increased celerity
to its movements.' " ^
In concluding his address he moved a series of
resolutions proposing the appointment of a committee
to investigate the plan, and calling for subscriptions to
start an experimental colony forthwith. In order to
encourage the rest, he added that he had just received
from a donor who wished to remain anonymous, the
offer of 1,500 acres of land suitable for the purposes of
a colony.
Such is the famous Plan, the promulgation of which
marks the beginning of modern Socialism. It is to be
noted that, as originally presented in the Report to the
Select Committee on the Poor Laws, Owen's scheme
purported to aim simply at finding productive work for
the unemployed poor. From the two letters, however,
published in the newspapers on July 2^ and August 9 re-
spectively, and from the address delivered in the '' London
Tavern " a few days later, it is apparent that Owen's
views have developed. He is now confident that when
the experiment had once fairly started, the whole civilised
world would gladly barter the cumbrous machinery of
modern social life for the chance of living in these happy
villages : *' When Society shall discover its true interests
it will permit these new establishments gradually to
supersede " all other arrangements (p. 74). He himself
looks forward to ending his days as " an undistinguished
member of one of these happy villages," living upon
^ Autobiography Vol. Ia, p. loi.
22 S ROBERT OWEN
twenty pounds a year and earning it.^ The change will
be effected easily and naturally. '' No difficulty or
obstacle of magnitude will be found in the whole progress.
The world knows and feels the existing evil : it will look
at the new order of things proposed — approve — will the
change — and it is done " (p. 84).
But though Owen no longer conceals his belief that
such an entire social reconstruction is inevitable in the
near future, in more than one passage he deprecates any
undue haste in carrying out the plan, or premature dis-
turbance of existing institutions. Thus, "To accomplish,
however, this great end, without injury to any one, it
is absolutely necessary that all the existing institutions
should be supported for a time, as they are ; to enable
them to protect, and beneficially to direct and control,
the mighty change which is coming rapidly upon us and
upon all nations ; from which it is utterly impossible for
us to escape ; and from which, when it shall be properly
understood, not one of us shall desire to escape" (p. 87).
Owen expressly disclaims originality for his plan —
and indeed the attempt to apportion credit for originality
in new ideas of any kind is apt to be unprofitable.
Nevertheless an enquiry into the pedigree of ideas is
always interesting, and often leads to results historically
valuable. It is clear, to begin with, that Owen's scheme
for regenerating mankind by dividing them into small
communities, of about one thousand to two thousand
persons apiece, and subjecting them to a wise paternal
government, had its roots deep in his own personal
history. New Lanark was for him the microcosm in
which the discerning eye might trace the outlines of the
' Autobiography, Vol. 1a, p. lo2.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 229
larger cosmos. In his original report, he writes of the
plan —
" I beg to submit it as the result of daily experience
among the poor and working classes, on an extensive
scale, for twenty-five years " (p. 51).
There were not wanting precedents at that time for
solving the problem of the poor by means of parochial
houses of industry. Several schemes of the kind are
described in the Report of the Committee of 18 17.
Thus the paupers of the Isle of Wight were collected
into a House of Industry at Newport, which had some
seventy acres of garden, arable, and grass land attached,
the whole of which was cultivated by the labours of the
paupers themselves. All the vegetables used were
supplied by the garden ; but the corn was sold in the
outside market, as the most economical arrangement.
There was further a small manufactory attached to the
poorhouse : the paupers made all their own clothes, shoes,
and linen, and manufactured also sacks and other articles
the sale of which produced a net profit of ;^i50 to ^^200
a year.^ We hear also of similar Houses of Industry in
Suffolk, with land attached to them,^ and we have a
detailed account of two parochial farms in Kent, at
Benenden and Cranbrook. In the latter case, the farm,
which consisted of 448 acres, had been in the occupation
of the parish authorities for more than 21 years. Wheat,
hops, potatoes, and turnips were grown, and part of the
land was laid down in grass. There was a fair amount
of live-stock. In October, 18 16, there were 88 paupers
in the farm-house, of whom 24 were children, and all
who were able found work of one kind or another on
» Report, pp. 95-102, ' Ibid.^ p. 165,
230 ROBERT OWEN
the farm. The wheat grown was sufficient in good years
to supply all the needs of the establishment ; the hogs
yielded 400 stone of pork a year ; and generally, the
farm supplied nearly the whole subsistence of the people.^
So widespread, indeed, at this time was the belief
that it was the duty of those who administered the poor
rates to provide productive employment for all those who
could not obtain it in the outside market, that, as already
said, the Committee of 181 7 found it necessary to argue
against such an interpretation of the Statutes. The
circumstances of the time thus made it natural that Owen
should look to the organisation of small self-sufficing
communities working on the land as the proper solution
of the problem of the unemployed.
Again, the parochial occupation of the land had been
brought prominently before the public for many years
from another quarter. Thomas Spence,^ born at
Aberdeen in 1750, was in 1775 earning his living as
a schoolmaster in Newcastle-on-Tyne. It happened in
that year that the Corporation of Newcastle had enclosed
part of the Town Moor and let it off in small farms.
The freemen of the borough claimed the rent as their
property, carried their claim to the law courts, and were
successful. This victory set Spence thinking, and in
the November of this same year, 1775, ^^ ^^^^ ^ paper
before the Newcastle Philosophical Society, '^ On the
mode of administering the landed estates of the Nation
' Report, pp. 163-5.
- See Memoir of T. Spefue, from Mackenzie's History of Ne^vcastle^
1 826 ; The Rights of Man, as exhibited in a lecture read to the Philo-
sophical Society of Newcastle, 4th edition, 1793 ; also Land for the
Landless: Spence and Spence s plan, by J. Morrison Davidson, 1896;
Precursors 0/ Henry George, by the same, 1904.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 231
as a Joint Stock property in Parochial Partnership by
dividing the rent." In this paper Spence sought to
demonstrate that the land belonged by inalienable right
to all the inhabitants of the country ; and that the people
might most conveniently resume possession of their
inheritance through the existing parochial machinery —
each parish, after due notice, taking charge of the land
within its boundaries and administering it as a common
estate for the benefit of all the parishioners. Being
expelled from the Philosophical Society, and apparently
finding Newcastle too small to hold him and his views,
Spence came up to London and started a bookseller's
shop in Chancery Lane, the rest of his life being spent
in disseminating the knowledge of his Plan, by means
of copper tokens, pamphlets, and various periodicals,
of which Pig's Meat^ or Lessons for the Swinish Multi-
tude^ is the best known. Spence naturally during his
life paid a good many visits to prison ; and after his
death in 18 14 fear of the Spencean Clubs, which were
founded to carry on his propaganda, was one of the
main causes which led the Government in 18 17 to
suspend the Habeas Corpus Act.
Now though Spence's methods and premises were
widely different from Owen's, and though the objects
aimed at were by no means identical, for Spence desired
to do justice to the whole people, not to dispense charity
to the unemployed poor, yet there was sufficient
similarity between the two plans to make it probable
that the later reformer was to some extent indebted to
his predecessor. The limits of Owen's ideal community
were about those of a fair-sized village, and he constantly
suggests that his community might conveniently be
232
ROBERT OWEN
started by the action of the parish authorities. At any
rate to contemporaries the resemblance was sufficiently
striking for Owen's name to be generally coupled with
that of Spence. Thus the editor of the Black Divarf,
in commcntinu: on the address of August 14, hails
Owen as the successor of Spence, and marvels that whilst
poor old Spence jhad been put in prison, and some ot
his followers were even then sharing the same fate,
Owen '' advertises his Spencean plan throughout the
country " and has the ministers on his committee.^
But Owen has himself indicated the examples which
most directly influenced his views. He had been much
impressed by the accounts which had reached England
of the extraordinary material prosperity achieved by the
celibate religious communities of America. Of one of
the best-known of these sects, that of the Shakers, Owen
published a Sketch in 1818, including with it in the
same volume Bellers's tract referred to below, his own
Report of March, 1817, and his subsequent letters and
speeches on the subject." Some account of a less-known
community, that of the Rappites, in Pennsylvania, had
also appeared in this country a year or two before.
An American traveller, John Melish, had visited the
settlement in 18 10 or 181 i and had written a fervid
description of the goodfellowship and material well-
being which he found there. The book had been
reviewed at length in the Philanthropist in 181 5, and
it is tolerably certain that Owen had seen the review,
if he had not actually read Melish's book. In his letter
» Black Dwarf, Vol. I. (1817), p. 468.
' New View of Society : Tracts relative to this subject, etc., by Robert
Owen. London, 181 8.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 233
to the Times of May 29, in defending his plan from
the charge of being impracticable, he writes that the
feasibility of such a scheme " is partly exemplified by
the conduct of a large body of persons in the State
of Pennsylvania ^ who became associated together on
the principles of combined labour and expenditure, and
who by their experience of about ten years have dis-
covered that the benefits in practice far exceed their
most sanguine expectations."
But it was a seventeenth-century English writer who
furnished the actual model for the villages of co-operation
and unity. In his letter of July 25, after disclaiming
originality for the principles on which his plan was
founded, on the ground that they had been advanced
by great thinkers long before him, Owen adds, " I have
no claim even to priority in regard to the combinations
of these principles in theory ; this belongs as far as I
know, to John Sellers, who published them, and most
ably recommended them to be adopted in practice, in
the year 1696." ^
Bellers^s pamphlet, which, as already said, was reprinted
by Owen in 181 8, bears the title "Proposals for raising
A Colledge of Industry of all useful Trades and
Husbandry, &c.," by John Bellers, London, 1696.^ In
the introduction the author defines his aim as threefold :
" First, Profit for the rich, (which will be life to the rest).
^ Rapp's Colony had originally started in 1804 near Zehenople in
Pennsylvania, and subsequently, in 181 5, removed to the site in Indiana
on the banks of the Wabash, which was afterwards known as New
Harmony.
* Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 76 {cf. Vol. I., p. 240).
' It is reprinted in Owen's Autobiography, Vol. Ia, pp. 1 55-181.
There is a copy of the tract in the British Museum.
234 ROBERT OWEN
Secondly, A plentiful living for the poor without difficulty.
Thirdly, A good education for youth, that may tend to
prepare their souls into the nature of the good ground."
Broadly his proposal is to found a self-sufficing community,
consisting in the first instance of some three hundred
persons. The necessary land and capital, which he
estimates for a community of that size at ^18,000, is
to be found by a joint stock association, each member
of which should have a share in the profits, and a vote
in the government, in proportion to his subscription.
But while the government of the college was to be
vested solely in the rich men who found the money,
and all surplus profits were to be divided amongst
them, the first charge on the estate should be the
maintenance in comfort of the workers, and the education
of their children. As to the first point, Bellers estimates
that the labour of 200 men, women, and children would
be sufficient to provide food, clothing, and whatever
else might be required for all the 300 members, leaving
the labour of the other 100 to supply the profit on the
capital invested. In order to make the community self-
sufficing he furnishes a table of the trades which should
be includt\i, and the number which should be assigned
to each — thus, 3 tailors, i baker, i brewer, 4 cooks,
6 nurses, 3 ploughmen, 3 shepherds, 20 linen and 20
woollen spinners and carders, and so on. There will
be no need ot money in the community. '* This
colledge-fellowship will make labour, and not money,
the standard to value all necessaries by ; and though
money hath its conveniences, in the common way of
living, it being a pledge among men for want of credit ;
yet not without its mischiefs. . . . Money in the body
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 235
politic, is what a crutch is to the natural body, crippled ;
but when the body is sound, the crutch is but trouble-
some : So when the particular interest is made a publick
interest, in such a colledge money will be of little use
there."
But though money will have no place within the
college walls, the rich, in addition to receiving the
interest on their capital, may if they so choose, live in
the college, or they may buy a *' colledge commons "
for any child for whom they wish to provide a decent
living. As to the poor, they will benefit by the scheme
yet more abundantly : " From being poor, they will
be made rich, by enjoying all things needful in health
or sickness, single or married, wife and children ; and
if parents die, their children well educated, and preserved
from misery, and their marrying incourag'd, which is
now generally discourag'd."
To secure this safe competence and complete freedom
from care, many workmen, Bellers thinks, would prefer
life in the college to the prospect of much better wages
outside.
Lastly, the children are to be educated. And on
the question of education Bellers's views are remarkably
sound, and curiously like Owen's own : " Tho' rules,
as well as words, must be understood to make a complete
scholar, yet considering words lie in the memory, and
rules in the understanding ; and that children have first
memory before understanding ; by that nature shows
that memory is to be first used ; and that in the learning
of language, words should be first learned, and afterwards
rules to put them together ; children first learning the
words of their mother-tongue, and then sentences ; . . ,
236 ROBERT OWEN
And therefore I think vocabulary and dictionary is to
be learnt before accidence and grammar ; and children's
reading and discoursing one to another, give a deeper
impression than reading to themselves." And again,
** At four or five years old, besides reading, boys and
girls might be taught to knit, spin, &c. and bigger boys,
turning, ^:c. ; and beginning young they would make
the best artists ; and by being upon business, tho' slight,
it improves their reasons by sensible demonstration
(which is sooner learned than any rational demonstration
without it. . . .) .... Thus the hand employed brings
profit, the reason used in it makes wise, and the will
subdued makes them good."
Bellers does not enter into much detail as to the
arrangement of the buildings in his proposed college.
But he mentions that there must be four separate sleeping-
wards — for the young men and boys, the young women
and girls, the married folk, and the sick and lame.
There is also to be a common dining-hall, where the
boys and girls are to wait upon the men and women at
meals. The tract concludes by citing a series of objec-
tions to the scheme and triumphantly refuting them.
It seems probable that this last feature in Bellers's
tract suggested the similar recital of objections and their
answers which forms the prominent feature of Owen's
letter of the 25th July — his first production, apparentlv,
after reading the earlier tract. And the enlargement
in Owen's views between March and July may plausibly
be traced to the same source. For Bellers's plan was
not intended for a particular time of distress, or for the
benefit of particular persons out of employment. He
boldly advocates industrial communism as the royal
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 237
solution of all the troubles and difficulties of the working
classes, whilst he quaintly justifies the proposal to assign
the surplus profits to the capitalists on the ground that
*' the rich have no other way of living, but by the labour
of others ; as the landlord by the labour of his tenants,
and the merchants and tradesmen by the labour of the
mechanics, except they turn levellers, and set the rich
to work with the poor."
The resemblance in its broad lines between Bellers's
" Colledge of Industry " and Owen's village of co-opera-
tion is unmistakable, and as will be seen in the next
chapter, Owen shortly proceeded still further to develop
his Plan upon the lines laid down by Bellers.
Probably no reforms so drastic were ever put before
the nation under such respectable patronage. Owen,
as he tells us, received friendly encouragement from
the Ministry, and was permitted to place on his committee
the names of nearly all the great personages in Church
and State.^ The leading newspapers gladly opened
their columns to him, praised his benevolence and his
patriotism, and expressed the desire that his scheme
should be fairly tried.
But the praise of the Times and other London journals
was not perhaps altogether disinterested, for Owen tells
us that he used to purchase thirty thousand copies of
newspapers containing his letters and addresses and post
^ According to the report in the Times of August 15, the com-
mittee proposed by Owen included the archbishops of England and
Ireland, the ministers, the judges, the bishops, the Dukes of Rutland,
Wellington, Bedford, and numerous other peers ; Sir F, Burdett, Wilber-
force, W. Smith, Thomas Babington, Coke of Norfolk (afterwards Earl of
Leicester), Huskisson, Walter Scott, Dugald Stewart, Robert Southey, and
many other well-known names.
238 ROBERT OWEN
them to the clergy of every parish in the kingdom, and
that on one occasion the bulk of the additional newspapers
was so great that the mail-coaches were delayed twenty
minutes in starting from St. Martin's-le-Grand. These
newspapers, Owen tells us, were franked by Lord
Lascelles, who had helped in the preliminary negotiations
for introducing the Factory Bill of 18 19 into the House
of Commons, and subsequently spoke against that measure.
As the Times and the Morning Post at that time,
including the stamp duty, cost sevenpence a copy, Owen
found little difficulty in the course of these two months,
August and September, 181 7, in spending the sum of
four thousand pounds in securing publicity tor his views. ^
The insinuation made by Jonathan Wooler, the editor
of the Black Divarf^ that this lavish expenditure was
defrayed out of public funds, was probably quite un-
founded. Wooler professed to believe that the ministers
stood behind Owen, hoping that the publication of the
plan might at least do something to allay public discontent
— might serve, to employ his own simile, as a tub thrown
to the whale. But if Wooler in making this charge
allowed his better judgment to be overborne by his
desire to discredit the hated Government, his criticism
of Owen's proceedings is in other respects acute and
by no means unfair. We have already seen that he
classes Owen as a disciple of Thomas Spence, the bugbear
of the Ministry. He goes on to pay a warm tribute
of respect to Owen's sincerity and his " enthusiastic
benevolence." But he points out that the plan aims,
in plain terms, at establishing '' a nursery for men," a
kind ()\ piiupcr barracks, where men, women and children
Autobiography, Vol. I., p. i 50.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 239
would be reduced to mere automata ; their feelings,
passions and opinions measured out by rule ; working
in common, living in common, and having all things
common except their wives ; with abundance of food
and clothing ; but without liberty or hope of anything
beyond.
Again, the Black Dwarf not unfairly points out that
Owen was quite unable to meet his opponents in
argument. If any one criticised the scheme adversely,
Owen's only reply was to accuse the critic of ignorance
and inexperience. '' With Mr. Owen it would be useless
to argue. He is only calculated to represent his system.
A defence of it is beyond his powers. He therefore
wisely shuns the replication, and persists in asserting
that his plan is the wisest, best and most admirable
scheme that ever entered into any human comprehension.
It is — because it is. ' See what a pretty plan 1 have
drawn out on paper. At what equal distances I have
placed such and such buildings. How imposing they are.
There are all the offices, attached and detached, that
could be wished. There are schools and lecture rooms,
and Committee rooms and brew-houses and workhouses
and granaries. There you will put the women, there the
men and there the children. They will be called to
dinner every day regularly, and they will be clothed and
taught and not worked very much. Oh, how happy
they must be ! There is nothing to prevent it whatever.
All the bad passions will be eradicated, and I should
like to live there myself. Nobody that understands it
can for a moment object to it. Why, there is to be
a chapel in which only the truth is to be taught ; and
schools where nothing but useful knowledge is to be
1^0 ftOBERT OWENf
inculcated.' Such is the reasoning Mr. Owen con-
descends to use : and if he had to make the beings who
are to inhabit his paradises, as well as to make the laws
that should regulate them, there can be no doubt that
he would manage everything extremely well."
That is how the plan impressed a contemporary,
himself an ardent worker on the side of the people,
and ready when the occasion came to suffer imprisonment
in their cause. If we compare this utterance with the
writer's venomous attacks on Sidmouth and the Govern-
ment generally, we shall see that the criticism, though
searching, is by no means unkindly. The Black Dwarf's
final advice to Owen is to *' let the Poor alone. The
working bee can always find a hive " ; and if the
philanthropist yearns to fill his barracks, let him take
the pampered sinecurists, the hungry placemen, the public
pensioners and a few well-fed bishops. These gentlemen
would scarcely do enough work to pay for their keep ;
but if they lived upon twenty pounds a head, they would
at least free themselves from the gout, and the country
from the cost of their maintenance.^
The other Reformers took much the same line.
Thus Hone writes : " It is the Spencean plan doubly
dipped " ; and again, '* Mr. Owen conceives that all
human beings are so many plants which require to be
reset. He accordingly proceeds to dibble them in
squares, etc." " Cobbett finds the plan " nothing short
of a species of monkery," and asks whether " the
novices when once confirmed are to regard their character
of Pauper as indelible } " and whether " the Sisterhood
' lilack iHuarf, August 20, 1817.
' Hone's Reformists' Register, August 23 and 30, 18 17.
FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 241
and Brotherhood are to form distinct bodies, or to live
together promiscuously ? " ^
The general trend of criticism on Owen's speech at
the meeting of August 14, was to the same effect. The
chief speaker was Major Torrens, who dwelt upon the
difficulties which must ensue with a population relieved
from the direct pressure of subsistence, but left free to
multiply. Then followed several prominent members
of the Reform party — Hunt, Wooler and Alderman
Waithman, the latter moving an amendment to Owen's
resolutions, calling upon the Legislature to reduce public
expenditure and adopt other measures to relieve the
present distress. No one spoke in favour of Owen's
plan. Waithman's amendment was put to the meeting,
but declared to be lost on a show of hands. The chair-
man's impartiality was, however, loudly questioned, and
a vote of thanks to him proposed by Owen was lost.
The Times report ends with the significant remark that
Watson, Preston, and Thistlewood were present.^
^ Cobbett's Weekly Political Pamphlet, Angnsi 2, 1817. Cobbett was
at this time in America, having fled from the suspension of the Habeas
Corpus Act and the general reign of terror. The letter from which the
above extracts are taken is dated " North Hampstead, Long Island,
June 13th, 1 817," and the criticism, therefore, is obviously directed to
Owen's first Report.
2 Times, August 15, 1817. Watson, Preston, and Thistlewood had
been amongst the ringleaders of the Spa Fields' Riot, mentioned on
p. 214. Thistlewood was hanged in 1820 for his connection with the
Cato Street Conspiracy.
VOL. I. 16
CHAPTER XI
1817— 1819
SUCH, then, was Owen's position in the middle of
August, 1 81 7. He found indeed little favour
with the party of reform. They viewed his plans
with half contemptuous tolerance, when they did not
actively oppose them. They disapproved of the scheme
on economic grounds ; they disapproved still more of the
undemocratic character of the government proposed for
the colonies. Owen's personal experience had led him
to regard a benevolent paternal despotism as the ideal
constitution, and this element, as we have seen, was
strongly repugnant to men of the type of Cobbett, Hone
and Wooler. Moreover, Owen's friendly relations with
the ministers were little likely to prepossess the Radicals
in his favour. And in any case they felt that, even
if a scheme of the kind proposed were feasible, it
could but act as a temporary palliative, and must in
the long run be harmful to the cause of progress, by
diverting attention from the real remedies for the
distress.
On the other hand Owen could count on sympathy
and encouragement from many persons high in Church
and State : he numbered several of the bishops amongst
his friends ; the most influential of the London journals
24a
i8i7 — 1819 243
had given flattering notices and had protested sympathy
with his plans. Lord Liverpool had invited him to an
interview and expressed his interest and approval. From
the fact that Owen was allowed to nominate the members
of the Ministry on his committee, it would almost seem
that the Government were not without hopes that good
might come of the scheme. The distress was real enough
and serious enough ; and, like a patient suffering from
an incurable disease, ministers may have thought their
straits sufficiently desperate to justifiy resort even to
quack remedies.
But again, whatever we may think of its later
development, in its original form Owen's plan could
scarcely be classed as a quack remedy. Farm colonies
had already been tried with good results, as we have
seen, in the Isle of Wight and in Kent. Similar colonies
were started, with some measure of success, in Holland
and Belgium a year or two later. And the hope of
bringing together vacant land and unemployed labour
has continued to inspire successive generations of social
reformers down to the present day. Owen's plan, re-
garded merely as a scheme for the employment of the
poor, was so far from being absurd or purely Utopian,
that no less an authority than Ricardo was in favour of
the experiment having a fair trial. At a public meeting
to promote Owen's scheme held in June, 18 19, Ricardo
allowed his name to be placed on the committee, ex-
. plaining that he did so because, though he did not go
all the way with Owen, nor expect of the scheme all
the good which Owen expected of it, yet in a limited
degree he thought it likely to " succeed, and to produce,
when it did succeed, considerable happiness, comfort and
244 ROBERT OWEN
morality, by giving employment and instruction to the
lower classes." ^
Later in the same year, on Sir W. de Crespigny's
motion for a Select Committee to enquire into Owen's
plan, Ricardo voted with the small minority in favour
of the motion.'
Briefly, then, up to the date of his second meeting on
August 2 1, 1 817, Owen had on his side the bulk of
the respectable classes, and the more influential portion
of the London press. He had, too, the cordial sympathy
and respect of many amongst the political economists
and reformers who were definitely opposed to his plan.
His conspicuous goodwill to all mankind and his
splendid record in the past spoke for him ; and he
probably does not gready exaggerate the case when he
says of himself, that at this time he was " beyond
comparison the most generally popular character living." ^
But Owen had other enemies besides the Reformers
and the economists. Southey, as we have seen, had
already discovered that the system was not founded
on religious principles. Indeed, though Owen had
refrained from defining his attitude precisely in the Essays
on the Formation of Character, he had made it sufliciently
clear that his own religious beliefs were far removed
from orthodoxy. To a mind like Owen's the mere
suppression, even from no ignoble motive, of unpopular
opinions must have seemed like treason to the truth.
He was troubled by no doubts as to the perfect reason-
' Report of meeting in Times of June 28, 1819.
» Hansard, debate of December 16, 18 19. On this occasion, how-
ever, Ricardo explained that he was at war with Owen's system, but
wanted to know more about spade liusbandry.
• Autobiography , Vol. I., p. 189.
Fiont ihc ford ait by Pickcrsi^ill, iit the f ossessivn cf Mr. IVilliaui Tcbb.
Pa ill led ill 1 82 6.
ROBERT OWEN.
'IHS
i8i7 — 1019 245
ableiiess of his own views on these matters ; he probably
saw no reason why any portion of the message with
which he was charged should be any longer withheld.
The attacks of the clerical party thus combined with his
own instinctive aversion to reticence of any kind to impel
him to speak out. Truth, as he said, will prevail.
He came, then, to the meeting of August 21 full
of the high resolve boldly to confront his accusers, and to
leave unspoken no jot or tittle of his message to man-
kind.^ The first part of the address travelled over
familiar ground, and was concerned mainly with demon-
strating the immeasurable advantages possessed by his
system over the present state of society, or of any scheme
yet devised for its amendment. In a passage informed
with sincere feeling he sought to show that when each
man was a member of a huge family, and all worked
together for the common good, even death would be
robbed of more than half its terrors. The mourners
would find " consolation in the certain knowledge that
within their own immediate circle they have many,
many others remaining ; and around them on all sides,
as far as the eye can reach, or imagination extend, thou-
sands on thousands, in strict, intimate, and close union,
are ready and willing to offer them aid and consolation.
No orphan left without protectors ; no insult or oppres-
sion can take place, nor any evil result whatever, beyond
the loss of one dear friend or object from among
thousands who remain, dear to us as ourselves. Here
may it be truly said, ' O death, where is thy sting ?
O grave, where is thy victory ? '" 2
1 The address, it should be remembered, was written out beforehand.
2 Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 114.
246 ROBERT OWEN
He then suddenly changed his tone. " It may now
be asked, ' If the new arrangements proposed really
possess all the advantages that have been stated, why
have they not been adopted iti universal practice during
all the ages which have passed ? '
"'Why should so many countless millions of our
fellow-creatures, through each successive generation, have
been the victims of ignorance, of superstition, of mental
degradation, and of wretchedness? '
" iMy friends, a more important question has never
yet been put to the sons of men ! Who can answer it ?
who dare answer it, — but with his life in his hand ;
a ready and willing victim to truth, and to the emancipa-
tion of the world from its long bondage of disunion,
error, crime and misery ?
*' Behold that victim ! On this day — in this hour —
even now — shall those bonds be burst asunder, never
more to reunite while the world shall last. What the
consequences of this daring deed shall be to myself, I
am as indifferent about as whether it shall rain or be
fair to-morrow. Whatever may be the consequences,
I will now perform my duty to you, and to the world ;
and should it be the last act of my life, I shall be well
content, and know that I have lived for an important
purpose.
" Then, my friends, I tell you, that hitherto you
have been prevented from even knowing what happiness
really is, solely in consequence of the errors — gross
errors — that have been combined with the fundamental
notions of every religion that has hitherto been taught
to men. And, in consequence, they have made man
the most inconsistent, and the most miserable being in
i8i7 — 1819 247
existence. By the errors of these systems he has been
made a weak, imbecile animal ; a furious bigot and
fanatic ; or a miserable hypocrite ; and should these
qualities be carried, not only into the projected villages,
but into Paradise itself^ a Paradise would be no longer
found! . . .
** Therefore, unless the world is now prepared to
dismiss all its erroneous religious notions, and to feel
the justice and necessity of publicly acknowledging the
most unlimited religious freedom, it will be futile to erect
villages of union and mutual co-operation ; for it will
be vain to look on this earth for inhabitants to occupy
them, who can understand how to live in the bond of peace
and unity ; or who can love their neighbour as themselves,
whether he be Jew or Gentile, Mahomedan or Pagan,
Infidel or Christian. Any religion that creates one
particle of feeling short of this, is false ; and must prove
a curse to the whole human race ! " ^
Such was the famous denunciation of all the religions
of the world, to which Owen himself was accustomed
to refer as the turning-point in his life.
In the debate which followed the address the religious
question was scarcely referred to, the chief speakers
being again Major Torrens, Wooler, Waithman and the
veteran reformer Major Cartwright. In the event
Owen's resolutions were lost, and Alderman Waithman's
amendment — ascribing the distress to heavy taxation and
bad Government and calling upon the Ministry for
retrenchment and reform — which had been declared to
be lost at the previous meeting, was again put to the
vote and carried by a large majority.
* Autobiog?'aphy, Vol. I a, pp. 115, 116.
248 ROBERT OWEN
But the effect of Owen's frankness was seen In the
attitude of the press. The Times, which up to this
point had continued to speak with enthusiasm of Owen's
philanthropy, and had more than once expressed a desire
to see his scheme fairly tried, opened its leader of
August 22 with the significant words — '* The curtain
dropt yesterday upon Mr. Owen's drama, not soon,
it is probable to be again lifted up. ... Mr. Owen
promised a Paradise to mankind, but, as t\\v as we can
understand, not such a Paradise as a sane mind would
enjov, or a disciple of Christianity could meditate without
terror."
Owen tells us that on the day after the speech he
met Brougham, who exclaimed, *' How the devil, Owen,
could you say what you did yesterday at your public
meeting ! If any of us " (meaning the Liberal party in
the House of Commons) " had said half as much, we
should have been burned alive — and here you are quietly
walking as if nothing had occurred ! " ^
Again, two years later, in the debate in the House
of Commons on December 16, 18 19, the Chancellor
of the Exchequer, in opposing Sir W. de Crespigny's
motion for a Select Committee to enquire into Owen's
scheme, found his weightiest argument in the passage
above quoted from the address of August 21.
There can be no doubt, then, that Owen's outspoken
denunciation of current religious systems did much to
alienate those of his friends who occupied high places
in the world. But it is probable that his own extra-
vagance and want of judgment did still more to discredit
his cause with many who would have remained unaffected
* Autobiography, Vol. I., j). 164.
1817 — 1^19 ^49
by the proof of his unorthodoxy. Owen had from the
first shown himself incapable of answering or even
apparently of understanding the objections urged against
his scheme, especially the two cardinal objections — the
enormous expenditure involved, and the danger of
population, deprived of the natural checks, increasing
beyond the limits of subsistence. In his letter of
August 19, he dismisses the arguments brought
forward by Major Torrens and others at the meeting
a few days previously as " little to the purpose, futile
and contrary to daily experience, and evincing much
real ignorance of the subject," and compares his excited
critics at the conclusion of the meeting to *' so many
individuals in a very ill-managed lunatic asylum." A
final letter, published in the newspapers of September 10,
1817, begins, "The adjourned public meeting, to
consider the plan I have proposed, has passed ; and from
its commencement to the end, it far more than satisfied
all my wishes. Each prominent figure moved correctly
to the wire that was touched for the purpose,, The
opposition to the measures recommended to these
meetings for their concurrence has well accomplished the
part assigned to it, and has thereby forwarded all my
views, and brought the adoption of the plan in its whole
extent some years nearer than otherwise could have
been possible. My chief apprehension previous to the
meeting was that there would not be a sufficiently
decisive stand made by its opponents, to elicit all the
arguments which could be urged against it ; for I was
anxious the public should discover all their fatuity and
weakness.*'
And again, ** The gentlemen who opposed the plan at
250
ROBERT OWEN
the public meetings, (tor whom, however, I do not
entertain one unsocial feeling,) did not surely imagine I
wished to have the opinions of the ill-trained and unin-
formed on any of the measures intended for their relief
and amelioration. No ! On such subjects, until they
shall be instruced in better habits, and made rationally
intelligent, their advice can be of no value." '
Lane^uage of this character was clearly more calculated
to alienate friends than to conciliate opponents. Nor
was the unhappy impression produced by this arrogance
mitigated by the nature ot the proposals as still further
developed in the letter of September 10. Owen
now makes it clearer than before that he aimed at
nothing less than an early and complete revolution of
the social state. The persons for whom these villages
of co-operation are designed are no longer simply the
unemployed, for beyond these he enumerates three other
categories, viz. ; II. The able-bodied working class with-
out property. III. The working class with property
ranging from £100 apiece. IV. The rich, who are
to live by employing the members of Class II. to work
for them. This further development of the scheme is
obviously borrowed from Bellers ; and like Bellers,
Owen enters into considerable detail as to the voting
powers, the appointment of committees, and the general
machinery ot government for these self-sufficing com-
munities. The letter concludes with an extraordinary
schedule, showing how in the present state of society,
divided as it is by religious and political differences, union
and stability can be ensured by founding a sufficient
number of communities to embrace at once every possible
' Autobiography^ Vol. I a, pp. 119, 120.
iSiy — 1B19 151
combination of religious belief and political conviction.
Thus Community No. I. may consist exclusively of
persons who are at once Arminian Methodists and
violent Ministerialists, whilst No. 50 may consist of
Jews who are moderate Reformers, and so on with all
other possible combinations.^ Finally, in an address
dated September 19, he announced that the New State
of Society Enrolment Office would shortly be opened
at Temple Chambers, Fleet Street, and that meanwhile
Books of Enrolment were to be found at Longman's
and other leading publishers.^
After the publication of his final address of September
19, Owen seems to have rested for a time from his
public labours. Probably his business and domestic
affairs claimed his attention. In the following year,
however, he published A ISIew Vieiv of Society : tracts
relative to this subject^ which contains a reprint of Bellers's
^ This schedule was a most unfortunate production. An enemy who
wished to caricature Owen's vdevvs could hardly have succeeded better.
An enthusiastic admirer writing in warm praise of the three addresses,
adds, " always excepted the abominable table of Sects ... (it has)
disgusted {imitecessarily). every one, and conciliated none." (Letter of
April 30, 1818, Manchester Correspondence.)
2 The address of September 19 (reprinted in Autobiography, Vol. Ia,
pp. 138-41) was not published in the Times. It appears, however, in
No. III. of a series of contemporary broadsheets (undated). No. III.
contains the Second Address (of August 21), the letter of September lo,
and this short address, and bears on the outer cover an intimation that
it was to be purchased from Dr. Wilkes, New State of Society Enrolment
Office, Temple Chambers. I cannot ascertain whether this office was
ever opened, or whether the Mirror of Truth, a fortnightly paper
announced in the address of September 19, ever made its appearance.
It should be added that a postscript to the letter of September 10,
explaining that Owen was not an enemy to true religion, but merely to
all sectarian manifestations of the religious spirit, which appears in the
Autobiography, (Vol. Ia, p. 137), is not to be found in the original letter as
published in the Ti7nes, nor in the contemporary broadsheet.
i5l ROBERT OWEN
tract, the sketch of the Shaker communities already
referred to, together with the Report of March, 1817,
and the public addresses and letters to the newspapers
of the same year. He also wrote in March, 181 8, the
two letters to Lord Liverpool and the Master Manu-
facturers respectively, on the Employment of Children
in Factories ; and in May of the same year he indited
from New Lanark a long letter to the Archbishop of
Canterbury on the Union of Churches and Schools.
A great part of the summer and autumn of this year,
I 81 8, was spent in a Continental tour, under the guidance
for some months of Professor Pictet, himself a well-known
savant, and member of a Genevan family distinguished
for two or three generations in scientific investigation.
Pictet introduced Owen to Cuvier, who was at the time
in London, and they went to Paris together. Owen
carried letters of introduction from the Duke of Kent
to the Duke of Orleans (afterwards King Louis-Philippe),
with whom he held a long and confidential conversation,
and to other personages. In the company of Cuvier
and Pictet he had frequent meetings with La Place,
Humboldt and other men of science, paid a visit to
the Academy, and conversed with many of the most
distinguished men and women in Paris.
After six weeks Owen was joined by his sisters-in-law,
and, accompanied by Pictet, the whole party set out for
Geneva. They drove across the Jura, and Owen records
one amusing little Incident on the journey. The weather
being fine, the whole party got out to walk, the young
women in front, Owen and Pictet conversing at some
distance behind. The two latter in passing a group of
well-dressed young women at the door of a house, heard
i8i7— i8i9 253
them making merry over the outlandish garb — riding
habits and hats of the late Georgian era — worn by the
English ladies. On rejoining his sisters-in-law Owen
tell us that he was much amused to receive in turn
their comments on the ridiculous costume worn by the
natives whom they had just passed.
At Geneva Owen met Madame Neckar, Madmoiselle
de Stael, Sismondi, and others. From thence he went
on to pay the visits already mentioned ^ to the schools of
Oberlin, Pestalozzi, and Fellenberg.
At Frankfort Owen wrote two Memorials — one dated
September 20, 18 18, to the Governments of Europe
and America, the other dated October 22, to the Allied
Powers assembled in Congress at Aix-la-Chapelle. He
met there many prominent statesmen and politicians and
expounded his system to the members of the Germanic
Diet at a banquet given, as he tells us, in his honour.
Here too he introduced himself to the Czar (Alexander
I., elder brother of Owen's guest, the Grand Duke
Nicholas) as the latter was leaving his hotel, and offered
him a copy of the two Memorials. The Czar had no
pocket big enough to hold the papers and refused to
accept them at the moment, asking Owen to call on
him that evening. The brusqueness of his tone offended
Owen, and he refrained from accepting the invitation.
Owen entrusted copies of his Memorial, however, to
Lord Castlereaghj one of the British representatives at
Aix-la-Chapelle, to present to the Congress, and he
learnt afterwards from various sources that they were
considered to be amongst the most important documents
laid before that assembly.^
^ Above pages 126-8. - Autobiography ^ Vol. I., pp. 186, 188.
2 54 ROBERT OWEN
These Memorials recapitulated briefly the main points
of the argument developed at length in the Essays on
the Formation of Character^ and the Addresses of 1817,
in a series of three propositions : —
(i) That the introduction of niachincry had rendered
possible the production of riches enough and much more
than enough for all human wants.
(2) That mankind now possessed the requisite means
and knowledge to enable them to mould to their will the
characters of the next generation.
(3) That it is to the interest of Governments and
individuals to put that knowledge into practice without
delay.
The Memorials were carefully and temperately worded.
There is no mention of quadrangular villages, or the
pernicious influence of religion ; and the egotism which
marked the addresses of 1817 is almost entirely absent.
But nothing can repress Owen's optimism.
" Any attempt," he writes, " to stop or retard the
introduction of these measures will be unavailing. Already
the principles and consequent practice are placed efl^ectu-
ally beyond the power of human assault. It will be
found that silence cannot now retard their progress,
and that opposition will give increased celerity to their
movements.' *
In 1 819 Owen renewed his propaganda. In the
early part of that year he wrote an Address to the
Working Classes which was published at length in two
London papers — the Star' and the Examiner.'^ In
making an appeal to one particular section of the com-
' Autobiography, \o\. I a, p. 212.
' April 15, 1819. ' April 25, 1819.
i8i7 — 1819 255
munity, Owen is careful to explain that he does not
seek to set class against class. He takes occasion to
assure the working classes, from personal knowledge,
that the rich are not animated by any ill-will against
them, but like them are bound in the chains of traditional
habits and sentiments. His message to the workers is
that, properly understood, the interest of rich and poor
is the same ; that the prevalent ideas and existing
social arrangements are destructive of the well-being
of all alike ; and that the true knowledge of human
nature and its potentialities, now at length revealed,
furnishes the means of a complete social revolution, to
be effected without violence, with the help and good-
will of all alike. The address ends with a characteristic
sentence.
" That the past ages of the world present the history
of human irrationality only, and that we are but now
advancing toward the dawn of reason, and to the
period when the mind of man shall be born again."
The address seems to have excited little attention,
though the Examiner had a friendly leader on the
subject. But an effort was made by Owen's friends in
the latter part of this year to bring his plans once more
before the public. The most influential of these friends
was the Duke of Kent, son of George III. and father
of Queen Victoria. The Duke appears to have been
genuinely impressed by Owen's character, and convinced
of his power for good. The Duke, with his brother,
the Duke of Sussex, was in the habit at this time, as
Owen tells us, of coming to his house and discussing
his social experiments with him. The two brothers
would inspect the model of the new villages, and marvel
256 ROBERT OWEN
at the set of eight cubes which Owen had caused to be
made, illustrating the proportions of the different classes
into which existing society was divided — the working
classes being represented at the base by a cube of 3^
inches a side, whilst the apex was formed by a cube,
representing the Royal P'amily, the Lords spiritual and
temporal, whose side measured only three-sixteenths of
an inch.^
Further, it appeared that Owen had interested himself
in the endeavour to straighten out the Duke's finances.
The letters written by the Duke to Owen in this year
show the terms upon which the two men stood to each
other. Thus on September 13, 1819, the Duke
wrote, in answer to a letter from Owen, " With regard
to my own finances, I admit the justice of all you say,"
and then proceeded to recount his efforts to live within
his income, and to explain the extreme difficulty, in his
position, of effecting any substantial retrenchment in
the expenses of his establishment.^
A few weeks later Owen invited the Duke and
Duchess to accept his hospitality at New Lanark. The in-
vitation came a few months after the birth of the infant
' The series of cubes (nine in all, since they included a cube repre-
senting the whole population, ^\q inches a side) was based upon
Table No. 4, " An attempt to Exhibit a General view of Society," given
in Colquhoun's Resources of the British Empire, first published in
1814. Owen gives at least two descriptions of the series of cubes,
(i) in the Millennial Gazette for August i, 1857, p. 77, where the numeri-
cal proportions are given, and (2) in Robert Owen's Journal, Vol. III.,
p. 191, where the sizes of the cubes are stated. The two tables do not
quite agree with each other, and neither appears exactly to correspond
with the figures given in Colquhoun's published work ; but the essential
point is that society is represented in a pyramidal form, the wealth and
dignities and privileges of the few rich broadbased upon the millions of
the industrious classes.
' The letter is given in full in the Rational Quarterly Review, p. 28.
i8i7 — 1819 257
Victoria/ and the Duke, in a letter dated October 8,
excuses himself at the moment from accepting the
invitation on account of the Duchess's health, adding,
*' but if, upon the Meeting of Parliament things take
that turn which it is to be hoped they will do — viz :
that your judicious plans to remedy the evil of the
want of productive employment are taken up by the
Government, or the majority of independent members,
in such a manner as to ensure them a fair discussion,
there will be no difficulty whatever, even if the Duchess
should be unable to accompany me on account of the
season of the year, for me to run over by myself and
make myself so far master of the whole system, as to
be able to deliver my sentiments upon it.
*' With respect to myself, be assured that I consider
the trouble and fatigue of the journey as nothing: nor
would the Duchess, but for the critical moment for her
health, immediately after nursing, which requires so
much attention.
*' With regard to the plam and simple accommodation
you will have to offer us, I speak equally her feelings and
my own, when I say it is what we should prefer to any
other, accompanied by the sincerity of that welcome
which we know Mrs. Owen and yourself would give us.
*' For my own part I am already convinced that what
I should see on the spot would amply repay me for any
little trouble and expense the journey might occasion
me ; and the Duchess is as much prepossessed in favour
of the thing as I am." ^
Sir W. de Crespigny's motion was lost in the House
^ May 24, 1819,
* Rational Quarterly Review^ p. 32.
VOL. I.
:»58 ROBERT OWEN
of Commons, and no debate seems to have been initiated
in the Lords, so that the opportunity never came for the
Duke to fulfil his promise, and his sudden death in the
following year, 1820, put an end to the project.
Much of the correspondence with the Duke is
occupied with the visits to New Lanark of General
Desseaux, Sir W. de Crcspigny and others, of the pro-
jected visit of " my illustrious relative. Prince Leopold,"
and of the advent of Dr. Grey Macnab, the Duke's own
physician, whom he had despatched to New Lanark to
examine and report upon the establishment. Macnab's
enthusiastic account, already referred to, and the Duke's
patronage no doubt did much to rehabilitate Owen's
reputation amongst many who had been alienated by his
proceedings in 181 7.
But the Duke did more to help on the cause. On
June 26 of this year 1819, a meeting was held under
his presidency in the Freemasons' Hall, to appoint a
committee to report upon Owen's plan. In his opening
remarks the Duke dwelt upon the fact that, whatever
Owen's private opinions might be, he allowed the fullest
religious liberty to all at New Lanark. But he seems
to have spoken in vain. The names of the Archbishop
and several bishops were proposed for the committee,
but in the final list of the committee published a few
days later, the Lords Spiritual are not represented. For
the rest, the committee included the Dukes of Kent
and Sussex, Sir W. de Crespigny, Sir Robert Peel, John
Smith and several other Members of Parliament, Major
Torrens, and David Ricardo.
On August II, the committee issued an appeal to
the public for subscriptions, in order that an experimental
i8i7 — 1019 259
establishment might be started. The amount needed
for the experiment was ^^ 100,000. On August 23 they
published an address, ■ explaining and justifying their
confidence in Owen's plan. The address begins by in-
sisting upon Owen's long experience in the management
of men and of business concerns, and describing in outline
the results achieved at New Lanark under his direction.
The only new point made here is that a certain portion
of land at New Lanark was kept under garden cultivation
by the mill operatives,^ and that the proposed villages of
co-operation would differ from New Lanark mainly in
the proportions assigned to agriculture and manufactures
respectively. The address then proceeded to state and
answer certain objections which had been raised to the
scheme. The first and greatest difficulty is presented
by Owen's unfortunately notorious opinions in religious
matters. On this the committee remark that Owen had
never been known to interfere with the religious opinions
of those in his employment ; that he and his partners
had for many years paid for the services of a Gaelic-
speaking minister, to provide for the religious needs
of the 'Highland workmen : '' that Mr. Owen's own
house is a house of daily prayer ; that he is the father
of a large and well-regulated moral family ; that his
conduct appears to be free from reproach, and that his
character is distinguished by active benevolence, perfect
sincerity, and undisturbed tranquillity of temper."
To the objection that Owen's plan involved a com-
munity of goods, the reply is made that, whatever Owen
^ The amount of land under cultivation at New Lanark was small.
From the report of the Leeds Deputation we learn that it amounted to
two hundred and forty acres, for a population of two thousand five
hundred persons.
26o ROBERT OWEN
may have said or written about communism, he does not
rceard it as an essential feature of his plan, nor would
he withhold his co-operation and superintendence from
the experiment if communism were vetoed.^ Further,
there need he no anxiety on this score, since community
of profits from land is not possible under the existing
laws. The objection that the plan contemplates equalisa-
tion of ranks, and the still more serious objection to the
proposed scheme on Malthusian principles, alike fall to
the ground if there is to be no community of goods,
but each man is to receive the reward of his own labour,
and the due profit of his invested capital — neither less
nor more.
The proposal to have meals in common may seem
to savour of communism ; but it is really, the committee
explain, a matter simply of convenience and economy ;
a common table need not be insisted upon ; '' the work-
men might receive their wages in money, and the mode
* Owen's original plan was purely communistic. The principle on
which it was founded was that of " combined labour and expenditure " ;
the colonists were to labour in a " community of interests" ; there would
be no disputes about the division of property, because all could procure
" the necessaries and comforts of life in abundance," and would no more
wish to accumulate an excess of such goods, than they wish in the present
state of society to take more than their share of water or air. Even
the superintendents and governors were to work without salary (Report
reprinted in Autobiography, Vol. Ia, pp. 71, 72, etc.). Later, in his letter
of September 6, in classifying the members of the proposed communities
according to the property which they brought in with them, Owen de-
parted from the simplicity of his original plan. Men who contributed
capital were to have superior accommodation, in proportion to the amount
of their capital ; and the workmen of the 2nd Class, by whose labour
the rich were to be supported, were to receive at the end of five years
£\oo, to invest in the community, or to enable them to start in the
outside world if they wish to leave the communal life. But even here
Owen does not apparently contemplate the actual payment of wages
or that there would be any need for money within the community.
i8i7 — 1819 261
In which they dispose of them would be entirely at their
own option."
In brief, the committee contemplated a joint-stock
enterprise on a large scale, which should pay interest
and profit on capital and wages to labour ; an enterprise
differing from ordinary commercial enterprises mainly
in its novel combination of agricultural and manu-
facturing pursuits, and in the character of its labourers.
The ordinary business house takes its labourers in the
prime of life and takes the best it can get. This novel
commercial enterprise, which repudiated the title of
charitable, was to find its recruits amongst the ranks
of the unemployed poor — the men and women who had
so far failed in the battle of life. Owen's original
scheme was no doubt Utopian in so far as it took too
little account of the existing facts of human nature.
Moreover, it was based on fundamentally false premises.
Its author's imagination had been entirely dominated
by the enormous multiplication of productive power in
the region of manufactures brought about by the
mechanical inventions of the past generation. And he
seems tacitly to have assumed that new inventions would
be forthcoming which would in like manner multiply
the productiveness of human labour when applied to
the soil. The spinning-jenny and the mule enabled the
men of Owen's generation to spin fifty- or a hundred-fold
the amount of yarn which their fathers could produce
with their utmost toil ; the further progress of invention
would no doubt enable their sons to extract from the
earth tenfold or a hundredfold the present harvests.
Implicitly this fallacious analogy dominated all Owen's
reasonings, and formed the economic justification for his
262 ROBERT OWEN
Utopian schemes. But if his premises are granted,
Owen's scheme can hardly be described as simply Utopian.
For it insisted, as the first condition of the New Society,
on the proper training of all its members ; and it made
its appeal to the nobler instincts of human nature. Owen
said in effect, '' You can, if you will, train man to be a
social animal, and to obey only social instincts ; and
with men so trained a community such as I propose
cannot tail of success."
The committee of 1819 did nothing to correct the
fundamental fallacy of Owen's economic reasoning : they
thrust almost out of sight the condition which he had
insisted upon as an essential preliminary — the training
of the children ; and they made their appeal, not to
the larger and finer nature which Owen hoped to evoke
in his future colonists, but to the men and women of the
market-place.
Such a scheme was open to many of the economic
objections which could be urged against Owen's plan,
and it lacked altogether Owen's wider outlook, and the
almost prophetic fervour which had inspired his advocacy.
The committee's appeal could inspire no man. Philan-
thropy plus 5 per cent, responded by off'ering less than
eight thousand towards the hundred thousand pounds
which was needed ; and the committee met for the last
time on December i, 1819, to declare their failure,
and to pass a vote of thanks to the Duke of Kent for
his ''condescending kindness" in presiding at their
meetings.
Three other events of this year fall to be noted. In
August a deputation of three gentlemen, Mr. Edward
Baines, Mr. Robert Oastler and Mr. John Cawood,
i8i7 — 1819 263
visited New Lanark for the purpose of reporting to
the Guardians of the Poor at Leeds on the nature of
the establishment, with the view of adopting Owen's
plan for the employment of the poor. Their report,
extracts from which have been given in a previous
chapter, was entirely favourable. On December 16
Sir W. de Crespigny moved in the House of Commons
for the appointment of a Select Committee to enquire
into Owen's proposals for the amelioration of the con-
dition of the lower classes. The motion was seconded
by Lord Archibald Hamilton, and supported by
Brougham, John Smith, Ricardo, and Alderman Wood.
It was opposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
and Wilberforce. All the speakers paid tribute of
respect to Owen's high character and to the excellence
of his work at New Lanark. The opposition was based
less on economic than on religious grounds. The
Chancellor read to the House the extract quoted in the
earlier part of the present chapter from the address
of August 21, 1 8 17, in which Owen had denounced
all religions. And Wilberforce contended that all that
was good in the state of New Lanark was due less to
Owen's wise government than to " the good old system
of Christianity." In the event the motion was lost
by a hundred and forty-one to sixteen.
In the spring of the year Sir J. Buchanan Riddle,
the member for the united boroughs of Lanark, Selkirk,
Peebles and Linlithgow, died, and Owen declared himself
a candidate for the vacant seat. In his address, dated
April 24, 1 8 19, and issued from 49, Bedford Square,
London, he bases his claim to represent the boroughs
on his extensive experience and his knowledge of the
264 ROBERT OWEN
true remedies for the existing distress.^ He was not
elected, owing, as he tells us, to his many public engage-
ments in London preventing the necessary prosecution
of his candidature. At the general election which took
place on the death of the King early in the following year
he appears to have stood again, but with like want of
success. His failure on this second occasion is attributed
in his Autobigraphy to the fact that some of the old
Lanark voters were won over by the bribes of his
opponents. He was, however, assured beforehand of
the support of the Magistrates and Town Council of
Linlithgow; and on March 3, 1820, i.e. ten days
before the dissolution of Parliament, he was entertained
at a public dinner by the inhabitants of Lanark."
' See the address published in Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 332.
' Autobiography, Vol. Ia, pp. 334, 335. Owen's own account of his
candidature {Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 226 seq) is rather confused. But
it seems clear, from the contemporary documents, that his //Vj'/ candidature
occurred on the death of Sir J. B. Riddle, in April, 1819, ^^^ ^'S second
candidature probably took place at the General Election of the following
year.
CHAPTER XII
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK
HITHERTO Owen had dwelt mainly on the ethical
aspect of the problem which he had set himself
to solve. Through the lately won knowledge of the
formation of character, human nature, he had proclaimed,
could be fashioned anew : the vicious could be made
well-disposed, the turbulent could be made peaceful, the
idle industrious. The economic aspects of the problem
had been almost completely left out of count. He
had himself grown rich, and had seen other men
grow rich, almost without effort or volition of their
own ; his own workpeople at New Lanark could at
the present time produce more cotton than the whole
county — perhaps the whole kingdom — could have pro-
duced when he was a child. He saw no reason to doubt
that the mechanical inventions which had thus multiplied
the productivity of human labour in the processes of
manufacture could as readily multiply the produce of the
same labour when applied to the soil. At New Lanark,
as we have seen, a widow with many young children
was a desirable prize in the marriage market. Owen was
fully persuaded that there was enough and to spare for
all, and that, as in the small corner of the world's
market with which he was familiar, new mouths would
»65
266 ROBERT OWEN
all the world over continue to bring with them hands
more than sufficient to provide for their wants.
Strong in this belief he felt that he could afford to
launch at Malthus, and to neglect nice calculations of
supply and demand. So little indeed had he considered
his new State of Society from the economic standpoint,
that he had not even made it clear whether his villages
of co-operation were to be self-sufficient, producing only
for their own consumption, or whether they were to
enc;age in commerce with other communities outside or
even with the world at large. Probably he was too little
versed in such matters to realise that the question had
more than an academic interest. But his position had
been definitely challenged by the economists at the
meetings in 1817 ; and again on July 26, 1819, Major
Torrens had renewed the attack. Torrens's speech at
this last meeting was afterwards amplified into an
article, which appeared in the Edinburgh Review for
October, and which fairly presents the case against Owen's
scheme from the standpoint of the orthodox economy
of the day.^ The reviewer points out that Owen had
apparently not made up his mind on what basis the
villages were to stand — whether to consume all their own
products and thus be self-suflicing, or whether to engage
in commerce with the outside.^ In the former event,
the reviewer pointed out, since the number of workmen
' The article in the Editiburgh was of course anonymous, but it
reproduces so exactly not merely the arguments, but in many cases the
very phrases used in Torrens's speech as reported in the Times (July 27,
1819), that it seems safe to attribute it to that gentleman.
» At the meeting of July 26, Torrens had actually asked the
(juestion "Are th(? commodities produced to be consumed in the villages,
or sent to market ?" and Owen had replied, " It is so arranged it may be
one or the other " [Times, July 27, 1819).
IT IS OF ALL TRUTHS THE MOST IMPORTANT THAT THE CHARA('TEH OF MAN
IS FORMED FOR AND NOT BY HIM .
^oo-C>~e^r/^ CJ^.c
^c-eyyfy.
^
'/-t?^?a' yc^^?^■
a/}7^ -u^fz/orUHi^'ny a/y.
/.cU.
\ TMC N;rvV VCrX
\ PUBLIC !
r
L \ i_]
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 267
in a community would not permit of a proper subdivision
of labour, such as that required by our present manu-
facturing processes, the cost of production would be
much higher than in the outside world. If, however,
the community gave up the ideal of being self-sufficing
and set itself to procure some of the commodities needed
for its own consumption by exchanging some of its own
surplus products, then it would at once become subject
to the very fluctuations and perturbations of the market
from which it was Owen's aim to save his colonists.
Moreover, if the community wished to exchange on
equal terms, it must consider all such questions as
position with regard to the market, facilities for con-
veyance, fitness of soil and climate for the particular kind
of manufacture or agriculture the products of which it
proposed to exchange.
Criticism of this kind apparently forced upon Owen
the necessity of defining his position. An opportunity
presented itself in the following year. In May, 1820,
Owen drew up by request a long Report on his plan
for relieving public distress, which was laid before a
committee of the county of Lanark. The report is
of value as setting forth for the first time a clear
and comprehensive statement of his economic views,
and of the industrial organisation of the proposed
villages.
Owen begins with an attempt to justify the assump-
tion already referred to, as underlying his whole position.
He seeks to show by a particular instance how the
product of the soil could be multiplied by mechanical
inventions, as the product of the spinning-wheel had
already been multiplied. In the report of their visit
268 ROBERT OWEN
to New Lanark in August, 1819, which the Leeds
deputation had presented to the Guardians of the Poor
in that town, attention had been drawn to some ex-
periments made by a Mr. Falla of Gateshead in sub-
stituting the spade for the plough as a means of breaking
up the land and preparing it for sowing. Falla was a
nursery gardener, and naturally therefore used the spade
for cultivating his land. But being forced on occasion,
for want of labour, to make use of the plough, he had
been much struck by the inferiority of the results
produced, and determined on a practical experiment.
His neighbour's land, broken up by the plough and sown
broadcast, produced in 18 19 under favourable circum-
stances a crop of wheat representing about thirty-eight
bushels to the acre. This was regarded as decidedly
above the average. Falla's land, he tells us, was of
slightly inferior quality, and not more highly manured.
Nevertheless, by using the spade to work the soil, and
sowing the seed in drills, he succeeded in two successive
years, 18 19 and 1820, in raising a crop which averaged
between sixty-five and seventy bushels to the acre. As
the cost in the case of spade labour but slightly exceeded,
on Falia's calculation, the cost of working the land by
the plough, the result was to raise the net profit by more
than 50 per cent. The result is no doubt interesting
as far as it goes ; but of course no single experiment of
the kind can be regarded as crucial, and the conditions
of the particular experiment leave much to be desired.
The land with which the comparison was made was not
India's own ; and he was hardly in a position therefore
to institute an exact comparison of the amount of manure
used, and other conditions of the experiment. And
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 269
above all, no comparison of this kind instituted for a
limited period can be other than fallacious ; for it leaves
out of account what is, after all, the most important
factor, the relative exhaustion of the soil by the two
methods. The Rothamsted experiments have taught us
that, in the long run, we take out from the soil in the
form of grain a fairly exact equivalent for what we
have put into it in the form of manure. And the
farmers of England, who have had the results of Falla's
observations before them for more than eighty years,
have not yet discarded the plough in favour of the
spade.^
Nevertheless it is on the result of this single and
inconclusive experiment that Owen proceeds to base a
new theory of agriculture. His readiness to generalise
from such meagre data indicates perhaps that he had
at length realised the need for justifying the economic
assumptions which underlay his schemes. After giving
a full account of Falla's experiment, and of the causes
which contributed to the alleged superiority of the spade
over the plough, Owen proceeds to explain that the
cultivators of the soil have hitherto persisted in using
the plough through ignorance and prejudice. Moreover
spade husbandry requires higher qualities than our
farmers at present possess : since the labour to be directed
is that of men, not of animals, a knowledge of human
nature and its attributes is required. " Closet theorists
. and inexperienced persons suppose that to exchange
the plough for the spade would be to turn back in the
^ A letter from Falla detailing the results of his experiments is ap-
pended to the Report to the Coimty of Lanark (reprinted in Autobiography^
Vol. Ia, pp. 314-20).
270 ROBERT OWExM
road of improvement, — to give up a superior for an
inferior implement of cultivation. Little do they imagine
that the introduction of the spade, with the scientific
arrangements it requires, will produce far greater im-
provements in agriculture, than the steam engine has
effected in manufactures." It will prove more fruitful
than all the inventions of Crompton and Arkwright.
And this extraordinary change is even now at hand.
" It will immediately take place ; for the interest and
well-being of all classes require it. Society cannot longer
proceed another step in advance without it ; and until
it is adopted, civilisation must retrograde, and the
working classes starve for want of employment."
Here then we have Owen's economic foresight
vindicated, and the material well-being of the new
colonist assured. It remains to consider how to dispose
of the wealth which will be so abundantly produced
under the new order of things.
It is now, Owen holds, sufficiently demonstrated that
when their labours are wisely directed the inhabitants
of the new colonies will without undue effort be able
to produce much more than enough for their mainten-
ance. Hence there will be little need for money or
private property within the community. " It will be
quite evident to all, that wealth of that kind which will
alone be held in any estimation amongst them, may be
so easily created to exceed all their wants, that every
desire for individual accumulation will be extinoruished.
. . . As the easy, regular, healthy, rational employment
of the individuals forming these societies will create a
very large surplus of their own products, beyond what
they will have any desire to consume, each may be freely
^Mf
r
ti,k
.V- '~v«^- iaiMHwlwa»tf^«— *>
Fioti! nit engraving after a picture by W. T. Fry pitblislicci in 1821.
ROBERT OWEN.
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 271
permitted to receive from the general store of the com-
munity whatever they may require. This, in practice,
will prove to be the greatest economy."
Part of the surplus will be devoted to the maintenance
of the infants, the aged, and the sick ; part to the rich,
who having advanced the necessary capital will not be
expected to do any work themselves ; part will be needed
by those whose work is not directly of a productive
character ; ^ and part again will be required for paying
taxes and public dues generally.^ What still remains
after these various claims have been satisfied, and after
due provision has been made for the future — for each
establishment will be provided with granaries and ware-
houses, where food may be stored against a season of
famine ^ — will be exchanged with other like communities
for part of the surplus of their special commodities ; and
thus each colony will add to its luxuries by a kind of
primitive foreign commerce. Precise details are given
of the amount of land to be taken ; the mode of its
cultivation ; the arrangement of the buildings in a
square ; the provision for education ; the internal
government of the colonies, and other matters. The
only new point discussed, however, is that of the clothing.
Owen favours a garb which should be as light and simple
as possible, on the grounds of health, economy, beauty
and sexual delicacy. He cites the national dress of the
Romans and of the Scotch Highlanders as most nearly
.realising this ideal in practice. He adds, that the best
fashion and material having once been settled, nobody
^ Autobiography, Vol. Ia, p. 282.
* Ibid., p. 304 et seq.
3 Ibid., p. 303.
-72 ROBERT OWEN
will need to give a thought to questions of dress " for
many years or perhaps centuries." ^
But the most interesting part of the Report is that
dealing with the question of a standard of value. At
the time when Owen wrote his Report the currency
was the question of the hour. In 1797 an Act of
Parliament had been passed to authorise the suspension
by the Bank of England of cash payments. The sus-
pension was, by the terms of the Act, to last until six
months after the end of the war. The war had come
to an end nearly five years ago ; prices had long
since fallen close to the normal ; but the Government still
hesitated to sanction the resumption of cash payments.
In the previous year, however (1819), they had appointed
a Committee under the presidency of Robert Peel the
younger — the son of the rich manufacturer who had
introduced the Factory Bill drafted by Owen — and in
accordance with the recommendations of the Committee
cash payments were to be resumed, not immediately,
but by four successive stages. In May, 1820, the date
of Owen's Report, the first of these stages had already
been passed.
Every social reformer believes that he understands
the part played by the currency, and those ot the more
thoroughgoing type are in substantial agreement in
attributing famine, poverty and all other social evils to
its agency. It was natural, therefore, especially at a time
when currency questions occupied so much of men's
thoughts, that Owen should find the secret of the
national distress in the artificial standard of value
accepted by civilised societies, and should foresee
' Autobiography, Vol. I a, pp. 291, 292.
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 273
imminent aggravation of that distress if the proposals
of Peel's Committee were carried out. His line of
argument may roughly be paraphrased as follows : Even
before the great mechanical inventions of the last genera-
tion, the labour of a man, properly directed, was more
than sufficient to maintain himself; by those inventions
his powers of production have been multiplied fifty- or
a hundred-fold — and yet the people are starving. Since,
then, the cause of that poverty does not consist in any
lack of wealth, or of the means of production, there
must be some obstruction to the proper circulation of
the wealth produced. In short, the cause must be
sought in the mechanism of distribution. Now distribu-
tion in civilised countries is no longer carried on by
a simple process of barter. An intermediate term has
been introduced into the process ; that intermediate
term is the standard of value — in other words money.
It is the imperfection of the standard which is the real
cause of the stagnation of wealth, and the consequent
poverty of so many of our fellow-countrymen in the
midst of riches. For gold and silver are a purely
arbitrary standard by which to measure commodities ;
they are, moreover, absurdly inadequate as a medium
of exchange, as the late Government found when they
wisely substituted a more elastic paper currency in 1797.
But even bank notes constitute but a palliative. The
true remedy for the evil is more radical. One of the
.first measures required " to let prosperity loose on
the country is a change in the standard of value " ;
and as a result of thirty years' study and experience
Owen propounds the doctrine " That the natural
standard of value is^ in principle^ human labour^ or the
VOL. I. 18
274 ROBERT OWEN
combined manual and mental powers of men called into
act ion y
Let, then, he continues, a labour-unit be fixed, on the
analogy of a foot-pound or " horse power " in mechanics ;
and let the price of all commodities be fixed in terms
of that unit, in accordance with the actual amount of
human labour required for their production. The
adoption of this simple and natural device would remove
all the evils from which civilised society now suffers.
Human labour, no longer subject to the caprice of the
market, would acquire a new dignity ; prices would no
Ioniser fluctuate ; all commercial restrictions would be
removed, and all markets thrown open ; every transaction
would proceed smoothly ; the whole process of bargaining
and higgling, with all its demoralising accompaniments,
would disappear ; and wealth would find its level as
inevitably as water.
The Report was printed for a general meeting of
the county held at Lanark on May i, 1820, and was
referred for consideration to a committee consisting of
the sheriff^ and six other gentlemen. In the following
November the committee presented a brief report, in
which, while refraining from committing themselves
to anv definite opinion upon Owen's scheme as a whole,
they expressed the view that it would be desirable that
further experiments should be made in spade culture.
After the reading of the committee's report. Sir James
Stewart brought before the meeting a proposal made
'ny Mr. Hamilton of Dalzell to let to the county from
five hundred to seven hundred acres of land, '' with a
view to facilitate the formation of an establishment on
Mr. Owen's plan, which would supersede the necessity
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 275
of erecting a Bridewell for the County." It was further
proposed that the county should erect suitable buildings
on the land, and that evildoers should be sent thither
instead of to the Bridewell, and there transformed into
respectable citizens. No action appears to have been
taken on the proposal, or on Owen's Report.^
The year 1821 saw the publication of the Economist^
a periodical designed to advocate Owen's views, and the
actual starting, on a small scale, of a Co-operative and
Economical Society, of which a fuller account will be
given in a later chapter. In June of the same year
Owen's plans were again brought before the House of
Commons. Maxwell moved in a feeble and unimpressive
speech for the appointment of a Commission to report
upon the establishment at New Lanark. The debate
was notable for a change in the attitude of the speakers.
Opposition on religious grounds to any countenance
of Owen's schemes was again a prominent feature of
the debate. Wilberforce spoke once more, and was
supported on this occasion by Lushington and Canning.
But the opposition which counted for most came from
another quarter. Lord Londonderry based his objections
to the motion mainly on the paternal character of Owen's
proposed government — '* The state of discipline recom-
mended by Mr. Owen might be applicable enough to
poor-houses, but it was by no means agreeable to the
feelings of a free nation." And Hume followed to the
same effect : " If Mr. Owen's system produced so much
happiness with so little care, the adoption of it would
^ Atitobiography, Vol. Ia, pp. 311-14. From a letter from Hamilton
dated December 5, 1820, it appears that he proposed to let sixty acres at a
nominal rent, and six hundred more at a rent of two-fifths of the produce.
Further he promised a subscription of ^1,000.
276 ROBERT OWEN
make us a race of beings little removed from the brutes,
only rann^ing the four corners of a parallelogram, instead
of the mazes of a forest." Other speakers ridiculed
the '' quadrangular paradises." In the event the motion
was lost.^
Owen himself did not come prominently before the
public again until June of the following year, 1822.
On the first of that month there was held a meeting
of the British and Foreign Philanthropic Society,
established, according to the Times, ^ mainly through
Owen's exertions. The names of nearly all foreign
ministers and ambassadors in the country, together
with a long list of noblemen and other distinguished
persons, appeared as vice-presidents. William Fry and
Isaac Goldsmid were the treasurers. John Gait was
one of the hon. secretaries, and the acting committee
included Sir James Graham, T. W. Coke (afterwards
Earl of Leicester), Brougham, Hume, and many other
Members of Parliament, bankers, clergymen and philan-
thropists. The object of the Society was declared to
be " to carry into effect measures for the permanent
relief of the labouring classes, by Communities for mutual
interest and co-operation, in which by means of education,
example and employment, they will be gradually with-
drawn from the evils induced by ignorance, bad habits,
poverty and want of employment." '^
At the first meeting, which took place in the Free-
masons' Hall in London, the Earl of Blessington read
the report of the committee, in which the establishment
' Hansard, June 26, 1821.
' Report of the meeting, June 4, 1822.
' Report in Robert Owen's Journal, Vol. I., p. 157.
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 277
of communities on Owen's plan was recommended to
the landed proprietor as " a safe and profitable mode
of investing capital," and "as a practicable method of
extinguishing the Poor's Rate in England." The secre-
taries announced a list of subscriptions amounting to
about ^50,000, including ^10,000 from Owen, and
^5,000 each from Hamilton of Dalzell, James Morrison
and Henry Jones, of Cole House, Devon. The speakers,
including James Maxwell, M.P., Sir W. de Crespigny,
John Gait, the Earl of Blessington and Viscount
Torrington, were enthusiastic in their testimony to the
success of the establishment at New Lanark, and hopeful
of the prospects of the similar experiment which the
Society projected.
Owen, in returning thanks, found occasion to say
a word for " the respectable individuals now denominated
political economists." Their amiable disposition and
good intentions, he declared, no one could doubt, but
experience showed that " their theories and their doctrines
could produce only misery to the human race."
Notwithstanding the enthusiastic tone of the meeting,
and the substantial sum promised in the subscription
list, we hear no more of the British and Foreign
Philanthropic Society or of its projected experiment in
community-forming.^
In the autumn of this year, 1822, Owen went over
to Ireland to spread the knowledge of his system there.
He spent some months in a tour through the country
accompanied by an agricultural expert and by Captain
^ The proceedings of this, the first (and only ?) meeting are reported
in the Times, June 4, 1822, and at greater length in Robert Owen's
Journal^ Vols. I. and II.
278 ROBERT OWEN
Macdonaki of the Engineers, an enthusiastic disciple
who afterwards followed him to New Harmony.
He visited Dublin and Bclfiist, Kilkenny, Waterford,
Cork, Kerry, Eimerick, Tipperary, King and Queen's
Counties, Clare, Meath and Down, spending some
months in the south and west, as those districts were
at the time most disturbed, and suffering the deepest
distress.^ He was welcomed by many of the nobility
and gentry, and by the clergy, both Protestant and
Catholic. He was even invited to Maynooth and ex-
pounded his system before an audience of Roman
Catholic divines.'"^ He called upon the Lord-Lieutenant
and expatiated upon his plans for an hour and a quarter.
*' I had a very fiivourable hearing : he has the plan now
under consideration, and I am to see him again." ^
In a letter dated March i, 1823, addressed to the
nobility, gentry, clergy and inhabitants of Ireland, Owen
gave the result of his observations during this tour,
lie found a soil fertile beyond his expectations, a suitable
climate, rivers, harbours and natural resources sufficient,
if properly used, to maintain in abundance a population
manyfold greater than the seven millions then inhabiting
the island. And yet he found these same millions, from
the highest to the lowest, living in squalor and dis-
comfort ; the landlords in constant anxietv lest the
tenants should refuse to pay rent, and their own means
of livelihood should thus disappear ; the middle classes
' Report of Select Cnmviittcc on the Poor in Ireland {i^z-^), p. 70.
' New Existence of Man upon Earth, Part IV., pp. 12, 16.
' Lettr-r to Mrs. Owen, October 31, 1S22. In the same letter he
mentioned dining on successive nights w itli the Bishop of Down and the
Lord Mayor, and chronicles visits to Lord Cloncurry, Lord Carrick,
the Duke of Lcinster and the Bishop of Ossory.
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 279
engaged in incessant struggle against poverty ; the
peasantry so poor that women were eager to be employed
for two pence a day, and strong active men were glad
of the chance of working fourteen hours for eightpence.
The responsibility for all this poverty and suffering he
traced to the misguided system under which the Irish
people were living ; the remedy he promised to declare
at a public meeting to be held on the i8th of the month
in Dublin. On the appointed day the Rotunda was
filled with an expectant crowd. The Lord Mayor was
in the chair, and amongst those who had come to hear
and to give their support to Owen were the Duke and
Duchess of Leinster, The Earl of Meath, Lord Cloncurry,
and a number of clergy.
In a speech which took three hours to deliver,^ Owen
sketched before the vast audience the outlines of the
New System of Society. " I will now disclose to you,"
said he, " a secret, which till now has been hidden from
mankind " — the secret that man's character is formed
for him by circumstances, pre-natal and post-natal. The
first part of the address is practically a re-statement of
the argument in the Essays on the Formation of Character.
In conclusion Owen briefly described his project of
co-operative communities.
Owen's address is said to have been received with
frequent applause. But the tone of the speakers in
the discussion which followed was by no means friendly.
-The Protestant party was prominent. Three clergy-
men, Messrs. Dunne, Daly and Singer, opposed Owen's
project on the ground that his system was contrary to
* The report of the speech in the Patriot (March 20, 1823) occupies
eight and a half columns — nearly two entire pages — of close print.
28o ROBERT OWEN
revealed religion, immoral in its tendency, and generally
subversive of the established order. It seems doubtful,
however, whether these champions of the faith carried
with them the sympathies of the audience. At any
rate a further meeting;, which was held in the same
place on April 12, was well attended ; the company,
which again included peers and peeresses, and many
persons eminent in literature and the sciences, being
apparently not less distinguished than on the tormer
occasion. At the second meeting a large painting
illustrating one of the proposed communities was sus-
pended above the orchestra ; and the greater part of
Owen's address was devoted to explaining the details
of the arrangements in the proposed villages — the
housing accommodation, the arrangements for warming
and lighting, the clothing, the education of the children,
and the organisation of the communal industry.
Though Owen's speech on this occasion, to judge
from the length of the reports, must have occupied
some two hours in delivery, he had still not completed
his exposition, and a third meeting, not less crowded
than those which preceded it, was held on April 19.^
In this third speech Owen entered into the financial
aspect of the question. He produced a series of
calculations designed to show that a community of one
thousand persons, men, women, and children, occupied
partly in agriculture and partly in nianufactures could,
if their labour were properly directed and co-ordinated,
produce enough not only to maintain themselves in
abundance, and to provide for the education of their
' The pressure and heat at the meeting were so great that several
ladies faiiitcd (report ia Dublin Evcnini^ Mail, April 23, 1823).
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 281
children, the maintenance of the sick and the aged, but
also leave a large annual surplus, sufficient to extinguish
in a few years any debt which might have been accumu-
lated in the original purchase of the land and erection
of the buildings. On Owen's calculations this surplus
might be reckoned as ranging from ^^2,500 to ^^ 16,000
a year, according to the nature of the industries pursued
by the happy villagers. A stormy discussion followed
Owen's speech, the Rev. Mr. Singer again being prominent
amongst the opposition.
The meeting was again adjourned until April 24.
At this fourth meeting, which appears to have been
of a semi-private nature, Owen's friends were in the
majority. Sir T. Esmond, Lord Cloncurry, ^Eneas
Macdonnell and General Browne spoke in favour of
the scheme.^ Finally, on May 3, was held the first
meeting of the Hibernian Philanthropic Society. Owen
was supported by Lord Cloncurry, Sir Frederick Flood,
Sir William Brabazon,Sir Capel Molyneux, General Browne,
the Hon. Mr. Dawson, and other persons of social
position. A clergyman, the Rev. E. Groves, was one
of the secretaries. A substantial list of subscriptions
was announced, and the table at which the secretary sat
was '' literally covered with bank-notes." After some
prefatory remarks by Lord Cloncurry, Owen made
another lengthy speech, in the course of which he
displayed his series of cubes, and explained in detail
how they illustrated the divisions of existing society.
Of the Hibernian Philanthropic Society we hear
^ For a report of the meeting see the Patriot, April 26, 1823. No
mention of the meeting appears in Robert Owen's Journal, or in the
Dublin Report.
282
ROBERT OWEN
no more after this year. But, as will be seen here-
after, the seed sown in the Dublin campaign bore
fruit later. ^
In the course of this same year, i82j, a Select
Committee of the House of Commons, of which Ricardo
was a member, was appointed to consider the employment
of the poor in Ireland. A memorial was presented to
the Committee from the Hibernian Philanthropic Society
prayinir that Owen's plan of villages of co-operation
mifiht be eiven a trial. Owen was himself called as a
witness before the Committee, and was examined at
considerable length upon the economic and the ethical
aspects of his scheme. The Committee report that the
scheme had attracted so much attention and interest,
especially in Ireland, that they telt it their duty to
examine it in detail and consider the tendency of the
principles on which it is founded. Their conclusion is
as follows :
" But when it is considered, that Mr. Owen's plan
is founded upon a principle that a state of perfect
equality can be produced and can lead to beneficial
consequences, your Committee consider this position so
irreconcilable with the nature and interests of mankind,
and the experience of all ages, that it is impossible to
treat this scheme as being practicable. Your Committee
concur in the opinion that a state in which an inequality
of conditions offers the natural rewards of good conduct,
• Accounts of tlie Dublin meetings will be found in the Dublin
Report, a pamphlet published in Dublin in 1823, subsequently reprinted
in the first three volumes of Robert UwoCs Journal, also in the New
J'.xistence of Man upon Earth, Part IV. Fairly full reports are to
be found in the C()ntemj)orary Dublin newspapers, the Evcnins; Mail
and the Patriot.
REPORT TO THE COUNTY OF LANARK 283
and inspires widely and generally the hopes of rising
and the fear of falling in society, is unquestionably the
best calculated to develop the energies and faculties of
man, and is best suited to the exercise and improvement
of human virtue. If Mr. Owen's establishments could
be conducted according to his intentions, the idle and
profligate would be placed in a situation equal to that
which would be a reward to the industrious and virtuous.
True it is, that Mr. Owen suggests that under his
new arrangements idleness and profligacy might be
altogether extirpated from society, but such an opinion
is one which appears altogether visionary. Certainly
your Committee feel every disposition highly to
estimate the efl^ects of good education and early moral
habits, but to conceive that any ' arrangement of
circumstances ' can altogether divest a man of his
passions and frailties, as they comprehend principles in
themselves undeniable, is a result which can never be
anticipated."
The Dublin meetings mark the conclusion of another
stage in Owen's career. They were the last occasions
on which he had the opportunity in this country of
addressing an audience composed mainly of the well-to-
do and educated classes. His appeals to them were,
as we have seen, by no means unproductive, measured
by the standard of the subscription-lists. But the
enthusiasm evoked seems to have been shortlived,
and none of these subscription lists ever matured. In
later years Owen addressed his message to a wider
audience. Flectere si nequeo Superos^ Acheronta movebo.
On his return, six years later, from America and the
failure of his great experiment at New Harmony, he
284 ROBERT OWEN
seems to have found a more congenial environment
amongst the working classes. For the rest of his life
his appeal was addressed mainly to them ; and if the
response which it evoked was not always of the precise
kind at which he aimed, the effects produced were at
any rate more enduring.
CHAPTER XIII
NEW HARMONY
FOR some years, as we have seen, Owen had been
endeavouring, aided by committees formed of his
wealthy and aristocratic followers, to raise the funds
necessary to start an experimental Community. But so
far none of these efforts had proved successful. But in
the summer of 1824 an opening presented itself in an
unexpected quarter, of which Owen was not slow to
take advantage.
George Rapp was a small farmer born at Iptingen
in Wiirtemberg in 1757. In early manhood he reacted
strongly against the lifeless formalism of religion as
manifested in the Churches of his native land, and
gradually gathered round him a band of disciples who
learned to look to him for spiritual instruction. Persecu-
tion followed ; and at length, in 1803, Rapp determined
to lead his followers to the land of religious freedom.
He sailed for America in that year with two or three
companions, and purchased five thousand acres of un-
cultivated land near Pittsburg. In the next year six
hundred of his followers joined him, and the Harmony
Society was formed. The little community was composed
of pious German peasants, sober, thrifty, and industrious.
They flourished exceedingly and in a few years possessed
mills and workshops, a tannery, a vineyard, a distillery
28.S
286 ROBERT OWEN
and grew all that was needed to supply themselves with
food and clothing. In 1807 a new wave of religious
feeling swept through the Society and the members
gcnerallv renounced marriage, agreeing to live a celibate
lifc.^ At the same time they forswore the use of tobacco.
In 1 8 14, being apparently dissatisfied with the site
of their original settlement, the Society purchased
some thirty thousand acres of Government land in
Posey County, Indiana, on the banks of the Wabash,
a tributary of the Ohio. In 18 15 they sold their
Pennsylvanian property, and the whole Society, numbering
it is said about eight or nine hundred persons," moved
to their new home. The new settlement, which was
named Harmonic or Harmony, consisted of a large
quantity of very fertile flat land on the banks of the
river, backed by low-wooded hills suitable for the vine.
The soil soon brought forth abundantly. They cultivated
cornland and pasture, magnificent orchards and far-
stretching vineyards. The streets of the little city were
planted with black locust-trees and mulberries — the latter
to afford material for the silk-weaving which was an
important feature in the communal industry. The
dwelling houses for the settlers were built some of brick,
some of wood ; each with its suflicient garden enclosure
filled with fruit-trees. There were also four large
buildings to serve as community-houses ; a substantial
' It does not appear that there was any comi)iilsion in the matter.
NordhofT {The Covimttnistic Societies of the United States, p. 73) says
that those who refused to accept cehbacy witlidrcw from the Society.
Hut Hebcrt, who visited the Society at its new habitation at Harmony
in 1822, says that marriages were permitted even at that date, and that
the last had occurred nearly three years before his visit {A Visit to
tht Colony of Hannony in Indiana. London, 1825).
' Their numbers are said to have been recruited by emigration.
VI!£
I'ilVV Y
jKt: I
: LIB:
:ary •
A-vroK
, LLNOX
AIsD
l:l.Ut.N
i-OUNDATlONS
H
'^ 1
NEW HARMONY 287
brick house for Father Rapp ; a massive stone granary
with loopholed walls, to serve at need as a defence
against attack by Indians and others ; a wooden church,
and a huge cruciform building of brick, with four doors,
one at the extremity of each end of the cross. The
upper storey of this building was supported inside by
massive pillars of wahiut, cherry and sassafras.^
There were also a silk-factory, woollen-mill, saw-
mill, brickyard, distillery, oil-mill and dye-works.
Harmony soon became an important business and
manufacturing centre for all the country round. Hebert,
visiting it in 1822, found the people very prosperous
and apparently very contented : but he notes that there
was an absence of mirth or conviviality. Besides the
church, the only undertaking not of a purely utilitarian
character appears to have been a maze or labyrinth, such
as that at Hampton Court, the walks walled in with
hedges of beech, with a small summer-house at the centre,
rude outside, but exquisitely furnished within. And even
this we are told served a symbolic purpose, having been
designed by Rapp to illustrate the wanderings of the
soul through the world, and the finding of the desired
haven at last in community-life.
In 1824 the colonists determined again to move their
home. The ostensible cause of the change was the
unhealthiness of the site ; but it was thought by some
^ Hebert {op. cit.) describes this cruciform building as a church. But
it is certain that the wooden building, which was furnished with a spire
and two heavy bells, was intended for a church. The New Hartnouy
Gazette (Vol. L, p. 22) calls the cruciform building the Town Hall : and
it was in fact used in Owen's time for public meetings, concerts, etc.
Robert Dale Owen {op, cit., p. 212) writes of "a spacious cruciform
brick hall."
2 88 ROBERT OWEN
to be {xirt of Rapp's policy to keep his people on the
move, lest, becoming too comfortable and prosperous,
they should forget their faith and their vow of celibacy.
At anv rate, the Society commissioned Richard Flower,
an Englishman who had helped to found a colony in
the neighbouring State of Illinois, to sell their property
for them.
In the summer of 1824 Flower came to Braxfield.
Owen, as we have seen, was already acquainted with
the Rappite experiment ; indeed the knowledge of it had
probably helped to shape his own ideal of a co-operative
colony. It is no matter for wonder, then, that the offer
made by Flower proved tempting. Here was a magnificent
theatre already equipped for his great experiment, and in
a country not yet in complete bondage to the prejudices
and conventions of older societies. His children, for
their part, were fascinated by the prospect. " I listened
with delight," says Robert Dale Owen, " to Mr. Flower's
account of a frontier life, and when one morning my
father asked me ' Well, Robert, what say you. New
Lanark or Harmony ? ' I answered without hesitation
* Harmony.' "
Owen accordingly went in December, i 824, to America
to view the property, taking with him his son William
and leaving Robert Dale Owen to look after the New
Lanark Mills in his absence. And in April of the
following year he bought the village as it stood, with
all its industries and twenty thousand acres of land,
for ^30,000,' a price which seems not exorbitant. The
' K. I)alc Owon, of), cit, p. 21 1, Nordlioff, p. 76. In the Xcw Harmony
(iazctU, Vol. II„ p. 353 (report of Robert Owen's speech at Fliiladelpliia), the
amount paid l)y Owen for the real and personal property together is given
as about i4o,cxx) dollars— say ^28,000. In New Harmony Gazette, Vol. I.,
NEW HARMONY 289
original colonists forthwith returned to Pennsylvania,
and estabHshed themselves not far from the site of their
former settlement. The new colony was named Economy,
and there the Rappites flourished for many years. ^
When Owen arrived in America he found that his
fame had already preceded him. There had indeed been
founded some years previously, in New York, a " Society
for promoting Communities," which in 1 822 had published
an " Essay on Common Wealths^^ containing extracts
from the New View of Society together with Melish's
account of the Harmony Society. The New World was
prepared therefore to welcome both the man and his
doctrines. On February 25 and March 7, 1825, he
delivered discourses In the Hall of Representatives at
Washington before distinguished audiences, which In-
cluded the President of the United States and several
p. 14, the land is said to have amounted to nearly 30,000 acres, of which
less than 3,000 were cultivated by the Society, From a copy of the deed
of agreement, dated May 21, 1825, which is preserved in the Manchester
Correspondence, it appears that Rapp conveyed to Owen, "20,097 acres,
together with all the tenements, buildings, implements and appurtenances,
including by express agreement the Town Clock and bells, all the furniture
of every description in the tavern," the copper brewing-kettles, dyehig-
kettles and blacksmith's tools, for 95,000 dollars ( = ;^i 9,451). The 40,000
odd dollars was no doubt the price of the live-stock and other personal
property.
^ The reader may be interested to learn the ending of the Rappite
Community — for it came to an end just a hundred years from its beginning.
After Rapp's death in 1847 the Society continued to prosper exceedingly,
and became extremely wealthy. The numbers, however, seem to have
steadily diminished. About 1890 several new members were elected,
amongst them one John S. Duss, who ultimately became trustee and
business manager for the Society. In 1903 the Society was reduced to
six members, amongst whom were John Duss and his wife, and in the
spring of that year the lands of the township. Economy, were sold, it
is said for 4,000,000 dollars, to a land company ; the proceeds of the
sale being divided amongst the surviving members {^Philadelphia Press^
April 17, 1903 ; Philadelphia Ledger, May 2, 1903).
VOL. I. 19
2 90 ROBERT OWEN
members of the Cabinet, Judges, Members of Congress,
and other persons of importance. In the first address he
confined himself to an outline of his doctrine of the
iiifiucncc of circumstances on belief and character. In
the second he gave details of the projected community,
a!id exhibited drawings and a wooden model of the
proposed quadrangle. After describing the town of
Marmony and its " infant manutactures," he went on to
point out that the existing arrangement of the houses,
etc., would not permit the settlement to form a fitting
habitation for the ideal Community. " Therefore it will
serve only a temporary but yet a useful temporary
purpose for the objects which I have in view. It will
enable me to torm imnicdiately a preliminary society, in
which to receive a new population, and to collect, prepare
and arrange the materials for erecting several such com-
binations as the model represents,^ and for forming
several independent yet united associations, having
common property and one common interest." He went
on to vindicate Harmony from the charge of unhealthi-
ness, pointing out that of the eight hundred persons in
the Society, only seven had died in the two preceding
years. Anticipating possible objections on political
* From an article in the Co-operative Magazine for January, 1826, de-
scribing the progress made at New Harmony, we learn that " a favourable
site has been marked out on which the new buildings are to be erected,"
and a reference is made to the frontispiece of the magazine, repro-
duced on the opposite page, which represents a quadrangular building
placed in a fertile valley-bottom on the banks of a winding river,
apparently intt-nded for the Wabash. The article continues, " It is
rontidcnlly expected that by the latter end of this year, the members
of the community will exchange their present residence for one in
which the most skilful combination of scientific arrangements will be
made subservient to the various purposes of social and domestic life."
But the intention, it ever formed, must soon have been dropped.
NEW HARMONY 291
grounds, he pointed out that it would be as easy for
communities of the kind to confederate themselves into
a State, as it was for the several States of the American
Union to confederate themselves into a nation, and that
defence against aggression could be secured by training
the schoolboys in the communal schools in military and
naval exercises.
Here, then, " in the heart of the United States,"
Owen proclaimed, " the Power which governs and directs
the Universe and every action of man . . . permits me to
announce a new empire of peace and goodwill to men."
He concluded his address, it is stated, by inviting the
" industrious and well-disposed of all nations " to come
to New Harmony.^ At any rate, some kind of manifesto
was issued, inviting those who were in sympathy with
the scheme to join the new Community.^
There came, in fact, in the early months of 1825 to
Harmony — or New Harmony, as it was henceforth to
be known — some hundreds of persons from all parts of
the Union, who if they could not all be described as
industrious, and did not all share Owen's hopes of a new
state of society, were all, no doubt, well disposed to a
communal life as they severally conceived it, and found
at least common ground in their dissatisfaction with the
existing order. Owen never had the opportunity of
selecting his recruits, as appears to have been his original
intention, for he found the settlement filled to over-
flowing on his arrival. Eight hundred, it is said, came
within the first few weeks, and by October, 1825, the
1 Noyes, History of American Socialis7ns^ p. 35. The words do not
appear in the address as published in the New Har??i07ty Gazette
(Vol. II).
^ Lockwood, The New Harmony Communities, p. 89.
292
ROBERT OWEN
number had increased to nine hundred.^ William Owen,
writing to his father from New Harmony on October
24, 1825, savs, " We have been much puzzled to know
what to do with those who profess to do anything and
everything : they are perfect drones, and can never be
satisfied here. We have got rid of a good many such,
although we still have a few left." And Robert Dale
Owen, who made the acquaintance of the Community
earlv in the following year, describes them as a *' hetero-
geneous collection of radicals, enthusiastic devotees to
principle, honest latitudinarians and lazy theorists, with
a sprinkling of unprincipled sharpers thrown in.*' -
On April 25, 1825, Robert Owen delivered an
address to the hundreds assembled at New Harmony.
He pointed out that a change from the individualistic
to the social system could not be made all at once.
Time was needed for the denizens of the future Com-
munity to become acquainted with each other : time
was also needed to enable the inhabitants to change the
selfish habits bred by individualism tor the superior
habits necessary in a social state. There must therefore
be a half-way house, and, he continued, " New Harmony,
the future name of this place, is the best half-way house
1 could procure for those who are going to travel this
extraordinary journey with me ; and although it is not
intended to be our permanent residence, I hope it will
be found not a bad traveller's tavern, in which we shall
remain only until we can change our old garments, and
fully prepare ourselves for the new state of existence,
into which we hope to enter."
* Auycs, lor. rit. ; New Harmony Gazette, Vol. II., p. 30.
' Threading my Way, p. 254.
NEW HARMONY 293
He then pointed out that it might be found necessary
that there should at first be some pecuniary inequality,
since it was essential for the proper starting of the scheme
to import a few men of science from the outside, who
would not be satisfied with the plain fare and simple
accommodation which would be the lot of the ordinary
workers. For himself, however, he wished no better
accommodation than the rest, and in any case there would
be no personal inequality — no distinction of rank.
Owen then proceeded to read the proposed Constitu-
tion of the Preliminary Society. At the outset he, as
founder and sole proprietor, proposed to appoint the
committee of management, with the proviso that at
the end of the first year the members should elect
representatives on the committee.^ The Society was
to be open to all the world, except " persons of colour."
The members accepted no pecuniary liability. They
were to bring with them their own furniture and effects ;
they were to work, under the direction of the committee,
at some trade or occupation ; a credit was to be set
against each name at the public store for the amount
of useful work done ; and against this credit a debit
was entered for goods supplied. At the end of the
year the balance would be placed to the credit of the
member ; but he was not at liberty to withdraw any
part of it in cash, without the consent of the committee.
He could, however, leave the Society at a week's notice,
-and withdraw his balance.
Owen had intended to prohibit the distillation ot
^ In fact the members appear to have elected three out of the com-
mittee of seven persons, from the outset (see New Harmony Gazette,
Vol. I., p. 102).
294 ROBERT OWEN
whiskey, but found that this step was impossible at the
present time. He hoped, however, that it might be
effected in the future/ He recommended that the
articles consumed by the members should, as far as
possible, lie of American origin, and especially those
that the Society itself could produce, so that it might
ultimately be self-sufficing. Finally he hoped that at
the end of three years the members would be prepared to
constitute a Community of Equality, "and so for ever
bury all the evils of the old selfish individual system."
At the beginning of June Owen left New Harmony,
and returned to Europe early in August. On October i,
1825, appeared the New Harmony dizette^ with the
motto, '' If we cannot reconcile all opinions, let us
endeavour to unite all hearts." In its early numbers
we have an interesting picture of the state of the Society
at that date. Nothing is said of the agricultural pro-
spects. As regards the manufactures we learn that,
though the Community possessed well-equipped mills
and workshops of various kinds, they could not use
them to the full for want of skilled workmen. The
sawmill was doing good business with all the country
round ; the hat manufactory and the boot-making shop
were doing well ; the manufacture of soap, candles
and glue had exceeded the rec}uirements of the Com-
munity. Hut the dye-works and the pottery were
standing idle for want of hands, and for the same cause
the cotton and woollen mills could turn out but a
small weekly product.
' William Owen writes in August, 1825, stating that a resolution had
been passed to the ctTcct that no spirituous liquors should be retailed
in New Harmony. (Ouoted in the Co-operative Magazine, January, 1826.)
NEW HARMONY 295
A letter from William Owen, who had been left in
charge of the colony during his father's absence, dated
New Harmony, December 16, 1825, gives a detailed
account of their position and of the difficulties of
founding a colony in the undeveloped West.
*'My dearest Father,
" We were astonished to hear that you had
advertised for so many hands, whom you wished to
engage as members or hired workmen, for it will be
impossible to give them houses or even rooms here,
until we shall have built more houses for their accommoda-
tion. Of many of those for whom you advertised we
have already sufficient numbers and excellent workmen."
He explains, however, that they need, amongst
others, " masons, bricklayers, wheelwrights, carpenters,
machine makers, potters (confidential men likely to
remain here), and above all good cooks and washer-
women, and laundresses. The tavern in particular
requires a good cook and also all the boarding houses.
If you can, I would advise to hire at Louisville a
black man cook, we want him here sadly, particularly
as you expect to bring so many people here. But
although I have said we want these men to make our
workshops full and perfect, I would at the same time
repeat and impress upon your mind that we have no room
for them. I believe I expressed the same opinion to you
in my letter to New York. I was therefore surprised
that you should advertise for so many mechanics ; we
had applications for membership almost every day from
296 ROBERT OWEN
various quarters and from then wc have received more
than gone away. We have received a good many
valuable mechanics since you lett us, and all the brick
and frame houses are filled except one, which we reserved
tor those you might bring with you, it having been
\acated lately. We shall find some difficulty in finding
room for those you bring with you, and as to those
with whom you may engage in New York, I do not
know what we can tlo with them. And as for building
houses, that is at present out of the question. We
have no lime, no rocks, (ready blasted) no brick, no
timber, no boards, no shingles, nothing requisite for
building, and as to getting them from others, they are
J to be had iu the whole country. We must ourselves
jM'oduce the whole of them, before we can build, we
must dig and burn the lime, dig and blast the rocks,
mould and burn the bricks, fell and hew the timber,
tell and saw the boards and split the shingles, and to
tlo all these things, we have no hands to spare, or the
l^ranches of business in the Society must stop, and they
cannot stop, or the whole Society would stop too.
These are the facts as they really are and you will find
them so when you come. 1 have not exaggerated the
difficulties or the time it will take to prepare for building.
As this is winter of course we can do but little in this
line. As to fitting up other houses, such as the church
or granary, it is out of the question. We have no
hiniber to make partitions of, and there is none to be
hatl, till we saw it, in the country, which we cannot
do till the creeks rise. Besides, the granary is full of
grain, and the church is the school. F'urther, no means
of cooking whatever. Besides, as McDonald observes,
NEW HARMONY 297
we must not immediately curtail their comforts and
conveniences, which would necessarily be if put in such
places to sleep. On this account I had hoped you would
have brought no Eastern mechanics, and also because
those who are already accustomed to a Western life
would put up better with such accommodations because
accustomed to them more and we can get plenty of them,
when we can receive them and have houses for them.
If you can bring with you some stoves from Louisville
foundries, and also abundance of stove pipes, we could
accommodate more people in our present houses ; the
stoves need not be large, the cheaper the better. We
should want perhaps 20 stoves. We have no bed-
ding for any body, not even for those along with
you ; we have no feathers, no ticking, no sheets, no
blankets. You must buy some, or every one must bring
with them enough for themselves. The sugar is gone,
quite gone, and the river being low, we can get none
till it rises. We use about 2 barrels per week. The
store will be quite empty in six weeks. We are all in
good spirits and the gentlemen of the Committee desire
best remembrances.
" Yours truly,
"William Owen."
In its non-productive activities, however, as we learn
from the Gazette^ the Society had more success to record.
The tavern was constantly filled with visitors from the
neighbouring States, who came to stay at New Harmony.
The military were well organised. There was already
a company of Artillery, one of Infantry, and a corps
of Riflemen ; whilst a company of Veterans and a
298 ROBERT OWEN
company of Fusiliers were being formed. About one
huiuired ami thirty children were boarded and educated
at the schools. 1^'inally, the need of recreation had not
been overlooked. There was a good band, and many
of the children showed decided musical talent. A ball
was held every Tuesday evening in the Town Hall (the
large cruciform building already described) ; there was
a concert every Friday ; and Wednesday evenings were
rrivcn up to a public meeting and discussion on all
matters relati?ig to the well-being of the Society. From
other sources we learn that the church and Town Hall
were thrown open on Sundays for the meetings of
different religious sects, and that ministers of all de-
nominations were given full liberty to preach.^
In November of this same year 1825, Robert Owen
returned to America, accompanied by his son Robert,
and by one or two disciples, amongst them Captain
Macdonald, formerly a prominent member of the Edin-
burgh Practical Society.^' He brought with him also a
model, nearly six feet square, of the proposed Com-
munity Buildings which he presented to the President
of the United States, for the uses of the General
Government.^
Owen returned to New Harmony on January 12, 1826,
bringing with him some of those men of science to whom
reference had been made in his speech of April 27.
Their leader was one William Maclure, a native of Ayr
in Scotland, who had already made Owen's acquaintance
in a visit which he had paid to New Lanark, in July,
' Letter dated December, 1825, printed in Co-operative Magazine^
February, 1826.
* See below, Chapter XV.
Ncu> Harmony Gazette, \'ol. I., p. 118.
NEW HARMONY 299
1824. He had been delighted with all that he saw there,
especially with the education of the children, and with
Owen's plans for reorganising society " so as to drown
the self in an ocean of sociality." ^ Maclure had come
to America towards the close of the eighteenth century,
and had spent several years in making single-handed a
geological survey of the United States, travelling on
foot through every State and Territory in the Union.
The results of his gigantic labours were published in
1809. He had subsequently helped to found the
Philadelphia Academy of Science, and was for many
years the President of that body. With his love of
natural science was joined a passionate enthusiasm for
popular education. He had long been ambitious to
found an agricultural school for the children of the poor,
i.e. a school somewhat after the model of Fellenberg's
school for the children of peasants, in which " physical
labour should be combined with moral and intellectual
culture," the labours of the children in the fields helping
to defray the cost of their schooling in the classroom.
A man of considerable wealth, he had started an ex-
perimental school of the kind on a large scale in Spain,
but was compelled to abandon the scheme on account
of the unsettled state of that country. Though by no
means agreeing with all Owen's economic views, he
was sufficiently in sympathy with him to be willing to
co-operate in the New Harmony experiment, mainly,
no doubt, because he saw in it a favourable opportunity
for giving effect to his educational theories. He agreed
therefore, to advance some of the capital needed to float
^ From Maclure's Diary, which is preserved in the New Harmony
Public Library.
300 ROBERT OWEN
the scheme, and to give his personal assistance to the
Community Schools.^
With Maclurc came Thomas Say, a distinguished
zoologist, afterwards known as author of an American
F.ntomolog^ and an ybnerican Conchology^ the latter work,
having been printed at New Harmony ; Charles Lesueur,
a French naturalist and draughtsman, who drew some
of the engravings in the conchology above referred to,
known also for his work on American freshwater fishes ;
(icr;ird Troost, a distinguished Dutch chemist and
geologist, afterwards Professor of Chemistry at Nashville
University; Joseph Neef, an ex-soldier, who had been
a master under Pestalozzi at Yverdun ; Phiquepal
d'Arusmont, afterwards the husband of Frances Wright ;
Madame Marie Fretageot (both Pestalozzian teachers),
and several others. The distinguished party travelled by
boat down the Ohio to New Harmony — " the Boatload
of Knowledge," as it was called — reaching that place on
January I2, 1826.
It had been Owen's original intention, as we have
seen, to wait for three years — i.e. until about the end
of 1827, before attempting to constitute a Community of
F^quality. On his arrival, however, in January, 1826, he
seems to have been so much pleased, both with the
material prosperity of the colony and with the progress
made by the members of the Community in the principles
• It is not clear how much money Maclurc actually advanced. The
original intention had been that he and Owen should each put down a
like sum. Maclure subsec|uently stijiulatcd that his risk should be limited
to /^2,ooo (io,(xx) dollars). Later, Owen expressly stated that "Mr.
Maclure before he went (to New Harmony) advanced a part, and only
a small part, of the purchase money for the real proj:)crty." (Address
at rhiladelphia on June 27, 1827, reported in IVcw Harmony Gazette,
Vol. II., p. 353.)
NEW HARMONY 301
of true fellowship and co-operation, that he proposed to
them that they should cut short their period of probation,
and enter at once upon the final and perfect stage of
social development.
Accordingly a general meeting of the residents was
summoned on January 25, which straightway elected a
committee of seven persons to draw up a constitution
for the community. Amongst the seven were William
and R. Dale Owen and Captain Donald Macdonald.
The committee reported to the convention on Febru-
ary I, and the convention at its ninth sitting, on Sunday,
February 5, 1826, finally adopted a constitution. The
document begins with a statement of objects and principles
and a profession of faith. Then follow the articles of
union. Article No. I prescribes the title — '' The New
Harmony Community of Equality."
Article No. II. runs — " All the members of the
Community shall be considered as one family, and no one
shall be held in higher or lower estimation on account
of occupation.
" There shall be similar food, clothing and education,
as near as can be, furnished for all according to their
ages and, as soon as practicable, all shall live in similar
houses, and in all respects be accommodated alike.
" Every member shall render his or her best service
for the good of the whole."
The Community was to be divided into six depart-
ments— Agriculture ; Manufactures ; Literature, Science
and Education ; Domestic Economy ; General Economy ;
Commerce : each department should again be sub-
divided into occupations. Each occupation should
choose an Intendent, the Intendents should choose four
302 ROBERT OWEN
Superintendents — and all these officers, together with
the Secretary, should constitute the Executive Council.
The real estate was to be vested in the Community
as a whole. ^
Thus the Society at one step emerged from the
chrysalis stage of modified individualism into the winged
glory of pure communism. Prior to February 5, the
value of the labour of each individual had been reckoned
up and placed to his credit at the Communal Stores, and
he had drawn upon this credit to procure whatever
provisions or other articles he required. But in the
new Society there was to be no discrimination between
one man's labour and another's ; nor any buying and
selling within the hounds of the Community. Each
man was to give of his labour according to his ability
and to receive food, clothing and shelter according to
his needs.
In a private letter written by W. Pelham (afterwards
for some months editor of the New Harmony Gazette)
to his son, dated February 8, three days after the
adoption of the constitution, we have an interesting
picture of the enthusiasm prevailing at the time. After
describing the free and exhaustive criticism to which the
draft constitution had been subjected, and its final
acceptance, the writer proceeds — " Hitherto there had
been much irregularity of effort, the consequences of
which nearly paralysed the energies of the population :
but at length I see the way clear, and I see the utter
impossibility of such a state of things again recurring.
The several parts of the great machine will be so
admirably adapted to each other as to effect the most
' New Uarmuny Gazette, Vol. 1., pp. 161, 162.
NEW HARMONY 303
valuable purposes. I anticipate that in six months the
New Harmony machine will go like clockwork." . . .
Again, referring to the pending election of officers, he
writes — " This is an anxious time (not with a view to
the final success of our principles, which must infallibly
succeed sooner or later, but) with a view to the
speedy accomplishment of the purposes for which we are
associated." The writer's tribute to Owen is worth
quoting — " He is an extraordinary man, a wonderful
man — such a one indeed as the world has never before
seen. His wisdom, his comprehensive mind, his practical
knowledge, but above all, his openness, candour and
sincerity, have no parallel in ancient or modern
history." ^
As Mr. Pelham surmised, it would appear that the
new constitution, with all that it implied, was adopted
with but few dissentient voices. Amongst the dissentients,
however, was Captain Macdonald. In an interesting
letter which appeared in the New Harmony Gazette of
February 22, he explains why he could not join the
new Community. Practically he objected to the whole
system of representative government, even a thoroughly
democratic government, such as that proposed by the
new constitution. In his view the machinery of repre-
^ I owe this letter to Professor Earl Barnes, who kindly lent me a
copy which he had himself made from the original (now at New Harmony)
in April, 1890. A writer who visited New Harmony in August, 1825,
gives similar testimony to the impression produced by Owen's character,
" Perhaps there has seldom been an instance in modern times where a
benevolent individual has obtained such a complete ascendency over the
minds of others, and such a thorough conviction of the rectitude of his
intentions, as this gentleman established during his short stay of only
a few months among us. Every one seemed to repose upon his promises
with undoubting confidence." (Quoted in the Co-operative Magazine of
February, 1826, p. 49.)
304 ROBERT OWEN
scntation and election would inevitably lead to suspicions,
jealousies and factions. He held that the organisation
of industry and all the details of the working of the
Society should be settled in the open family assembly,
that all niiLi^ht know what was going on, and that each
individual man or woman might feel that he or she
had a voice in all the decisions arrived at. Clearly a
Community of eight hundred or one thousand persons
was too unwieldy to be worked on these lines. With
such numbers some form of representation or delegation
was a mechanical necessity. Macdonald's strictures,
however, were probably not without justiiication. The
constitution, which was no doubt partly modelled on the
system in force at the New Lanark Mills, was too
elaborate ; and in a Community of Equality the mere
existence of Intendents and Superintendents constituted
the most glaring of inequalities. Macdonald's views
were apparently to some extent shared by others. For
the new constitution did not march in accordance with
the hopes of its authors. At any rate the general
assembly on February 19 passed a resolution requesting
Owen to assist for one year in conducting and super-
intending the affairs of the Society.
Then tor a time all seemed to promise well. An
editorial in the Gazette of March 22 breathes a spirit
of optimism worthy of Owen himself The article
begins by admitting that hitherto they have spent too
much time in debate, and in the endeavour to reconcile
conflicting opinions. *' We have discovered that our
energies have been wasted in fruitless eftbrts, each one
endeavouring to convince the others that he alone
possessed the power of unlocking the treasures of social
NEW HARMONY
305
life. This error is happily dispelled. By the indefatigable
attention of Mr. Owen, a degree of order, of regularity
and system has been introduced into every department
of business which promises increase and permanency.
The town now presents a scene of active and steady
industry, the effects of which are visible and palpable.
The Society is gradually becoming really, as well as
ostensibly, a Community of Equality, based on the equal
rights and equal duties of all. Our streets no longer ex-
hibit groups of idle talkers — but each one is busily engaged
in the occupation he has chosen for his employment. Our
public meetings, instead of being the arena of contending
orators, have assumed a different character, and are now
places of business. . . . No vain disputations now grate
upon the ears of patient industry." ^
But the Society was too large and its elements too
heterogeneous for all to work smoothly. William
Maclure, writing to Professor Silliman on March 16,
explains that they had succeeded better than they had
any reason to expect. But they '' found it much easier
to assimilate a few having the same pursuits than many
having different occupations." There were, moreover,
it is evident, social inequalities, religious differences, and
national idiosyncrasies to create disunion, or at lowest,
to hinder the complete amalgamation required. " It was
therefore decided," continues Maclure, ''to divide into
small communities the land surrounding Harmony, and
already two Societies are formed, one with 1,200 acres
of good land, the other with 1,100 acres, at 83.60 and
at 85 dollars per acre, seven years credit being
allowed, and 5 years afterwards to pay it " by annual
* New Harmony Gazette, Vol. I., p. 207.
VOL. I. 20
3o6 ROBERT OWFN
instalments. Money was also advanced for stocking the
land, etc/
The two Communities were named Macluria and
Feiba Peveli, the first separating, it is said, mainly on
relie^ious grounds, the second, which consisted chiefly of
English country folk, on racial differences. These two
Societies adopted a common profession of faith, and a
constitution differing little from that of the parent Society.
The most notable difference was that the executive
powers were vested in a non-elective body — a council
of fathers — who in Macluria were to be the five oldest
members of the community under the age of sixty-five.
In Feiba Peveli the limiting age was fixed at fitty-five.
Both societies appear to have contemplated a system of
pure communism. -
In a leader commenting on the formation of the
two new Societies, the New Ha'rmony Gazette remarks
'' that the formation of communities is now pretty well
understood among us, and is entered upon like a
matter of ordinary business."^ Again, in an address
' The letter from which the above extract is quoted originally
appeared in Si/limafis Journal. It is re[)rinted in the Co-operative
Afa^azinc for November, 1826.
' For an account of Macluria see Ne7u Harmony Gazette, Vol. I., p. 209.
P'or Feil)a Peveli, Jln'd., p. 225. The name calls for explanation. Stedman
Whitwcll, its godfather and presumable founder, invented a system of
nomenclature under which the name of a place should contain an
indication of its latitude and longitude \ a 01 b representing \, e ox d = 2,
the diphthong ei = 8, and so on. Thus Feiba Peveli = 38.11 N., 87.53 ^^^•
Under this system New Harmony (38. 1 1 N., 87.55 ^) might be called Ipba
Veinul ; Orbiston (55.34 N., 4.3 W.) would be Ulio Ovuoti ; London and
Paris might be known henceforth as Lafa-Tovutu and Oput Tedou re-
spectively. The system is recommended by its author as agreeable alike
to the man of common sense and to the man of taste ! {A'ew Harmony
Gazette, \'ol. I., pp. 226, 227.)
» Ibid., Vol. 1.. p. 230.
NEW HARMONY
307
published on May 10 containing a retrospect of the
previous year, Robert Owen, with his perennial optimism,
finds only cause for congratulation in the multiplication
of Communities. *' In one short year," he says, ''the
mass of confusion, and in many instances of bad and
irregular habits, has been formed into a Community of
mutual co-operation and equality, now proceeding rapidly
towards a state of regular organisation ; and out of it
two other Communities have been formed and are located
in the immediate neighbourhood. Both are in close
union with this Community and with each other ; both
are founded on the true communistic principles " — the
principles of equality and common property. Macluria,
indeed, would have grain and vegetables of their own
growing to supply the year's consumption ; and had
already built and occupied comfortable temporary cabins.
Feiba also had much land under cultivation, and seemed
assured of ultimate success.
On July 4, Independence Day, 1826, Owen delivered
at New Harmony an oration inaugurating the era of
mental independence : and thereafter the Gazette bears
on its title page the legend '' First (Second, etc.) year
of Mental Independence."^
It happens that we have pictures from several different
hands of the state of New Harmony in the early months
of 1826. Robert Dale Owen gives a few pages to it
in his Autobiography? Reaching New Harmony early
in 1826 in his twenty-fifth year, full of faith in the new
order of society which his father was about to inaugurate,
he was intoxicated with the freedom, the good fellowship,
the enthusiasm which he found prevailing. It was,
^ New Harmony Gazette^ Vol. I,, p 329. - pp. 244 et s^.q.
3o8 ROBERT OWEN
indeed, the land of youth and hope. There were
concerts and weekly dances, and all manner of social
intercourse ; there were, above all, the weekly discussions
in which matters of high moment were debated with
.ill the freedom and fine seriousness of youth. The
housing, no doubt, was of the rudest, the fare of the
simplest, and there was plenty of hard work for those
who cared to undertake it. But these things do but
idd zest to a picnic, or to a camping-out expedition.
And here was a picnic on whose issues depended the
regeneration of the world.
Young Owen's zeal impelled him to volunteer for
all the hard work that came along. He helped to pull
down some of the oldest and most dilapidated of the
\'illage cabins ; he took a turn at sowing wheat, until
his arm refused any longer to perform its office ; he
helped to bake bread, and by a unanimous vote was
awarded the product of his labours for his own sole
consumption. But he soon left these undertakings to
others, and found more congenial employment in helping
to edit the Gazette^ and in teaching in the schools. He
took also a prominent part in the government of the
infant colony.
On April 13, 1826, there came to New Harmony
a distinguished European traveller, Charles Bernard,
Grand Duke of Saxe-Wcimar-Eisenach. The Duke
was an acute and interested observer, and tells us a
good tleal about the real condition of affairs. He lodged
at the Community tavern and found the accommodation
passable. In the tavern he met a man *' very plainly
dressed, about fifty years of age, of rather low stature,"
who proved to be Owen himself Owen showed him
NEW HARMONY 309
all over the Community, and expounded to him all his
plans and his hopes for the future, and the Duke
marvelled at Owen's invulnerable belief in his ability
to remake the world. The Duke tells us that Owen's
faith was by no means shared by the New Harmonites
with whom he talked. Moreover, he saw signs of the
early breaking-up of the Society. He talked with Mr.
Jennings (one of the committee of seven who had drawn
up the new constitution, and for some time editor of
the Gazette). Mr. Jennings, he found, " intended to
leave the place and go to Philadelphia. Many other
members have the same design, and I can hardly believe
the Society will have a long duration. Enthusiasm, which
soon abandons its subjects, as well as the itch for novelty,
have contributed much to the formation of the Society.
In spite of the principles of equality which they
recognise, it taxes the feelings to live on the same
footing with others indiscriminately, and eat with them
at the same table. ..." Two things specially impressed
the Duke : the extreme frugality of the living, and
the difficulty of amalgamating different social grades.
In fact he found that in their amusements and social
meetings, at all events, the better educated classes kept
together. The working men, he notes on his first evening,
did not join in the dance in the public hall, but read the
newspapers scattered on the tables ; and later he remarks
that when partners were assigned for the cotillon by
drawing numbers, " the young ladies turned up their
noses at the democratic dancers who often in this way
fell to their lot." Even at the lectures the better
educated members kept themselves together and took
no notice of the others ; but the Duke observed that
3IO ROBERT OWEN
some tatterdemalions placed themselves on the platform
close to Owen. Again, there was a distinctive Community
dress, which was worn almost exclusively by the more
aristocratic members. The costume of the men consisted
of " wide pantaloons buttoned over a boy's jacket made
of light material, without a collar ; that of the women of
a coat reaching to the knee and of pantaloons such a^
little girls wear among us/' The Duke even hazarded
the remark that these dresses " have a good appearance."
But *' Hermann's a German."
But after all, the most prominent item in the
Duke's narrative is the dancing. During the first six
days of his visit he witnessed dancing every evening.
On the Tuesday there was a formal ball in the public
hall — the cruciform building already referred to. The
Duke notes that there was "a particular place marked
off for the children to dance in, in the centre of the
hall, where they could gambol about without running
between the legs of the grown persons." But on the
other evenings the dances were impromptu affairs, or
were merely sandwiched in between lectures and concerts.
Here is an account of his Sunday evening in the settle-
ment. " In the evening I paid visits to some ladies,
and saw the philosophy and the love of equality put
to a severe test with one of them. She is jiamed \Mrginia,
from Philadelphia, is very young and pretty, was delicately
brought up, and appears to have taken refuge here on
account ot an unhappy attachment. While she was
singing and playing very well on the piano, she was
told that the milking of the cows was her duty, and
that they were waiting. Almost in tears she betook
herself to this servile employment, execrating the Social
I
w -^ *
1^
/
frx
#*
THt? NEW Y0!:K
""X AND
L
NEW HARMONY
311
System and its so much prized equality. After the cows
were milked, in doing which the young girl was trod
on by one and mired by another, I joined an aquatic
party with the young ladies and some young philosophers
in a very good boat upon the inundated meadows along
the Wabash. The evening was beautiful, it was moon-
light and the air was very mild. The beautiful Miss
Virginia forgot her stable experiences, and regaled us
with her sweet voice. Somewhat later we collected at
House No. 2, appointed for the School House, where
all the young ladies and gentlemen of quality assembled.
W^e amused ourselves during the whole remainder of the
evening dancing cotillons and waltzes, and with such
animation as rendered it quite lively. New figures had
been introduced among the cotillons, among which was
one called ' The new Social System.' Several of the
ladies made objection to dancing on Sunday ; we thought,
however, that in this sanctuary of philosophy such prejudices
should be entirely discarded, and our arguments, as
well as the inclinations of the ladies, gained the
victory." . . .
On the following day the Duke was invited to dinner
in House No. 4. " Some gentlemen had been out
hunting and brought home a wild turkey, which must
be consumed. The turkey formed the whole dinner.
Upon the whole I cannot complain either of an over-
loaded stomach or a headache from the wine. The
living was frugal in the strictest sense."
The Duke visited Communities Nos. 2 and 3 and
notes that Maclure had broken off from the parent
Society mainly on religious grounds ; and Feiba Peveli
from social prejudice, the latter Community consisting
312
ROBERT OWEN
chiefly of English country people, who found the
cosmopolitanism of New Harmony little to their taste. ^
It is hardly necessary to say, of any Community
founded under Robert Owen's inspiration, that a school
for the children was one of the first objects of the
Society's care. Robert Dale Owen tells us that when
his father left New Harmony in June, 1825, after
starting the Preliminary Society, he left behind him a
school in which one hundred and thirty children were
boarded, clothed and educated at the public expense." The
first number of the Gazette (October i, 1825) contains
an advertisement of the school, intimating that there
were vacancies for a limited number of children from
the outside.^ The inclusive fees for outsiders were 100
dollars a year. But when William Maclure arrived on
the scene in January, 1826, he took entire charge of
the schools, which hereafter appear to have been run
as a separate undertaking, under the name of the
Education Society. In the letter to Professor Silliman
already cited, Maclure explains his views on education.
Children, he says, have hitherto been unjustly treated,
by being given tasks which were useless and, to them,
unintelligible. The propensitv to imitation, he points
out, is very strong in children, and he proposed to take
advantage of this propensity to teach them the trades
and occupations followed by their elders, as fiir as their
' Travels tfirou<(/i X. Atnerica duriu<j; the years 1825-6, by Il.K.H.
Charles Bernard, Duko of Saxe-VVeiinar-Eisenach (translated), Phila-
delphia, 1828, Vol. II., pp. 106-123.
' Threading my Way, p. 229. It ai)j)oars, however, from Owen's
speech of May 27, 1827 (quoted below), that a great part of the cost
came out of Owen's own pocket.
' Lock wood, op. cit.y p. 1 93, states that these pupils came from as far
cast as Philadelphia and New York.
NEW HARMONY 313
feebler strength would permit. In that way their willing
interest would be secured and — an important point for
the poor — the products of their labour in field or work-
shop would go far to defray the cost of their subsistence and
their education in the necessary arts of writing, arithmetic,
in natural history, etc. Moreover, as they would never
be idle they would be always kept from mischief " All our
vacations are injurious to youth and only serve the caprice
or the pecuniary interests of the Master." In a letter
dated July 4, 1826, addressed to the Editor of the Revue
Encyclopedtque^ Maclure gives further particulars of the
progress made at New Harmony. The Education
Society had purchased from Owen, at a price apparently
of 30,000 or 40,000 dollars in all, 900 acres of good
land for the experimental farm, several houses large
and small, " two large granaries and stables for the
experimental farming school ; a large public building
now converted into workshops for the instruction of the
boys in the useful arts " [the latter was apparently the
Rappites' wooden church] " and a hall to be employed
as a museum, for meetings, lectures, &c." There were
nearly four hundred children already in the schools,
divided as follows : one hundred between two and five
years of age, under the direction of Madame Fretageot ;
nearly two hundred from five to twelve years old, under
the direction of M. Neef with his four daughters and
his son — all pupils of Pestalozzi ; and eighty in the
church under M. Phiquepal d'Arusmont, who taught
the useful arts and mathematics. The children under
M. Phiquepal had produced in six weeks produce to the
value of 900 dollars. Owen's two sons were engaged
^ Reprinted in the Co-operative Magazine for December, 1826.
3H
ROBERT OWEN
in the schools, and MM. Say, Troost and Lesueur taught
natural history, chemistry, drawing, etc.
Robert Dale Owen, after trying his hand, as already
said, at various agricultural and domestic employments,
took charge for a time of the elder boys, and found the
task of managing them no sinecure. They were, he tells
us, a rough, boisterous, lawless set, not wanting in mother-
wit, but impatient of discipline and social restraints of
any kind — as might, indeed, be expected from the
children of their fathers. Dale Owen insisted that no
corporal punishment should be permitted, and his account
of how ultimately he succeeded in establishing perfect
obedience by no other means than his own common
sense and sheer goodwill shows him to have been a
true son of his father.^
The Duke of Saxe- Weimar naturally paid a visit to
the schools. '' I found Professor Neef," he writes, " in
the act of leading the boys of the school out to labour.
Military exercises formed a part of the instruction of
the children. I saw the boys divided into two ranks
and parted into detachments, marching to labour. On
the way they performed various wheelings and evolutions.
y\ll the boys and girls have a very healthy look, are
cheerful and lively and by no means bashful. The boys
labour in the field or the garden, and were now occupied
with new fencing. The girls learned female employments ;
they are as little oppressed as the boys with labour and
teaching ; these happy and interesting little children were
nuich more employed in making their youth pass as
happily as possible. Madame Neef showed me their
schoolhouse, in which she dwelt, and in which places for
' Threading viy \\ \i)\ pp. 246 9.
NEW HARMONY 315
sleeping were arranged for the boys. Each slept upon
a cot frame, on a straw bed." Later on, the Duke
" went to the quondam church, a workshop for the boys
who are intended for joiners and shoemakers. These
boys sleep upon the floor above the church in cribs,
three in a row, and thus have their sleeping place and
place of instruction close together.'' There was also an
infant school conducted by Madame Neef and Madame
Fretageot. A quaint picture of the girls' school is given
by a former pupil, Mrs. Thrall, who died at New
Harmony some years back. She wrote that " in summer
the girls wore dresses of coarse linen with a coarse plaid
costume for Sunday or for special occasions. In winter
they wore heavy woollen dresses. At rising a detail of
the girls was sent out to do the milking, and this milk,
with mush cooked in large kettles, constituted the
essential part of the morning meal, which the children
were expected to finish in fifteen minutes. We had
bread but once a week, on Saturday. I thought if I
ever got out I would kill myself eating sugar and cake.
We marched in military order, after breakfast, to
Community House No. 2. I remember that there were
blackboards covering one side of the schoolroom, and
that we had wires, with balls on them, by which we
learnt to count. We also had singing exercises by which
we familiarised ourselves with lessons in various branches.
At dinner we generally had soup, at supper mush and
milk again. We went to bed at sundown in little bunks
suspended in rows by cords from the ceiling. Sometimes
one of the children at the end of the row would swing
back her cradle, and when it collided on the return
bound with the next bunk, it set the whole row bumping
3i6 ROBERT OWEN
together. This was a favourite diversion, and caused
the teachers much distress. At regular intervals we used
ti) be marched to the Community apothecary's shop,
where a dose that tasted like sulphur was impartially
dealt out to each pupil. Children regularly in the
hoarding school were not allowed to see their parents,
except at rare intervals. 1 saw my father and mother
twice in two years. We had a little song we used to
sing :—
Number 2 pigs locked up in a pen
When they get out — it's now and then ;
When they get out they smell about ;
For fear old Neef will find them out ! " ^
Such harmony dwells in immortal souls, when
nourished on a sufficiency of mush and milk !
l^rom one Paul Brown, who came into the Com-
munity at the beginning of April, 1826, we hear of
dissension and distrust as prevalent amongst the mem-
bers.' By the constitution of February 5, it was pro-
vided that the real estate should be held in trust for
the use of the Community, and that members leaving the
Community should be entitled to receive only the money
which they had actually brought into the common stock,
and a proportionate part of the value of any real estate
acijuired by the Community during their membership.
The measures by which the real estate was to be trans-
ferred trom Owen to the Community are nowhere set
torth in the Gazette. But Brown states that, apparently
after the constitution had been accepted, the members
were asked to si<rn a document bindinir themselves to the
1
(Juoted by Lockwood, op. cit., pp. 194, 195.
' Twelve months in Nciu Harmony, Cincinnati, 1827,
NEW HARMONY 317
ultimate purchase of the estate as hereafter to be appraised,
and that there was much dissatisfaction thereat. Ulti-
mately, Brown tells us, Owen selected twenty-five men
who were willing to take upon themselves the respon-
sibility of signing a contract with himself and Maclure.
These twenty-five were to co-opt others who should
share the responsibility with them ; besides these full
members there were to be the conditional and probationary
members.
Owen, according to Brown, was constantly inculcating
on the people the necessity of thrift, " and knacks of
saving and gaining money. Yet persons were spending
their time in teaching music and dancing ; profusions
of musical instruments were provided, and great quantities
of candles burnt at their balls. It is said he once told
them in his preaching that ' they must be good misers.'
A great part of the time the people were very much
stinted in their allowance of coffee and tea, butter, milk,
&c. Mr. Owen, constantly boarding at the tavern,
where luxurious regale was copiously provided to sell
to travelling men of the world and to loungers, drank
rich coffee and tea." ^
Another subject of Brown's criticism was the minute
and complicated system of accounts. Accounts were kept,
he tells us, of every pennyworth that was consumed, and
every member was credited with every hour's work done ;
and a number of intelligent persons were occupied in
^ Twelve months in New Ha7'nw7iy, p. 25. In his speech at Philadelphia
on June 27, 1827, Owen stated that whilst at New Harmony he tried the ex-
periment of having only two meals a day — at 7 a.m. and 5 p.m., and that
his " average expenses of living, for about five months, including eating
and drinking, amounted to less than six cents (3^.) a day." i^New
Harmony Gazette, Vol. II., p 347.)
31 g ROBERT OWEN
the "sterile and tasteless drudgery" of keeping these
accounts, who might otherwise have been employed on
useful and productive labour.
Brown's criticism here is obviously wide of the
mark ; for nothing could be more important in a new
experiment of this kind than to keep the most minute
and accurate account practicable of every item of ex-
penditure, and of the disposal of every member's time.
His remark, however, that *' the children ran mad, in
point of morals, from having heard the doctrine of no
praise or bhuiie, no reward or punishment, which went
under the name of the new system," derives some con-
firmation from the account by Robert Dale Owen of the
unruliness and want of discipline amongst the elder boys
in the school. We shall see later that the same difficulties
were encountered at Orbiston.
But taken as a whole Brown's strictures are unintelli-
gent, and instructive only so far as they serve to show
the spirit which prevailed amongst some ot the baser-
minded members of the little Community. Unfortu-
nately, however, there can be no doubt that there were
differences of view — not always perhaps acute — amongst
the colonists ; and that the new constitution did not for
long work smoothly. In the course of the next twelve
months there were several changes of constitution in the
parent Community. Paul Brown describes two or three,
and the editors of the Gazette hint at yet others ; ^ and
several daughter Communities were formed. Finally, in
an editorial in the Gazette o^ March 28, 1827, written
' A. J. Macdonald, quoted by Noyes {op. at., pp. 35-40), enumerates
seven .successive constitutions for the parent Community. In this total
arc inchidcd the Preliminary Society and the constitution of February 5,
1826.
NEW HARMONY
319
by Robert Dale Owen and his brother William,^ we have
an authoritative account of the state of affairs. The
article is practically a confession that the great enterprise
has failed for the time. " The experiment to ascertain
whether a mixed and unassorted population could success-
fully govern their own affairs as a Community was a bold
and a hazardous and, as we think, a premature one.
" Our own opinion is that Robert Owen ascribed too
little influence to the early anti-social circumstances that
had surrounded many of the quickly collected inhabitants
of New Harmony before their arrival there, and too
much to those circumstances which his experience might
enable them to create round themselves in future."
One form of government, they proceed, was tried after
another, " until it appeared that the whole population,
numerous as they were, were too various in their feelings
and too dissimilar in their habits to unite and govern
themselves harmoniously in one Community." They
split therefore into three. Then two of these again
united, and asked Owen with four other trustees to take
charge of their affairs. Shortly, however, the trustees
found that the reunited Society consumed more than it
produced. " The deficiency of production appeared im-
mediately attributable in part to carelessness in many
members as regarded Community property ; in part to
their want of interest in the experiment itself — the only
true incitement to Community industry ; and these again
were to be traced to a want of confidence in each other,
not perhaps unfounded, and which was increased by the
unequal industry and by the discordant variety of habits
which existed among them." So the parent Community
1 Threading my Way, p. 257. The editorial is anonymous.
320
ROBERT OWEN
was finally subdivided into independent occupations —
each occupation managing its own affairs and making a
small weekly contribution to the general expenses of the
town. " New Harmony, therefore," the editors continue,
'' is not now a Conmuinity but, as was originally intended,
a central village out of and around which Communities
have forined and may continue to form themselves."
Eor Owen offl'red land and pecuniary assistance to any
who wished to form a community on the estate. At
this time (March, 1827) there w^re, including the
Education Society, four such daughter Communities, of
which one, Feiba Peveli, had been in existence for about
a year. Macluria had also flourished for a year, but had
apparently dissolved itself. The Education Society, how-
L\'cr, under the direction of William Maclure himself,
still flourished, though the Indiana Legislature had
recently rejected by a large majority a Bill for its
incorporation.^
At the time that the parent Community was dissolved,
as we learn from an address by Robert Owen delivered
on May 6, all those persons who did not at once join
one of the daughter Communities were warned that they
must henceforth either support themselves by their own
industry, or leave New Harmony. Under these circum-
stances, Owen adds, " many families left New Harmony,
with their feelings more or less hurt," a statement which
' Seiu Ilarmnny Gazette, Vol. II., p. 158. Macliire's advertisement for
i'lipils appears later in this year in the Gazette. He desires a few
pupils, not under twelve, to be bound until tliey come of age. The boy^^
would 1)6 emj)loyed in school five hours a day, and seven hours on farm,
Rardf-n, or in the workshops. The girls would be taught " housework,
iK.rdlcwork, and suc!i other useful knowledge as is suitable for their
.->c.\."
NEW HARMONY 321
is full of illumination for those who desire to know why
New Harmony failed. But now, Owen adds, the exodus
is happily over. " The Social System is now firmly
established ; its principles are daily becoming better
understood," and there are already eight daughter Com-
munities, exclusive of the Education Society, and more
are projected. Owen feels an inexpressible delight in
looking back upon the obstacles which have been
overcome, and " in viewing the cheering prospects which
are before us. The latter, although not exactly in the
way I expected, far exceed the most sanguine antici-
pations I formed at the commencement of the experiments
here, and induce a belief that nothing can prevent the
rapid spread of the Social System over the United
States."^ Just three weeks later, on May 27, 1827,
Owen delivered a valedictory address to the ten Social
Colonies of Equality and Common Property forming on
the New Harmony Estate — they have grown, it will be
seen, in two months from four to ten.
In this address Owen explains that he would like to
undertake the work of feeding, clothing and educating
the children in the Community Schools without cost to
the colonists ; but he had already expended so much
money on the scheme that he is doubtful if he will
be able to defray the entire cost. He had left, however,
3,000 dollars for the purpose. On June i, Owen left
New Harmony : on the twenty-seventh of the same
■month he delivered an address at Philadelphia, and reached
England on July 24, 1827.
After his departure the New Harmony Gazette is
silent as to the progress of the ten Communities, the
* New Harmony Gazette, Vol. II., p. 255.
VOL. I. 21
322 ROBERT OWEN
last item being a brief notice of a harvest festival at
Feiba Peveli on July 28, 1827, at which upwards of
fifty persons sat down to an excellent supper/ The
editor indeed seems intentionally to shun all reference to
domestic concerns. We arc told, however, that a Thespian
Society had been formed at New Harmony, and gave
their first dramatic performance — the Poor Gentleman and
Fortune's Frolic — on February 23, 1828. The perform-
ance gave general satisfaction ; and on the twenty-third
of the following month two other comedies were pro-
duced."
In the late autumn of 1827 Robert Owen returned
to America, and delivered lectures in various cities through-
out the Eastern States. On Sunday, April 13, 1828, we
find him again addressing a public meeting of the inhabitants
of New Harmony. The state of things which he found
on his return had convinced even his optimism that the
great social experiment had so far failed. He briefly
recapitulates the history of the enterprise, and then
characteristically proceeds to reconstruct a new edifice
from the ruins of the old :
" I came here with a determination to try what could
be effected in this new country to relieve my fellow-men
from superstition and mental degradation, so that if
successful the experiment might be an example which
all might follow and by which all might benefit.
'' 1 tried here a new course for which I was induced
to hope that fifty years of political liberty had prepared
the American population — that Ts, to govern themselves
advantageously. I supplied land, houses and the use
' A'ew Harviony Gazette, Vol. il., p. 342.
» Ibid., Vol. III., pp. 142, 150, 190.
NEW HARMONY 323
of much capital . . . but experience proved that the
attempt was premature to unite a number of strangers
not previously educated for the purpose, who should
carry on extensive operations for their common interest,
and live together as a common family. I afterwards
tried, before my last departure hence, what could be
done by those who associated through their own choice
and in small numbers ; to these I gave leases of large
tracts of good land for ten thousand years upon a
nominal rent, and for moral conditions only . . . now
upon my return I find that the habits of the individual
system were so powerful that these leases have been,
with a few exceptions, applied for individual purposes
and individual gain, and in consequence they must return
again into my hands.
" This last experiment has made it evident that
families trained in the individual system, founded as it
is upon superstition, have not acquired those moral
qualities of forbearance and charity for each other which
are necessary to promote full confidence and harmony
among all the members, and without which Communities
cannot exist."
He then proceeded to refer to various breaches of
the engagements entered into with him, and to conduct
on the part of certain persons at variance with the
principles of the Social System, especially the establish-
ment of monopolies, and the carrying on of " petty
stores and whiskey shops " on the competition system.
" My intention," he . proceeds, " now is to form
such arrangements on the estate of Harmony as will
enable those who desire to promote the practice of
the Social System to live in separate families on the
324
ROBERT OWEN
individual system, and yet to unite their general labour,
or to exchange labour for labour on the most beneficial
terms for all, or to do both or neither as their feelings
and apparent interests may influence them. While other
arrangements shall be formed to enable them to have
their children trained from infancy in a knowledge of
the principles of human nature and of the laws which
govern it. . . .
" By these measures I hope there will be brought
around us by degrees an honest and industrious and
also a well-educated population, with right feelings and
views, who will earnestly endeavour to promote the
happiness of each other, and unite in bringing up their
children as one family with simple manners, temperate
habits and useful knowledge, both in principle and
practice." ^
On Sunday, June 22, 1828, Robert Owen met the
inhabitants of New Harmony to bid them farewell,
and on the following Friday he left the Colony.'^
* New Har^nony Gazette^ Vol. III., pp. 204, 205.
» Ibid., p. 287.
CHAPTER XIV
THE END OF NEW HARMONY
AFTER Owen's departure in June, 1 828, we hear little
more of the colony at New Harmony. The
ISlew Harmony Gazette still continued, indeed, under
that name until October of that year, when it changed
its title for The New Harmony and Nashoba Gazette or
Free Inquirer. The new periodical was edited, as its
predecessor had been for some twelve months, by R. Dale
Owen and Frances Wright. The little Community soon
lapsed into complete individualism, Owen and Maclure,
the two landlords, selling or leasing in small lots such
of the property as they did not retain in their own
hands.^ One of the daughter Communities, however,
No. 3 (? Feiba Peveli), is reported to have continued as
a Community under the terms of the original lease for
some years. But eventually that too was dissolved and
some of the property bought by two of the members for
their private occupation."
1 A. J. Macdonald, quoted by Noyes, History of American Socialisms,
pp. 41. 42.
' Dr. Schuach, quoted by Lockwood, The New Harmony Communities,
p. 215. From a private letter written by Richard Owen in December,
1880 (a copy of which has been lent me by Professor Earl Barnes), I gather
that the freehold of the land on which the Community stood was given by
Owen to his son Richard ; and that on the expiration of the lease, the
Community having, it would seem, previously dissolved, Richard Owen
sold part of the land to two of the members, retaining part for his own use.
325
326 ROBERT OWEN
The whole enterprise, culminating in the change to
private ownership, entailed heavy loss to Owen. The
exact nature of the financial transactions in connection
with the original purchase of the site and buildings
and the subsequent conduct of the enterprise — which
was probably at no period self-supporting — remains
obscure. From Owen's Philadelphia address ^ we learn
that the sum p^aid for the real estate amounted to near
100,000 dollars,- and for the personal property 40,000
more — say /^2 8,000 in all. It was the original intention
that Maclure should contribute a like amount. It does
not appear that he actually did so ; but he certainly
advanced large sums. Unfortunately the pecuniary
arrangements between him and Owen were not apparently
placed upon a sound business footing ; and subsequent
misunderstandings on Maclure's part led to a serious
rupture. On April 30, 1827, Maclure issued an
advertisement warning all concerned that he would
not be responsible for any debt contracted by Owen in
their joint names, and subsequently commenced legal
proceedings against Owen to recover money alleged to
be due. Eventually, however, the matter at issue was
referred to arbitrators, from whose award it appears that
it was Maclure who was indebted to Owen, to the
amount of 5,000 dollars."*
In the winding up in 1827 and 1828 of the com-
' New Ilafrnony Gazette, Vol. II., p. 353. The address was delivered
on June 27, 1827.
' Actually ninety-five thousand, as shown above, p. 289 (footnote).
' The only account which we have of these transactions is Owen's
own, given after the Philadelphia address referred to. Hut a full report
appeared subsequently in the New Harmony Gazette, and as Maclure still
continued to reside at New Harmony it may perhajis be presumed that if
not substantially accurate it would have been contradicted.
THE NEV/ YORK
PVpUC LIBHARY
A.SI(()H,.LEN.^X. Abi:D
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 327
munity affairs, Owen lost a large amount of property
through unscrupulous speculators, who took advantage
of his simplicity and generosity. In particular, it is told
of a man called Taylor, who was for some time in
partnership with William Owen and Fauntleroy, that
on the dissolution of the partnership he agreed to pur-
chase from Robert Owen a large tract of land, with all that
was on it, and that on the night before the agreement
was actually signed he caused a large quantity of cattle
and farming implements to be put upon the land, and
so came into possession of them. Having got the land
he built a distillery upon it.^
Owen reserved some part of the land for himself and
eventually made it over to one of his sons. His own
loss over the whole experiment from the beginning
amounted to over ^40,000 — more than four-fifths of his
entire available capital at that time.^
Owen left not only his fortune but his family
behind him in Indiana. His four sons — for the two
younger sons, Richard and David Dale Owen had
come over in 1828 — remained in New Harmony as
citizens of the United States,^ and ultimately won
distinction in various fields. Robert Dale, as already
said, continued to edit the New Harmony Gazette and
1 Macdonald, quoted by Noyes, op. cit., p. 48. See also Threading
my Way, p. 258. The dissolution of partnership with William Owen
and the cancelling of all agreements with Robert Owen is advertised in
the New Harmony Gazette of October i, 1828, p. 392.
' Threading my Way, p. 261.
3 In the Manchester Correspondence there is a Court Copy, with
the official seal, of a declaration made by Robert Owen at a Circuit
Court held at Palestine, State of Illinois, on May 9, 1825, in which
he announced his intention of becoming a citizen of the United States.
But the intention does not seem to have been fulfilled.
328 ROBERT OWEN
afterwards the Free Inquirer, in conjunction with Frances
Wri<T:ht. He returned to England for a time in the
early thirties : the first volume of the Crisis (1832) bears
on the title page the legend "Edited by Robert Owen
and Robert Dale Owen." About this time also Robert
Dale Owen published a pamphlet, Moral 'Physiology,
in which he advocated the use of checks on conception.
But his later life was spent as a citizen of the United
States. In 1835 he became a Member of the Indiana
State Legislature, and in 1843 ^^ ^^^"^ elected to the
Congress of the United States. As a Member of
Congress he intoduced the Bill providing for the founding
of the Smithsonian Institution ; the plan of the actual
building is also said to have been due to him and his
brother David Dale. He was elected a member of the
Indiana Constitutional Convention in 1850 and proved
" beyond all comparison the most laborious, fertile
and efficient member of that body. The law reforms
and the provisions for woman's rights and free schools
were especially his work, and leave upon our Statute
books the ineffaceable mark of his father's inculcation,
modified and strengthened by his own talent and
observation." In effect, the constitution which he helped
to frame provided for a uniform system of common
schools, free to all, throughout the State. He later
succeeded in passing State laws giving married women
control of their property, and providing for greater
freedom in divorce. In 1853 he was appointed U.S.
Minister at Naples. Whilst there he became converted
to Spiritualism, and his two books. Footfalls on the
H^jundiny of another IVorU^ and The Debateable land be-
I'jcecn this IVorld and the Next, remain two of the best
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 329
books ever written on the subject. That pernicious
heresy never found a nobler or more persuasive advocate.
His Autobiography^ pubhshed in 1874, is marked by
the same winning candour and simplicity. He died on
June 24, 1877, his last days being unhappily clouded
by slight mental derangement, brought on, it is said,
by the shock of the exposure of a medium in whom
he had placed full confidence.
The second brother, William, settled down at New
Harmony, marrying there in 1837. He died in 1841 or
1842. The two younger sons, David Dale Owen and
Richard Owen were at Fellenberg's School throughout
the whole period of the Community experiment, and
only arrived at New Harmony in January, 1828. David
Dale Owen afterwards returned to Europe to pursue his
scientific studies. In 1839 he was appointed United
States Geologist and instructed to make a survey of the
North-West, including what is now Minnesota, Wisconsin,
Iowa, etc. The headquarters of the United States
Geological Survey continued at New Harmony until
1856, when they were transferred to the Smithsonian
Institution. David Owen continued his work at geology
until his death in 1860.-^
The youngest son, Richard Owen, on his arrival at
New Harmony in his eighteenth year, found employment
in teaching in the schools. Later for some years he
cultivated the land left him by his father, and ran a steam
flourmill. In 1848 he assisted his brother David in the
geological survey referred to. Subsequently he became a
Professor of Natural Science in the Nashville University.
' I take these particulars mostly from Lockwood's book, The New
Harmony Communities, pp. 260-7.
330
ROBERT OWEN
On the death of David in i860 he succeeded him as
State Geologist. In the following year he accepted the
lieutenant-colonelcy of the 15th Indiana Volunteers, and
for the next two or three years was actively engaged in
the war. In the spring of 1862 he and his regiment
were taken prisoners, and the Confederate general took
the opportunity of publicly thanking Owen for his kind-
ness to some four thousand Southern prisoners who had
been placed in his charge the previous winter. After the
war the remainder of Richard Owen's life was given to
his scientific pursuits. He published numerous reports
and monographs, chiefly on geological subjects, terrestrial
magnetism, etc., and also a few addresses on education
and ethical questions. He died at New Harmony on
March 24, 1890, in his eighty-first year.^
After the death of her mother and sisters, Owen's only
surviving daughter, Jane, married Fauntleroy, one of
the men at one time associated in partnership with Owen,
and settled at New Harmony.
William Maclure remained at New Harmony for a
short time after the collapse of the Community experi-
ment, and continued to carry on the schools ; and when
his health compelled him to leave New Harmony, he did
not sever his connection with the place. In 1828 he
started a periodical called the Disseminator^ *' containing
hints to the youth of the United States ; edited, printed,
and published by the pupils of the School of Industry." ^
In 1 83 1 he brought out a bulky octavo volume of
"Opinions on various subjects, dedicated to the In-
dustrious Producers." The book was published at New
' From a Memoir in the American Geologist for September, 1890.
' Lockwood, p. 252.
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 331
Harmony and printed at the School Press, and the print-
ing is by no means badly done.^ Shortly before his death
he conveyed a sufficient sum of money to found the
Working Men's Institute and Public Library at New
Harmony, which still stands as a monument to his
memory.
Thomas Say also remained on in New Harmony,
acting as Maclure's agent and assistant. As already
stated, he there produced his treatises on American ento-
mology and conchology. The latter book was actually
printed at New Harmony.
Thus, though Owen's great experiment failed, a quite
unlooked-for success in another direction rewarded his
efforts. New Harmony remained for more than a ^
generation the chief scientific and educational centre in -^
the West ; and the influences which radiated from it ~
have made themselves felt in many directions in the ^
social and political structure of the country. Even to ^-
this day the impress of Robert Owen is clearly marked-^
upon the town which he founded. New Harmony is-
not as other towns of the Western States. It is a town
with a history. The dust of those broken hopes and -.
ideals forms the soil in which the life of the present is
rooted. The name of Owen is still borne in the town
by several prominent citizens, descendants of the great
Socialist. The town is proud in the possession of a
public library — the librarian himself a grandson of one
of the original colonists — of some fifteen thousand
volumes, many of them scarce and valuable works.
New Harmony and its daughter Communities were
by no means the only experiments in practical Socialism
^ There is a copy in the British Museum.
332 ROBERT OWEN
at this period. We have already seen that there existed
in New York some years before Owen's visit in the
autumn of 1824 a Society for founding Communities.
Owen's New View of Society had no doubt attracted
attention in America long before his advent. Moreover
there were examples in the Shaker Communities, and in
Harmony itself, to prove the practicability of association
on the principles of common property and equality.
The lectures delivered by Owen, therefore, at his several
visits in the large towns, found a ready hearing ; and
several attempts were made in the years 1825-8 to
carry out his views in practice. The colony of Nashoba
was apparently in contemplation even before Owen's visit
in 1824. PVanccs Wright, its founder, had the cause of
negro emancipation much at heart, and her experiment
was designed to educate the slave to live in freedom and
equality with his white brother. She visited the Rappites
both at Harmony and Economy, studied their methods, and
finally in the autumn of 1825 purchased two thousand
acres of land in West Tennessee, and purchased also
several families of slaves, whom she settled on the land,
there to work out their freedom. Her own illness
hampered the progress of the scheme, and ultimately in
December, 1S26, she made over the estate to a body of
trustees, amongst whom were Lafayette, Robert Owen, W.
Maclure, Robert Dale Owen and George Flower, to hold
in perpetual trust for the negro race. The experiment
lasted for some years. It failed ultimately from much
the same causes as brought failure on New Harmony.^
One of the most notable of the experiments which
' Noygs, pp. 66-72. New Harmony Gazette, Vol. II., p. 164; Vol. III.,
pp. 124, 132, 172, etc.
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 233
owed its inspiration directly to Owen was the Community
of Yellow Springs, Ohio. On his way to purchase
Harmony, Owen delivered a lecture on the new system
in Cincinnati and created a profound impression. Amongst
those who were most affected was a Swedenborgian
minister named Roe ; and he with members of his
congregation and others soon organised a Community
and purchased 800 acres of land, for 8,000 dollars. The
Community started in July, 1825. In September we
read that nearly 100 hands were already at work ; the
number was to be limited to 2,000. The members ex-
pected soon to have trades of all kinds and factories at
work. In fact the Community is said to have lasted
for a few months only.^
Other Communities were started in the course of
these four years, 1825-8, at Franklin, New York ;^ Kendal,
Ohio ; ^ Forrest- ville, Indiana ; * Coxsackie, New York ; ^
Haverstraw, New York ; Blue Spring, Indiana. We hear
also of a '* Community of United Germans " at Teutonia,
Ohio. But this, though a democratic Community re-
cognizing the principle of common property, had a
religious basis.^
By 1828 it is probable that all these Communities
had come to an end. But Owen's teaching, and the
^ Noyes, pp. 59-65. New Harmony Gazette, Vol. I., p. 71. Noyes's
authority is a newspaper extract, without title or date, found amongst
Macdonald's papers. But some particulars of the Community are given
in the New Harmony Gazette.
^ New Har7nony Gazette, Vol. I., p. 287.
3 Id., Vol. I., p. 349 ; Vol. II., p. 81 ; Vol. III., p. 141.
* Id., Vol. III., pp. 34, 141.
* Id., Vol. III., p. 141. Haverstraw and Blue Spring, so far as I can
find, are not mentioned in the Gazette ; but some account of them is
given in Macdonald's MSS. quoted by Noyes.
6 New Harmony Gazette, Vol. III., p. 81.
334
ROBERT OWEN
demonstration of his principles and his ideals afforded
by the New Harmony experiment, had an influence
of a more permanent character. There can be little doubt
that the Eouricrite enthusiasm of 1840-50 onwards, which
produced Brook l^'arm and iiinunicrable *' Phalanxes,"
owed much to Owen. They reaped a harvest of which
he had sown the seed. The later experiments were,
indeed, in many instances far more longlived than any
Communities of the Owenite period. Brook Farm lasted
for five years, the Wisconsin Phalanx for six, the North
American Phalanx for twelve ; and several minor
Fourierite Communities had an existence of two or
three years. The secret of their relative success reveals
one of the main causes of the failure of New Harmony
and the other experiments of the earlier period. All
the Owenite Communities, as we have seen, were
theoretically conducted on the principle of absolute
equality and community of property. No man was to
be esteemed before or after another ; and no man's
labour was to be rewarded more or less than another's.
All were to work as they could, and to receive a like
share in the common product. In the Fourierite
Communities differences of status and accommodation
were recognised, liach member contributed a certain
sum to the common stock, and paid for what accommo-
dation he required. Further, each received a reward
proportionate to the amount and value of his labour.
The causes contributing to the failure of New
Harmony were many and various. The first mistake
was made when the general invitation was issued to
the industrious and well-disposed of all nations to join.
I'he new colony was indeed fortunate in that so many
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 335
of those who joined it did fairly answer to this descrip-
tion. But there were some sharpers, some unsuccessful
speculators, many amiable visionaries ; and not a few,
apparently, whose only proof of fitness for the world
to be was their failure in the world that is. Again,
if all the colonists had been as industrious and as honest
as Owen himself, they were still too heterogeneous to
fuse into a Community of Equality. Differences of
sect, race and social rank, as we have seen, constantly
stood in the way. Once more, the Rappites, whose
example and guidance Owen had hoped for at the
starting of the colony, left before it had fairly begun.
Owen himself was not on the spot to direct affairs
throughout the first year ; and there was no one capable
of taking his place. But if the colonists had been
judiciously selected, and if Owen had guided the enter-
prise from the commencement, the inevitable catastrophe
would only have come a little later. Even the most
carefully organised of the Fourierite Communities,
which did provide some incentive to effort, struggled
on for a few years at most.
Under Owen*s scheme there was to be no scourge
for idleness, and no reward for industry ; no outlet
whatever for ambition. Such a system might work in
a golden age, when mankind, finding all their material
wants satisfied, should have realised the universal human
brotherhood, and left themselves free to turn their
thoughts to the things of the spirit. But in a society
which had found that the good things of the world are
not enough to go round, and whose members had been
trained each to snatch as large a share as he could, the
great dream was too great. In fact, the only Communist
336 ROBERT OWEN
Societies which have attained any high degree of
material prosperity and have retained it for any length
of time, have been precisely those which did not look
for material success, to wit, those whose members had
been unified by a common religious enthusiasm. They
have also for the most part consisted of persons of
the same social rank, and the same nationality ; their
union has generally been consolidated by emigration,
which has kept them strangers in a strange land ; they
have most of them been governed by a religious oligarchy
or monarchy. And lastly, they have escaped their fair
share of the world's burdens by an enforced celibacy.
A member of the Oneida Community, one of the
most successful communities which was ever founded
on a professedly democratic basis, and did not adopt
celibacy, sums up the case against New Harmony in
one pregnant sentence. "There are only two ways,"
said he, '' of governing a Community ; it must be done
either by law or by grace. Owen abolished law, but did
not establish grace." ^
Owen bade farewell to New Harmony, as described
in the preceding chapter, at the end of June, 1828, and
returned to England ; but only to embark on a new
attempt at Community-building. Owen's own account of
this new venture is that he was solicited by Rocafuertez,
the Mexican Minister in London, to apply to the
Mexican Government for the grant of Cohahuila and
Texas, then a province of the Mexican Republic, to
form the stage of a social experiment on a colossal
' Noyes, Op. cit., p. 54. The constitution of Oneida was never really
democratic during the lifetime of Noyes, its founder ; and though
not adopting celibacy, the members took measures to regulate the growth
of population.
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 337
scale/ But from the Manchester Correspondence it
would appear that the idea was first started in his mind
by a letter ftom one Ben. R. Milan, who wrote on
August 30 of this year from Louisiana, stating that
he and General Wavell had received grants from the
Government of Mexico of land in Texas, and were
prepared to offer valuable allotments on suitable terms,
if Owen would care to consider the proposal. Owen
had thus it would seem already made up his mind to
colonise Texas, before he approached the Mexican
Minister, who for his part did his best to discountenance
the project, as the following letter will show.
" Ivy Lodge, Fulham,
11 th October, 1828.
" My dear Sir,
'* The more I reflect upon your plan more
obstacles I meet in its execution, and greater is my
apprehension that you will not succeed in Texas ; the
interest I take in your concerns and the value I set on
your time always applied to useful purposes stimulates
me to tell you my candid opinion on this interesting
subject. I am afraid you will be completely disappointed
in your expectations, and in carrying into effect your
benevolent scheme of moral reform in such a country
as Texas, and if I dare suggest to you the idea of
giving up your trip to Mexico by the next Packet, I
would do it, guided by a feeling of respect I have
for you.
1 London Investigato7\ Vol. III., p. 232. Owen wrote a brief sketch
of his hfe which appeared simultaneously in the Londoji Investigator
(a secularist journal edited by Robert Cooper) and the Millennial Gazette
during the year 1856.
VOL. I. 22
338 ROBERT OWEN
*' I ha\c sent your memorial to the Mexican Govern-
ment and have recommended it, but I tear it will not
meet the sanction of the Ministry, at all events 1 think
it would be more advisable to wait for an answer.
Hopinu: vou will excuse my frankness, proceeding from
the interest I take in your welfare, I have the honour
to be,
^' My dear Sir,
'' Your most obedient servant,
tcYj^^TE KoCAFUERTEZ."
Oweti received the letter in New Lanark and
replied to it on October 31, in characteristic fashion —
'' . . . The subject of your letter in reference to
Texas is in unison with my views from the time it
was first mentioned to me. I knew many formidable
difficulties would present themselves as 1 proceeded in
the negotiation, but I have always had the prejudices
of mankind to overcome, and my success has given
me confidence to meet them openly and fairly
under every form in which they may arise. And the
republic of Mexico with the Governments south, north
and east, seem to me at this period to be in a
state peculiarly favourable to be beneficially acted upon
to an extent that few unacquainted with the real state
of the human mind in Europe and America can readily
imagine. The world is, as it appears to me, full
ripe for a great moral change, and it may be, I think,
commenced the most advantageously in the New
World ; the Mexican Republic presents perhaps at the
moment the best point at which to begin new and
mighty operations . . . ."
THE END OF NEW HARMONY
339
Towards the end of November Owen set sail for
Vera Cruz. The ship touched first at San Domingo,
and afterwards at Jamaica. At Kingston Owen renewed
some old friendships, amongst others with Admiral
Fleming, then in command at the West Indies, and made
many new ones — for throughout his life he had the
power of attracting all men to him. He took the
opportunity of studying the condition of the slave
population in Jamaica. This is his account of his
observations :
*' The slaves whom I saw in the island of Jamaica
are better dressed, more independent in their look, person
and manner, and are greatly more free from corroding
care and anxiety than a large portion of the working-
classes in England, Scotland and Ireland. What the
condition of these slaves was in former times I know not.
But I request with all the earnestness such a subject
demands, that our good religious people in England will
not attempt to disturb these slaves in the happiness and
independence which they enjoy in their present condition.
For while they are under humane masters — and almost
all slave proprietors are now humane, for they know
it to be to their interest to be so — the West Indian
* slave ' as he is called, is greatly more comfortable and
happy than the British or Irish operative manufacturer
or day-labourer. These slaves are secure in sufficiency
for the enjoyment of all the animal wants, and they
are, fortunately for themselves, in the present stage
of society too ignorant to desire more. If their
present condition should not be interfered with by
the abolitionists on the one hand, and the religionists
on the other, these slaves cannot fail to be generally
340
ROBERT OWEN
the happiest members of society for many years to
come — until knowledge can be no longer kept from
them." '
I'he extract is not more instructive on the condition
of the slaves in pre-abolition days, than on the writer's
views of life and on his patriarchal attitude towards the
working-classes.
From Jamaica Owen proceeded to Vera Cruz. Mexico
was at that time in revolution, Santa Anna, at the head
of the army, having recently installed in office a new
President, his friend Guerrero. On his way up from
the coast Owen fell in with Santa Anna and the revolu-
tionary forces. He was given safe conduct, however,
after having made an engagement with Santa Anna to
meet him on his return journey, in order to make to him
an important communication. On his arrival in the city
of Mexico Owen called upon the President of the
Republic and other influential personages. His application
for the provinces of Texas and Cohahuila could not, he
was told, be complied with, but he was promised full
jurisdiction over a strip of neutral territory 150 miles
in breadth, which ran from sea to sea, forming a barrier
between Mexico and the United States. The fulfilment
of the promise was made conditional, however, on the
Mexican Congress passing an Act to establish freedom
of religious belief over the Republic. Later, Owen learnt
that the measure was thrown out, and his great scheme
accordingly came to nought.-
' British Co-operator (1830), pp. 93, 94.
' It must be remembered that we have only Owen's own version of
what took place on the journey to Mexico. That he did actually receive
such a promise — even a conditional promise — as he states seems scarcely
probable.
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 341
After a stay of a few weeks only in the interior
Owen made his way back to the coast. On the return
journey, in accordance with the arrangement made, he
called upon Santa Anna, and proposed to discuss with
him the principles of the New System. Santa Anna, we
are told, readily assented, and on Owen's attending at
an early hour on the following morning he found the
general and three of his officers prepared to listen.
Owen had drawn out a summary of his doctrines in twelve
sections, probably the twelve fundamental laws which
figured so prominently in the Cincinnati debate as
described at the end of this chapter. These twelve
sections he read and expounded to his audience one by
one. x'^fter an animated discussion we learn that all the
officers were converted to the new views, and Santa
Anna in particular was so enthusiastic that he expressed a
wish that the principles could be translated into Spanish
and circulated throughout the Republic. Further, he
promised to aid Owen at all times to the full extent of
his powers.
On reaching Vera Cruz again Owen was met, in
accordance with a promise given by Admiral Fleming,
by H.M.S. Druid and H.M.S. Fairy and was con-
veyed by the latter, a ten-gun brig, to New Orleans,
whence he travelled to Cincinnati, reaching that town
early in April, 1829, in time to fulfil an engagement
made a twelvemonth before. In January, 1828, after
giving a course of lectures in New Orleans, Owen had
issued a public challenge to the clergy of the United
States inviting any of them to meet him in friendly
discussion.
The propositions which Owen had professed himself
J42 ROBERT OWEN
ready to defend were '* (i) That all the religions of the
world have been founded on the ignorance of mankind ;
(2) that they are directly opposed to the never-changing
laws of our nature ; (3) that they have been and are the real
cause of vice, dissension and misery of every description ;
(4) that they are now the only real bar to the formation
of a society of virtue, of intelligence, of charity in the
most extended sense, and of sincerity and kindness
among the whole human family ; and (5) that they can
be no longer maintained except through the ignorance of
the mass of the people, and the tyranny of the few over
the mass." ^
A Universalist minister, the Rev. Alexander Campbell,
of Bethany, Virginia, took up the challenge.
The discussion actually began on Monday, April 13,
1829, and continued day by day, Sunday excepted,
until the afternoon of Tuesday the 2ist — eight days
in all. The proceedings began at 9 a.m. each day and
lasted until noon, and were resumed at 3 p.m. each
afternoon. Plach disputant spoke alternately ; but
Campbell on one occasion claimed to have spoken for
twelve consecutive hours. The audience who attended
this strenuous entertainment is said to have numbered
about a thousand persons.
in October, 1828, a letter from Owen had appeared in
the London limes, stating that " the object of the meeting
between the clergy and myself in April next in the
city of Cincinnati, in the United States, is not to
discuss the truth or falsehood of the Christian religion,
as stated in the Scotsman^ but to ascertain the errors in
* Debate on the Evidcfucs of Christianity, etc., between Robert Owen
and Alexander Campbell, London, 1839, p. 30.
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 343
all religions which prevent them from being efficacious
in practice, and to bring out all that is really valuable
in each, leaving out their errors, and thus to form from
them collectively a religion wholly true and consistent,
that it may become universal, and be acted upon
consistently by all.'*
No doubt in writing this letter Owen thought that
he had correctly interpreted Mr. Campbell's aims as well
as his own, just as he appears to have thought that he
had correctly represented the attitude of Rocafuertez
to the Mexican project. In fact Owen was at all times
incapable of seeing a point of view differing from his
own, or even of conceiving the possibility of such
a different view, except as the result of ignorance or
blindness. But naturally the matter did not present
itself in the same light to Mr. Campbell. Even when
directly challenged by the latter, however, Owen was
unable to recognise that his letter to the London
Times was not a fair statement of his original proposal.^
With such a beginning, it could hardly be expected
that the discussion should lead to any common under-
standing. Owen's share in the proceedings throughout
the entire eight days consisted of long expositions
of his system, the twelve fundamental laws of human
nature, the natural code of law which should obtain
in a perfect society ; the arrangements for the organisa-
tion and government of such a society, and so on.
The germs of all the doctrines which he developed
later in the 'Book of the JVezv Moral World^ the Lectures
on Marriage and other works are to be found here.
But it will be more convenient to consider them in the
* Debate on the Evidences of Christianity^ pp. 30, 35.
344 ROBERT OWEN
more systematic form in which they were put before
the world later on.^
Campbell's discourse consisted in the main of a learned
and occasionally eloquent apology for Christianity. But
he took occasion to assail Owen's position, and to
point out difficulties and inconsistencies in his argument.
Owen was uiiapt at defence ; and Campbell's attacks
remained for the most part unanswered.
An EngHsh lady, Mrs. Trollope, who was present
at the debate, gives an account of the proceedings, trom
which the following extracts are taken :
'' When I recollect its object, and the uncompromising
manner in which the orator stated his mature conviction
that the whole history of the Church mission was a
fraud, and its sacred origin a fable, 1 cannot but
wonder that it was so listened to ; yet at the time I felt
no such wonder. Never did anyone practise the suaviter
in modo with more powerful effect than Mr. Owen.
The gentle tone of his voice, his mild, sometimes
playful, but never ironical, manner, the absence of every
vehement or harsh expression, the affectionate interest ex-
pressed for ' the whole human family,' the air of candour
with which he expressed his wish to be convinced he was
wrong, if he indeed were so ; his kind smile, the mild
expression of his eyes — in short, his whole manner
disarmed zeal, and produced a degree of tolerance that
those who did not hear him would hardly believe
possible. , . .
'^ From this time Mr. Owen entrenched himself
behind his twelve laws, and Mr. Campbell, with equal
gravity, confined himself to bringing forward the most
' See below, Chapter XX,
LIBRARY
THE END OF NEW HARMONY 345
elaborate theological authorities in evidence of the truth
of revealed religion. Neither appeared to me to answer
the other, but to confine themselves to the utterance of
what they had uppermost in their own minds when the
discussion began." ^
From Cincinnati Owen went to Washington, where
he had interviews with Van Buren, the Secretary of State,
and with the President, Andrew Jackson. Owen tells us
that he discussed fully with these two gentlemen the
causes of disagreement then existing between the United
States and Great Britain, the nature of the settlement
which they were prepared to accept, and received
assurances of their sincere desire for friendly relations
with this country. He was given letters to the United
States Minister in England, to be presented after an
interview with Lord Aberdeen.
On his return to England, Owen at once sought
and obtained an interview with Lord Aberdeen : —
" I explained fully to him what I had done to
prepare for a cordial reconciliation with the United
States, and what I had promised on the part of our
Government. He promptly said, ' Mr. Owen, I highly
approve of the policy which you recommend, and of all
you have done. If the American Government will meet
us halfway, we will meet it in the same spirit.' I said,
* I have instructions here to the United States Minister
from his Government, if I found you willing, to enter
at once in this spirit to settle by immediate negotiations
all existing differences.* Lord Aberdeen said, ' I am
quite ready to meet Mr. McLane on these conditions.' "
^ Quoted in the Co-operative News^ August 6, 1904, from Do??iestic
Manners of the America?is, 2 vols., 1832,
346 ROBERT OWEN
Owen accordingly communicated the message to Mr.
McEanc, a meeting with Eord Aberdeen was arranged,
and all differences between the two countries were, Owen
tells us, amicably settled ; until some years later the
Oregon dispute again gave occasion for his friendly
intervention.'
' Ijnndcn Invcstif^ator, Vol. III., p. 247. For the Oregon question
and Owen's share in it, see below Chapter xxiii. Again the reader
should be reminded that we have only Owen's own version of these
incidents.
END OF VOL. l
PtiHltd by Hatell, H'atson iS* i tney, Ld., London and AyUsbury.